Friday, May 15, 2026

One Historical Example of How An Existential Threat Was Neutralized Thanks To Human Cooperation

 


    Diagram illustrating formation and loss of ozone (O3) molecules.



One of the events that got me interested in solar research occurred when a massive solar flare shredded the ozone layer in the early 1970s. The then Skylab orbital observatory reported up to 80 percent of the ozone layer "eroded" by one single super flare (class 4B optical, and X 9 x-ray). The event also aroused my curiosity regarding the ozone layer and its importance for Earth - or rather the organisms that inhabit the Earth.

By now most people know that ozone O3 - is a form of oxygen - and found from 6- 32 miles  above Earth's surface or at the lower edge of the stratosphere. It basically is critical in protecting life forms from the effects of the Sun's ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Take that layer away and you will behold sunburns the likes of which would rival 20 hours straight in a tanning bed, not to mention an explosion of skin cancers.  Minus the ozone layer, in other words, life as we know it would not exist.

So, it is important what happens to that layer.

What disturbed many space and atmospheric scientists is that the ozone layer over the Antarctic appeared to be especially susceptible to erosion, but not from solar flares. We became aware of this via tracking of ozone concentrations by NASA satellites since the 1970s. This paved the way for a study that tapped into that database thereby discovering the adverse role of chlorfluorocarbons or CFCs.

This ground breaking research by Susan Solomon and her team discovered that these chemicals - often released via hair sprays, spray deodorants etc. - reduced stratospheric ozone concentrations all over the world. At that time (1986) industries also used CFCs in refrigeration and dry cleaning. The reduction was observed to be especially bad over Antarctica hence the term "ozone hole".

One by product of the work was to explicate the processes underlying ozone hole formation. It was known, for example, that CFCs destroyed Antarctic ozone every spring. But only later was it revealed that the process begins even before winter.  It commences, in fact, at the summer solstice or shortly thereafter when the Sun rises causing light to strike the ambient CFCs, breaking its chemical dons and freeing chlorine (e.g. CCl3F → CCl2F. + Cl.    )

The freed chlorine atoms (at the end of the right side of the above equation) then strip the oxygen  (O2) from the ozone (O3) to form other chemicals destroying the ozone itself. This leads to the emergence of an "ozone hole" which generally reaches peak area in October.

Solomon et al more recent research can be accessed at this link:

http://bit.ly/science-ozone

It shows the extent to which changes in atmospheric chemistry and human activity are inextricably linked. Specifically, the authors show how public policy efforts i.e. (to ban CFCs) over decades have paid off by shrinking the Antarctic ozone by more than 4 million square miles (a 16 percent decrease) since 2000.  

But let's back track a bit to set the context. In 1985 the world learned about a hole in the ozone layer above Antarctica.  The culprit was later discovered to be an industrial chemical: chlorofluorocarbons or CFCs.  The things became literally ubiquitous because millions - for decades - had been using the likes of spray paints, insecticides (e.g. Raid),  hair sprays and deodorant- antiperspirant sprays. I myself learned I'd been a culprit having used Gillette spray deodorant for years.

But to cut to the chase, atmospheric scientists (like James McDonald in the early 70s) learned these industrial agents were shredding the ozone layer and opening it up to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation.  Unless action was taken the hole would keep growing- leaving millions to go blind or get skin cancers owing to the absence of UV protection. The CFCs had become an existential threat.

Atmospheric scientists (like Solomon), thankfully made the threat  tangible using colored satellite imagery and clear discussion of the health consequences if no action was taken.  In response, the world got together to get ahead of the CFC threat.  NGOs orchestrated boycotts of the hugely popular commercial brands (like Gillette antiperspirant sprays) while school children worldwide ran educational programs and concerned citizens wrote protest letters - even as the UN put its weight behind public awareness campaigns.

The all-out efforts worked so that by 1987, just two years after the ozone hole was made public, every nation had signed the Montreal Protocol.  The successful cooperation resulting in the signing and subsequent ban on CFCs demonstrated it was possible to quickly reach decisive international consensus even amidst international tensions. (The Cold War was still going on under Reagan).  The sequence of images at the top of this post shows the initial growing then stabilizing hole. 

 One key factor in the success, possibly the biggest one, was that the ozone hole endangered virtually everyone on the planet.   In many respects, unchecked climate change is also an existential threat to everyone on this planet, but the urgency to form a unified front to tackle it dissipated.   Is it exaggeration to say climate change rises to the same threat level as the growing ozone hole once did? I don't think so.

Three years ago the northern hemisphere had just experienced the hottest summer in recorded history, including month by month the warmest June, July, August, and (by a country mile) September ever. Staggering heat records were set in place after place globally. Fires from Canada to Hawaii to Europe broke all records. The southern hemisphere had a “winter” from — yes! — hell. Europe was burning up, Greece experienced unprecedented fires and floods as well. Libya had a significant part of a major city washed away. China, too, experienced unprecedented flooding around its capital, where 1.2 million people had to be evacuated, and in Hong Kong, too. 

Meanwhile the sea ice in the Antarctic fell to the lowest levels (yes again!) in recorded history, as did sea ice in the Arctic, helping to ensure a future in which rising sea levels could flood coastal cities. And Greenland has been lending a hand to that same future, starting 2023 with temperatures unmatched in at least 1,000 years and still setting new temperature records in July. Worse yet, that’s just to begin down a list that increasingly seems unending.

In certain parts of the United States, the summer of 2023 was literally a hell on Earth and, as a New York Times piece headlined it recently, also “A Summer Preview of the Future; Floods, Fires, and Stifling Heat. It felt like the opening minutes of a disaster movie.” 

 So what's different from the 1985 tackling of the ozone hole?  First, the climate threat has not been taken seriously especially by the young.   Thanks to the short sighted voting choices of millions (including Gen Z whose futures will be cratered), the orange felon has returned to power and vowed to burn the rest of the planet to a crisp.  In barely 18 months, Trump has so severely damaged the world’s ability to fight climate change, it may never recover.

 This ignorant tyrant has upended U.S. environmental policy with cynical, short-sighted moves that will have lasting implications for this country, and the planet. With a flurry of bogus executive orders-  that have exceeded the limits of presidential power- Trump has gutted federal climate efforts, rolled back regulations aimed at limiting pollution and given a major boost to the fossil fuel industry. 

Trump has also frozen funds appropriated by Congress for clean energy projects, taking particular aim at wind energy, the country’s largest source of renewable power. He has stopped approvals for wind farms on public land and in federal waters and has threatened to block projects on private land.

He's also abandoned efforts to reduce global warming, even as the world has reached record levels of heat that scientists say is driven largely by the burning of fossil fuels. After all, on Inauguration Day, Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris climate agreement, making it the only nation to walk away.

Process that! The only nation to walk away.  Bottom line: given the climate havoc he's wrought, the world and particularly the younger generations inhabiting it, will be left to live fraught and destitute lives as the worst of climate change transpires between now and 2100. The critical time threshold to act on global warming has now likely passed and there's little to do except try to help the coming generations- and other peoples of planet Earth - to prepare as best they can.

See Also:

UN Climate Framework Withdrawal By Trumpers Puts The Planet On Path To Runaway Greenhouse Effect

 And:


WSJ: 'Late Night Posts Offer Peek Into Trump's Mind' - Errrrr... What Mind? The Journal Won't Go There

 

                       A measure of Trump's late night posting derangement

Of course Hamas - as a terrorist outfit - merits a WSJ editorial thrashing ('The Truth About Hamas', p. A14 yesterday) documenting all of its vile, inhuman transgressions.  There's no debate about that. But at the same time, Hamas doesn't control nuclear weapons like Donald Trump.  So why are we not informed about the freaking truth concerning a totally deranged DJT, given the Journal's front page yesterday went into detail about his Trash Social late night postings ('Late -Night Truth Social Bursts Offer A Peek Into Trump's Mind').

Most infuriating is how the story - in the main section - leans into this demented imp's assumed normality, e.g.

"Monday was a typical day for President Trump. He took questions in the Oval Office. He met with members of Indiana University’s football team. And he had dinner with law-enforcement officers in the White House Rose Garden.

After the sun went down, another familiar ritual began: late-night social-media posting. The president’s Truth Social account posted 55 messages between 10:14 p.m. and 1:12 a.m.  The messages, mostly reposts from other accounts falsely claimed the 2020 election was stolen, aired frustrations that Democrats hadn't been indicted by the Justice Department and called for the arrest of Barack Obama for, among other things, that he 'fabricated the finding that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win the White House."

To read these overly-curated and tempered paragraphs you'd think the guy just went about his normal doings on a normal day and then just relaxed over late hours to do some re-posting and la-dee-da.

This in contrast to the more genuine and honest portrayal - showing all dimensions of his derangement - from podcaster Kyle Kulinski, e.g.

Trump Has TOTAL PSYCHOTIC BREAK & Threatens To NUKE IRAN ON LIVE TV | The Kyle Kulinski Show

By contrast, Mr. Kulinski  documents all the mental and physical marks of Dotard's deterioration, with the emphasis on his total unfitness for the job - oh, and proximity to the nuclear codes. Let's also bear in mind that his Monday night Trash Social barrage of unhinged posts was only a fraction of his ongoing insanity.

Last month, the fungal imp even stooped to attacking the Pope, e.g.

Why Trump Is Batting On A Losing Moral Wicket In His Battle With Pope Leo

 In his latest deranged episode he even claimed to "Have a better understanding of the Bible than Leo" e,g,

Trump promotes claim he has a 'better understanding' of the Bible than Pope Leo

But even these attacks were relatively minor compared to his Easter Sunday outburst:

"Open the fucking Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in hell. JUST WATCH! A whole civilization will die tonight never to be brought back again."

Disposing the WSJ weekend columnist Peggy Noonan to write:

"The post left his friends and foes slackjawed. They constituted hitting a new bottom, a new and infernal, face-lit-by -flames bottom, in world communications....The posts weren't showbiz they were sinister. 

You destabilize the world when, as the American president, you say such things. You rob your own nation of a claim to moral seriousness in the military action in which it is engaged."

Again, Ms. Noonan was delivering to the Journal a warning alarm that it needed to get serious in holding this nearly 80-year old senile nut to account. That meant to cease giving him normal portrayals in the WSJ pages, whether for new cabinet picks, the WH Correspondents dinner (and his using it as an excuse for a $1b ballroom) and flip-flopping every other day on the Iran war - resulting in a continual spike on the costs of gas, food, and energy.

Which again makes me wonder, what gives? Why is the WSJ holding back on exposing this orange fruitcake and that he needs to be removed under the 25th amendment?  Why the balking? Is the Journal terrified he will come after them again with another lawsuit? Declare the Journal an "enemy of the state" (i.e. Trump's petty dictatorship?  So what? If you have a scintilla of adherence to objectivity it is your duty to expose this guy as a deluded, demented wackjob not a functional president.   

 A possible hint emerged on the front page  of the WSJ account of Trump's late night posting, to wit:

"The activity is emblematic of Trump's account, which operates as a nearly round the clock, high volume amplification system that blends his own voice with a network of partisan and fringe content. Since the start of his 2nd term his Social account has ballooned to 12.6 million followers, up from 8.6 million."

And there it is: The Journal staff acknowledges his rising claim on attention, likely of his Maggats or other Rightist hardliners from the dregs of the net- who are endeared and totally invested in his every word, fecal meme and vile vomitous insult. So we can say fear of antagonizing these twits is a possible reason. But beyond that, the coin of the realm here is attention, and Trump with his insane antics drives it and knows it is his superpower. 

 As Chris Hayes puts it in his book, The Siren's Call (p. 112):  

"The story of Trump's life is wanting recognition, instead getting attention, and then becoming addicted to the attention itself."

The Journal also has evidently become addicted to the attention Trump gets and 'doubles down' on page A4, showing over a half page of Trump's image memes and insults including the one of him as a Jesus figure, and another of Illinois Governor Pritzker stuffing his face along with the note: "JB is too busy to keep Chicago safe" see e.g.

                                 Some of Trump's memes depicted in WSJ

Prompting podcaster Kyle Kulinski to bark in his own podcast (see earlier link):

"Hey you fat overweight fuck, what about you stuffing your own face?"

The rest of the page included sundry Journal observations, such as Trump saying "Somalia isn't a real nation it's just people walking around killing each other."

Adding: "The posts leave the public with a stew of presidential musings and reposts, many of which are published while people in the U.S. are asleep. Most of the posts get little scrutiny disappearing into the cascade of posts in his account."

And in a separate 'boxed' column detailing the myriad ways Trump "savages his enemies and amplifies his frustrations ...often sharing AI images that cast his opponents as cartoonish and himself as powerful."

Such as the AI cartoon of Barack and Michelle Obama as apes and Trump as the 'king of the jungle' lion.

But again, NO criticism of Dotard in any of the torrent of  his venomous dreck, only noting:

"Natalie Harp, Trump's executive assistant, plays an integral role in Trump's activity. She brings the president stacks of printed -out draft social media posts for his approval."

So we now know at least the orange traitor misfit and felon has an accomplice, who is at least as much to blame as his own narcissistic ego for keeping him up half the night in his deranged posting binges.  As for the Journal, one gets the idea that it's all mostly just harmless entertainment - except maybe for those (like Kyle Kulinski) who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

 Hell, basically the Journal's contributors know if the WSJ plays its cards right some of the Trash Social attention may 'wash off' in new subscriptions. So it walks a tight rope and doesn't hold Trump to criticism too often, perhaps in the odd editorial if then.  And near the end we get the predictable comment from Trump's 'Jabba the Hut' look alike WH Communications Director Steven Cheung:



"Truth Social has never been hotter and it's because President Trump offers his unfiltered and direct thoughts to the American people without the biased media taking him out of context".

This is why it's so important for Americans to gain access to the numerous podcasts and Youtube videos exposing Dotard's dereliction and sheer insanity as well as depravity (in the words of former Trump lawyer Ty Cobb), e.g.

Trump Lawyer Calls For 25th Amendment Over PSYCHOTIC MELTDOWN

So it's important not to be drawn into the rabbit hole (evidently fostered in the WSJ piece) of some kind of Trump normality and novel 'entertainment'. No, hell no, fuck no. There is NO normality there, nor any "entertainment" and no amount of WSJ sane washing can or will  change that.

See Also:

Trump Suffers MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS As Unhinged Behavior SHOCKS THE WORLD!!! | The Kyle Kulinski Show

And:

Trump's Psychiatric Presidential Crisis

And:

The Scary Detail of Trump’s Late-Night Meltdown w/ George Conway

And:

IHIP News:🚨 MAGA Voters BAILING?! DEMENTED Trump ADMITS He's Not Going To LEAVE OFFICE WILLINGLY!!

And:

by Sarah K. Burris | May 14, 2026 - 5:26am | permalink

— from Alternet

`

The downside to spending a year attacking an opponent for his cognition and mental capacity is that your own cognition and mental capacity falls under the microscope. Such is the case with President Donald Trump, who has noticeably slowed as his 80th birthday in June approaches, wrote CNN's Aaron Blake on Wednesday.

In his first year in office, President Donald Trump has appeared to doze off over a dozen times, and there have been multiple questions about it occurring in April and May. The most recent came just this week during a May 11 photo op on maternal healthcare in the Oval Office event. Reuters and other reputable outlets reported video showing the president appearing to doze or repeatedly closing his eyes. It has prompted renewed coverage and White House rebuttals.

Blake recalled Trump blasting the White House a “s— house.” After invading and capturing Nicolás Maduro months previously, Trump openly thought about making Venezuela the 51st state. In another incident, Blake pointed out, Trump couldn't identify Indiana University football coach Curt Cignetti. The coach was standing right next to him and Trump looked directly at him just moments earlier.

» article continues...

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Looking Again At Basic Fractals And Some Basic Fractal Calculations

 

                                                         Fig. 1 - Base space gasket                                                         Fig. 2: A  2-space gasket

We return to fractals again, this time to examine them in more detail at a basic level and some simple computations.  I want to first compare two simple fractal spaces based on an object known as "the Sierpinski gasket". The most elemental form is depicted in Fig. 1 above and can be compared with Fig 2 which is generated from it.

For Fig. 1, we regard the simple (1/a) space as the generator of more complex fractal spaces F that are essentially infinite. To undertake the cyclic generation process we require that the specification of the vertices (a1, a2, a3) be non-degenerate, i.e. no more than one eigenvalue: a1, a2, or a3 can be assigned for any triangular space. The fundamental space depicted in Fig. 1 we shall call a "Planckian gasket" and note that its fractal mass density can be found as well as its fractal dimension.

The fractal mass density can be computed from:

r (f) = {N(s) - N(h)}/ N(s)

or the number of scale elements minus "hole" elements divided by scale elements.

In this case: N(s) = 1, and N(h) = 0, so:

r (f) = {1 - 0}/ 1 = 1

The fractal dimension D f is the inverse, or: D f = 1/ r (f)

In this case we can write,  D f = 1

Now, examining the larger space (2-space)  in Fig. 2 defined by {2/a}, we again obtain the vertex designation (a1, a2, a3).

However, we further note that to get from the primitive space to the space {2/a} we require the transposition:

(a1, a2, a3) -> (a1, a3, a2)

That is, a1 remains fixed, and a2 - a3 are "mirrored" through a bisector axis identified above from, e.g.  a1-a1. Note that the "hole" (in black) represents the inversion space (or negative space: -a1a2a3) a result of the inversion of the positive space of the primitive {1/a}.

The fractal mass density can be computed from:

r (f)  ={4 - 1}/ 4 = 3/4 = 0.75


The fractal dimension is:

D f = 1/ r (f) = 1/ 0.75 = 1.333

Suggested Problem

Draw the space for {3/a} with three symmetric holes of oriented vertices a1, a2, and a3 inside it. Then work out the fractal mass density and fractal dimension. 

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

In A World Governed By Calamity, Criminal Regimes And Chaos It Makes Sense Young People Are Foregoing Children

 

Isaac Asimov warns of overpopulation in 1976 Barbados lecture


"It is now the willingly childless woman who is the heroine of our planet. She is the one who now deserves all the kudos and praise, for helping to do what is necessary to spare humanity from the ravages of over-population"- Isaac Asimov, from his Barbados, 1976 lecture.



The 3-fold increase in human numbers (since 1950) has already stretched food, water and energy supplies to their limits. That increase also has globally diminished the rule of law along with regression of basic human rights.  That was determined in the lead story of Project Censored 2019: 'Global Decline in the Rule of Law as Basic Human Rights Diminish'.

Specifically, the report noted an enhanced regression in fundamental human rights, including: absence of discrimination, right to life and security, due process, freedom of expression and religion, right to privacy, freedom of association and labor rights.  Most notable in the findings:

"Constraints on government powers - which measures the extent to which those who govern are bound by law - saw the second greatest declines (64 nations receded out of 113 named). And most distressing, "The U.S. saw the greatest deterioration."

Specifically here in the U.S., we've graphically beheld Trump's warped ascension to power over the last 10 years and the fracturing of stability, misuse of resources and chaos now spread all over the world. The latest shock being the ravaging of fuel and agricultural resources sending prices spiking as a result of Trump's war of choice against Iran. 

 So, of course, those who are inescapably caught in this dystopian political realm express fear and that fear may include the rational choice not to procreate. After all, why send offspring into a world so full of hate, chaos and calamity? Trump's demolition of climate change initiatives alone will likely bring us to the horrors of the runaway greenhouse effect much sooner. In terms of staple crops for agriculture,  soy, wheat and corn don't do well when ambient temperatures tend to stay over 30 C (86F).  Given the temperatures throughout the world will be much hotter in a runaway greenhouse environment, that means we can predict collapse of key food sources and mass famines. Indeed, the 1.4 C the planet has already heated since the preindustrial era has gouged global agriculture by 21%. That's like wasting 7 years of productivity gains.

 Thus we see, from a Times' piece 8 days ago, another basis for why the young choose not to reproduce and we are talking not just in the U.S. but the world at large - many nations, many cultures, many governments affected

As the NYT piece observes:

"What unites these disparate cultures, policy environments and demographics, researchers are now realizing, is young people’s inescapable and crushing sense that the future is too uncertain for the lifelong commitment of parenthood. Call it the vibes theory of demographic decline."

And the vibes clearly must encompass the fear of overpopulation of the planet itself which feeds into the climate instability given more people means more CO2 produced. As I wrote in my March 25, 2024 blog post:

"An astonishing fact of modern history is taking hold:  No matter what governments do to convince them to procreate, people around the world are having fewer and fewer kids. Many are opting to have no kids at all. What gives?  Is the human race on the verge of self- annihilation owing to population collapse?  Nope. In fact the opposite is true, we are on track to hit 10 billion by the year 2050, it's just that the majority will be in 3rd world (i.e. African, Asian) nations.

According to an article in 'Population Connection' (March) the U.S. birth rate has been falling since the Great Recession, dropping almost 23 percent between 2007 and 2022. Today, the average American woman has about 1.6 children, down from three in 1950, and significantly below the “replacement rate” of 2.1 children needed to sustain a stable population. 

In Italy, 12 people now die for every seven babies born. In South Korea, the birth rate is down to 0.81 children per woman. In China, after decades of a strictly enforced one-child policy, the population is shrinking for the first time since the 1960s. In Taiwan, the birth rate stands at 0.87."

 Isaac Asmiov incisively spelled out the threats from global overpopulation with these points from a lecture he delivered in Barbados in February, 1976:


The Times piece goes on to echo the dystopian themes of Asimov's  1976 Barbados talk and the Project Censored Report:

"The future has never been assured, but it feels as though we are living in a time of spectacular uncertainty. In the United States, job tenures have contracted and income volatility has risen. Life expectancy, once on an inexorable march upward, has fallen for less-educated women and men. Many of the forces our economy is built on — A.I., immigration, global trade — feel distressingly volatile; disruption, once a byword for a disturbance or problem, is the governing ethos of a terrifyingly powerful sector of our economy. The rise of prediction markets has turned the world into one large casino. The climate crisis is spiraling, as are the costs of everything that could enable parenthood, whether that’s a roof over one’s head or child care. The past half-century has brought us breathtaking inequality, accompanied by a sharp decline in social mobility."

Which is perhaps the best summation one could ask for of all the reasons not to have children.  After all, the smarter segment of the global populace has already figured out humanity has outrun its sustainability for living on this planet, e.g. 


The interpretation of the graph is straightforward.  By June, 2030, two full Earths will be needed to support the then human population. Already we are at 1.5 Earths, or 0.5 Earths beyond where we ought to be in terms of our sustainable numbers. 

Isaac Asimov himself, in his 1976 Barbados lecture, believed the carrying capacity of Earth had to be 3 billion, no more. We are already past that by more than 4.5 billion. Again, the severe limiting of numbers ought to have been from 30+ years ago - not acted on just now!  

Beyond this, there is the sheer economics of the situation, and given the degree to which Gen Z (the most plausible baby makers) are saddled with student loan debt and job-income instability, i.e.

A Skewed Economic System (Weighted for the Wealthy) Explains Why Gen Z Is Embracing "Financial Nihilism"

They clearly discern adding more mouths to feed -and house -is an impossible, unrealistic option. Besides, even if it could be achieved how can it be sustained in a world (and nation) beset by polycrises (like the Great Recession and Covid Pandemic)as well as nefarious maniacal sociopaths - like Trump and his family of grifters. This lot seek to enrich themselves.  as they destroy others via their deformed policy agenda - such as destroying medical care, SNAP benefits and precious research facilities. At the same time AI-engineering a total surveillance state, i.e.

A SciFi Movie That's Closer To Reality Than You May Believe Given Today's AI-driven Surveillance State

As the Times piece notes:

 "The two generations currently of child rearing age bear the psychological and financial scars of coming of age amid world-scale catastrophes: Older millennials entered the labor market during the Great Recession; many watched their parents lose their jobs or homes. Gen Z, whose lives were upturned by the Covid-19 pandemic, now find themselves competing against A.I. for entry-level jobs and even prospective partners. The man running America seems single-mindedly devoted to chaos at home and abroad."

And this is a man is not only devoted to chaos but the annihilation of the fabric of the nation including the rule of law, as well as obliterating critical research and countering the climate crisis. Not to mention his destruction of the economy and medical care. So no surprise costs on everything from food to fuel are now so high - and we also see millions are opting out of Obamacare. As one Colorado family put it, it made more sense to exit the ACA then add $4,500 more in monthly expenses. They would have to just take their chances.

With so many aspects of life being deformed then, the rational choice is not to add offspring to the mix of costs and planetary degradation. Will things - events turn around to make such a negative choice look foolish?   This is not likely given the extent to which climate change is now ramping up to catastrophic levels. And it will only get worse, not better - so again why bring a kid int a hellhole world and almost certain destitution - not to mention law of the jungle reactions?

Asimov's answer was you don't do it, don't make life on this planet even worse. Hence his praise for the childless woman as embodied in his quote at the top.

 Bottom line: raising kids now is simply too costly ($250k/ yr. each through high school), on top of paying off college loans and scraping enough moola to rent a decent apartment, far less buy a home.  Hell, the student situation alone is now so bad that many could see their wages garnished in the coming months, i.e.

Student Loan Borrowers in Default Could See Wages Garnished in Early 2026

Interestingly, some sources cited in the NYT piece have offered "faith" as the panacea for the uncertainty dominating our times.  But this solution is too pat, too simplistic. It does not, for example, take into account how white Christian Nationalists (and evangelicals) have flocked to Trump - seemingly unconcerned by his numerous crimes including sexual assaults - and even attacking the Pope. In his latest derangement he even claimed to "Have a better understanding of the Bible than Leo" e,g,

Trump promotes claim he has a 'better understanding' of the Bible than Pope Leo

Indeed, complicating matters further one senior pro-Trump pastor (Jeffress) also went after the Pope:

Dallas pastor Robert Jeffress says Pope is wrong about Iran

None of this sits well with the world's genuine Catholics, who appreciated Leo's Gospel basis for asserting a nation cannot "pray for conquest and blood" in a war. They are also aware that a guy who slaughters innocent fishermen in boat - fancying the video game scene of drone explosions -  and blows up Iranian schools with Tomahawk cruise missiles, has zero grasp of the Good Book.

 It also compounds the chaos and confusion even among faiths, explaining why a majority of adult Americans still don't frequent churches and remain 'Nones'.  Indeed,  fewer than half of Americans even belong to a church or other house of worship.

The pro-Trump Christian Nationalist - white supremacists are also at the core of overturning our democracy and turning it into a Theocracy. So why would any serious person believe "faith" is a balm to navigate these troubled times and even decide to have kids in the midst of it?  Especially when a proven autocrat and criminal is trying to use it for his own promotion, nefarious agenda and demented 'excursions'  

If anything, it's even more reason NOT to bring children into a world turned upside down and lacking any moral compass among the most powerful leaders. Especially one who combines a predatory psychotic malignancy with access to the world's most powerful nuclear weapons.

See Also:

Trump Suffers MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS As Unhinged Behavior SHOCKS THE WORLD!!! | The Kyle Kulinski Show

And:

And:

 Prof. Albert Bartlett Skewers The Trope That "The Total Global Population Is A Meaningless Number"

And:

by Henry Giroux | May 10, 2026 - 4:35am | permalink

— from Truthout

`

Under the Trump regime, the United States has entered a dark age in which conscience is not merely ignored but systematically dismantled. Compassion is mocked as weakness, truth treated as disposable, and cruelty elevated into a governing principle. This is more than corruption. It signals the suffocation of civic culture under gangster capitalism — a predatory system in which power serves wealth, law serves vengeance, and democracy is hollowed out from within.

Donald Trump did not create this moral vacuum. He seized it, refined it, and weaponized it. For decades, neoliberal rule has hollowed out the social state, normalized staggering inequality, elevated billionaires to the status of civic arbiters, and schooled generations to believe that self-interest is the highest virtue. Public goods were dismantled or sold off, civic responsibility withered, and citizens were reduced to consumers, detached from any shared sense of fate. In such a landscape, empathy is no longer a public good but a private burden, something to be shed in the relentless pursuit of profit, power, and spectacle. As Zygmunt Bauman notes in Modernity and the Holocaust, gangster capitalism as a form of fascist politics thrives on “moral sleeping pills” and “the dead silence of unconcern.”

» article continues...

And:

by Amanda Marcotte | May 5, 2026 - 5:09am | permalink

— from Salon

`

Are young men rushing back to church in record numbers? To hear many in the media, especially conservative media, tell it, the answer is a big fat yes. According to these reports, there’s not only a stampede back to the churches by the young, but it’s being led by a surprising cohort: Gen Z men. This, we’re told, is highly unusual because women are typically viewed as more religious than men.

“[Y]oung men in the U.S. say religion is ‘very important’ in their lives compared to young women,” a recent Associated Press story read, noting this is “the first time young men have surpassed young women” on this measure. CNN got in on the action in September with a segment that argued a religious revival among young men was a major trend, with Richard Reeves of the American Institute for Boys and Men declaring that it’s “not politically driven,” even as he admitted that the group seems drawn to Christian leaders that teach women’s subordination. Fox News has heavily hyped this idea as well, producing segments insisting — without good evidence — that young men are converting in huge numbers or that they “are turning to faith more so than young women.” Other outlets like The Blaze and Breitbart have also embraced these claims.

» article continues...

And:

Brane Space: Sorry, Neither 'Trump Accounts' Or Pro-Natalist MAGAs Will "Make Babies Great Again"

And:

The Catastrophe Implicit In A World With 5 Billion More People Than It Can Support