Mark Elias Warned Us: 6 Conservo Supremes' Latest Bogus Ruling Is A "Tragedy For Democracy" - If We Allow It

                                    "When I say 'bow and scrape' you will do it!'

 One should never underestimate the desperation of a deranged autocrat to hold onto total, unchecked power at any cost. For example, Donnie Dotard, earlier this month announced that every American adult citizen would be paid a “dividend” of $5,000 should the Republicans perform well in the midterms. The payout would cost an estimated $1.2 trillion.  The bond market went berserk and sent the 10 year Treasury yield past 5% for the first time in nearly 2 decades. 

Then, probably realizing the move had felony written all over it, the Orange Turd did the next thing that came to his feral brain – do another “emergency’ plea to the Supremes to deliver his voter verification executive order. Sure enough the corrupt six obliged and delivered his wish, e.g.

Supreme Court Allows Federal Voter Identification Tool Ahead of Midterms - The New York Times

Meanwhile, the headline in The Financial Times for Saturday said it all

US Supreme Court lets Trump vet voters’ immigration status

But not delving into how this pernicious piece of judiciary Judas mimicry could cripple Dem voting levels in the midterms using the 'SAVE citizenship' database- a misnomer if ever there was one. How so? It's predicated on a fraudulent purpose; i.e. "to check whether any voter is a U.S. citizen".  Basically, a problem in search of any miniscule facts or evidence.  This is given the instances of voter fraud, as noted by the Brennan Center for Justice are roughly between 0.0003% and  0.0025%. (See links below).  The stated purpose could have as well been" "to check whether any voter is a citizen or a vampire."

So it is just a ruse from this foul Six to enable massive voter purges using a 25 year old data bank created under Bush Jr. (designed to help with eligibility for federal benefits  - NOT  identification of voting fraud), to the ability of renegade states to challenge any election results they don't like. Not to mention - in terms of the first - the probability of 81% errors in tagging a legitimate citizen voter as a fraudulent pretender.  Case in point: In Nevada, officials just debunked the Trump Administration’s false claims that over 15,900 voters identified by DHS were “noncitizens or ineligible.” Their audit proved that all of the voters provided by DHS were in fact citizens and valid voters. 

Worst of all, there is the despicable use of private Social Security individual data to add to their nutso 'SAVE' system. The fact this misbegotten system could now be used to harass and even remove legitimate voters has been called a "tragedy for democracy" by Mark Elias (election lawyer for Democracy Docket). Who added the reason for Trump & Co. for doing this is to "stave off the wave they know is coming in the midterms".

To see more go on the likely effects go to the Deadline White House opening segment from Friday: 

ALERT: Trump-aligned Supreme Court justices hand Trump STUNNING voter suppression win

Another aspect: The cowardly crew of 6 who rendered this emergency ruling left it unsigned. But we damned well know who they are: the same unelected misfits that believe in the wacko 'unitary executive' barf that basically makes Trump a King.

Jamelle Bouie, ‘Why Does Trump Think He Can Act Like A King? (NY Times, 9/26), hits the nail on the head with this Court of anti-Constitutional Trump supplicants:

"Trump believes the court is contradicting itself. It told him he is criminally immune and has far-reaching authority to exercise his powers, but then it wants to limit those powers. His anger is understandable, since this court is very much trying to have it both ways. The conservative justices want to write their vision of unitary executive power into the Constitution and somehow limit this particular president’s ability to use that power for his personal and political ends.

Put a bit differently, when Trump’s assertions of executive authority serve the ideological and institutional interests of the Roberts court, the conservative justices are happy to affirm them. When those assertions cut against those interests, the justices are more inclined to reject them.

This dynamic is why I think it is shortsighted to clap for this Supreme Court for its occasional moves against Trump. Those judgments exist in a context where the court has all but blessed an autocratic, imperial presidency

Trump's clear derangement and malignant narcissism - which forms the basis for his feral energy -  is what drives him to incessantly "work the refs" (6 conservo Supremes) as Jamie Raskin noted in his clip from Deadline Whitehouse Friday.  Thus, having repeatedly been given the benefit of the corrupt 'shadow docket' Traitor Trump has come to expect it as the perfect end around any lower judicial rulings he hates - like the blockage (in congress and courts) of his nefarious SAVE act. So now, when stopped at one level, he automatically runs to his servile Supreme Six to give him succor.

As well as feeding his frenzy of nonstop lies (mail ballots = frauds) while undermining our election integrity via bogus shadow docket rulings. The most degenerate aspect of the latest shadow docket SC stunt? 

"The high court's action wasn't a final ruling in the case. Instead it allows the government to continue with its project while legal proceedings stretch beyond the midterms". (WSJ, Sept. 26-27, p. A4)

This despite: "A federal judge had ruled this summer that the expanded database must be disbanded because it violated laws that prohibit the government from sharing Social Security records and other personal information in its possession."

So, in other words, a purely performative judicial jerkoff to placate the orange pestilence and enable the Trumper Nazis to break the law and try to rig the midterms.  It may work, if too many legitimate voters in too many states are terrified to exercise their voting franchise. 

This particularly applies to any naturalized U.S. citizens. Now is not the time to become fearful irrespective of how many goons Trump dispatches to the polls to act as "observers."

See also:

Brane Space: Mark Elias Was Correct: Supremes Don't Merit A "Gold Star" 

And:

Briefing_Memo_Debunking_Voter_Fraud_Myth.pdf

And:

Non-Citizens Are Not Voting. Here Are the Facts. | Brennan Center for Justice

And:

Heritage Fraud Database: An Assessment | Brennan Center for Justice

And:

Republicans

‘Mood Is Very Bad’: GOP Operative Says ‘Knives Are Out’ As Election Nears

by Sarah K. Burris | September 25, 2026 - 5:12am | permalink

— from Salon

Speaking to Politico's Thursday "Playbook," one Republican operative explained the mood is souring in the party.

“The mood is very bad right now,” a GOP operative told Politico. They are one of the many Republicans working on multiple races this cycle. “The polling is dropping like a rock, the map is expanding, and the knives are out among consultants."

They said there is a possibility they could save themselves from the bloodbath, but it would mean a significant shift.

"There is a world where we win everything if folks can turn it around and there is a world where this midterm is a historical blow out. People are very on edge," the operative said.

» article continues...

And:

Trump Administration | Donald Trump | Republicans

The Best Comeuppance for the First Anti-American Administration – Perpetual Exposure As the Constitution-Killing Party

by Robert Becker | September 27, 2026 - 4:43am | permalink

Electoral, then political payback kicks off the most lasting legal, moral, and knowledge-based assault against discredited MAGA betrayal of Constitutional government

Once upon a time, in a fit of pique induced by punitive fates, a boastful nation contracted a terrible, internal sickness – infected by fundamentalism, racism, wishful thinking, and ignorant reductionism. Not thanks to a foreign invasion, economic disaster, global pandemic, not even a looming asteroid – just the searing contradictions of a country too big for its britches or too unenlightened to act as prudent world leader. Thus it came to pass that a regressive 2024 minority rose up because they just couldn’t stand things as they were, certainly all prior presidents but one. The rampage, however deviant, demanded recognition, then control, then domination, as if a strongman autocratic theocracy was just what highly skeptical founders envisioned.

» article continues...

Reviewing Algebra II (Part Four): Manipulating Complex Numbers, Solving Complex Equations

 Fortunately, there are a number of previous blog posts which will be of use in solving complex or imaginary problems. These are given below:

 Taking Complex Roots (1)

Solution of Complex Roots of Unity Problem

Solutions to Complex Roots Problems

More Complex Roots

Obtaining Complex Conjugates

Brane Space: Introducing Complex Functions (1)

We can begin with a few practice exercises in manipulating complex expressions, the aim being to simplify each:

a) (5 + 2i) (3 + 4i) 

b) (2 + 6i)²

(c)Express:  (5 + 10i)/ (½   -   2i/3 ) in the form a + bi

The solutions follow in order:

 (a): (5 + 2i) (3 + 4i) =5 (3 + 4i) + 2i (3 + 4i) 

In which we are just using the distributive law.

Then:  15 + 20i + 6i +  8i² = 15 + 26i + 8(-1)

= 15 + 26i - 8  Or:   7 + 26i (Simplest form)  

 (b): (2 + 6i)²   =   (2 + 6i) (2 + 6i)

Using the distributive law again:

 2(2 + 6i)  + 6i(2 + 6i) =  4 + 12i + 12i +  36 i²

= 4 + 24i  + 36 (-1) =  -32 + 24i (Simplest form) 

(c)(5 + 10i)/ (½   -   2i/3 ) 

  Þ

(5 + 10i) (6)/ (½   -   2i/3 ) (6)  

= 30 + 6o i/ 3 - 4i

 Þ

30 + 6o i (3 + 4i) / 3 - 4i (3 + 4i)  =

90 +  120i  + 180 i  + 240 ² /  (3²   +  4²  ) =

-150 + 300i/ 25   =  -6  + 12i (Simplest form) 

Finally, consider solving a complex equation:

x²   +  12 =  6x  

for which we need to find the complex roots.

Solution:

Begin by writing the equation in standard form:

x²  - 6x  + 12 = 0

This is easily seen to be a quadratic equation for which we will need to use the quadratic formula:

The key aspect to bear in mind is that the discriminant (term inside the radical sign) will always be a negative term for a complex equation. In this case, given a =1, b = -6, c = 12 we have:

 b ²  - 4ac    =  36 - 48  =  -12

Substituting values for the full formula:

x =  6 +  Ö(36 - 48)/  2(1) 

=

6 +  Ö -12/  2  =  6  +   Ö (4)/Ö (3)/ Ö (-1)/  2 

Þ

6 +   2i Ö (3) /  2 =

 3 + i Ö (3) 

Selected problems:

1)  Write: (2 + 3i)/ (1 + 2i) in the form a + bi

2) Show the product of a complex number a + bi and its conjugate (a - bi) is a real number. (You can use the result from (1).

3) Find the product: (3 - 5i) (2 + i)

4)  Write in the form a + bi:

Solve each of the following:

5)   x²   +  32  = 0  for all roots  

6) x⁴   - 1  = 0

7) x²   - 4x  + 8 = 0

8) x²   + 10x + 29 = 0

9) 4x²   - 4x  + 5 = 0

10) 4x - 7  = x²  

Did Open AI's Collective Of Agents Really Solve The Navier -Stokes Equations (In 3D)? Not Quite

AMS Newsroom

Statement from American Mathematical Society Leadership on Navier-Stokes Problem:

"The news today of progress on resolving the Navier–Stokes problem, one of mathematics' great longstanding challenges concerning the equations that govern the flow of fluids, represents a milestone advance in human knowledge. This story began with Navier, Stokes, Leray, and Ladyzhenskaya and has culminated in the recent breakthroughs of Córdoba and Martínez-Zoroa, then — assisted by new technologies — Alpöge and Buckmaster, with the final steps taken by OpenAI mathematicians. The purpose of mathematics is human understanding, and this achievement, and the process that led to it, will bear fruit for a long time to come."

The statement by the AMS does not assert a solution has been found to the 3D Navier-Stokes equation, mainly because there is still an open debate. (See Note 1).   This is mainly because the Open A.I. chosen "forced fluid scenario" relies on a contrived external force that does not occur in real world fluid dynamics. Removing that contrived force causes the mathematical singularity ('blow up') to disappear.  This is neat, but then little useful insight emerges into actual physical turbulence (or the unforced Navier-Stokes problem researchers really care about.)

Despite this, it is still possible to approach to the history and background of the Navier-Stokes equation, to puts in perspective this partial achievement, starting with the classic 2D methods.  To fix ideas we are concerned with an 'ideal fluid' moving under an internal force known as the pressure gradient, i.e.  Ñ p. 

The original Euler formulation in 1755 recast Newton's 2nd law (F = m dv/dt) in terms of the velocity vector field  v (x (t), t) and the scalar pressure p (x (t) t) of an incompressible fluid.  Then the form of the resulting equations is:

1) ¶ v/ ¶ t + (v  · Ñ) v  =    - Ñ p   (x Î R ⁿ ,  t > 0}  

1a)  Ñ · v  = 0  

With the initial condition: v (x (t) = v_o (x)

Where  v_o (x)  is the given divergence-free vector field.  Jump forward now to  1822 and the French mathematician Navier has derived a modification of the Euler equations, viz.

2) ¶ v/ ¶ t + (v  · Ñ) v  =  e D v  - Ñ p   (x Î R ⁿ ,  t > 0}  

And:   Ñ · v  = 0  

Again with the same initial condition.  Note that effects of non-linearity are "strikingly different" in two vs. three dimensions.   The 2D Navier-Stokes equations are classical results proved in 1933 (by Jean Leray) while the 3D version amounts to the same Clay prize problem. (Ref. 1).

Navier included the factor  e as simply a function of the molecular spacing. Also a crucial difference between the 2D and 3D scenarios is the constraint that eqns. (1) and (2) impose (in 2D) on the evolution of the vorticity. (op. cit.) Taking the curl of (1) and (2) gives the equations for the evolution of the vorticity in an inviscid fluid, the first of which:

¶w/ ¶ t + (v  · Ñ)w   =    (w  · Ñ) v

I noted (in my Aug. 11 post) this equation could be applied to the newly discovered solar vortices, e.g.

given that the solar plasma is highly inviscid. But in the curls noted one other result appears for a viscous fluid:

¶w/ ¶ t + (v  · Ñ)w   =    (w  · Ñ) v  +    e D w

which can be seen as the analog to Navier's modification of the classical Euler equations in 2D. (Equations (2) above). Note the term (w · Ñ) v  vanishes in 2D. Still, although the inviscid and viscous equations remain nonlinear they are significantly simpler than the 3D equations. (Op. cit., Ref. 1)  In 2D the inviscid equation (the one which also may apply to solar vortices) becomes:

¶w/ ¶ t + (v  · Ñ)w   =    d w/ d t  = 0

So in 2D the vorticity is a scalar conserved along the trajectories of the fluid particles. (Ibid.)  Interestingly, where the solar vortices are concerned it is precisely the Kelvin circulation (or Kelvin-Helmholtz) instability where the relevant theorem for 3D flows preserves the (w  · Ñ) v  term so there is no vanishing.  This "may be instrumental in creating blowup for the Euler equations". (Ref. 1, p. 9) 

 All of this shows the solution to the Navier-Stokes equations may be a bit farther away than the Open AI agents solutions suggest. In any case nothing will be final until the results get published in a peer-reviewed paper. (And claims are settled with mathematicians who insist they got there first.)

Ref. 1:Cannone, Marco and Friedlander, Susan: Notices of the AMS, Navier: Blowup and Collapse, January, 2003, p. 7.

 Note 1: The Clay Mathematics Institute still lists the problem as unsolved. Official validation requires formal publication in a peer-reviewed journal and a multi-year community review process, and OpenAI stated it does not plan to claim the $1 million prize.(In September, Open AI announced that a collective of coordinating agents used an unreleased model to produce a proof showing the equations can develop a singularity or blowup in finite time.

 

Why A Plurality Of White Women Remain Entranced By Trump - And The Aspiration To 'Mar-A-Lago Face'

 

                        MAGA  white women,  delirious for Trump

                          White RC nuns loved the pussy grabber too.

Incredibly, despite major efforts in the 2024 election to wake up white women to voting D, such as the mass voting campaign ('White Women For Harris')  organized by Shannon Watts which raised over  $11 million via super Zooms:

                                                    Shannon Watts
             

55 percent still chose Trump - obvious from multiple drooling scenes at the RNC:

                 Delirious white women gasping at Trump at 2024 RNC

As in earlier election cycles a majority of white women denied Kamala a chance for history, as these fools have voted Republican in every presidential election this century. And it is "white Christian women" who have been chiefly responsible for the Republican advantage. What gives?

Basically they are all in with patriarchy and having authoritarian white men - whether Trump (or  a barking hubby) leading them around by the nose. We know this is true given many polls have confirmed it, some even copping to the admission they 'will only vote as my husband does'.  This, of course, was at the bottom of Kamala's campaign ad (The One Place in America Where Women Still Have a Right to Choose ) - featuring Julia Roberts - saying in a voiceover:

 "In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote any way you want and no one will ever know." 

The 30 second spot featured a woman who arrives at a polling station with her husband who appears to be a Trump supporter. Before entering the voting booth she casts a knowing glance at another woman before smiling and casting her ballot for Kamala Harris. 

Afterward, when hubby asks: "Did you make the right choice?" The woman proudly says: "Sure did, honey!" (The ad concluding with the tagline: 'What happens in the booth stays in the booth'.

Of course, in the aftermath the Rightist Trumpers and especially their 'MAGA  white women' went ape shit. Trump himself, imbecile that he is, questioned why a wife would hide her vote from her husband. Turning Point Founder Charlie Kirk described it as "marital subversion". Suggesting any woman who'd betray her Trumper hubby would need to be brought back to the straight and narrow.

That elicits the question, who are these MAGA women who would be so docile as to yield their free will and choices to patriarchal, authoritarian bullies? Well, a goodly set appear to be "Trumpworld" glam girls who follow the makeup rules of the likes of Adrienne Gray:

                                   Gray:"We like the Mar-a-lago face!"

The key trait is to establish an almost surreal template "repeated across the faces of Trumpworld women like a uniform."(WSJ, Aug. 26, 'She's Got The Right Stuff In Her MAGA Beauty Bag')  In other words, turn millions into the modern version of the Stepford wives, based on the 1975 movie where the men of a quiet Connecticut town replace their independent wives with submissive, robotic replicas.  Well, Gray's routine and that of other MAGA women comes close, given most plastic surgeons describe the aesthetic as displaying a "highly uniform, curated look".

How so?

- Liberal use of dermal fillers to create plump ('pillowy') lips and high cheeks

- Heavy use of Botox to create high foreheads.

- Baby doll false eyelashes to create 'high-drama eyes'

-  All steps - and possible plastic surgery - guaranteed to end up with 'Mar-a-Lago face.

Thence, the women - like Karoline Leavitt, Bettina and Lara Trump - reach their acme in beauty standard for Trumpworld because, we are informed: "Conservative women love feeling beautiful!"  Or perhaps more like Stepford wives to match their robotic submission to Dotard and their hubbies.  Their basic role then is somewhat anodyne or tame - just show off a fake standard of beauty they believe will drive more young women to the Trumpworld side.  

Then there are the 68 percent of white women who identify as Christian, and in 2024, two-thirds of those — and more than eight in 10 white evangelical women — voted for Trump, while nearly 8 in 10 white women with no religious affiliation voted for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Conventional wisdom suggests that opposition to abortion drives Christian women to vote Republican, but even among white evangelical women, the religious group most stalwartly opposed to abortion, polls shows abortion ranks well below issues like the cost of living, immigration and crime. 

What was the pivotal event for white women to back the self-confessed pussy grabber? Easy.  It was the attempted assassination of Dotard back in July, last year, complete with his raised fist,  shouting 'Fight, Fight, Fight!"

                                                  "Fight! Fight! Fight!"

All the white women could see was a 'superhero', one who would protect them against the 'radical leftists', Antifa, black & brown immigrants and the crazed abortionists. As the authors of the book Regime Change observed, Trump had seized the moment of his near assassination, taken advantage of it, and he'd work it for all it was worth to ensure re-election.

Elicited one WaPo commenter to write the next day:

"Let's not sugar-coat the black heart of a fascist is still black  just because a bullet grazed his ear."

Turns out the writer was correct. According to a New York Times piece the following Sunday  ('Trump Suggests No Laws Are Broken If He' Saving Country'):

“Trump on Saturday posted on social media a single sentence that appears to encapsulate his attitude as he tests the nation’s legal and constitutional boundaries in the process of upending the federal government and punishing his perceived enemies.

He who saves his Country does not violate any Law,” Mr. Trump wrote, first on his social media platform Truth Social, and then on the website X. By late afternoon, Mr. Trump had pinned the statement to the top of his Truth Social feed, making it clear it was not a passing thought but one he wanted people to absorb."

Adding that Trump's survival of the attempt proved he had "divine backing" to enforce his will.  And the white women gobbled it up. This despite Financial Times columnist Edward Luce pointing out in his column ('America is staring into an Abyss’) the day after the attempted assassination:

"No honest accounting of America’s fetid climate can ignore the fact that the former president himself is the country’s most influential exponent of political violence. "

 No matter to the white women Reep voters, they were all in with the god man. They wanted the top thug to wield his violence against all the perceived threats: abortionists, immigrants (especially black or brown), atheists and leftists. This still leaves the question: Why run to a self-admitted pussy grabber for protection?

Recall, in a previous post (January 9, 2019), I  referenced the anomaly of  a certain subgroup of white women gravitating to Trump, even after his infamous Access Hollywood tape was exposed. In that tape he openly bragged about "grabbing 'em by the pussy".  .  There is, of course, a well known pathology among certain females who are attracted  toward pussy -grabbing pseudo presidents, serial killers, generic psychos and even family murderers, e.g. the murdering filth Chris Watts:

Chris Watts Inundated With Love Letters Behind Bars: 'I Want to Get to ...

https://www.insideedition.com/chris-watts-inundated-love-letters-behind-bars-i-want-g...

So why not these RC nuns at the Trump rally? Why would they -  because they wear a  habit - be immune to this malady?  My psychology post doc niece Shayle has her own theory:  "They've taken a vow of chastity, and this is a slightly defiant way of getting a vicarious thrill by being in proximity - in a public setting - to an admitted pussy grabber."

I already addressed the issue of evangelical white women being captivated by a pervert like Trump in this previous post from 2018:

Why Do White Christian Evangelicals Worship A Pervert Prez Who Loves Spankings & Golden Showers?

Another possibility - which I rather lean toward-  is that these women (including the two nuns) have become so inured to Dotard's crass behavior, gaslighting and racist dog whistles in the past three years they've become like Stockholm syndrome victims. Lance Morrow actually raised this as a conceivable explanation for why the Dems way back in October, 2018 might not take back the House (WSJ, Oct. 19,  'We've Grown Accustomed To Trump', p,  A19) writing:

"Familiarity and the passage of time may breed a certain kind of acquiescence, even grudging acceptance.  We see a touch of the Stockholm syndrome.

My guess is that the variations on Stockholm syndrome will play a role in the minds of independent voters in the 2018 midterms, producing a slightly friendlier inclination toward Mr. Trump and anyway, toward Republicans."

Of course, Morrow's midterm projections didn't happen. Most independents saw the insanity and disruption of Donnie Dotard and sided with millions of Dem voters to generate what we now recognize as a true blue wave.  Despite massive gerrymandering in Reepo -governed states (like MI and WI), it succeeded in taking back the House with the largest majority since the Nixon era.  Nonetheless, the Stockholm syndrome Morrow invokes may have played a role in keeping too many right leaning white women in fealty to Trump.

But the two nuns?   That requires deeper thought, in this case viewing Trump as an ironic choice (by their deity) to protect the life of the unborn.  Or perhaps to halt the use of contraceptives by young women not bound by chastity vows-  in this case via Trump's denial of service exec orders issued under the guise of "religious freedom".

So to these nuns, despite his crass, pussy grabbing bravado, Trump would appear a kind of  savior. I mean who can forget the psychotic words of wacko televangelist Paula White at a Florida rally back in July, i.e.:

"Let every demonic network who has aligned itself against the purpose, against the calling of Mr. Trump, let it be broken. Let it be torn down in the name of Jesus! And I now declare that President Trump will overcome every strategy from Hell and every strategy from the enemy!"

 In that respect, these two nuns may well be on the same unhinged wavelength as Paula White, and totally believe Trump is the bulwark against some insidious evil, as opposed to being an embodiment of evil.  I.e.

Controlling The Evil Tendencies Of Wannabe Tyrants' Brains Should Be A Top Priority

  I  mean, look at their faces, these Trump-loving women are not self conscious in the least.  It occurred to me looking at them that they may well feel totally content, confident and morally justified sitting in that audience of moral dunces and twisted crackpots. Think about it and how these fools got involved with Donnie the Deviant.

Despite knowing about his affair with Stormy Daniels, her beating his ass with a book, and his pussy grabbing penchant,  they've mutated into his staunchest defenders. Indeed, they are uniquely brazen to the extent to which they justify any means to favored ends. His evangelical Christian supporters, for example, are willing not merely to excuse Trump’s adultery and deceit but also to embrace them: The more vulgar he is, the more he fulfills his supposedly divine mission.  You have lots of  spineless weaklings giving him "mulligans" in golf, but this boggles the mind:  to be awarded them in spades for serial morality transgressions.  And lo and behold by a bunch who profess to be holier than any other sect in the US of A.  They "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ", but don't you dare say a word against the pussy- grabbin' Dotard!

In the same vein, it's evident these two nuns - smiling behind the 'Women for Trump' sign - take to Trump for the same reason white evangelicals have.  That is, he is the ironic choice of their God to halt the downward  spiral of America,   based on too many abortions and too much sex out of wedlock (using gov't provided birth control).  

Again I recall here how my sister-in -law Krimhilde (before she fell victim to Alzheimer's) described these mental and moral misfits:

"They preach love and God's mercy to sinners, but their souls  have been degraded by  hate. This hate is against all others unlike them, whether immigrants, poor black people  or gays, or atheists.  So they seek to remake  their god hateful in their image.  They also knew they needed a strong  darkness to cover and protect their own hateful darkness so they used Trump to that end.  They really have sold their souls to purchase what they believe is spiritual security but is really selling their souls and faith to a human devil."

Those two nuns would do well, when they return to their convent, to consider those words carefully. As for The Evangelical white women hypocrites who worship the ground Trump walks on, and who chose to elevate him to Christ level - enabling his reelection-  they don't give a crap how many pussies he grabs or porn stars he fucks. Just as Jim Jones' female worshippers at Jonestown didn't care how many People's Temple women he had sex with - even those with husbands. 

 As one 20 year old self- proclaimed Evangelical female put it at the RNC:

 “Trump may be a sinner, but his positions represent my religious values. All I need to see is a speck of my faith represented!”

 Well, how about a speck of brain power, girl? Or is that too much to ask?

See Also:

Republicans

MAGA Loves Motherhood (If You’re White)

by Mitchell Zimmerman | September 26, 2026 - 4:38am | permalink

Creepy. That’s the word for the rising right-wing interest in family policy, exemplified by a recent administration proposal to pay $9,000 each year per child for women to stay at home with their children. The money would come from, and deplete, an existing federal program that helps working parents pay for childcare.

Of course, that program, the Child Care and Development Fund, is already woefully underfunded—only 1 in 7 eligible parents is able to use it. Most of those are single working mothers, the kind of hardworking people who do tough work for low wages and are derided by conservatives as “Welfare Queens.” They would not be eligible for the stay-at-home moms benefit.

MAGA leaders like Vice President JD Vance have a model of family life that is a caricature of a 1950s TV family: Dad works and Mom stays home with the kids, shops, cooks, cleans house, and puts on a clean apron and a big smile for Dad when he comes home from the office. A woman’s appropriate concerns in that model life are “Kinder, Küche, Kirche.” Children, cooking, church, as 19th-century Germans described the feminine role.

» article continues...

And:

Donald Trump

The Second Worst MAGA Trump Calamity — More Than Equal to Its Constitutional Concussion

by Robert Becker | August 30, 2026 - 4:56am | permalink

And:

What's With All The RNC Women Transfixed By Trump & Macho Apes In Milwaukee? Ans. MAGA Machismo + BSOs 

And:

Brane Space: The Awful Truth The MAGA Trumpies Can't Bear To Hear

And:

MAGA Christians Go Full Adolf H*tler | The Kyle Kulinski Show