Friday, July 10, 2026

D.E. Littlewood's Elegant Introduction To Non-Commutative Algebras (Pt. 2)

 Continuing on from  D.E. Littlewood's Chapter XIII, (p. 101, Algebras) in his monograph  The Skeleton Key Of Mathematics'  we learn the existence of a non-commutative algebra in higher than 3 dimensions.   Enter Grassmann algebra, also known as Exterior algebra, is an algebraic system created by 19th-century mathematician Hermann Grassmann. It concerns vector products but is applicable to any number of dimensions whereas quaternions (Part 1) are confined to 3 dimensions.

It also extends vector algebra to include geometric objects like directed planes and volumes. Its fundamental feature is the exterior product, which is anti-symmetric, meaning reversing the order of the terms flips the sign, e.g.

e ij  =  - e ji

As Littlewood notes (p. 103):

"In Grassman's space analysis a vector with components:

x 1,  x 2,......  x n

is associated with:

e 1x 1  +  e 2  x 2,.....+     e x n

where the quantities:

e 1,  e 2,......  e n

Satisfy the following:

     e i 2    =   0,    e ij  =  - e ji

In other words, displays the anti-symmetric feature. (e ij  =  - e ji  )

In three dimensions a vector would be of the form:

ae  be 2  ce 3

An element of area would take the form:

ae  e 3   + bee1  +  cee 2

And would thus be distinguishable from the vector with which it would be identified in quaternions. An element of volume would have the single component: k ee 2  e 3

For:

 e1 e 2  e 3  =  ee 3  e 1   =   e 3  e 1  e2 =  -  ee 3 e 2    = - e 2   ee 3

=   -  e 3  e2  e 1

The algebra immediately yields the formula for the area of a triangle as half of the product of the two sides.  Or for the formula of a tetrahedron as one-sixth of the product of three concurrent edges.

Littlewood goes on (p. 104) to make a number of key distinctions to the previous algebra (for quaternions):

- With quaternion algebra there are no factors of zero, i.e. =xy =  0 

IFF  x= 0 or y = 0

- In Grassman algebra some power of every element is equal to zero.

- The square of a vector is zero but the square of every element of the algebra is not zero, i.e.

e1 e 2    +   ee 4 ) 2  =   2 e1 e e3 e 4

Addendum note:

In Grassman algebra the fundamental volume element V  is represented by the wedge product of three basis vectors, i.e.:  

 e1  e 2   e 3  


Problems for budding mathematicians:

1) Consider the parallelopipped  below spanned by the vectors u, v and w in 3-space.

Find the volume of this solid given that:

u = (1, 1, 3)

v = (1, 2, -1)

w = (1, 4, 1)

2)Show how the Grassman algebra formula for a single component of volume element  k e1 e 2  e 3  can be used to find the volume of a tetrahedron.

Find that volume given for this tetrahedron:

a = (3, 0, 0)

b = (1, 4, 0)

= (2, 1, 5)


See Also:

Fundamentals of Grassmann Algebra

Thursday, July 9, 2026

BIS ('Bank of all Central Banks') Connects Dots To Show Proximity Of Global Financial Crash Linked To AI Boom

 


Amidst increasing signs of unchecked AI debt and a mounting bubble, the 'banker of banks' has now weighed in ('An AI Bust's Effects n Global Economy Detailed', WSJ, July 1, p. B12).  That bank of banks would be the Bank of International Settlements or BIS.  According to the WSJ piece:

 "If you're anxious about the AI-impending bubble and its global economic risks maybe don't read the latest annual report from  the Bank of International Settlements. The report released on Monday, lays out in unsettling detail how an artificial intelligence bust could throw the global financial system into disorder.

It comes from an institution that has a good track record of predicting problems, including the 2008 financial crisis.

 So what has the BIS so concerned?  Basically, the ongoing, excessive investment in AI infrastructure from the tech company moguls - to the tune of hundreds of billions. (Open AI plans to spend $600 billion more on AI infrastructure by 2030 despite generating only $2b/ month in revenue - according to WSJ, July 7, p. A14)

Given that up to now the products are not measuring up to the outlays a pullback in financing (and with it lower stock prices) will ensue.   In many ways this is reminiscent of the overselling of the notorious investment trusts in the 1920s - especially with the bankers lending money to those who couldn't afford them to buy them. Hence, a whole vast house of cards was created mostly using money the average person didn't have. A bubble was the result, and a very unstable one. As Andrew Ross Sorkin put it in a May, 60 Minutes interview:

"In good times if stock went  up, it was free money. In bad times, you're on the hook in a very bad way."

As the WSJ article goes on to point out:  

"There's nothing especially new about those concerns, but the BIS connects some other dots. For example, drawing lines between an AI bust and the unusually vulnerable state of consumers, governments and the global economy. U.S. households are significantly more exposed to stocks than in the past couple of decades, both relative to their wealth and their income."

Hence, any significant AI bubble bursting - especially if based on debt, could crater that paper wealth as well as real income. Apart from which those still rising (and already overpriced) U.S. stock prices during this AI boom could risk a major global erosion of wealth in the event of a U.S. tech-focused bust.

The further bad news is that these overspending tech companies are only the "tip of the iceberg", in the take of the BIS.  Basically, if the tech honchos slow the pace of their inordinate capital spending it will spell contractions across a wide front.  Specifically, construction contractors (building the AI data centers) with relatively weak balance sheets, would feel the pain quickly.  This among other financial dominoes, all ready to fall.

The fact that - as in 1929 - debt has come to increasingly fuel investments (in this case for AI), means that there exists an even greater potential for destruction. Why? The BIS notes that government budgets in advanced economies are stretched as it is (especially with Trump's Iran war and reckless tariffs) which means any capacity to reinvigorate these economies via spending is severely limited.   As the WSJ piece points out:

 "Persistent elevated inflation and geopolitical uncertainty  caused by the Iran war make it trickier to find a good response to disruption. These warnings are worth listening to because of where they come from."

Again, reminding readers the same BIS  - a 'Swiss-based consortium for global central banks" - was instrumental in giving advance warning about the 2008 credit collapse.  This was put out in a paper entitled 'Prime or Not so Prime':

Prime or not so prime? An exploration of US housing finance in the new century - BIS Quarterly Review, part 6, March 2006

Which detailed the risks posed by the securitization of subprime loans in the U.S. housing markets. The warning turned out to be prescient and let's just say the BIS could be prescient again in its AI bust warning.

See Also:

‘GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRASH’: Central Bank Issues DIRE WARNING About NEW GREAT DEPRESSION!! |

  • And:

      And:


       


  

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

All Experts Redux: Constellation Patterns in the Sky Random Or Real?

                        Some Fall constellations in Constellation Finder program


Question: Looking at the night sky and using my Constellation Finder, I am absolutely amazed at the degree of similarity between the star patterns and the objects they represent. I mean, the Big Dipper clearly looks like a dipper, no?  Isn't there more here than just random patterns?

Answer: I will give you that the Big Dipper really does have the shape and appearance of a dipper, but this is merely an optical illusion.


What you’re actually seeing is separate stars at wildly different distances simply appearing as one ensemble or pattern by coincidence of time and location. At vastly different epochs the appearance will change, i.e.  100,000 yrs. from now.

Further, the Big Dipper is not actually an official constellation; it is an asterism (a recognizable star pattern) within the larger constellation Ursa Major (the Great Bear).



If you look closely you can see the Big Dipper planted in the Bear's 'tail' at the left end.

My general point here is that any and all such projections and patterns in the end amount to purely imaginary extrapolations from random groups of stars. No actual or absolute pattern conforming to any 'Big Dipper' (or Ursa Major) exists, only as it appears to a certain sub-group of humans at a given time. Indeed, the ancient Chinese saw no 'dipper' at all - but rather a cart to carry their bureaucrats!

You can think of any or all of these as a kind of cosmic 'Rorschach' - the sort of ink blot that psychologists used to show their patients to see if they "perceived" any evident patterns. The blots were such that no two people were likely to see the exact same pattern, since each person came to the observation with a different background, perceptual selection bias and so forth.

 In the end, humans just have a penchant - in their brains – to create or impose patterns. They can see "faces" in the clouds in the sky, or figures of mythological beings in the stars- and project their own meaning and interpretations onto them.

This has nothing to do with any objective findings or facts that reside in the objects themselves. Which is to say that it's no more likely plausible an actual 'Big Dipper' exists in the night sky as a Big Bear. In the end, yes we are talking about nothing more than random patterns.


Tuesday, July 7, 2026

'Little' Holman Jenkins Jr. Cracks Up - Confusing Comcast-MSNOW With FOX News

 


"Little" (in mind) Holman Jenkins Jr. (he whose bellowing twaddle dwarfs his actual mental range), again can't help himself as he bellows in his barks in his latest WSJ op-ed screed (Happy Days Again For TV News?) that:

"Comcast did one shrewd thing. In previously getting rid of CNBC and MSNBC, it wisely stripped the NBC brand from the disreputable liberal propaganda channel (renamed MSNOW) while leaving its name on the business channel."

Adding:

"Of course, in better days Comcast never would have let its brand be devalued by MSNBC in the first place."

Seriously, you demented twit? How about FOX News, currently gaslighting Americans before their very eyes, i.e. regarding the 'pristine' reflecting pool, and Trump never falling asleep on the job despite all the evidence, i.e.



But this is all part of little Holman's shtick which he's now been doing so often he can no longer distinguish reality from psychotic fantasy even when he isn't binging on magic mushrooms.   And as for stark, open propaganda Holman himself takes the cake. Among the most grievous deliberately denying in one nutso column from 2020 ('Disinfecting Journalistic Ethics', WSJ, May 6, p. A13)  that Dotard ever stated people ought to consider 'disinfectant' (injecting it) to cure Covid. Holman yapped:

It was a reporter in the audience who asked an accompanying official, 'The President mentioned the idea of cleaners, like bleach and isopropyl alcohol.  There's no scenario then that that could be injected into a person is there?

But the little liar probably never counted on savvy readers going back and checking the actual news segments, e.g.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9kWsUwTcj8


How many different ways can that be interpreted anyway?  Is a "reporter" asking a leading question or is Trump popping off on his own?  Oh wait, it gets even more choice. To further obscure the issue Jenkins writes:

"The Poynter Institute's PolitiFact website kindly summarized:  'The briefing transcript shows that Trump did not say people should inject themselves with bleach or alcohol. He was asking officials whether they could be used in potential cures."

But this deliberate shading of language is all part of Holman's  time -tested gaslighting shtick: to shave words and meanings around the edge to make the lies appear to be facts. Then assume few of his readers will check his trwaddle. He also did it when he claimed in a Mar. 22-23 WSJ column ( 'CBS Kicks The UFO Habit', p. A13)  the Nimitz pilots were actually chasing actually chasing a 46' Chinese drone, not a genuine UFO (seen by Cmdr. David Frav0r as an incredibly high velocity craft), e.g. his House testimony  - given under oath (unlike Jenkins' blabbery):

Video Navy commander David Fravor gives detailed description of his encounter with a UAP

Jenkins Jr. then claimed the 60 Minutes original report on the Nimitz UAP sightings, i.e.

Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs

 was "retracted" by CBS’  60 Minutes correspondent Bill Whitaker:

 “who states plainly the Pentagon did little to dispel speculation these images taken with night vision equipment were not UFOs but ship’s log identification as drones. At the time and the Navy suspected they came from a Hong Kong flagged freighter sailing nearby."

All of which blather was totally exploded when Ret. Cmdr. David Fravor testified about the incident before Congress (and under oath) in July, 2023. Proving again Jenkins is a consummate liar, spinner and troll.

 We may never know what brand of MJ munchies Holman was snacking on when he wrote this drivel, or indeed what Jenkins insists about the ship’s logs being changed has any valence in the real of non-FOX reality.  We do know Holman is an intentional falsifier and twister of facts almost as bad as his master Trump.  

My point is this his referring to MSNOW as a  "disreputable liberal propaganda channel" is so far in the pot-kettle -black domain that it essentially loses aby meaning without his own and FOX News propaganda volume - which is about 1 million times as large. 

 At least on MSNOW one can get cold hard facts such as:

- The frequency and locations of Trump's proposed ICE detention centers

- The facts surrounding the cold-blooded ICE killings of both   Alex Pretti and Renee earlier this year. I.e. the slaying of Pretti,


All of this was covered up by FOX News and sanitized almost to the point of non-existence by Jenkins Jr. and his WSJ op-ed trolls (Kim Strassel, Dan Henninger)

- The actual size of the 'No Kings protests that were mis represented by FOX.

- The actual facts of how Trump's tampering with the D.C. Reflecting pool led to the algae infestation, not "vandals".

No, if one is looking for shameless and disreputable propagandists and gaslight fiends, one need look no further than Holman Jenkins Jr. and the cabal of paid liars at FOX News.

See Also:


And:


by Thom Hartmann | June 18, 2024 - 5:42am | permalink

— from The Hartmann Report

Hitler’s brilliant propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, famously told the Fuhrer, “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.” Donald Trump and the MAGA faction of the Republican Party have taken Goebbels’ advice to heart, and it’s going to make this fall’s election one like we’ve never seen before.

Already they’ve been lying so often and so effectively that nearly all Republicans, and majorities or near-majorities of Americans, believe:

— the GOP lie that we’re in a recession (we’re in better shape, in most ways, than any time since the 1960s and inflation last month was zero while Ronald Reagan never got it below 4.1% in his entire eight years);
— Republican lies about crime being up (it’s down dramatically since Trump);
— their lies that “Democrats want elective abortion up to the moment of birth” (none have ever said that);
— Trump’s lie that the 2020 election was “stolen” from Trump by “voter fraud”;
— GOP lies that the southern border is “wide open”;
— the Republican lie that Social Security is on the verge of bankruptcy and must be saved by privatization or benefits cuts;
— their vicious lie that queer people are pedophiles targeting America’s schoolchildren; and
— their NRA lie that more and more deadly guns will keep our kids safe.

» article continues...


And:


And:



And:


And:

WSJ's Holman Jenkins Jr. Tries To Blame "FBI Charlie Kirk Sideshow" On Dems? WTF Is This Loon Smoking?




Monday, July 6, 2026

An Introduction To The Basic Equations Of Elementary Astrophysics


                     Webb Telescope image containing hundreds of galaxies

 The fundamental equations of astrophysics, embody its primary principles and are the steppingstone to mastering advanced courses. The equations that comprise the basic inputs into stellar properties are generally covered first. Most students of  physics are already familiar with the gas pressure: P= nkT.  But in astrophysics (i.e. applied to stars) there is also the even more important  radiation pressure:


P R = aT4/ 3

where a is the radiation density constant which is equal to:  7.55 x 10 -16 Jm-3 K-4 and T is the absolute temperature (in K degrees).  The equation above is valid only if the material is in thermodynamic equilibrium (i.e. the distribution of radiation is that of a black body). This is generally true, but some exceptions do exist.

In dealing with stars, energy considerations also arise. In particular, the thermal and gravitational energy of a star are very closely related.  In a perfect gas, the total thermal energy is found by multiplying the number of particles N by the degrees of freedom, f, possessed by each particle. The thermal energy per unit volume is then: ½Nf kT.

The number of degrees of freedom f is also related to the ratio of specific heats (g) of the material by:

g         = (f + 2) / f


where g is the ratio of the specific heat at constant pressure to the specific heat at constant volume:

g  =  C p / C v

Using the equation for a perfect gas and introducing the thermal energy per kg, U, we find:

U = P/ (g   - 1) r

Bear in mind the material inside a star is highly ionized and in physics a fully ionized gas or plasma is mono-atomic, for which g = 5/3.

Using the previous equation for U in conjunction with the virial theorem, it can be shown that for a star with g = 5/3:

2U + W  = 0

where U is the thermal energy for the whole star and W is the gravitational energy such that:

W  =  - G ò o R   M(r) dM(r) / r = - GM2/ 2R

But note the potential energy, V = 2W = - GM2/ R

This can be put into an even more useful form based on the kinetic theory of gases, for which:

P = r
v2/ 3

And: -  W  =  3  Ã² PdV = ò  (P/r) dm

Whence:

   3 ò(P/r) dm    =  3 òv2dm/ 3  =  m v2   = 2 K


Where K denotes the (gravitational) kinetic energy, which is also expressed:

K = GM2/R

Then in terms of the gravitational energy, W:

-  W  =  2K   or  2K + W  = 0

But: W= - GM2/ 2R  so: K = -W/ 2 = GM2/ R

Which checks out.  We are left with these conclusions:

1) 2K + W  = 0 applies to any spherical system in equilibrium where K is the gas kinetic energy and also the gravitational kinetic energy. (K = 3/2(g - 1)U). As we saw before for the internal energy:

U = P/ (g   - 1) r  so:  P/r  = U (g   - 1) 

Then:

 3 ò (P/r) dm =  3 ò U (5/3   - 1) dm = 2 K


2) The binding or total energy of a star ET is then:

 ET  = K + V  = GM2/ 2R  + (- GM2/ R) = - GM2/ 2R

Or: ET  =  W/ 2 = -K

Thus, the total energy of a star is negative and equal to half the gravitational potential energy or the negative of the gas kinetic (or gravitational kinetic).   From the preceding we see that if for some reason ET  decreases, then K increases but W decreases (e.g. the sphere must contract).

Problem for the budding astrophysicist:

For a uniform sphere with a polytropic index n = 0 for uniform density, show that:

 V = -6/5 (GM2/R). 

Take the potential energy to be:

W=  3/ (n – 5) (GM2/ R )