Tuesday, May 12, 2026

All Experts Redux: What Is Sidereal Time and How Is It Measured?

 Question:  Can you explain what is sidereal time and how one can find it?  - Marge M., Montreal


Answer:

"Sidereal time" basically means time by the stars, i.e. using star positions to obtain the time at one's location.   The diagram below is useful as a reference:

















Here, the observer ('Obs') at longitude L with respect to Greenwich (G, or the Greenwich meridian at 0 degrees). The L.S.T. or local sidereal time is 6h 00m as denoted by the fact that 6h Right Ascension (RA) is on the observer's meridian. Then the hour angle (HA) for the star will be as shown. (Note: the view shown is a POLAR one, i.e. the Earth as seen from above Earth's north pole).

The crucial thing to note is how the sidereal time is related to RA as well as hour angle. So to find it one usually needs to know - or find- these measures as well.

The Right Ascension (RA) is measured in units (hours, minutes, seconds) associated with time, and the Right Ascension of the star is clearly equal to the local sidereal time (L.S.T.) plus the hour angle (which in this case is negative). Thus, we can write:

HA = RA of observer meridian - RA of object

Again, the hour angle is the angular distance in hours separating your local meridian and the RA of the object. It increases westwards, unlike RA - which increases eastwards. As may be seen, the RA of the observer's meridian (6 h in Figure 1) is none other than the local sidereal time. If you know what Right Ascension is on your meridian you know the L.S.T.

Another useful expression used often is:

Local time of transit (L.T.T.) = Star's RA - Sun's RA

Where L.T.T. is the local mean solar time of transit (or L.M.T.) of the star or other object and Sun's RA is the Sun's Right Ascension on the particular date. A simple interpolation method is adequate (for most purposes) to obtain the latter, given the base data for the specific dates of the solstices and equinoxes below:

Date: ----- March 21---------June 22-----------Sept. 23--------Dec. 22

Sun R.A. ----( 0 hr.)--------(6 hr.)-----------(12 hr.)----------(18 hr.)

March 21 is just the (approx.) date of the Vernal Equinox, June 22 is the summer solstice, Sept. 23 the autumnal equinox and Dec. 22 the winter solstice. Since the Earth complete one circuit of the Sun in 365 days, the Sun (as seen from the Earth) will be apparently displaced along the ecliptic (the plane of the Earth's orbit projected onto the celestial sphere) by about one degree per day or equivalent to a 4 minute time difference. (Since 24 hours of Right Ascension corresponds to a 360 deg angular difference).

Thus, using either of the four known RA dates for the Sun - and knowing the Sun's RA changes by 4 mins/day, the new solar RA on any day can be found.

Example (1)

Find the Right Ascension of the Sun on July 1st.

We note that 8 days separates July 1st from June 22 when the Sun's R.A. is known to be 6h 00m.

The time difference is: 8 days x (4 min/day) = 32 mins.

So the Sun's RA on July 1st = 6h 00m + 32 min = 6h 32 m

Example  (2):

Aldebaran (RA = 4h 34m) is found to be 45 degrees east of your meridian on a particular date. What is your L.S.T.?

Solution

First, find the hour angle (HA) of Aldebaran. We have 45 deg = 45 deg/(15 deg/h) = 3 h. But since the HA is measured east of the meridian then one must use the negative value (-3 h) so:

24 h + (- 3h) = 21 h 00m

We know:

HA = RA of the meridian - RA (object)

and RA of the meridian = L.S.T.

Therefore:

L..S.T.= HA + RA of object

L.S.T. = 21h 00m + 4 h 34 m = 25h 34m = 1h 34m (25h 34m - 24h 00m)


A nice additional problem for practice, to see if you understand sidereal time, is given below:

The star Canopus (RA = 6h 20m) is observed to have a local hour angle = 45 deg on Feb. 10th for a given location.

What is the local sidereal time ?

A Quantitative Look At The Physics Of Landau Damping - Part 1

Consider electric field of form:

E1   (x’,t)  =   exp(  t) (sin kx’   -    t)

In wave frame:

E1   (x’,t)  =   E1  (t)  sin kx

The particle velocity in wave frame:

v0 = v  -    vf    (The lab velocity – phase velocity)

Change in energy of particle:

d e  =    ½ m (vo  +  d v) 2 – ½ m Vo 2

= m vo   v   +  O (d v2)

Averaging energy change over one wavelength:

 < d >xo    =    vo  <v>xo

And: 

d v  =  v(t) -  vo =   - (e) E /m  òt sin kx (t) dt'

x(t')  must be along the particle orbit, so:

x(t') =  x o +  òt' v (t") dt"

v(t") = vo =   - (e) E /m  òt' sin kx ("'t) dt"'

Return to eqn. of motion:

mx"   =   - eE sin kx

For which:

mx'x"   =   - eE sin kx dx/dt

d/dt (½ m x'2)  =   -eE /k   (d/dt cos kx)

And:

½ m x'2  = eE /k [cos kx -  cos kxo

Take the square root:

x'  =    Ö{2eE /km   [cos kx -  cos kxo]}

Integrate:

dx/[cos kx -  cos kxo1/2  =  Ö 2eE /km  dt

dv(t)> = 

  - (e) E /m  òt <cos kxo   +  kvo (t')>xo + sin <(kxo  +  kvo t)> dt

where < > denotes average over one wavelength                                                                         

<cos kxo   +  kvo (t')>xo   = -t'eE/m vo   (½) [cos kvo t')>xo

- eE / km vo2 (½) [ <sin kvo t')>xo   +  < cos (-kvo t')>xo + sin <(-2 kvt')>xo


=   - t' eE / 2m vo   cos  (-kvo t')  +  eE / 2 km vo2  sin (2kvo t'


 Whence:

< dv(t)>xo = 

  - (e) E /m  ò0 t s <cos( kxo   +  kvo t')>xo +  <sin <(kxo  +  kvo t')> dt

Monday, May 11, 2026

That Trump UFO Files Release: Richter Scale 10 Fanfare Matched By 'Meh' Output



 I seriously doubt these files, or anything that might follow, will contain a smoking gun.A recovered craft is far too valuable to show, so it's a foregone conclusion that the U.S. government will never fess up to having such a craft in their possession until an alien actually lands on the National Mall on live TV. - WaPo comment


On Friday, the Pentagon released what it called “new, never-before-seen” files related to unidentified flying objects on a webpage with fonts and grapics reminiscent of a 1990s sci-fi thriller. Trump described it as a promise fulfilled, but I saw it as yet another distracting bamboozle like the JFK and MLK files he released last year.  As I noted in my March 19, 2025 post in the case of the former's release:

 JFK Files Released - And Lee Oswald's Innocence Remains Despite Warrenite Disinformationists

 in the case of the JFK assassination, one really doesn't need to bury one's nose in the newly released files.  The evidence Oswald had nothing to do with it has been sitting out in the open for decades. It has been out there for the asking, for those who seek truth rather than fantasy.

Much the same applies to the current release, i.e a lot of volume and 'noise' but virtually no signal. Say like the missing Advanced Targeting Forward Looking Infrared Radar (ATFLIR) tapes reported missing by Ret. Lt. Cmdr. David Fravor in his House UAP testimony in 2023.  As he noted, on encountering an object 46 feet long with  Lt. Jr. Grade Alex Dietrich, in their U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornets. (In the Nimitz (2004) incident.):

"What you don't see is the radar tape which was never released and we don't know where it is right now.   But there was active jamming the object put on our AG373 radar. I can get into modes later if you want. What was shocking to us is the incident was never investigated, tapes were never taken."

But what if it was 'never released' for a reason?  To conceal the presence of non-human craft violating our airspace with impunity.That would most certainly disclose a very real non-human intelligence able to make our most advanced fighters look like 3rd rate mock ups from a grade z scifi flick. Release of those radar tapes (and ancillary material described in Fravor's testimony) would have shown a real file release not just more 'shiny stuff' to distract the hoi polloi. Hence, Trump had no basis to boast as he did on his Trash Social post:

Whereas previous Administrations have failed to be transparent on this subject, with these new Documents and Videos, the people can decide for themselves, ‘WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?’

Some of the "never before seen" initial files released include documents from the 1960s space race between the United States and the Soviet Union - but again just more distractions not really focusing on the genuine 'meat' - like the missing radar tapes. A couple of the more recent highlight sets and WaPo takes on them in one Friday article :

March 2024

"A Pentagon report found no evidence that the government covered up knowledge of extraterrestrials and no evidence that any U.F.O. sightings actually were aliens visiting Earth. The 63-page report was a sweeping rebuttal to claims that the government had secretly harbored alien spacecraft or alien technology."

Yeah right. But I shattered this bunkum in a blog post soon after this codswallop made its way into the 'legacy' media headlines, i.e.

Therein I included the actual Sept. 23, 1947  Twining memo, which also would have comprised a real item for release. In addition, the testimony of Ret. Maj. David Grusch, who was asked in 2019 by  the head of a government task force on UAPs to identify all highly classified programs relating to the task force’s mission. Grusch added in his July, 2023 testimony:

I was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program to which I was denied access,” 

Yeah, so AGAIN, where are the details of the crash retrieval program? THAT would have been something worth looking at, but no indication of it. Nor of any of the high resolution (4k) imagery of the evidence (UFO crash debris)- which Grusch noted could not be divulged in open session. (A SCIF or special compartmentalized intelligence facility was required for congress to access sensitive materials.) 

February 2026

Former President Barack Obama tells a YouTuber that aliens are “real, but I haven’t seen them and they’re not being kept in Area 51.” 

In the wake of Obama's blurtation, Trump directed his administration to begin releasing files related to aliens, extraterrestrial life and unidentified flying objects to obviously 'one up' him.

He also attacked Mr. Obama for his comments about aliens in the YouTube interview, insisting he “gave classified information; he’s not supposed to be doing that.”

Which is total hogwash. All Obama delivered were his own off the cuff speculations on UFOs and aliens. But Dotard's overreaction to Obama does shed light on why he hasn't delivered anything meaningful in his much ballyhooed UFO file release: He KNOWS that giving us the actual missing AG373 radar tapes - from Ret. Lt. Cmdr. David Fravor's encounter - would violate classified information law under the 1917 Espionage Act.  This is also why he blocked the release of the high resolution (4k) imagery of crashed debris, noted by Ret. Major Grusch. In other words, Trump busted himself with his rash Obama comment.

Cutting to the chase, what does come through when one accesses the material available at  war.gov/ufois the sheer volume of murky images that could be anything- govt drones, illuminated kites or blowing detritus. In effect, most of what was released were just irrelevant distractions. But why be surprised? I never expected anything substantive to be provided when the orange freak first bellowed his blarney in February i.e.

A May 1st "Major Speech" By Trump Revealing Alien Craft Are Real? Don't Make Me Laugh!

 Noting:

"Up to now, there is no hard evidence of a planned Trump UFO-alien speech, and no White House announcement has been forthcoming. As I noted earlier, the only reason I can see Dotard suddenly giving such a speech is to one up Obama in his recent podcast. Also, perhaps to try to boost his historically low approval ratings."

And that was confirmed. Trump gave no speech he merely let his pawns and trolls in the Dept. of War release what they felt would keep the hoi polloi happy and occupied and at least with radar off the Epstein files.

Let us also bear in mind, that as previously reported by Newsweek, Trump himself has always expressed skepticism about the existence of UFOs in the past, telling comedian and podcaster Joe Rogan in 2024 he "had never been a believer.”  So why make people think you are? Why not just come out and say:

 "Look I know this stuff is all bullshit but I'm telling my guys in the War Department to release a bunch of never seen stuff. Just make sure to hide the images of the actual alien craft recovered and the bodies".

But that is brute honesty, something Trump has never been capable of and besides would give the game away. He'd rather keep manipulating a captive populace with 'shiny new' distractions than figure out how to pay for gas because of his stupid war.

That this release is not serious at all was proven when Dotard posted on his Trash Social for Americans to "have fun."  So he treats it like a jokey distraction much like his nightly deranged Trash Social posts, i.e.

Trump Has TOTAL PSYCHOTIC BREAK & Threatens To NUKE IRAN ON LIVE TV | The Kyle Kulinski Show


As a humorous counter to all the Trump -"Dept. of War" (sic) huff and puff, Neil deGrasse Tyson appeared on CBS this morning with his own take:


                         "Just fork up the aliens!"


In answer to a Matt Gutman's lead question, Neil replied:

"Remember for three years now we've had military and intelligence people testifying under oath about these things are real, and that some might be in a mock shed.  I'm just sayin', though it's a little bit anticlimactic, why not just bring out the aliens. Then we wouldn't have to believe."

Ah, Neil, Neil.  Ret. Major Grusch did actually attempt to do that at his hearing in July, 2023. Well at least to display the 4k high def imagery showing crash debris, recovered nonhuman bodies. But as I noted, he emphasized this required use of a SCIF  for national security - since the material was highly classified. 

 As before, Neil either thinks it's funny that UAP-alien evidence is classified, or somewhat incredible that the Pentagon would actually impose prison sentences on anyone (like Grusch) openly revealing alien presence, existence of re-reengineered craft. However, not if the latter are part of an ongoing re-engineering process - which was Grusch's point. So Neil's facetious insistence:

 "Ya know, just fork up the aliens then we wouldn't have to believe."

Is partly understandable, but totally unrealistic. Especially coming from a claimed astrophysicist most of whose objects of inquiry - like black holes, pulsars, quasars - are not directly accessible.

Or as my now deceased AF brother Jerry said in 1990:



"From '47, the Air Force intended to re-engineer downed saucer parts - such as recovered at Roswell- and develop new, more powerful weapons. Do you really believe if they were at the point of possibly developing the equivalent to a new nuclear weapon they'd advertise the work to the whole fuckin' world?"

Good point. See David Grusch's interview about UFO crash retrievals here:



See Also: 


     And:

And:

Transient Optical Phenomena of the Atmosphere - a Case Study     

and:




And:

Friday, May 8, 2026

2073 : A SciFi Movie That's Closer To Reality Than You May Believe Given Today's AI-driven Surveillance State

                     Patriot act protesters march in San Francisco in 2013
    Autonomous AI in 2026  can track, ID strangers in public places


" I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America. And we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return"Sen. Frank Church, referencing the NSA in 1975.


 The 2025 movie, 2073, see trailer here:

2073 trailer - Google Search

 just got a whole lot more real after watching it again immediately after reading a front-page Wall Street Journal article, 'America's Expanding Domestic Surveillance, May 2-3, p. A1.  The basis is simple: the evolution (devolution?) of the U.S. and the world to a total surveillance condition, began decades before. The scifi film, which no longer seems so, traces the beginnings back to the 1990s and then takes off in the 2020s under the tech bros and their ilk - from Palantir, Deloitte, NEC and other spyware specialists.

The tremendous benefit of the film is that it presents graphic segments showing how most humans (not the uber rich) reached the downtrodden,  dominated state portrayed finally in the year 2073.  With the spokesperson a former librarian or teacher who must hide herself underground given the nature of the books, teachings she has absorbed and isn't about to give up.

So why did the WSJ piece make such an impact: Well one of the first paragraphs is like a punch to the gut:

"The idea of the government watching you is not just the makings of an Orwell novel or a political thriller. The U.S. has greatly expanded its domestic surveillance system, using a high-tech dragnet to locate, track and deport people residing illegally in the country. But the data and location of American citizens is also being collected.

The newly expanded surveillance system allows thousands of federal agents nationwide to peruse a trove of data belonging to more than 300 million people. The government's tracking system relies on an amalgam of public and private information sifted, sorted and packaged by contractors that include Palantir Technologies, Deloitte, Japanese conglomerate NEC and smaller spyware specialists."

We learn further that an array of surveillance tools have been created, including. facial recognition software, location tracking and social media 'scrapers' once aimed largely at suspected terrorists and drug traffickers. In the hands of federal agents (like ICE) any regular citizen can be tracked by entering a name, license plate, or simply taking a photo.   

We learn in the piece, that Maine resident Liz McLellan, 48, and four others got the shock of their lives when they were singled out and threatened after observing the work of ICE agents. In the case of McClellan, who followed one ICE vehicle and photographed it, she was shocked when some moments later - on pulling up to her door- she found them waiting for her and delivering a stern warning: 'Be careful because we know where you live.'

Two of the Mainers accused ICE of using their license plates and biometric data to track and intimidate them for exercising their first amendment rights. Well, fourth amendment rights may well be included too, and we know - or ought to remember -it was the Patriot Act which opened the door to a lot of attacks on civil liberties.

To be specific, readers unfamiliar with the act's most notorious sections may want to process the following - before asking how ICE got the power it has:

- Section 206: Allows roving wiretaps - allowing surveillance on any target who frequently changes communications devices (i.e. disposable phones).   Search or seizure was permitted without getting a warrant for each device.

Section 216: Expanded authority to monitor internet traffic, including  email, using 'trap and trace' devices.

Much of the Act's overreach only became known after Edward Snowden disclosed them. And which I had warned and blogged about, i.e.

Brane Space: We Must Get the "Patriot Act" Repealed in 2015!

So much of what's going on isn't totally new, although the extent of it is - supported by Trump's yen for autocracy.

Regarding the current transgressions - which are claimed (by Dept. of Homeland Security) to "operate in full accordance with the law" - a former Justice Dept. lawyer is quoted in the WSJ piece thusly:

"The retaliation we've seen against Americans who chose to lawfully record DHS activities should alarm everyone."  said Rush Atkinson, who is representing two people in a case. Noting: "This is a fundamental First Amendment right and the public has the right to know why the government is collecting data on those who peacefully protest."

Well, Mr. Atkinson might want to go back to examine certain provisions of the Patriot Act, which was passed in 2001, after the 9/11 attacks.  Specifically, how even the Pennsylvania protesters who inveighed against fracking in their state were subject to surveillance, as I wrote in my 2013 post above.

"We are now the enemy, the perceived collective  "enemy of the state", and if we don't get this horrific Act repealed or fully rewritten we will pay for it years to come, as the "good Germans" did after the Reich steamrolled all their Weimar democracy liberties to smithereens."

Back to the WSJ surveillance piece we learn:

"Last year DHS paid Palantir $30 million to put a broad span of information about individuals into an app on agents' smartphones, allowing them to plot the location of people in the U.S.  The app, known as Enhanced Leads Identification and Targeting for Enforcement or ELITE, lets officers research and track individuals based on criminal history, license plate searches, name, date of birth, or location.

The results display on a map or a list according to ICE agents. The app pulls from a variety of government data bases, including information compiled by private investigators known as 'skip tracers' who track the current addresses of individuals.  One ICE agent in court testimony compared it to Google maps - with the targets appearing as 'pins' on the map."

Clearly, if we don't get Trump and his runaway autocrat helpers under control soon, we will all be paying a steep price in loss of liberty. Like the Germans who let Hitler come to power and then impose his 'Enabling Act'.  If you want to see how this would play out in the future, watch the film 2073.

See Also:

Letter to America - From Germany:

https://youtu.be/Q-Z6M-LDXWg?si=iAn_Q64zUypuNDHB
And:

Don't Think NSA's Dragnet Spying Program Matters? Ask Occupy Wall Street's Protestors!

And:

The Main Problems I Have With The Jan. 26 Wall Street Journal Editorial: Failure To Recognize Trump's Police State

And:

by Pierre Tristam | May 4, 2026 - 4:43am | permalink

— from Flagler Live

`

In November 1939 there was that odd poll of Princeton University undergrads–as educated an American student bunch as there was at the time–ranking Hitler “the greatest living person,” ahead of Einstein, who’d taken refuge from Hitler at Princeton, and FDR.

Five years later the New York Times’s Benjamin Fine won a Pulitzer Prize for a series detailing how ignorant of their own nation’s history college freshmen across the country were (the same year Ernie Pyle won a Pulitzer for telling the stories of GIs dying in defense of that ignorance). A large majority of the 7,000 students surveyed couldn’t identify Lincoln, Jefferson, Andrew Jackson or Theodore Roosevelt.

» article continues...

And: