Friday, March 21, 2025

Trump's War On Universities Based On Eradicating the "Educated" and "Elites" - So More 'Poorly Educated' Can Vote.

 

                                      "Hey! I love the poorly educated!"


Make no mistake that the Trump administration’s ultimatum to Columbia University this month ordering a dramatic overhaul of admissions and disciplinary rules could crater all higher ed in the U.S.  But really, isn't that what this dumb Turd and his sapling followers always wanted? And going back to his first term, didn't Dotard proclaim his "love for the poorly educated".  Forgot? Then read this Reuters link:

Trump loves 'the poorly educated' ... and social media clamors | Reuters

Wherein we read:

"U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump's declaration of love for "the poorly educated" in his Nevada victory speech lit up social media on Wednesday, sparking a battle between those dumbfounded by the remark and those saying it had been taken out of context...By Wednesday morning, the phrase "I LOVE THE POORLY EDUCATED" was trending heavily. On Twitter, it was tweeted roughly 15 times a minute, according to social media analytics firm Zoomph.

"I am, by modern standards, poorly educated, and I think that Donald Trump is a threat to America," tweeted Aaron Camp (@AaronApolloCamp).
Another Twitter user, Kat (@VTweddingPhoto), wrote, "This is an embarrassment. For the GOP and for us as Americans. The world is once again laughing."

Well, they aren't laughing now, least of all those overseas students who'd planned to advance their higher education at a U.S. college or university. But given this attack on higher learning, they can no longer depend on university support and will go elsewhere. 

For those not paying attention, with $400 million in canceled government grants and contracts on the line, federal officials ordered Columbia’s administration to place the university’s Middle Eastern studies department under academic receivership for at least five years.

Typically, a receivership is handled internally. University administrators can take the rare step of imposing this measure if an when a department descends into chaos. It is viewed as a last-resort solution to extended periods of internal strife and dysfunction.

This time is different. The call for a receivership is coming from outside the university — and directly from Trump's White House. It also arrives at a moment when dozens of other colleges and universities are facing federal inquiries and fear a fate similar to Columbia’s.

But as with his other burst norms, including plans to destroy the Dept. of Education, and taking over the Kennedy Center,  Dictator Trump is testing how far he can push boundaries. Then, if successful - no major outcry or backlash-  take over the last bastions of independent thought capable of offering strong criticism to his authoritarian reign.

Why be surprised? Numerous election post-mortems - from Nate Silver to Ezra Klein - have noted the major 2024 election fracture was between the college educated and non-college educated. 


Silver, the polling expert, argued in a December Substack essay, “The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency,” that the emergence of the Democrats as “'the party of the educated” has resulted in what he called “ the Indigo Blob,” which he described as:

"the merger between formerly nonpartisan institutions like the media, academia and public health on the one hand — institutions that draw almost exclusively from the ranks of college graduates —"

The result, Silver wrote, is that the left “is losing the battle of ideas, the one thing that it’s supposed to win.”  In fact, the left is losing the battle of ideas to stupidity, mass stupidity infused from multiple sources and fed by the basic diminution of intelligence in the electorate over the past two decades.

The current assault against the "elites" can be traced back to a December, 2022 WSJ rant by Barton Swaim in which he screamed:

"The Democrats are increasingly the party of educated urban elites; the GOP belongs to the white working class.....That one party is the educated party—that its members see themselves, in some respects accurately, as more cultured and informed than their opponents—has generated an intellectual pathology that is obvious to everyone but themselves..."

Swaim takes a fact everyone knows to be valid: Democrats have the largest proportion of college-educated voters -  and twists it into a liability.  I.e. that the "smart party" is also a "wiseass" snark party because it happens to attract the most educated people. Then going from there to conclude that "it needs no self reflection".  But in fact it is the party (GOP) featuring the fewest college-educated voters that is the one with the least self-reflection. 

All of which has been a lead up to the current assault on the last bastion of elite, objective knowledge - in the universities.  In the words of Sheldon Pollock, a retired former chair of the Middle Eastern studies department at Columbia:

It is one small department in one university. But it will reverberate across the entire country.”

You better believe it, and I can just visualize Barton Swaim gloating now as the Trumptards take an axe to the last redoubt of higher ed and a university system that had been the envy of the world.

One comment in the NY Times perhaps summed it up best as to how we got here:

"The root of the Democratic party's failure and the Republican party's success is that the public is so spectacularly ill-informed. Only 15% of adults read a newspaper? Good lord, no wonder people are so easily snookered."

And Dotard loves them being snookered because then he can more easily consolidate and expand his misbegotten, ill-gained and feral power, e.g.

Opinion | Trump Voters Love Him More Than Before. Four Conservative Columnists Pinpoint Why. - The New York Times

Excerpt:

Why do so many Republicans like the direction Trump is taking the country in? Is it about his style, or his policies?... Sixty-nine percent believe the “political and economic elite don’t care about hard-working people.” If those are your priors, then you’re going to be happy with a president who wields a wrecking ball….and many Republicans (sadly!) want their opponents to suffer. They’re actually happy to see people lose their jobs or to see nonprofits lose funding if those people are perceived as part of the “deep state” or ”elites”

See Also:

Anti-Intellectualism In The U.S. - A Real Concern Or Hyped Worry?

And:

Columbia University’s Concessions to Trump Seen as a Watershed - The New York Times

And:

Carl Gibson's picture
Article Tools
E-mail | Print
Comments (0)
by Carl Gibson | March 20, 2025 - 6:39am | permalink

— from Alternet

Another academic has been arrested by President Donald Trump's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on legally dubious grounds, according to a new report.

Politico reported Wednesday that Indian national Dr. Badar Khan Suri was recently arrested outside of his Virginia home by "masked agents" who said they were with the DHS. Suri — who is in the United States legally on a student visa and who is married to a U.S. citizen — was not charged with any crime and has no criminal record, yet he is being targeted for deportation and awaiting transfer to Texas.

Suri is being put into deportation proceedings under the same vaguely worded statute that the Trump administration invoked after it arrested Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil (a legal permanent resident and Columbia University graduate student who led pro-Palestine protests last year). That statute claims that an administration has the authority to deport any foreign-born resident who it suspects could be a threat to U.S. foreign policy.

» article continues...

And:

And:

Another Slapdown for Trump as Education Dept. Is Saved

Thursday, March 20, 2025

Revisiting Cylinders, Quadric Surfaces And Their Analytic Geometry


                                     Circular cylinder, plotted using MathCad 14.

In this post I explore some of the interesting aspects of surfaces and their analytic geometry  What we will find is that in many respects, there are similarities to plane analytic geometry, e.g.

http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2017/01/seen-hidden-figures-heres-look-at.html

including the use of analytical equations to examine the properties or what will now be solids or 3D surfaces, as opposed to plane figures like circles, ellipses, parabolas etc.   In general, given some locus of points P(x, y, z) satisfying an equation:

F(x,y, z) = 0

One will generate a surface.  The simplest examples are  planes, yielding linear equations involving only first powers of the variables,, e.g. x + y  + z = 0 . The next simplest surfaces are the cylinders for which:  F(x,y) = 0  and the x, y are raised to the 2nd power.  In general, a cylinder is a surface generated by a straight line that moves parallel to a given line and passes through a given curve.   For example, the given curve may be:

 x 2   +  y 2   =    r 2

One of the first things the math enthusiast needs to be aware of is that the equations need to be seen in context.  In the case of the cylinder surface, such as shown in the top graphic,  the cross-sectional area is a circle and also the given curve, i.e. in the x-y plane.  Here the generator of the cylinder is also parallel to the z-axis, so z = 0,  and therefore z would not be included in the equation.

 On inspection, we see the radius r of the cross section area circle is 5 units on either side. Hence, the applicable equation for this cylinder will be:

x 2     +  y 2     =      (5) 2 

Now consider the equation below, also for a cylinder:  

y  =   x 2   

At first glance this may be recognized as a parabola, but in the context it is really a parabolic cylinder, i.e. having parabolic cross section and in the plane z = 0.   Below I show the detailed image for the theoretical cylinder and to the lower right, the MathCad 14 plot.



Again, note carefully that the given equation from which one letter is missing - in Cartesian coordinates- represents in space a cylinder with elements parallel to the axis associated with the missing letter.  In a similar vein, which the math enthusiast can check, the surface with equation:     y 2  +  4 z 2  =   4  

represents an elliptic cylinder with elements parallel to the x- axis.  It extends indefinitely in both positive and negative directions along the x-axis which is now called the axis of the cylinder, e.g.



In this case the cross -section area is that of an ellipse, which the reader can check by graphing.


All cylinders can be analyzed using analytical equations similar to the one we employed in plane analytic geometry, i.e.



Ax 2    +  Ay 2   + Dx  + Ey  + F   = 0   (A not equal 0) 

 In this case we will use for various cylinders:


Ax 2    +    B xy  +  C 2   +  Dx  + Ey  + F   = 0

(With elements taken parallel to the z -axis hence all equations in terms of x and y) 

The Ellipsoid & Sphere:


Consider the ellipsoid shown above, with the origin of the coordinate axes (x,y,z) at its center.   We take a,b,c to be positive constants and the relevant general equation here is:

x2 / a 2   +    y2   / b2  +    z2  / c2  =  1

Note the ellipsoid cuts coordinate axes at: (+ a, 0, 0),  (0, +b, 0) and (0, 0, +c).  Note all the sections cuts out by the coordinate  axes are all ellipses, e.g. 

x2 / a 2   +    y2   / b2  =  1

And  further when we have a = b = c the  sphere is generated.  For the special case of the sphere which does not have center at the origin of coordinate (e.g. x, y, z) we can write:


(x - h) 2    + (y - k ) 2   + (z  - m  ) 2   =  a 2 

With center now at: (h, k, m)  and radius a. 

Clearly, just as we have plane curves which we recognize as circles, ellipses and parabolas, we have surfaces which we see are spheres, ellipsoids and paraboloids.

Consider now the elliptic paraboloid below, for which:  x2 / a 2   +    y2   / b2    = z/ c



And  for which I have also provided the corresponding MathCad 14 plot.   Note the surface is symmetrical with respect to the planes z = 0, and y= 0. The only intercept on the axes is at the origin (not as clearly shown in the MathCad plot because of limitations in the program)  The key point is that the section cut out from the surface by the yz-plane us:

z = 0,      y2       (b2  x )  z

This is a parabola with vertex at the origin and opening upward. Similarly, when:

y = 0,      x 2       (a2  / c )  z   

One also has a parabola.  Note that when z = 0 the cut reduces to the single point: (0, 0, 0)

We now examine the elliptic cone given by the equation:

x2 / a 2   +    y2   / b2  =    z2   / c2  

Which object is symmetrical with respect to all three coordinate planes, i.e.



(Note: The cone is also below the x-y plane shown as a 'mirror image' of the cone above the plane.  It's just that the MathCad 14 program is limited in showing the dual aspect)

The plane z = 0 cuts the surface n the single point (0, 0, 0).  In addition, the plane x = 0 cuts it in the two intersecting straight lines:

1) x = 0,   y/b   +  z/ c

2) y = 0,   x/ a =   +   z/ c

The section cut out by the plane z = z1 > 0 is an ellipse with center on the z-axis and vertices on the straight lines given by the preceding eqns.

Example Problem:

Describe and sketch the surface given by:  r =   2 cos Θ

The characteristics of the equation indicate the surface is a right circular cylinder, e.g.

  The given coordinate system is cylindrical, e.g. r,  Î˜ , z.   Sketching the equation yields a circular cross section of radius 1 unit.   The cylinder- with the displayed cross section area-  extends indefinitely in both the positive and negative directions along the z axis which intersects at (1,0) in the rectangular frame shown.  The polar view is shown to the right.

Suggested Problems:

1)  A surface configuration is described by the following analytical aspects:

A= 1,  B = 1,  C = 2,  D = 1, E = 3,  F = 1


Write the equation for the object and identify it.


2) Describe and sketch each of the following:
a)    2     +  y 2   =      a 2  


b)  x 2   +  y 2  
+   z 2  +  4x    - 6y  = 3  


3) Sketch (and identify)  the surface given by:  


f(x,y) =  4   -  x 2  +  y 2

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

JFK Files Released - And Lee Oswald's Innocence Remains Despite Warrenite Disinformationists

                    JFK minutes before being assassinated on Nov. 22, 1963


        “I believe that irrefutable evidence shows conspirators, none of them Oswald, killed JFK. A mentally ill Jack Ruby, alone and unaided, shot Oswald. The federal inquiry knowingly collapsed and theorized a political solution. Its corruption spawned theorists who tout solutions rather than define the facts that are locked in the massively muddied evidentiary base, and released only by hard work.”

 

Prof.  David R. Wrone, in The Journal of Southern History(6), February, 1995, p. 188.

 "Our collective denial of the obvious, in the setting up of Oswald and his transparent silencing by Ruby, made possible the Dallas cover-up. The success of the cover-up was the indispensable foundation for the murders of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy by the same forces at work in our government – and ourselves.

 Hope for change in the world was targeted and killed four times over. The cover-up of all four murders, each leading leading into the next, was based – first of all –on denial. Not the government’s but our own- and the unspeakable was not far away." - James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters, Orbis Book, p. xvi

After the release of the much trumpeted remaining JFK files last night there will likely be more disappointed truth seekers than not. The newest batch of records can be found on the agency’s webpage under the headline, “JFK Assassination Records - 2025 Documents Release.” The page features a table listing more than 1,100 entries of hyperlinked PDF files.  The problem? Many if not most of the pages are difficult to read and filled with a litany of names and pseudonyms whose significance is not yet known—and may never be. For the average member of the public trying to piece together the names or even to compare the new unredacted records to their partially or fully redacted prior versions will be like trying to play 3D chess.

The basis for the confusion is simple: Most of the public has done minimal research into the assassination - if at all- and is unaware of the HSCA, the only legitimate investigation. All they know is the Warren Commission - a creature of LBJ - to cover up his involvement.  Hence, they will be lost "at sea" trying to make sense of what was released.

But from what I've seen - including of the 6 million pages already released - the 'wild goose hunt' and whitewash of the Warren Commission Report has been confirmed. In the words of House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)  Chief Counsel Robert Blakey:

"The purpose of the Warren Commission wasn't to find out what really happened but to assure Americans what didn't happen."  

Files still missing as far as I can discern:

- The files on George Joannides:   

Joannides served as chief of the CIA's anti-Castro psychological warfare operation in Miami in 1963. The operation was run out of the largest CIA station outside of Langley, called JM/WAVE. More than 300 CIA agents directed over 3,000 Cuban agents and subagents, out of a front corporation called 'Zenith Technical Enterprises, Inc. The operation was designed to spread disinformation using a group: Directorio Revolucionario Estudantil (DRE) under David Atlee Phillips.

Joannides played a major role in helping to block the HSCA  access to critical JFK files at the time of that investigation (1978-79). Later, in 1992, when the Assassinations Review Board wished to release a critical Joannides' file and asked a CIA go-between, he replied: "I know there's a reason why that Joannides file shouldn't be released, I just can't think of it!"  It never did see the light of day and hasn't up to now.

- All of Oswald's CIA files (OS-351-164 (office of security), the 201-289248 CI/SIG, and the 74-500) and what was done with them, e.g. by the guy who framed him: CIA Mexico City Station chief David Atlee Phillips:


Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said that "only a few documents remained under a court seal because of grand jury rules, were still secret."   And I am convinced these Oswald CIA files are among them, as well as the Joannides files, in addition to the identities of the two CIA hit men named by former CIA Director Richard Helms in the Church Committee hearings. See below.

-The elements of the Staff D program run by NSA contact William Harvey. As pointed out by researcher Peter Dale Scott in Deep Politics Quarterly, January, 1994:

In 1961, when William Harvey headed Staff D, he was assigned the task of developing the CIA Assassinations Project, ZR/Rifle.

When ZR/ Rifle was altered from targeting Castro to targeting JFK, it was all over except for the triangulation of gunfire that took Kennedy out in Dallas.  The closest we likely got to who the actual shooters (mechanics) were occurred during the (1975) Church Committee hearings.  Former CIA Director Richard Helms spoke at length about ZR Rifle in one session. When pressed, he identified two generic (i.e. for any purpose) hit team members by their code names: WI/ROGUE and QJ/WIN.  Helms described the former as   "a stateless soldier of fortune and a criminal(Church Committee Report, pp. 43-44).

 Helms explained his latter statement in these terse terms:

"If you need somebody to carry out murder I guess you had a man who might be prepared to carry it out.”

- The names of the 2 CIA hit men: WI/ROGUE and QJ/WIN.  Richard Helms disclosed the code monickers in the Church Committee Hearings, but we need to know: 

1) WHO were these guys?  Cuban hires after the CIA Bay of Pigs fiasco? Mafia hit men hired by the CIA? Or...members of P2 out of Marseilles??

(2) Were they in Dallas that day as part of an assassination K Group team?   We know the existence of K-groups has already been established, e.g.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/

Wherein we read:

"The idea of forming assassination teams ('K' groups) apparently originated with Castillo Arenas in 1952.  Adopting Castillo Arenas' concept the [  ] chief routinely included two assassination specialists in his training plans.  CIA training for sabotage teams in early 1954 also included creating a 'K' group trained to perform assassinations."

- The number of "assassination teams" that were active at the time of JFK's murder.   

- The number of teams under control of Staff D, William Harvey's program with NSA connections. Also how many were connected to David Atlee Phillips and his operations in Mexico City?

What about ''Who dunnit"?  We can't say, but we DO know who didn't.

We know it was NOT Lee Oswald - given he could not have made the kill (fatal head) shot.  That shot came from the grassy knoll with the shot direction already identified from the acoustics in the HSCA investigation of 1978-79 and captured in Z-frame 314:

This was traced to the right front temple wound in JFK's skull, as revealed by Robert Groden in his superb book, The Killing of a President. (On page 178 is shown the complete path of the bullet from the right front of Kennedy’s forehead to the rear of his head.)

Let us recall here that Oswald was alleged to be shooting from the Texas School Book Depository which was behind the limo, so no shots from there could have delivered the right frontal head shot. In addition we have the Z-film frame after 314 showing Jackie clearly moving backwards over the limo trunk, she said (in secret WC testimony) to try to retrieve a piece of the skull.


Jackie's motion alone proves the shot was not from the TSBD.

One other claim that JFK files readers need to ignore is the trope that Oswald visited Mexico City shortly before the killing. Also, that he met with Cuban and Russian spies and even spoke openly about killing Kennedy with employees of the Cuban embassy there.  All of this is a pack of ripe merde, likely planted and ok'd by CIA spook David Atlee Phillips to frame Lee. 

As I have repeatedly pointed out, the Mexico City nonsense is total disinformation (and distraction) based on a misidentified image of Oswald.  This was first revealed in Military Science Professor John Newman's book, Oswald and the CIA.  Therein showing the actual Oswald (as a prisoner in Dallas) compared to the impostor Oswald in Mexico City. e.g. 

Hence, all the Mexico City tropes amount to pure distraction. No serious researcher accepts them.  They are all irrelevant to the facts already known, disclosed, i.e. from earlier file releases in the 1990s. And we know Oswald not only had no part in it but was himself assassinated within two days of Kennedy's assassination, e.g.



likely to prevent him from revealing his role (as a decoy) in Bill Harvey's Staff D operation. 

For the most authentic depiction of how the assassination likely went down, check out the relevant sequence from the film 'Executive Action' (1973):


In the meantime it will be interesting to see if any serious conclusions are forthcoming from the tens of thousands of files that came over the transom last night. And also how many Warren Commission defenders (i.e. fairy tale believers)  remain. 

Among the latter one can count the U.S. media which remains doggedly in the Warrenite camp - such as on Laura Coates (CNN) analysis tonight when Laura barked to her guests: "Up to now we've seen no evidence other than that pointing to Lee Harvey Oswald as the sole assassin."  Which is total bull pockey as this blog post clearly shows.  What is it with the media that they can't break through the brain-less barrier, even to get to the only actual serious investigation, the HSCA?  (Which found for 96% probability of conspiracy based on acoustic analysis).  My guess is they are all caught in the trap of the "Middle Mind", e.g.


Author Curtis White's view is that the 'Middle Mind' is a safe mental space where all the old verities are true and right -thinking citizens don't question them too closely or trespass intellectually into areas that mark "forbidden zones".  Such as LBJ having helped plan the JFK assassination (to avoid prosecution in the Bobby Baker scandal) or that UFOs are actually alien craft, see e.g.


The U.S. media, by and large, promotes middle mind tropes - as Laura Coates did tonight - in pronouncing no evidence exists that contradicts the WC finding of Lee Oswald as sole JFK assassin.  Clearly, these middle mind tropes, repeated often enough, can then be used to manipulate citizens' consciousness, but more often reinforce 60+ year old lies.

But in the case of the JFK assassination, one really doesn't need to bury one's nose in the newly released files.  The evidence Oswald had nothing to do with it has been sitting out in the open for decades. It has been out there for the asking, for those who seek truth rather than fantasy, and who are not hostage to the "middle mind."  

All one needed to do is dig it up from the array of documents, images (e.g. from Zapruder and Nix films) and use one's own intelligence and powers of deduction.  Understanding that the facts of the conspiracy were not going to be handed out on a platter by the CIA or the National Archives - or the forlorn media. (See Prof. David Wrone's quote at top.)

One of the early glaring (and shocking) findings revealed in the newly released files ought to shake the middle minds out of their stupor.  This was noted in the Washington Post. In an early review of previously redacted material, the WaPo researchers discovered key members of the HSCA investigation had their Social Security numbers exposed. 

In addition, more than 100 members of the Senate Church Committee - the one that grilled former CIA Director Richard Helms (who identified two CIA hit men by their code names: WI/ROGUE and QJ/Win)- had their Social Security numbers, birth dates and birth places revealed. Why would this have been done and by whom? Clearly, the CIA orchestrated it to instill fear into the respective committees' members, lest they "go too far" in their respective inquires. This is not Mensa level stuff. 

 One hopes the larger media will put two plus two together and finally get out of its Warren Commission mind rut. But as I wrote in one of my 50th anniversary posts, that would take boldness which most of the media lacks.

At least one former CIA agent in one file fesses up to his role. Eat this Warren Commission hacks:


Excerpt: