The Wall Street Journal's editors, tired of blaming Dems for super high prices and lacking the balls to expose an orange traitor, have found a new target for their ire. These weasels are now taking Traitor Trump's side in a lawsuit recently filed to block the AK Senate electoral result - IF the Reepos don't win. In their weekend Journal editorial, Exposing ‘Decoy Dan’ in Alaska, they go all in attacking Dems for "whining about a lawsuit exposing their dirty ballot trick."
The nattering nabobs of negativity squeal:
"Democrats pulled a dirty trick by enlisting a decoy, Daniel J.
Sullivan, to run against Republican Alaska Sen. Dan S. Sullivan. Now they are
indignant that the Trump Administration on Thursday filed a lawsuit that calls
attention to their subterfuge. Please spare us the lectures about election
interference.
The Justice Department lawsuit seeks to block certification of
Alaska’s
Senate election results if they “may be impacted by voter confusion.” “Daniel
J. Sullivan’s presence on the ballot threatens to mislead Alaskan citizens who
want to vote for Senator Sullivan,” the lawsuit says. That’s the Democratic
hope."
One can hardly believe these asswits would go after this political coincidence - painting it as some kind of nefarious plot - when they've said nothing - not word one - about Vivek Ramaswamy’s vile campaign ad featuring his opponent (Amy Acton’s) mother. That hag actually lived with her 12 year old daughter’s rapist, and has now sought to accuse Amy Acton (D- candidate for OH governor) of lying.
In the ad, Acton’s mother, Donna Arthur, calls her “a liar.” Arthur and her daughter have not had contact since 1978, when Arthur’s second husband, Cledith Arthur, was indicted and charged with raping his 12-year-old stepdaughter. Acton and her brother were removed from the couple’s home because of the threat of continued abuse.
And the Journal's hypocrite editors said not one word about it? Well, probably because the WSJ editors prefer to continue to suck Traitor Trump's ass. As we read in the (regular, main page) WSJ piece from Friday ('Trump Praises Ohio Ad Featuring Deomcrat's Estranged Mother', p. A3) wherein we read:
"President Trump defended an attack ad against Democratic gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton that featured her elderly, estranged mother, calling it 'very powerful'. Also accusing Republicans who condemned the spot as playing into Democrats' hands."
As for the vicious little turd Vivek Ramaswamy, his campaign "plans to spend $4 million airing the ad", despite the bipartisan denunciations it has received, including from Ohio’s Republican governor, Mike DeWine.
The Journal article goes on:
"Trump's remarks came a day after Vice President JD Vance also defended the ad. He criticized fellow Republicans for 'whining' about the video saying that 'politics is tough business'."
Really? Then can we not also say the WSJ editors are also whining about the Dems in Alaska - by using a conspiracy meme to claim the Ds are "facilitating the entry of another Dan Sullivan into the Senate race". Even if real - as Vance said, 'politics is tough business'" - so why not get over it?. Besides, where is your outrage at the Ramaswamy maggots running a vile ad featuring a video of a woman who stood by her 12-year-old daughter's rapist even after the slime was indicted. So in other words, pussy grabber Trump is fine with supporting an ad which features the supporter of a child rapist.
Back to the WSJ editor's claim that the presence of Daniel J. Sullivan is a Democratic dirty trick. Can we say horse shit here? Daniel J. Sullivan, who lives in the tiny fishing community of Petersburg, has always said he is running of his own accord. But given the stakes are high, and Republicans worry that voters will get confused and accidentally vote for the wrong Sullivan, they’ve been trying to get Daniel J. thrown off the ballot for months.
The lawsuit went all the way to the Alaska Supreme Court, but Republicans lost. Got that WSJ nattering nabobs? The REEPS LOST! Besides, why are you fools so worried when even a low IQ person can tell the difference between a D and and an R, and an I - behind a name on a ballot.
Long story short, Alaskan voters will see "Dan S. Sullivan" identified as a "registered Republican" and "incumbent" on their ballots, while "Daniel J. Sullivan Jr." will not have a party affiliation.
Former House Rep. Mary Peltola is the actual Democratic candidate.
At the end of the day the WSJ editorial is just another rhetorical 'storm in a teacup' done at the behest of bowing and scraping to their orange Overseer Trump. So Murdock's Morons aren't exposing anything except their own partisan B.S., so desperate are they to keep Trump's power unchecked so he can demolish what's left of this country.
See Also:
Why
Legal Experts See the Justice Dept.’s Alaska Election Challenge as Dubious -
The New York Times
Excerpt:
The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit pre-emptively challenging the
certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican candidate narrowly
loses. But election law specialists said the litigation lacked any legitimate
legal basis.
“It is one of the weakest election lawsuits I’ve ever seen,”
said Richard H. Pildes, a New York University law professor who
specializes in election issues. “It should have no realistic chance of success
in the courts.”
Nevertheless, the lawsuit raised alarms as President Trump
has sought to undermine confidence in the election when polls indicate that
Republicans are likely to suffer sweeping losses, with control of Congress
hanging in the balance. Mr. Trump tried to overturn his loss of the 2020
election, culminating in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot.
The litigation centers on an oddity in the four-candidate
ballot. The incumbent Republican senator, Dan Sullivan, is being challenged not
only by the Democrats’ nominee, former Representative Mary Peltola, but also by
a novice candidate with almost the same name: Daniel J. Sullivan Jr.
Voters could mistakenly vote for the other Mr. Sullivan
instead of the senator. The lawsuit seeks a judicial order blocking the state
from certifying the results if Senator Sullivan loses to Ms. Peltola, but would
have won had he received votes cast for the other Mr. Sullivan.
No obvious legal authority supports a pre-emptive effort to
block the certification of Alaska’s Senate election if the Republican incumbent
narrowly loses.
Add:
Opinion | Despicable Doesn’t Begin to Cover It - The New York TimesBy now, you almost certainly know
the story. Vivek Ramaswamy, the Republican candidate for governor of Ohio,
posted an ad featuring a malicious attack on Amy Acton, Ramaswamy’s Democratic
opponent. The ad starred Acton’s own mother, a woman named Donna Arthur.
The family story here is evil. Arthur married a man named
Cledith Arthur, who became Acton’s stepfather. Cledith Arthur was indicted when
Acton was 12 for raping her. He fled the jurisdiction rather than face charges.
Donna lost custody of her children and — as Charles Hilu at
National Review reported — she has her own criminal history. She was
convicted of theft by deception in the 1990s and accused of animal neglect in
2021.
It’s hard to imagine a more cruel and evil act than raping a
child. There is no betrayal greater than the betrayal of a child by a parent.
And then Ramaswamy compounded that betrayal by wielding that evil mother as a
weapon against her own daughter.
Long ago we learned that there is no bottom for MAGA,
and there is still no bottom to this scandal. If Ramaswamy had a molecule of
decency, he would take the ad down and apologize. Instead, he attacked Acton. “It is an ad from our campaign,”
