Friday, July 24, 2026

'Regime Change' - Perhaps The Best Political Expose in 20 years (A Review)

 The new book, 'Regime Change' - by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, is arguably the best political expose I've read since James Douglass's JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died And Why It Matters'.   Douglass’ words in his Introduction are like a gut punch:


Our collective denial of the obvious, in the setting up of Oswald and his transparent silencing by Ruby, made possible the Dallas cover-up. The success of the cover-up was the indispensable foundation for the murders of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy by the same forces at work in our government – and ourselves:

Hope for change in the world was targeted and killed four times over. The cover-up of all four murders, each leading into the next, was based – first of all –on denial. Not the government’s but our own- and the unspeakable was not far away
.”

But Haberman and Swan deliver a series of gut punches all the way through. While Douglass focuses on how one of the most beloved Presidents was taken out by a cabal of intel operatives (along with three other leading lights of the 60s), Regime Change exposes how a felon and his own cabal took control of our government in the actual electoral process (in 2024). Including how Trump's 4 year hiatus from power (Biden winning in 2020) was actually the fertile period from which he could gestate the multiple planned attacks on our democracy - literally bringing it to its knees in 17 months.

As the authors point out in their Introduction, had Trump managed to eke out a victory over Biden he'd have "begun his second term in a sorry state" - what with the Covid pandemic still raging, "warping the economy and destroying global trade".

Instead, the loss - which the sore loser continues to bitch about - actually gave him the time to figure out how to tweak the laws and  master the intricacies of using the federal government for his own purposes. As well as being assisted in this effort by enlisting place thugs like Russell Vought and Stephen Miller. Who later helped to lay the groundwork to take over the DOJ to exact massive retribution on all political enemies on retaking power. 

And unlike his first term, when he had a cabinet that could at least keep his worst instincts in check, he'd now have only his own hand-picked loyalists and sycophants to do his bidding. He'd also now have the power to inflict untold damage on the techies' companies if they didn't toe his line. Add to that a Supreme Court that essentially conferred unlimited power via their 2024 immunity ruling, and a gutless Reep congress- and one had an imperial president. 

The wreckage to the federal government and workers began even before Trump's inauguration as we learn (p. 30), Miller's highest priority was to have Trump sign as many executive orders as possible to "overwhelm the opposition by sheer force and volume".  To that end he had "created a giant Excel spreadsheet tracking more than one hundred executive orders."

In addition, in opposition to all standard norms:

"Miller had refused to send the draft executive orders to the Office of Legal Counsel to review". Instead, Miller's team assembled a trusted group of MAGA-friendly lawyers which they referred to as 'the fake OLC' to replace the real Office of Legal Counsel."

With this feral move the door was open to blow past every other norm and standard in kneecapping the legitimate federal government so it could be replaced by one answering only to Trump. The decades' long fantasy of the "unitary executive" now come to life - thanks to a complicit Supreme Court, a spineless congress and 77 million dumbshit voters who fell for his lies.

The carnage these clueless voters enabled was then presented some pages later (pp. 50-51) as we learn the MAGA Trump team "saw USAID as a hotbed of liberal ideology. Decimating this critical agency then became a way - in their minds - of "attacking the woke left".  Especially after Trump's then bosom Buddy Musk described it as "evil and criminal".

"The orders handed down by Rubio would then to filter to USAID offices around the world."

The repercussions of this stupidity have been made clear in the wake of the latest Ebola outbreak, which is now "the second largest on record" according to a TIME report (July 27, p. 40). That report also laying the blame for the spread on the withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the demolition of USAID, i.e.

"The  U.S. was no longer a member of WHO which monitors pathogens and coordinates responses to emergency threats.  The withdrawal led to 3,000 job cuts at the WHO including disease surveillance and response."

"The decision to defund USAID in 2025 abruptly shuttered its programs  and broke many of those chains of communication. Ebola then moved for weeks, and possibly months, before the first patient was reported."

This was bad enough, but then we later learn in Regime Change (pp. 96-97) how the ICE rampage got started.


"Right away, the agency developed a fearsome persona - armed, masked and menacing - and began to post daily arrest members."

We also learn that Stephen Miller, the proto-Nazi behind this facade, "applied immense pressure on the agency to keep up the pace of mass deportation to hit 3,000 per day."

There was little doubt in the authors' minds this savage, indiscriminate program led directly to the ICE invasions of American blue cities, ending with the killings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis in January, 


Nor has it halted, with two more ICE killings in the last two weeks in Houston and Maine, the latter committed by a deranged vet who had no business being in any law & order capacity.

By Part II, 'Retribution' (p. 125) and Part III, 'The Enemy Within' (p. 270) we learn of the multitude of ways Trump planned to exact revenge on all political enemies - real or imagined. This would be facilitated by his having captured the DOJ, installing it with lackeys (like Pam Bondi and Todd Flanche), to do his bidding.  As a result, indictments flowed out for Letitia James, John Bolton, James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.  As well: "Grand juries in Florida would begin considering evidence against a slew of Obama-era officials in connection with the Russia investigation."

The whole ploy was not necessarily to succeed, as Haberman and Swan note, but to put as much stress on the indicted as possible. Forcing each to lawyer up and pay for legal counsel out the wazoo. 

By Part IV ('Plunder',  p. 314) we learn of the multitude of ways Trump planned to ravage assorted targets - foreign and domestic- for gain.  The authors note - in terms of alleged small boats trafficking drugs -  Trump "wanted to take the Duterte approach, just kill them."

Thus, "if the U.S. military were to start using Reaper drones and Hellfire missiles to blow up drug boats , that would send a message to would be smugglers."

No consideration at all, that Trump had already pardoned  former Honduran president Orlando Hernandez, a genuine narco king who was sentenced to 45 years for transporting 400 tons of cocaine into the U.S.  


But this is how Trump rolled, pardon the criminals and terrorists (like all the insurrectionists in the Jan. 6 Capitol attacks) but go after and kill the innocent. Like innocent fisherman in small boats, earmarked for extra-judicial slaughter.  As the Regime Change authors note (p. 323):

"The boat-bombing campaign in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific would be tailor made for videos on social media... raising immediate questions, on what legal authority had he blown up the boats?"

That included one incident in which two boat survivors were left and begged for help, but then were blown up by another drone.  A clear case of violation of the Geneva convention. All of this was based on the bunkum of the 'Donroe Doctrine'.

And the kicker (p. 375):

"Of the thirty-five strikes in the boat-bombing campaign that began in September, twenty -one came as the year ended.  The rapid intensification of this opaque operation suggested the bombings themselves were not the endgame.   Trump had already begun to openly discuss oil he described as "stolen" from the United States, declaring he intended to get it back."

Basically, p, 324, "the Trump administration refused to release its detailed rationale for the strikes and said little beyond the assertion these were 'drug traffickers'."

Again, eliciting the question: Why then pardon the top drug trafficker of them all, Orlando Hernandez? Well, obviously because a mega criminal loves another mega criminal, just as Trump fancied Duterte's manner of disposing of ordinary drug smugglers.

And there followed his seizure of the oil tanker the Skipper, off the coast of Venezuela, leading to a blockade then finally invasion of Venezuela to take out President Nicolas Maduro and effectively, do a regime change to grab its oil. By p. 366 of Plunder, we learn the extent to which Trump has defiled national buildings, memorials by pasting his name on them for the purpose of grift and domination:

"By the norms of history, naming rights for monuments belonged to subsequent generations, and these honors were conferred by Congress, commissions or public acclaim. It was the American way. But Donald Trump had long since demonstrated he could adore himself far more and in greater detail than anyone else might."  

And thence, this narcissistic pig would go on a rampage document by the authors. What triggered it?

"He had watched in rage as his name was removed from buildings in New York City in protest during his first presidency after its calamitous end."

From that rage, the traitor slime was driven to attach his name to the Kennedy Center,  renamed the United States Institute of Peace, the 'Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, and ordered a 'golden fleet of Trump class warships'  - the last particularly ironic given he'd dodged the draft five times with the bonespurs ruse.

He then had his glaring rat dog face hung from the Justice Dept. headquarters and the words "Make America Safe Again" along with the DOJ seal. Oh, and lest we forget, he pushed his "Trump Gold Card" then getting his feral face on our money, 


Not to be stopped, he then went for demanding an "Independence Arch" that would stand across from Arlington Memorial Bridge and the Lincoln Memorial.  According to the authors (p. 369): 

 "He wanted this to be the biggest arch in the world and began showing visitors to the Oval Office his various models which he called the 'Arc de Trump'"

How did this lunatic felon traitor get so emboldened?

"Trump saw himself as a transformational figure in history, one who was already remaking the world in his image, something few leaders had ever done definitively."

Transformational indeed! Especially given Trump realized early that a successful 2024 presidential campaign could help him escape a long prison sentence. After all, as the authors noted in their Introduction, people were already "de-sensitized" to Trump's antics and so many indictments br0ught against him. So it was just a matter of this tyrant:

"repurposing his legal peril as a powerful political asset"

All that was needed was a transcending event to eliminate that peril entirely and recast him as a special human worthy of leadership- and even worship (to his MAGA cult). That arrived with the attempted assassination in July, 2024 in Butler PA.  As the authors noted he had enough perception and political savvy to see how he could use it for power - by retaining an the image of the day-  blood coming down his ear, fist raised and screaming: "Fight! Fight! Fight!"


It became an instantly powerful campaign image that would literally propel him into the White House, and alas the Dems had no answer to that.  Other than an ever weaker Biden, who Trump demolished in their only debate.

By the authors' Epilogue  (p. 407)we behold just how much Trump's exercise of power - thanks to a corrupt, enabling Supreme Court and supine Congress - had gone to his head.  How so?  This kook was now (p.411), putting himself historically "in the company of Alexander the Great, the Caesars, Tamerlane, Attila the Hun and William the Conqueror."

Incredible.  I mean this felon - barely two steps from Rikers Island in June, 2024 -  now comparing himself to history's greats? Well judge for yourself in this paragraph (p. 411):

"Trump gestured for (Natalie) Harp to bring us copies of a two page document. He began reading from it, reciting the names reciting the names of history's most powerful figures  explaining how each fell short of his power as U.S. president."

And there in a nutshell we behold an imperial president absolutely drunk on his own power. Which is now betrayed in every conceivable way as he tells Americans to basically eat dirt while he plays with the stock market scarfing up millions, and adds to his crypto billions.  

Of course, there are always bound to be soreheads, losers and trolls that will find 'Regime Change' overblown, over-hyped and under sourced.  Such is the case with one WSJ reviewer named Tunku Varadarajan, mayhap making nice with Rupert to try to keep his job in his hollow 'The Not-So-Imperial Presidency'. (June 27-28, p. C9)

One has to really wonder what stash of shrooms Tunku ingested before writing this babble:  

"The book largely relies on sources who spoke exclusively on 'deep background', journalism jargon for the pinky swear promise of eternal anonymity"

Seeming to forget that this was exactly the mode of reporting used by Woodward and Bernstein when they exposed all the Nixon shenanigans to do with 'CREEP' (the Committee for the Re-election of the President) and extending into the Watergate break in and who was behind it and why.  And more than ample to bring Nixon's presidency crashing down - the subject of the book, 'All The President's Men'. But we must forgive Tunku because he wasn't around back then and likely never researched American journalism history in the 1970s.

More claptrap from Tunku's poisoned WSJ pen:

"At the core of the authors' narrative is their insistence that Mr. Trump is romping through his second presidency unchallenged."

Well, look Sparky, as the authors noted no one was doing squat to halt his deployment of National Guard as well as ICE goons to the streets of blue cities. And up to now,  slaying two other hard working immigrants (on the path to green cards) who were "accidentally" killed by ICE (wrong targets, so we're informed) with no one brought up on any charges. 

Further, not one iota of correction has descended on the orange toad in the wake of hundreds he's had killed in boats in the Caribbean and Pacific- by Reaper drones and Hellfire missiles. I mean, he's acted like judge, jury and executioner while enjoying the video game-like aspects of his slaughter.

And we won't even go into the latest brazen move - again with no congressional checks-  launching a destructive war on Iran based on his own ego needs to rival Alexander the Great and Attila the Hun. Oh, and based on his having a 'cakewalk' in Venezuela which he believed he could duplicate with Iran.

So pardon while I howl with laughter as I read Tunku's last sentence:

"The authors portrayal of a president unchecked omits the extent to which he has, in fact, been checked in his second term including by the Senate."

Righto.  Except on just checking the latest news (WSJ, NYT) the Senate refused to go along with the House in halting Trump's war with Iran. Choosing instead to "cede congressional powers to Trump."

Oh yeah, anyone gonna stop him with issuing more tariffs - now on over 80 countries,


 sending costs and inflation higher into the stratosphere? How about stopping the ICE invasions or even holding those renegades who've already killed citizens accountable? And now we've learned, the drunk with power traitor has dispatched B-1 bombers for potentially hitting Iran nuclear power sites with 'bunker busters' - but also potential tactical nuclear strikes. Anyone on earth stopping this punk at all?

Methinks Tunku needs to come out of dreamland or whatever parallel universe he inhabits.


Thursday, July 23, 2026

CU Associate Prof Among Thousands Of Academics Who Lost Funding For Bogus "DEI-Woke" Transgressions

 

Casey Fiesler - CU Prof had funding cut


In Trump's Amerikka, let's try to have some sympathy for CU Associate Professor Casey Fiesler. We have sympathy for her given federal loss of funding and ending up in Trump's cross hairs. What was her mistake, her misstep? Easy! She conducted a course in which she tried to combat misinformation - note I wrote misinformation, not information - and was hung out to dry for violating "free speech".  This is given the Trumptards actually believe misinformation constitutes free speech which it does not. 

Let's back up a bit.  The National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded the University of Colorado information science professor Cary Fiesler a $268, 428 grant in 2024, The funds were slated for a project teaming up CU media and communications students with information science students to create educational social media content about artificial intelligence.  

The objective? Scholars well-versed in communications would learn more about the complicated nature of AI.  And information science students would learn how to become better science communicators. Social media users would also benefit from being able to discern accurate, compelling information.  

But alas, as the Trump regime's disdain for "DEI" - "Wokeism"  metastasized Fiesler was among the legions of academics whose research was halted last year as a result of drastic federal funding cuts.  All scholarship that the Trumpites deemed "out of alignment" with its mission (i.e. extinguishing 'woke DEI") was halted or terminated. Basically, anything the fools believed constituted research dealing with diverse populations, misinformation and climate change. 

 The purpose and intent of these radical dimwits was clear: research surrounding diverse populations meant these could be found talented or even superior in multiple ways and couldn't have that challenging the regressive ('whites only') narratives of the Trump "brain trust".  

Alerting citizens, especially students, to misinformation was also anathema - given it would render them too smart and quick studies in spotting the propaganda from FOX News. Accurate research on climate change couldn't be permitted as this would conflict with the Trumpites efforts to smear it and undermine it.

So Prof. Fiesler, like thousands of academics, was caught in the trap of Trump's regressed "baboons" - as podcaster Kyle Kuhlinski calls them.  As Fiesler related to the Denver Post:

 "My project just died and my assumption is it got cut because it prominently featured the word misinformation."

Indeed, the Trump 'baboons' - as Kuhlinski noted in one of his recent Youtube podcasts, focused on canceling grants across the country researching the spread of misinformation and disinformation. Why? Because it challenged the regime's prime focus of keeping the U.S. populace dumbed down - or at least as many as feasible.  That was the truth, not the twaddle circulated that it "infringed on protected speech rights."   

The result here in Colorado? More than $375 million in grants already allocated- from the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, CDC, and Environmental Protection Agency were disrupted. Meaning either terminated, reinstated through legal hoops and levers, or axed altogether. This was during the first 18 months of the Trump regime according to a tracking group, Grant Witness.  

The loss of funding, needless to say, disabled researchers' careers, stunted young scholars from entering given professions and blighted the nation's scientific progress.  Is it any wonder then, according to a recent Financial Times report, e.g.



 China is now more trusted as a nation .  As we learn:

More people have favorable views of China than the U.S. in 25 out of the 36 countries and territories that were surveyed, including Canada and Mexico. The poll was conducted from February to May, a period when the United States and Israel launched a war against Iran.

In only six countries do people still see the U.S. more positively than China, according to the findings released Wednesday. Views in 22 out of the 36 countries and territories also are more favorable of Chinese leader Xi Jinping than U.S. President Donald Trump, including in Canada, Mexico and major European powers including France, Germany and the U.K. However, people in many of the countries have low confidence in both men.

It marks the first time in the roughly 20 years Pew has been tracking global opinions that China has been viewed more positively than the U.S., said Laura Silver, associate director of Pew’s Global Attitudes Research and one of the researchers on the study

China also excels in things like development of solar and other alternative energy, superior fast transport, and AI.  Thanks to the Trump cabal and gangster state the U.S. is being left far behind and it may take decades to catch up.

See Also:


And:



And:


And:


And:


And:


And:










Solution to First Order DE Problem - Eliminating Dependent Variable (Solving For y)

 Solve by finding a general solution: 

px 2 -  y = 0


----

Solve for y:  

y   =  px 2


Differentiate: 

dy/dx = y' = p  =      p 2 +  2 px p'   

Rearrange:

2 dp/ (p - 1)   +  dx/x  = 0

è

(p - 1) 2  x  =  c

Eliminating p:

y  -   2  Ã–yx   +  x  = c


Which is the general solution.

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

All Experts Redux: Gauge Fields Factor Into Solar Flares?

 

Solar eruption: Are gauge fields behind it?

Question:  I recently read an article, I think in Scientific American, on the role of gauge fields in solar flares. How would gauge fields relate to powerful solar flares?

 

Answer: Lacking a specific citation (issue, date, title etc.) with the necessary elaboration, the question is not really answerable in a solar physics or astrophysics context. Basically, what you would need to do is present far more details from the piece you read and elaborate the case made. But it appears you are unsure of the source you actually saw it.

  While it is true there is a fundamental relation between gauge fields and plasma physics, and plasma physics underlies solar flares, the objects of inquiry are vastly different.  So while the electric and magnetic fields peculiar to plasma physics are themselves classical gauge fields, no solar physicist uses gauge fields to describe solar flare dynamics, nor will you see him using the term 'plasmons' (for the quanta of longitudinal plasma oscillations.)

In standard plasma physics, the dynamics are driven by Maxwell's equations which can easily be integrated into plasma dynamics of flares. However,  specific gauge fields are far less amenable and out of place in flare theories. One could say the language is incompatible as well as the objects of inquiry.

 One is more likely to find them in formulations like Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), and also references to electromagnetism as the simplest Abelian gauge theory (specifically, with a U(1) symmetry). The photons that mediate these interactions are the gauge bosons. But no one doing flare physics uses the term gauge bosons.

 The problem in addressing it arises because the Wikipedia link you gave shows absolutely no citation reference for the term - so it is possible the author coined it himself- or interpreted it in a different context. Does it have special meaning? We may never know unless he himself explains it. I am in no position to since I have no idea what he means by "using gauge fields in flare physics"- anymore than if he used the term: "superflare plasma instability vortex".

However,  if you are interested in pursuing the gauge field aspect, on consulting a book I have entitled 'Gauge Fields' there is a chapter on 'Asymptotic Freedom' in connection with energies associated with gauge fields.

It is noted that "grand unification" can be constructed on the basis of the SU(5) group. At this level of energy - "all interactions are combined". Meaning that we are probably looking at the very hottest temperature in the Big Bang itself where all the forces were still unified. (Again, this is all much more fundamental physics than solar flare plasma theory!)

How much more fundamental? In advanced group theory, objects such as spheres are identified with one or more planes of symmetry. The effect of this is to identify different symmetric groups through transformations. Among the most common such groups in physics are:

U(1) - > electromagnetic force

SU(2) -> weak nuclear force

SU(3) -> strong nuclear force

All of which have very significant importance in high energy and particle physics. For example, one might be looking at the transformation of a quantum wave function (U) such that:

U(t) = exp [-iHt/ħ]

Where U(t) is the unitary time-evolution operator, where i is the usual imaginary number, H is the Hamiltonian,  Ä§ is the modified Planck constant (i.e.  h/ 2p. )  Unitarity ensures that the total probability of finding a particle remains exactly 1.

  In such a case, we say that the transformation of U is a unitary transformation and that the exponent (in brackets) is a (1 x 1) matrix. In effect, all such transformations form a unitary group, based on the 1 x 1 matrix, called U(1).

The (1) identifies one particle (boson) which mediates the associated field for this group. For U(1) that is the electromagnetic field, and the boson is simply the photon. For SU(2) and any SU(n) where n is a whole number , we can associate a unitary matrix of size (n x n) with determinant 1. Thus, SU(2), associated with the weak nuclear force (responsible for radioactive decay) requires a format such that a typical group member is:U = exp(-i M)

where M is now a 2 x 2 matrix of zero trace. Remember the trace of a matrix M is the sum of the diagonal entries, viz. Tr(M) = a11 + a22 + a33. The applicable matrix would look like this:


(a11 ……a12………a 13)

(a21…..a22……….a23)

(a31……a32……..a33)


Following the same rubric as above, SU(3)- associated with the strong nuclear force, means that the matrix M (as defined in the earlier example for SU(2)) now has a 3 x 3 element size. This 3 x 3 matrix can now be resolved into eight (8) independent component matrices (instead of only three), each of which corresponds to a charge, so there are now eight charges in all: G1 .......G8, called 'gluons'. Putting all together:

SU(3) x SU(2) X U(1)

Note this represents lower energy than achieved at SU(5)!

One has a symmetry system which embodies all the gluons (for the strong nuclear force) as well as the vector bosons for the unified electro-weak force (SU(2) x U(1)) which subsumes the weak nuclear force as well as the electromagnetic force. This in turn can be subsumed under a 'grand unified' symmetry, ie. SU(5).

From the rubric we are using, SU(5) must have a defining matrix M of 5 x 5, that is 5 elements by 5 elements. Its resolution yields a total of 24 separate matrices which are associated now with 24 different bosons. This is but one example that would pertain to a GUT or grand unified theory.

Thus, the temperature referred to this (highest) energy embodied in SU(5) would be that associated with "extra-dimensional gauge freedom" - possibly because of all the extra dimensions needed to craft the SU(5) matrix.

Again, all of this is to show there is a vast and fundamental difference in the physics usually applied to gauge fields, compared say with the dispersion relation associated with plasma waves. Such a relation 
implies that a relationship exists between the plasma frequency w and the wave number k. If, on the other hand the group velocity the group velocity , V g    does not depend on wave number i.e.

 

V g   =  w /k   = 0


All of this is at a macroscopic level compared say to the behavior of gluons or bosons in a gauge field.


Hopefully, this makes sense!

With Congress Threatening To 'Fix' Social Security By 'Flattening' COLAs Why Hasn't The Least Toxic Solution Been Attempted?

 

The two Social Security cutters – Alan Simpson and Ernest Bowles - on Obama Deficit Commission in 2011

"Social Security is a “cow with 310 million tits”!  - Alan B. Simpson, Feb., 2011

Back in 2011, one of Ernest Bowles and Alan Simpson's wonder “cure alls” for Social Security shortfalls was to raise the retirement age (at which full Social Security can be received) to 70. This was despite the fact that the newest demographic economic data showed that contrary to the myth that “all Americans are living longer”, elderly poor black women were seeing decreases in life expectancy. 

Bowles and Simpson’s solution would not only have added 1.5 million seniors to the poverty rolls, but literally forced millions more poor black seniors (mainly women- to work until they literally dropped dead. (45% of black men were already dead by 66). 

Thus, these two clowns would literally chop off an essential lifeline for millions of Americans, especially poor female minority Americans. In this context, one elderly female sent an email to Simpson – the top asshole on the commission, complaining about his denigrating reference to “pink panthers”- and dismissing Social Security as a "cow with 310 million tits."  

Of course, the situation with Social Security has gotten worse since then given congress has basically sat on its hands, doing nothing to save this critical program. Indeed, 2 weeks ago the program's trustees warned that the trust fund that helps pay benefits to more than 75 million Americans will be depleted by the end oof 2032.

While Social Security wouldn't collapse, the incoming revenue from payroll taxes and taxes on benefits would cover only 78 percent of scheduled payments - which will force automatic benefit cuts. For a middle income household that could equate to a loss f up too $18,000 a year. Not  small chunk by any means.

Basically, Social Security has paid out more than it receives since 2010. That shortfall has worsened in recent years because of drops in worker participation rate - owing to reduced immigration and fewer births - which result in fewer younger workers paying taxes (as well as the huge tax cuts passed last year in the Trump -GOP 'Big Beautiful Bill).

According to LZ Granderson in the LA Times, the "mess should be dominating midterm campaigns".  Especially now as affordability fears ramp up owing to Trump's Iran War and tariffs.  But weak-kneed politicos refuse to touch the issue out of fears they will scare voters with talk of benefit cuts or huge tax hikes.

Two changes, meanwhile, have been discussed - one mainly on the left, the other on the right.  In the latter case "means testing" has been proposed, e.g. by Ted Cruz.  This would reduce or eliminate benefits for millions who have paid into the system, but because they had much higher than average incomes over their earning years, they'd now be disqualified. Basically, Social Security would be then reserved for the lowest earning citizens which would turn it into a welfare program. And we know what happens to those.  

Another cockeyed proposal reported in a Washington Post editorial piece yesterday is to resurrect a 1987 plan that freezes cost of living allowances for some deemed not to need it.

A much more rational (and fairer) way to solve the problem is simply to raise the ceiling on income subject to the Social Security payroll tax. To fix ideas, that cap is now at $184, 500 which means anyone earning at least $1 million in wages stops paying any payroll tax from the beginning of March. That is $0.

Interestingly, if the payroll tax cap were raised to $400,000, i.e. all income in excess of that amount subject to the payroll tax, then Social Security's solvency would be ensured forever - or at least as long as this Republic lasts.

A simple solution, but you can be sure it will somehow escape the noggins of too many Reepo hardheads and wannabe Trumper crypto billionaires.

See Also:

Opinion | A missed opportunity to save Social Security - The Washington Post

Excerpt:

A “new option” to reform Social Security turns out not to be so new. If it had been adopted when first proposed, Social Security today would be solvent for another 40 years or so.

In October, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget released a proposal to cap the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) at a certain level of benefits. Rather than adjusting for inflation for every beneficiary, as the program currently does, it would do so only up to a certain point. They thought they had a fresh idea. But a CRFB blog post on Tuesday found that Reps. Tim Penny (D-Minnesota) and Arlan Stangeland (R-Minnesota) had introduced legislation along the same lines — in 1987.

As Penny said to Congress at the time, the bill would have created a “flat-dollar” COLA. Social Security would work the same in calculating the initial benefit level for seniors, based on their lifetime earnings. For the annual COLA, it would calculate the monthly increase for the beneficiary at the 20th percentile to account for inflation, then give that flat increase to all seniors.

And:

Hijacking Social Security: How Trump’s "Freedom 250" Grift is Draining Your Benefits

And:

Brane Space: A "Chained CPI"? Yes! For the CHAINSAW!

And:

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Solving First Order Differential Equations By Eliminating The Dependent Variable (Part 1, Solving for y)

 Many times in order to solve a differential equation, all that's needed is to eliminate the dependent variable (y or x). To that end, we look first at solving DEs for y, then for x.

If a first order DE can be solved for y, they n it can be written in the form:  y =  f(x, p)

The total derivative of this equation with respect to x is:

dy/dx = p =  f/ x   +   f/  p (dp/ dx)  

An expression involving only x and p. The objective now is to solve this equation to obtain: 

F(x, p, c) = 0

To obtain the general solution of the original differential equation we need to form a pair of parametric equations with p as the parameter.  Then p can be eliminated to obtain  a solution in x and y along with an arbitrary constant.

Example:  Solve:

p 2 + 2 xp - 2y = 0

(1)  Solve for y to obtain:

y =   ½ p 2 + 2 xp

2) Differentiate with respect to x:

dy/dx = p =  p (dp/ dx)  + x (dp/ dx)  + p 

Or: (p + x)  (dp/ dx)  = 0

From this result we see:

Either:  dp/ dx  = 0  or:  p + x = 0

Hence:  p = c  or p = -x

3) Eliminate p between the last equations and the solution for y:

y =   ½ c 2 + c x

y =   ½ x 2 -   x 2   =   - ½ x 2


Both of which satisfy the original differential equation.  However, note that the 2nd solution does not contain c (an arbitrary constant) so is not the general solution. Rather it is what we call a singular solution.

Suggested Problem:  

Solve by finding a general solution:

 px 2 -   y   =   0