Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Solutions to Problems 2, 3 for Suggested Comprehension Ex. ('Constructing A Star', Pt. 2)


2) Do the first two radiative envelope computations for temperature, density and pressure, i.e. at radial fractions r/R = 0.183 and r/R = 0.200.

Soln.  (A)  At r/ R = 0.183   And we have: U = 2.562 and V = 1.389

r =   9.800  x 1010  cm (0.183) =  1.793  x 1010  cm

Mr/M = 0.172   so

Mr   =  3.970  x 1033  g (0.172) = 6.83  x 1032  g

density

 r   =     UMr/4p r3

=  [(2.562) (6.83  x 1032  g)]/ 4p (1.793  x 1010  cm) 3



r  =   24.16  g/ cm 3        log   r  = 1. 3831


Pressure:

P   =      G  r Mr/ V r

=  [(6.67 x  10-8 dyne-cm 2/ g.2)  (24.16  g/ cm 3 )(6.83  x 1032  g)/   (1.389)(1.793 x 1010  cm)

P   =  4.417  x 1016    dynecm 2


log P   =   16.645


 Temperature:

T = t  m  (H/R) (GM/r)

log t = - 0.15695  so t (dimensionless T) =  0.6969

T =  (0.6969) [m  (H/R) (GM/r) ]      (for  m  = = 0.64,   H  = 1.672  x 10-24)

So: 

T =   1.417   x 107  K  and log T  = 7.1516


Soln: (B)

At r/ R = 0.200   And we have: U = 2.450  and V = 1.684
r =   9.800  x 1010  cm (0.200) =  1.960  x 1010  cm

Mr/M = 0.217   so

Mr   =  3.970  x 1033  g (0.217) = 8.61  x 1032  g




density

 r   =     UMr/4p r3

= 
[(2.450) (8.61  x 1032  g)]/ 4p (1.960  x 1010  cm) 3


r  =   22.31  g/ cm 3        log   r  = 1. 3485


Pressure:

P   =      G  r Mr/ V r

=  [(6.67 x  10-8 dyne-cm 2/ g.2)  (22.31  g/ cm 3 )(6.83  x 1032  g)/   (1.684)(1.96 x 1010  cm)


P   =  3.884  x 1016    dynecm 2


log P   =   16.5893


 Temperature:

T = t  m  (H/R) (GM/r)

log t = - 0.19200  so t (dimensionless T) =  0.6426



T =  (0.6426) [m  (H/R) (GM/r) ]      (for  m  = = 0.64,   H  = 1.672  x 10-24)

So: 

T =   1.346   x 107  K  and log T  = 7.1291


3) Estimate the uncertainty in the core radius as a consequence of the 'fuzziness' of the interface parameters.


The percentage uncertainty can be computed as:

D  (  r c  )   =  100%(0.172 - 0.148) / 0.172   =  0.024(100%)=   2.4 %



No! Donald J. Trump Will Not Be My President

Image result for Trump as Hitler
I would no more accept Trump as President than I'd accept Hitler as Chancellor if I were a German living in Heidelberg in 1933.

"I am not with President -Elect Trump and I am not here to help him in any way. In fact, when his policies border on the unconstitutional, the criminal and the morally unjust, I am here to oppose him in every possible and legal way." -- George Polisner, former Oracle Executive.

Technically, of course, the matter of who is one's President is defined at a specific time and place, via a presumably fair election. Then, definitionally, that person who has most electoral votes - however obtained - becomes President putatively for all Americans.  That is by way of operational, political definition.

On the other side is the matter of active investment and support of whatever presidency manifests. As a matter of record, virtually no white Republicans supported Obama after his 2008 election, and the congressional Republicans sought to block him at every turn. This was based on orders from Sen. Mitch McConnell to reject everything Obama offered,  any Obama-Dem policy.. The current president -elect, Trump, actually sought - via the birther movement - to delegitimize Obama on the basis of the specious claim he was not born an American.

So it is all kind of choice now to behold the political and media Right squawking like recently fucked hens and yelping that we need to "get over it", "get behind our President" and "cease trying to delegitimize him". My answer? Fuck no!  The guy is as illegitimate as they come all on his own, as bad as Hitler when he ascended to the German Chancellory  in 1933. I could recount a hundred reasons, but those who want specifics can check out any of my recent posts.

Let's turn events upside down and envision the situation if Hillary Clinton had won the electoral vote, and Trump the popular vote by the same 2.9 million difference. Does anyone seriously believe that Trump and the Repuke contingent would now be all nice and comfy with that setting and prepared  to "get over it". Hell no! They'd be fighting like rabid ferrets, filing lawsuit after lawsuit and pursuing recounts in every state.  Trump would also be on Twitter nonstop, expelling infantile blabber and bollocks,  trying desperately to mock and delegitimize HRC.  There'd be no end to it and further, all the "deplorables" who voted Trump would also be solidly behind rejecting HRC as their President.

Taking that tack I adopt the exact same position as George Polisner, who offered the quote at the top of this post on his way out at Oracle. Well, his response to Trump as President-Elect is exactly the same as mine - when he assumes power. That is, to oppose him in every possible moral and legal way when his policies veer into the unconstitutional, the criminal  and morally unjust.

And let's not bandy words, we know in advance this will occur because of Trump's very personality traits and who he's surrounded himself with. In terms of the first, I already described the man's premoral character and the narcissism and authoritarianism derived from it. See e.g.

http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2016/10/narcissism-pre-moral-mind-and-donald-j.html


That his actions are already on record, and hence can predict future actions, has been noted in a Sunday Review NY Times piece, e.g.:

"Trump has encouraged violence among supporters; pledged to prosecute Hillary Clinton; threatened legal action against unfriendly media; and suggested that he might not accept the election results.This anti-democratic behavior has continued since the election. With the false claim that he lost the popular vote because of “millions of people who voted illegally,” Trump openly challenged the legitimacy of the electoral process."

Past is prologue, and Trump's previous actions are the prologue to how he will lead. Hence it is kind of incredible to read the words of the delirious Joe Klein in his recent TIME magazine column (Dec. 26, p. 34),  babbling:

"Trump hasn't actually done anything yet, and his opponents are acting as if the sky has fallen. ...what if this turns out to be a popular presidency"

After which this Neolib hack goes on to regale us with an assortment of beneficial, imagined Trump policies and actions which clearly have been fermenting as fantasies in his wishful- thinking brain. These include "cleaning out the cobwebs at departments and agencies like Health and Human Services, Labor, Education and the EPA".    Is he serious? With the likes of Ben Carson at HHS, and Betsy DeVos at Education - committed to destroying public education. What has Klein been smoking anyway?  Or is it some new kind of drug that implants preposterous ideations when confronted with a guy every bit as regressive as Mussolini or Hitler? But most puzzling is how Klein could write this refuse after 4 paragraphs earlier noting Trump "is without question the most expert news manipulator in American history".  Well, evidently Joey boy is not immune to his manipulations, besides having a memory of 4 minutes duration.

Truth be told, Klein ought to be ashamed for even writing such doggerel which, let us acknowledge, will be part of an ongoing media effort to normalize Trump and his minions. The purpose will be to get as much of the country to get behind this fool as possible under the banner of "unity", which will also translate into calls for "bipartisanship". The Dems will be pressured to act like little sycophants as opposed to a real opposition, and this we cannot allow.

Cancelling out Klein's nonsense, the same TIME issue, 20 pages earlier, gets down to reality with the short article 'How Trump is Restocking the Washington Swamp'.   The piece reminded people how Trump bragged at his rallies (e.g. in Akron, OH in August)  that he planned to "drain the swamp" in DC.   Trump, in his Ohio performance, denounced career politicians and lobbyists that help run the nation's capital.  His pledge to drain the swamp was also "slapped onto bumper stickers and hashtagged on tweets"  As the article observed "it helped lift the swaggering outsider to his upset victory".

But what did we find post-election in the transition of team Trump? Well, all those fine words went by the backboards. As author Zeke J. Miller puts it:

"The President-Elect is stocking his Cabinet and senior staff with the same sort of connected insiders that he railed against on the campaign trail."

Or as one comic correctly put it, "He ain't draining the swamp he's stocking it with crocs and alligators!"

Miller added:

"He's tapped four billionaires for his administration not to mention three former and current financiers from Goldman Sachs"

For those with short memories, Goldman Sachs was one of the few investment banks that made out like bandits after the credit and housing crash in 2008. This is because they used credit default swaps to bet ON mortgage failures not against them. Go figure! Maybe the Trumpie voters can't or won't, or they just don't care.

Most worrisome, and a primary reason I wouldn't back this ambuulatory bag of snot if he was the last president ever:

"Meanwhile, the Washington influence machine has kicked into overdrive. Scores of lobbyists and political consultants are brokering meetings between their clients and members of the Trump transition team . The President -Elect and his advisors are also holding fundraisers where they will collect checks of up to $1 million each - including from corporations."

And:

"While some supporters may balk, Trump's decision to embrace those who have wallowed in the Washington muck has spread a sense of relief among those in the capital's political class."

Well, of course it would spread a sense of relief! It shows all his campaign bloviations which suckered his voters, were bullshit and crappola.  Contrary to the bill of goods he sold all those stooges, as one insider put it, he "will govern like a normal Washington insider".

So much for draining the swamp. The swamp that really needs to be drained is Trump's if and when we finally manage to remove this walking, talking turd - if we ever do! In the meantime, no, I don't support turds as President, even turds with orange hair. Neither do many millions of others and one emblematic display has the Trumpies in a lather, that is - the design of the pin worn by the Rebel heroes in the new Star Wars flick, Rogue One.   One beholds an image of the Rebel insignia with a safety pin through it, a reference to the symbol of solidarity with persecuted minorities that has gained currency in the U.S. following the election. 

Given most Trumpies are racists they can't handle this display of covert free speech and are now calling for boycott of the film (which we saw yesterday). Well, good luck!  But you better get used to it because you're gonna see a lot more!

Other Trumpists (as a recent letter writer to the NY Times) have taken those of us to task for "threatening democracy" if we hashtag "Not My President".  The specious claim being circulated - with tons of chutzpah and irony (as if they wouldn't do the same if HRC was elected) is that by not accepting the results of a democratic election we are sowing the "seedbeds of violence". But we are under no such obligation if the person "elected" managed that trick by recourse to preventing people from voting (using the voter ID ruse) or refusing to count provisional ballots.

Also, we are under no obligation to get behind a leader who appoints slime for key positions. Riff raff and vermin why are dedicated to destroying the very agencies of government to which they've been appointed. No, in such instance it is WE who defy and resist who are the true patriots and defenders of democracy.  Just as we will be when we must take on Trump and his hired hit men if they try to destroy what remains of our nation.   As for "seedbeds" of violence, that totally depends on those who try to infringe on first amendment rights of the defenders. Bear in mind our own Declaration of Independence clearly sets out the option to remove a government if it fails to meet the adherence to the Constitution and principles of liberty, e.g.

"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government"

See also:

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/jack-lessenberry/70380/fascism-with-yellow-hair

And:

http://inthesetimes.com/article/19660/trump-inauguration-sick-out-general-strike

And:

http://www.salon.com/2016/12/25/no-middle-class-no-republic-gop-plans-to-destroy-americas-safety-net-will-also-kill-democracy_partner/

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Electors With No Coherent Strategy Leave Us Facing The Trump Reich

No automatic alt text available.

In the end, the great Electoral College resistance and 'fail safe' check on Trumpian power went out more with a whimper than a bang. An effort by anti-Trump activists to stop him reaching 270 fell pathetically short. Activists who had urged electors to back efforts led by academics (e.g. Prof. Lawrence Lessig) to cast their ballots at variance with election results to keep Trump from reaching the magic number came to practically nothing. With counts still ongoing in California and Texas, the number of electoral college members who attempted to cast a protest vote was likely to reach at least nine. Wow, nine of 538!

What happened? Basically a combination of too little will to overturn the Electoral College as a mere rubber stamp, and too little actual strategy. Specifically, I place the preponderance of blame on two factors: 1) A disorganized effort to thwart the fascists with too many distracting and unrealistic alternative choices, and 2) An unwillingness to rock the boat and just play it safe, especially among Republican electors.  As for the much ballyhooed "Hamilton electors', they turned out to be more a myth than reality.  If a person had to, he might have counted them on one hand, if that.

The result was predictable: with only external protests erupting - as in Madison, WI-  Trump cakewalked to his official electoral victory as millions tuned in to updated tallies, aghast.  While many of us expected it to be an uphill fight, we didn't believe the electors- charged with being the last bastion to protect the Republic would simply surrender their duty so easily.

But there were some interesting moments. More than 200 demonstrators were on the steps of Pennsylvania’s capitol in Harrisburg on Monday morning, waving signs and chanting in chilly, 25F(-4C) weather. They thundered: “No Trump, no KKK, no fascist USA!” and “No treason, no Trump!”

In respect of the latter, some on the Left have circulated that Trump ought to be hung for treason as a punishment for colluding with the Russkies to ambush Hillary, if ever impeached. There are several things wrong with this proposition including you can't just hang the man after being impeached (if he ever is, especially for "treason") and besides, there is as yet no proof Trump knew all along what was going on and "colluded". Besides, the Left has bigger things to worry about as I will get to.

Meanwhile, several dozen protesters gathered outside South Carolina’s statehouse in Columbia, waving signs with messages imploring electors not to back the president-elect.  But anyone familiar with the South ought to have known this would be a fool's errand. Most of those electors fly Confederate flags in their homes and would have laughed at the objectors.

Vermont was the first state to report the results of its vote. As expected, all three electors voted for Clinton. Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, West Virginia and South Carolina followed for Trump, and Delaware for Clinton as the totals started to mount.

After a Hawaiian elector cast a vote for Bernie Sanders, the total was Trump with 304 votes and Clinton with 227. It takes 270 electoral college votes to win the presidency. Texas put Trump over the top, despite two Republican electors casting protest votes. Then there was Washington state which actually saw an elector or two voting for Colin Powell. In other words, they were 'all over the map' and had no coherent strategy to take down 'the Donald'.

In many cases, the Republican electors had taken their own kool aid, Jonestown-style, even as they were implored to do the right thing. Many admitted that they had been deluged with emails, phone calls and letters urging them not to support Trump. Many emails were part of coordinated campaigns, all trending with the same theme I had elaborated in my post from yesterday.

Lee Green, a Republican elector from North Carolina, told the Associated Press:

The letters are actually quite sad  They are generally freaked out. They honestly believe the propaganda. They believe our nation is being taken over by a dark and malevolent force.”

Dark and malevolent force? But what would one call a faction that has ascended to power by way of foreign intervention in the election, fake news and racist vitriol? Also, is led by a tweet-happy lunatic who (as recorded in a Sunday Review NY Times piece:) has:

"encouraged violence among supporters; pledged to prosecute Hillary Clinton; threatened legal action against unfriendly media; and suggested that he might not accept the election results.This anti-democratic behavior has continued since the election. With the false claim that he lost the popular vote because of “millions of people who voted illegally,” Mr. Trump openly challenged the legitimacy of the electoral process. At the same time, he has been remarkably dismissive of United States intelligence agencies’ reports of Russian hacking"

And as the piece further pointed out, political scientist Juan J. Linz definitely showed Trump passed the "litmus test" for an anti-democratic leader. His indicators included: a failure to reject violence unambiguously, a readiness to curtail rivals’ civil liberties, and the denial of the legitimacy of elected governments.  All of which ought to incite lots of foreboding on the Left and especially among those who value civil liberties.

As my sister-in -law Krimhilde put it on learning of the electoral college results: "It reminded of the day Hindenburg turned over the Chancellorship to Hitler....and then the Reichstag fire"  Sometimes, indeed,, people who ought to know better lose track of the historical patterns, and resonances.  But maybe that's because they never learned history in the first place.

Her reference to the "Reichstag fire"  evoked the singular event many Germans (who were alive then) trace to the establishment of the Nazi Third Reich. It occurred on 27 February 1933. Marinus van der Lubbe, a young Dutch council communist, was caught at the scene of the fire and arrested for the crime. Most Germans alive then -including Krimhilde, and three former Wehrmacht soldiers I spoke to in 1985-  believe the fire was a false flag and the kid was a patsy. A decoy used expediently to take the blame, as much as the Warrenites have tried to use Lee Oswald for assassinating John Kennedy.

But never mind, it led to pivotal changes in the nation, leading it to be unrecognizable within a few years. For example:

'The Decree for the Protection of the People and the State'  issued on Feb. 28, 1933 and which abolished basic rights, authorizing preventative arrest. That is, if you were even suspected of committing a "crime against the state" (including speaking out against it) you were arrested.

- March 22, 1933, the concentration camp at Dachau, outside Munich, was opened. Among the first dispatched there were journalists who flouted the 'Decree for the Protection of the German People' which limited freedom of the press.

- August 2, 1934, Paul von Hindenburg dies, and Hitler becomes Chancellor and Fuhrer.

So, looking at the parallels to previous history, there is more than ample basis for fear among those who value civil rights, liberties.

Of course, it's understandable why many other electors punted. Take the case of the sole Republican, Christopher Suprun of Texas, who said: “Since I announced my intention to vote according to my conscience, I have received about half a dozen death threats against me and my family."

Make no mistake we can expect many more such threats as Trumpeters become emboldened after Trump's inauguration and especially the massive protests being planned to disrupt that event. These are people who fall into a proud group Chris Suprin referenced when he said:

More happily, a person I’ve known for years who traces his ancestry back to the American revolution told me he thinks his forebears would have been proud of what I’m doing, which made me feel pretty good.”

And my own ancestor, Conrad Brumbaugh - who fought in the Revolutionary War- would have too!

Meanwhile, Wirt A Yerger Jr, a Republican elector in Mississippi, said: “I have gotten several thousand emails asking me not to vote for Trump. I threw them all away.”

But what would one expect from a Rebel yokel who likely has the Confederate flag flying over his home and draped on every wall?

The first prediction I have for Trump's first year will be a sober one: a false flag, in many ways like the Reichstag fire, that he will use to invoke Martial law and the repeal of civil liberties under the "continuity of government" provisions. Also, look for a repeal of habeas corpus, which loophole had been left in place on account of the Military Commissions Act (2006) and the most recent National Defense Authorization Act.

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Monday, December 19, 2016

Solutions For No. 1 of Suggested Comprehension Exercises ('Construction of A Star', Part 2)

1) Using the appropriate stellar model parameter relations calculate the core values: T c  ,  r c ,  Pc  .


Soln. We have, for the three core parameters -

T  = Tc      ,    q  = (  rr c  )1/n    And q =   (P/ Pc ) (1+ 1/n)

At the interface (core-radiative boundary)  one finds:  q  = 0. 7839768

Then, for the (dimensionless)  core temperature:   t c     =  t /   q

And, since 0.6969 =    t c   q   =     t c    (0.7839768)  then:   t c   =  0.8876

The dimensional form is:  T  =  Tc   q

Since we have, at r/R = 0.172, log T = 7.1643   then

antilog (7.1643)  =   T   =   1.46  x 107  K

And:   Tc      =   /   q

For which we set up the ratio:

(0.6969)/  / (0.8876) =  (1.46  x 107  )/   Tc 

Whence:  Tc     =   (1.46  x 107  ) (0.8876)/  (0.6969)  = 1.86  x 107  K

Take log T = log (1.86  x 107  )  = 7.2695

Which is the core temperature log value we find at r /R  = 0.0, i.e., See Table in Part 1

For core density:

q  = (  rr c )1/n   


Where:   The polytropic index n can be defined:   n = 1/ (g   - 1)

where g   is the ratio of specific heats. (g  =  C p / C )


In a non-relativistic limit  one will have g = 5/3 and

n = 1 / (5/3 - 1)  =  1/ (2/3)  =  3/2


Then write the core density as:   r c    =    rq 3/2


Now, take  q  =   0.7839  SO:   q 3/2    =   0.6941

Since we have, at r/R = 0.172, log r = 1.4033   then

antilog (1.4033)  =   r   =   25.31 g/ cm3


Therefore:  r c    =    rq 3/2  =   25.31 g/ cm3 / 0.6941


And:     r c    =   36.46   g/ cm3 

Now, take log  (r c  ) =   1.5618


Which is the density log value we find at r /R  = 0.0, i.e. the core (See Table in Part 1)


For core pressure, we have:  q =   (P/ Pc ) (1+ 1/n)

Since:  q    =  (p/ p c ) (1+ 1/n)     and n = 1.5 (assigned polytropic index - see top of Lane-Emden function table)

Then:   p c   =     p / q 5/2      and   q 5/2 =  0.5441


And, since we have, from the model table,  at r/R = 0.172, log P = 16.6770   then

antilog (16.6770 )  =   P = 4.754  x 1016    dynecm 2



Therefore:     P c   =   P /   q 5/2 =  (4.754  x 1016    dynecm2 )/  0.5441


P c   =   8.737  x 1016    dynecm2

and the log is: 16.9414 or the value shown at r/R = 0.0 (the core)

Electors Need To Revolt, Not Rubberstamp 4 Years Of Trump Tyranny

No automatic alt text available.
"You better all act like the pussies I expect you to be and rubber stamp me, or pay the price!"

"The only thing necessary  for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"- Edmund Burke

"Good Lord! We are about to inaugurate as president a man whose election - according to the CIA - was aided by a Russian intelligence operation. Try as we might, we cannot pretend this didn't happen." - Eugene Robinson, columnist for The Washington Post

" You want to believe Trump will be just another president – more conservative and pompous than most, but one who will make rational decisions once in office.  You are under a grave delusion. Trump has a serious personality disorder and will pose a clear and present danger to America and the world." Robert Reich,   'The 4 Syndromes of Passivity In the Face Of Impending Tyranny'. - on smirkingchimp.com


Sadly, it appears that most of the nation's 538 electors simply lack the pluck or commitment to constitutional principle to prevent the Trump Tyranny from gaining a foothold. Yes, yes, I have heard the malarkey that we still have "divided government" and "articles of impeachment" to use if he gets out of hand. But if you seriously believe that then you are as drunk or deluded as the Trump voters recently interviewed in Kenosha, Wisc. who said they "never really believed what Trump said" (on the campaign trail)  because "no one would take that literally".  Well, don't be so sure when you're dealing with a guy that has explosive personality disorder as well as psychotic narcissism overlaid with feelings of omnipotence.

Better yet, if you suffer from such delusions you need to see the documentary 'The Nazis- A Warning From History', which I watched again Friday night.  By November 30, 1933 the only bastion standing between continued German (Weimar Republic) democracy and a fascist dictatorship was Paul von Hindenburg - not exactly an "electoral college" to stop a maniac from ascending to power. But Hindenburg was under relentless pressure, e. g. from Franz von Papen and others, to allow Hitler to be Chancellor to halt the endless political infighting. Predictably, Hindenburg caved under pressure  convinced by other German politicians (mainly Social Democrats) that "we will be able to control Hitler". One of the Social Democrats interviewed some 45 years later admitted in retrospect, "What fools we were! We didn't realize he and the Nazi Party would change the laws!"   And change them he did, specifically using the Enabling Act, e.g.

http://www.dw.com/en/the-law-that-enabled-hitlers-dictatorship/a-16689839

Is Donald Trump every bit as bad as Hitler?  We don't know, only that they share many of the same personality defects and disorders, namely for narcissism and authoritarianism. One of the most alarming comparisons is that both have exhibited  thin skins and a vengeful mindset. A person would be a fool not to think these attributes would not emerge in a President Trump as they did in a Chancellor Hitler as he altered laws, after demolishing the Reichstag, to speed his path to one man rule.

A NY Times editorial ('Is Donald Trump A Threat To Democracy?') in its Sunday Review noted:

"Drawing on a close study of democracy’s demise in 1930s Europe, the eminent political scientist Juan J. Linz designed a “litmus test” to identify anti-democratic politicians. His indicators include a failure to reject violence unambiguously, a readiness to curtail rivals’ civil liberties, and the denial of the legitimacy of elected governments.

Mr. Trump tests positive. In the campaign, he encouraged violence among supporters; pledged to prosecute Hillary Clinton; threatened legal action against unfriendly media; and suggested that he might not accept the election results.This anti-democratic behavior has continued since the election. With the false claim that he lost the popular vote because of “millions of people who voted illegally,” Mr. Trump openly challenged the legitimacy of the electoral process. At the same time, he has been remarkably dismissive of United States intelligence agencies’ reports of Russian hacking to tilt the election in his favor"

The Times piece goes on to emphasize constitutional protections and so-called safeguards are not enough if these aren't also reinforced by strong informal norms or expectation, say of how state or federal government should act. Thus, if I find that what's going on in the state of NC now to be outrageous (the previous gov wiping out all powers for the incoming Dem gov) and a Trumpster sees nothing to get worked up over....we have a problem,  a serious one. As I told Janice Friday night while we viewed the Nazi documentary, this is the exact template Hitler used to become the Fuhrer: alter the powers of checks and balances to avoid constraints.

Alas, recounting history for Trump's blind groupies is probably a fool's errand, since they are too submerged in fake news and may not see the peril in his taking office.  But one must expect more from the state  electors  meeting at noon today, who hold the future of this nation now in their hands. And while it is true Hitler - like all demagogues - was finally removed from power, it wasn't until Germany was basically reduced to rubble after a World War.  (My sister-in-law, Krimhilde, still speaks of Russian soldiers going door to door raping German women as "revenge" for Hitler's invasion of Russia.)

So that from the historical perspective alone, the time to rid the nation of this Trump pestilence is now - not hoping for a miracle stop it after the fact. True, the recounts didn't work, but this was because one state (PA) never allowed them to begin, and in the two others (WI, MI) the recounts of provisional and other ballots in mainly African -American areas (e.g. of Detroit and Milwaukee) were never allowed.

See e.g.

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/steven-rosenfeld/70158/michigan-election-officials-refuse-to-recount-thousands-of-ballots-in-states-communities-of-color

So the only barricade now against Trump and his utter destruction of the nation we love is the Electoral College. It is in them, at least 37 of them, that we've placed our trust to grow a pair and stand tall as opposed to rolling over to perform the perfunctory. (And admittedly, it hasn't been easy for them, with threats issuing from state attorneys general not to "revolt" as well one lower court hysterical judge here in Colorado who insisted faithless electors would be guilty of a "criminal offense". No, they emphatically would not , since breaking a rubberstamp oath is not the same as perjury or 'treason')

But according to an AP release ('Don't Look For The Electors To Upend Trump Victory', Denver Post. p. 15A, Dec. 16):

"Whether they like Trump or not, and some plainly don't, scores of the Republicans chosen to cast votes in the state capitol meetings told the AP they feel bound by history, party loyalty or the law to rubberstamp their states' results and make him president"

Which is astounding, given that the Electoral College - as I noted in a previous post- was the one institution specifically designed to stop a demagogue like Trump from sullying the office.

Writing in The Federalist No. 68, Alexander Hamilton for his own part was blunt and to the point and his words bear directly on Trump's entanglements with his many foreign businesses and their diplomats:

"Nothing is more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to a cabal, intrigue or corruption. These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.

How could they better gratify this than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?

Hamilton then lists the measures to ensure safeguards from overt foreign influence in our councils,  including, e.g.   no senators, representatives or others holding a position of trust shall be named as state electors, i.e. to the Electoral College.

However, later he leaves open the possibility that the same electors can ensure the integrity of the office through their own discretion which may, at some extreme points, diverge from what the people themselves voted for (particularly if motivated by passion as opposed to reason).

Thus we read:

"The process of election (by state electors) affords a moral certainty that the office of President shall never fall to the lot of any man who is not to an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications...It will not be too strong to say that there will be a constant probability of seeing the station filled by characters pre-eminent for ability and virtue."


One is left to ask if all those hesitant Republican electors have read Hamilton's essay. If not, why not? Also, how can you possibly place blind party loyalty above the welfare of the whole nation? Can we not agree that if the nation's welfare is threatened, its security compromised, then political parties mean little or nothing? After all, they cannot exist in a vacuum,  apart from a vibrant and secure nation, especially one whose electoral system is beyond reproach.

As for "history", sorry, the only relevant history entails Alexander Hamilton's spot on essay in The Federalist #68 to stop a man "who is not to an eminent degree with the requisite qualifications"

As for the appeal to "duty" - there is only one duty in the end and that is to the citizens of the nation and to the constitution. And since the Trumpists have already shown to have been catapulted to near the seat of power by "mischief of faction" (in Madison's words in Federalist #10) the only duty of electors is in ensuring Trump is not our President next month. Pick Mitt Romney (who clearly has an axe to grind after Trump jettisoned him from Secretary of State consideration), or even Joe Biden - if you can't find a moderate Repub with the gumption to buck the Trumpistas.

Washington elector Bret Chiafolo, quoted in the Post piece, agrees that knocking out Trump is a :losing bet" but he also says:

"It's one the Republic's founders would want us to make. I believe Donald Trump is a unique danger to our country and the Founding Fathers put the Electoral College in place  to among other things, stop that from happening."

If the electors fail to stop this abomination from happening, for whatever reason, then they will have a long time to process Edmund Burke's famous words at the top.

Footnote: FBI Director James Comey now agrees with the CIA Director John  Brennan, and the National Intelligence Director, James Clapper, that "Russia hacked into DNC accounts to influence U.S. elections to help Donald Trump.".  Over the weekend 80 electors requested the intelligence community for more evidence, but were denied- obviously to await the release of the full report. But also because disclosure of cyber-hacking detection methods undermines their efficacy.  it doesn't matter in any case. There is more than ample material on record to raise the issue of reasonable doubt that a Trump presidency would be in the interests of the nation. In such a case, the electors need to revolt.


See also:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/p-m-carpenter/70356/the-terrifying-prospect-of-trumpism-unbound