Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Looking Again At The Two-Stream Instability Of Plasma Physics

 Image result for brane space, 2 stream instability

Profile for two-stream instability.
 




















In earlier blog posts we examined the two stream instability, which also has significance for solar and space physics.  We saw it can be induced by an energetic particle stream injected in a plasma, or setting a current along the plasma so different species (ions and electrons) can have different drift velocities. The energy from the particles can lead to plasma wave excitation

 Basically, the two stream instability can be thought of as the inverse of Landau damping, where a greater number of particles that move slower than the wave phase velocity vph (as compared with those that move faster), leads to an energy transfer from the wave to the particles.  In the case of the two stream instability, when an electron stream is injected into the plasma, the particle's velocity distribution function has a "bump" on its tail as shown in Fig. 1.

In two-stream instability, when an electron flow is suddenly injected into a plasma – say for a coronal loop – the particles’ (Maxwellian) velocity distribution acquires a “bump” on its "tail" (higher velocity end of the distribution), consistent with two streams- an unperturbed one ( f  ov) and perturbed one ( f  eb ) applicable to the electron beam (See diagram below ).



In the region where the slope is positive (df   /d v > 0) there is a greater number of faster i.e.  than slower particles so a greater amount of energy is transferred from particles to associated (e.g. Alfven) waves. Since  f eb contains more fast than slow particles a wave is excited, and there is inverse Landau damping such that plasma oscillations with vph (phase velocity) in the positive gradient region are unstable.

Resonant electrons (at ph   >  
w e / k) where  w e  is the electron plasma frequency, i.e.


w e     =  [ne e2/ me  εo½ 


 are the first to be affected by the local wave-particle interactions and have distributions altered by the wave electric field, E1, such that the total energy balance:

E1 (TOT) = ½ E1 w + ½  E1 k

referencing the wave and kinetic (particle) contributions respectively.

Thus, for E1(TOT) = const. then as the electron velocity decreases, the particle kinetic energy decreases and the wave energy density increases.

In Landau damping the exact opposite occurs, so the gradient df(v)/d v decreases, and with it the wave amplitude, while the particle kinetic energy increases- i.e. wave energy lost is fed to the particles (electrons) which gain energy.

Development:

The electron plasma frequency can be written:

w e     =  [ne e2/ me  εo½

Where ne is the electron number density, e  is the electron charge,  me  is the electron mass and ε is the permittivity of free space.

For our purposes in looking at the 2-stream instability we will change the above form to read:

w e2     =   4n o e2/ me  

Similarly, we can write:

w i2     =   4n o e2m i


For the electron ion frequency.

For our purposes also, the Poisson equation, for charges in a vacuum:

Ñ ·E  =  4r           

Can be rewritten:

ik E =  4r  

Now, write   in terms of E such that:

ik (E -  4r / ik ) = ikε E = 0

For cold plasma waves (T e =Ti  = 0)  we can write:


ik (1 -     w e w 2  =  0

So that: ε    = (1 -     w e w 2  )

The dispersion relation here is equivalent to equating ε ( w)  to 0.

N.B.   A dispersion relation implies that a relationship exists between the plasma frequency w and the wave number k.   Now,  and this is critical, because we have ε ( w)  = 0 this implies:

1 =      w e w 2  

Or:   w  =   w e  

Now,  assembling all the preceding results allows us to write:


ik = 4p e [ (ik n o e)/ m iw 2    -   ik n o e/me (w  - k Vo ) 2]

Using the earlier equation for the electron and ion plasma frequencies and basic algebra, the energetic reader can satisfy himself that:

ε ( w)  =  1 -  w i  w 2    w e /(w  - k vo ) 2  =  0

Note that in the limit, m i    -> oo  and  w i -> 0  we have:
 w  =   k Vo  +  w e

We can then look at wave numbers k such that  k Vo  =   w e
  

and acknowledge that that 2nd term above is much less than unity (to cancel the 1st term the 3rd must be close to unity) whence:

0 =  1 -  w i  w 2     -    w e /(w  -   w e ) 2

0 =  1 -  w i  w 2    -    1/(1  -   w  /  w e ) 2


0   »   1 -  w i  w 2    -  (1 +     2w / w e ) 


And:  0 = -  w i  w 2     2w / w e  

w      =  - ½ w i ) 2  (w e)   

Finally, we can write:

w /w e  =   ( -1/2) 1/3   (m e / m i) 1/3       

which represents instability since one of the three values of  (-1) 1/3   is (1/2) + iÖ 3/ 2.

Thus, in the frame moving with the electrons, the Doppler shifted frequency (since   k Vo   =  w e) is:

w’ =   w  - k Vo

Factor into the mix that |  w  |  <  w e    and we conclude this is roughly w’ =   w e  so the electrons are nearly at their natural frequency of oscillation. But there is another way to determine that the dielectric function, i.e.

ε ( w)  =  1 -  w i  w 2    w e /(w  - k vo ) 2  =  0

yields instability. This can be done via a simple algebraic manipulation, so we transpose the negative terms to the right hand side and let: 

F(k,  w ) =  ε ( w)  -  1  =  w i  w 2   +   w e /(w  - k vo ) 2 

We can then plot the resulting function vs. the real frequency (at fixed wave number, k)  as depicted in my 2nd graph above.

Note where the line at unity intersects the graph of  F(k,  w)  at four different points. In other words, there are four real roots and no instability for the selected value of k. But...what happens when the central minimum of  F(k,  w)  occurs at a value greater than unity? Then, there are only two real roots .

To determine when this happens we determine when:   F(k,  w ) >  1, or where the function minimum is determined by ¶ F/  w  =    0.  We then will find:

w  (min)  = (m e /m i1/2  k Vo


Yielding an equation which predicts instability whenever:

| k Vo  |    <   w e

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Is A 'Wave of Pain' Headed Our Way From the Ongoing Strait of Hormuz Blockage?

 A major wave of pain is headed for global economies - perhaps within weeks - thanks to the Strait of Ormuz blockade.  And that wave exists even under the rosiest scenario, say if Trump were to settle matters in a week with Iran. Yes, it will be felt worse in Europe and Asia but will hit business bottom lines like a mega- economic thunder clap.  All this according to a recent Wall Street Journal piece, 'Wave of Panic Is Likely Headed Our Way Over The Hormuz Blockade, April 25-26, p. B4, Exchange).

According to Spencer Jakar, the bearer of this bad news:

"Prices on our screens might be making us complacent about a looming economic drag. The Iran conflicts effects will get a lot uglier.

There's widespread faith that, while not perfect, the stock market is good at seeing around corners.  For example, it often swoons months before economists predict recessions and then rallies before they give the all clear. Millions of people putting their savings at risk distill available information pretty well."

But alas, not all the time.  For example,  the last 'Bear' occurred in the wake of the 2007-08 financial meltdown which itself was triggered by the spread of overrated mortgage securities and credit default swaps. But virtually no one wo plowed money into the market was aware of how treacherous those devices were. 

Earlier there was the bursting of the dot com bubble - with many in 401ks over invested prior to planned retirement. The aftermath saw too many ending up with a withered nest eggs and little more than canned cat food to eat. The reason?  Likely because few in the market at that time (late 1990s) had personally experienced a really long downturn.  But perhaps just as relevant, too many were possessed by an "irrational exuberance" - a term first used by then (1996) Fed Board Chairman Alan Greenspan.

Already, and despite the depletion of critical resources (like liquid natural gas, aluminum, urea from fertilizers, helium to produce semiconductor chips) from the Hormuz blockades, we are seeing bursts of irrational exuberance. For example, the recent breakneck rally in shares of Intel powering the S&P 5oo and Nasdaq - with giddy investors clearly looking past the stark geopolitical tensions, e.g.

The Last Warning Before America's Iran War Collapses the Global Oil Market - Prof. Jiang Xueqin

Intel basically mesmerized investors as it soared 24% in value, clinching its first record since the height of the dot -com boom in 2000.  But that previous experience seems to have fallen into an informational black hole.

As Jakar writes:

"But the hit to global supplies of oil, gas, fertilizer, helium, aluminum and other commodities from the Strait of Hormuz blockade is the sort of thing the market - and most Wall Street professionals- are bad at processing."

He goes on to note this hasn't been the first time a "burbling threat" so obvious in hindsight was underestimated.  Case in point how the Covid 19 pandemic - erupting in 2020 - cratered supply lines and consumption. Still the gravity of the emergency didn't hit Americans until weeks after stocks hit a record on February 19th. (Covid already spreading at a rate quarantines couldn't control.

In the case of our current situation we are getting early warnings. As Jakar notes, it is energy specialists who are sounding alarms that deviate from the Street's "relaxed message".  

Josh Martin, head of securities and equity capital markets at Pickering Energy Partners, said in a recent podcast:

"I've been surprised by how  the stock market is willing to look through the fact that the strait continues to remain closed."

Jakar adding:

"Americans are concerned about pump prices but - with no physical shortages - a billion missing barrels seems as abstract as 10,000 pneumonia cases in far off Wuhan."

But harsh reality is on its way, not just from pump prices to spike - to maybe $5 a gallon in the next week, but outright shortages of gas like we experienced in the 70s.  Long gas lines, or no lines because gas stations closed. People panicked. For now, strategic reserves have dulled the blow and made it seem less serious. But you won't find that rection in Europe and most of Asia now. Many regions are nearing states of emergency.

 Even if that phase isn't reached soon look for the dearth of petrochemicals too have multiple adverse effects, especially in providing fertilizer, as well as diesel for jet transport.  Already, we are seeing multiple airlines close routes in Europe because of the lack of jet fuel.

One can only hope Trump,  who incepted this mess, comes to reality soon and grasps he is not going to get Iran to knuckle under to his demands. They hold all the big cards and they are not giving them up. In the words of Scott Anderson ('Operation Epic Fury Meet Operation Epic Blunder', NYT):

 "Granted, matters might get ugly, but surely this will lead to American victory and an end to the impasse, right? Wrong. Build out an ironclad blockade or put 50,000 American troops on Persian Gulf beachheads, and the Iranians will still retain the ability to fire a drone over their heads to hit an oil-laden tanker and paralyze the global economy anew."

But one can only do so much to get people over their denial. As the WSJ writer observes: "The damage is cumulative. One reason energy futures don't fully reflect this is that any glimmer of hope blows up bullish derivative positions. And two of the largest per barrel drops in crude futures ever, have occurred in the last two weeks".

And so it goes

See Also:

by Richard Heinberg | May 4, 2026 - 4:37am | permalink

`

Pop culture has long memorialized the Warner Brothers cartoon gag in which Wile E. Coyote, lured by his nemesis the Roadrunner, races off a cliff. Instead of immediately falling, Coyote keeps running, then looks down and realizes there’s nothing beneath him but empty space. His expression turns from anger to panic, whereupon he plummets. Coyote’s belated moment of realization is a trendy metaphor for our response to inevitable, though not yet fully realized, consequences of foolish behavior.

For the past couple of decades, we at Post Carbon Institute have been pointing out that energy is the basis of the economy, that oil is our foremost energy source, and that a transition to alternative energy sources will necessarily be slow and incomplete. Given that oil is a depleting, polluting, non-renewable resource, industrial society is due for a reckoning at some point. We are all in an extended Wile E. Coyote moment.

» article continues...

And:

We Have Just Entered the Most Dangerous Period in 100 Years — And Most People Have No Idea | Jiang