Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Kudos To Federal Judge For Ridding Traitor Trump's Name From Kennedy Center

 

                                  The Kennedy Center desecration soon to be corrected


Take heart Orange Caligula. Once they remove your name they can place it in a more appropriate spot. Atop the largest area dump or sewage depot would be absolutely perfect.- WaPo comment

It’s so pitiful that Trump is so insecure and needy that he needs his name and pictures plastered on buildings and currency. He is an infantile, petty, uninformed, impulsive , impatient, narcissistic wannabe dictator who fortunately is being reprimanded by the courts.- WaPo comment


Federal Judge Chris Cooper on Friday, at last put an end to the disgusting defiling of the Kennedy Center with Trump's name on it. He ordered the Jan. 6th insurrection leader's name be stripped within 2 weeks. He wrote in support of his decision:

“Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name and only Congress can change it.”

As Joyce Beatty, an ex-officio member of the Kennedy Center Board also noted:

The Kennedy Center is an institution that belongs to the American people, not to Donald Trump. He has desecrated this sacred memorial for his own vanity.”

Indeed.  Like a mad chimp in a zoo's ape house, Trump has been on a 16-month ego binge, hurling his orange face and feces at everything in D.C. Tearing down the East Wing of the People's House (not his), fouling every wall, every nook with his gold bling, plastering the front of the Justice Dept. bldg with his snarling mug and now also proclaiming he wants a Nazi-style 'Arc de Trump', as well as re-doing the WW II Memorial, after planning to re-paint the reflecting pool in front of the Lincoln Memorial.

Someone had to stop this insanity at some point and bring the orange fungus back to earth (if even partly).

The reasons for not mingling this traitor and convicted felon's name with JFK's are almost too obvious to recite.  The most obvious: JFK at every turn supported and sustained democracy, he didn't try to destroy it. He even faced down Soviet Premier Nikita Khruschev in October, 1962 forcing him to back down from delivering further nuclear missiles to Cuba. That in contrast to Trump at every turn doing Putin's bidding, including now withdrawing U.S. troops from NATO countries and even letting Putin bomb them, e.g.

by Sarah K. Burris | June 2, 2026 - 5:17am | permalink

— from Alternet

Russia is now bombing NATO countries, and it appears that President Donald Trump is asleep at the wheel.

Writing on Monday, MS NOW producer Steve Benen sounded the alarm about an incoming disaster visible on the horizon.

A Wall Street Journal report last week quoted several world leaders in Europe as saying that they fear Russian President Vladimir Putin is about to go beyond Ukraine and look at the countries he can go to war with next in an effort to grow the former Soviet Union back to its original borders.

"Russian drones have repeatedly crashed without causing casualties along the Danube River border between Romania and Ukraine since 2023. But the drone crash on Friday, on the roof of a residential compound in the port city, Galati, sharply escalated tensions between NATO and Moscow," The New York Times reported.

» article continues...

Adding insult to injury Trump attempted to start a slush fund to pay Jan. 6 traitors - for 'suffering' during their infernal attack on the Capitol- and after. When most received deserved prison sentences for their perfidy.  That included smashing windows to gain entry, clobbering DC police with clubs and Trump flags, hurling feces at the walls once in, and threatening to hang then VP Mike Pence.

In fact, while Trump has sought to wreck every viable function of government, from the EPA and its regulation of climate risk, to firing tens of thousands of federal workers, to hollowing out the CDC and Dept. of Education, JFK did the opposite.

 It was under JFK's administration that the Peace Corps (in which I served), e.g.

Sharing Some Photos of My Peace Corps Service For Peace Corp's 65th Anniversary- And 'Peace Corps Week'

was founded, as well as USAID which Trump and his henchmen (like Elon Musk) took to the "woodchipper" last year. A move we may all come to regret as its resources to have checked the new Ebola spread exist no longer, e.g.

Inside the Ebola Epicenter, the Virus Rages With Little to Stop It - The New York Times

JFK, like my dad, served in the Pacific Theater in WW II and actually helped save a number of his men. Trump, by contrast, had his daddy get him excused from military service five times using "bone spurs".   Further, he has mocked those service men who lost their lives in wars as "losers".  See e.g.

Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are 'Losers ... - The Atlantic

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/trump-americans-who-died-at-war-are-losers-and-suckers/615997/

According to the piece:

"When President Donald Trump canceled a visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018, he blamed rain for the last-minute decision, saying that “the helicopter couldn’t fly” .....In a conversation with senior staff members on the morning of the scheduled visit, Trump said, “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” In a separate conversation on the same trip, Trump referred to the more than 1,800 marines who lost their lives at Belleau Wood as “suckers” for getting killed."


Unlike Trump, JFK read profusely, up to twenty complete newspapers a day. In addition, he read books - whole books - not comics like Trump, or National Enquirer gossip pieces.  JFK could do this because he read at a rate exceeding 1200 words per minute. This compares to Trump's 50 words per minute, which is why he must stick to tweets.

JFK held full news conferences for any major policy announcements, more than any other president where he took on the press, media openly and ably. 
To get a hint of the extent of his verbal command see the following highlights from his press conferences:

"THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT" (1983)

He would never have posted on a social media cartoon board- even if one would have existed then. His  vocabulary and wit never failed to astound the gathered press corps. Trump, when he does have the press in the Oval Office, brooks no serious questions or criticisms, so all one beholds is a retinue of docile pawns who simply validate and coddle the senile fool, and see who can kiss his ass the most. Much like his deplorable cabinet who often try to outdo each other in their sickening sycophancy.


JFK, unlike Trump, was the epitome of class and intellectual refinement. He appreciated intellectual and artistic endeavors and often used the White House as a venue to present special musical or other events (poetry reading) . Check out, for reference, Jackie's 1962 tour of the White House, including its previous architectural changes.

From the archives: Jacqueline Kennedy's televised tour of the White House in 1962

Compare the setting and decor with the gold-defiled monstrosity Trump has created including tearing down the East Wing and paving over the outside WH garden.  Trump, by contrast to JFK, is  the embodiment of the Vulgarian and anti-intellectual Philistine He is only interested in using his Trump-branded crap to try to make more money, defying the Emoluments clause of the Constitution at every turn

Lastly, JFK exhibited a core of decency and would never brag about "pussy grabbing", frolick with a pedophile pal, nor brand Mexicans as "rapists" , mock a disabled NYT reporter, or belittle an American soldier (John McCain) for being captured by the enemy.

JFK's impulse control was tested most severely during the October, 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis when the Joint Chiefs, especially Gen. Curtis Lemay, implored him to invade and bomb Cuba.  A move that would have triggered a release of at least 93 IRBMs and initiated a nuclear exchange.

Would Trump have been able to exert such control and opt for a peaceful alternative? I doubt it. Trump barely has the impulse control of a rabid ape, e.g.

Trump LOOKS LIKE DEATH As White House SPIRALS & He LOSES TOTAL CONTROL!! | The Kyle Kulinski Show

Had Trump been in power for such a situation as in Oct. 1962, likely none of us would be around to relate the story.

Thank whatever power there is or was that JFK was at the helm then and not "The Donald".

Monday, June 1, 2026

Exchange Traded Funds Bundling Alleged Govt UFO Disclosure Are NOT A Good Investment


Neil Tyson gets a laugh talking about aliens

The current hoopla over Trump's purported release of 'never before seen' UFO files,


 inevitably found its way into other domains. Namely market investments, if you can believe it.  In his recent WSJ column ('How Weird Are ETFs Getting? Try UFO and Midnight-Bitcoin Funds', May 24-25, p. C2), Jason Zweig warns:

"To see just how far ETFs have drifted from the investment mainstream, look at the Tuttle Capital UFO Disclosure ETF. It was launched - and I do mean 'launched' - in February. 

The fund seeks to buy stocks that could benefit from 'government disclosure, confirmation or exploitation of advanced technologies related to non-human intelligence.'

But is it worth paying 0.99% a year for an ETF tailor made for E.T.?  Matthew Tuttle says he was inspired to create the funds by videos that purport to show alien spacecraft moving across the skies in anomalous ways."

Let us note here the launch date for Tuttle's ETF in February was no coincidence. It occurred the same month as Dotard's big UFO files release announcement, e.g.


In which post I noted:

Trump himself has expressed skepticism about the existence of UFOs in the past, telling comedian and podcaster Joe Rogan in 2024 he "had never been a believer.”  So riddle me this?  Why suddenly become one now?

The public does indeed deserve transparency on this issue, but call me a skeptic in terms of Dotard Trump delivering it without some grift or unknown advantage he wants to secure.  Like pumping up his current dismal approval rating. 

In addition, Tuttle betting on government disclosure of the non-human technology behind the craft observed by military pilots is like believing Trump will suddenly channel Mahatma Gandhi tomorrow. As I wrote in the post, referencing my late AF brother, Jerry:

As my late AF brother Jerry told me back in 1990 during an extended discussion: “It would be like the techniques of the Manhattan Project and A-bombs getting leaked back in the early 1940s.”

In other words, it ain't gonna happen. There is no way, now or ever, the government - under Dotard Trump or anyone else- is going to allow the release of the firsthand evidence showing either the non-human bodies or EBE's (Extraterrestrial Biological Entities  ) or the recovered craft. You can take that to the bank, if not the ETF.

Speaking of which, a nearly 1% expense ratio for a fund (ETF) based on a fantasy is pure wacko-land and not something a sensible person should even consider. As Jason Zweig writes: 

"Investors need to start approaching ETFs with caution. All too many of the newer  ones are investment junk food, just as bad as candy, cookies or french fries. And filling up with them can be just as bad for you."

In that class I'd also put Tuttle's new ETF, with his giveaway remark to Zweig:

"If this technology exists and becomes public it's a game changer, more than the internet or AI.  I don't even need aliens to be real for my thesis to work. but it's a lot more fun if they are."

Several observations:

1) This technology does exist, it will just never become public because it's classified to the hilt and then some. Quoting Jerry again:

"From '47, the Air Force intended to re-engineer downed saucer parts - such as recovered at Roswell- and develop new, more powerful weapons. Do you really believe if they were at the point of possibly developing the equivalent to a new nuclear weapon they'd advertise the work to the whole fuckin' world?"

2) If ever divulged, yes, it would be a 'game changer' and bigger than AI.

3) Of course, Tuttle doesn't "need aliens to be real", he just needs enough easy marks to bite at the promise of a govt delivery of the "goods" and buy in. What was it P.T. Barnum purportedly said about 'suckers'?


See Also:  

Solution to basic Mensa Algebra Problem

    Find all values of x that satisfy the equation:

x 2 +  x 3 = 36 

Factor after re-arranging order:

(x + 3) (x2 -  4x + 12)  = 0

(x + 3)  = 0,   

so x = -3  is one REAL root

For the quadratic part of the equation we can use the quadratic formula:

x = -b + Ã– {b2 - 4ac}/ 2a

Where: a = 1, b = - 4, c = 12

Working:

x = - (- 4) + Ö {42 - 4(12)}/ 2

x =  4 + Ö {16 - (48)}/ 2

x =  4 + Ö {- 32} / 2

x =  4 + iÖ {16 (2)} / 2

x =  4 + 4iÖ (2)) / 2

x = 2 + 2iÖ 2

Yielding two imaginary roots:

x = 2 + 2iÖ 2 ,    x = 2 - 2iÖ 2 

in addition to the single real root

Friday, May 29, 2026

The WSJ Once Defended Birthright Citizenship - Maybe This Is Why Trumpers Are Now Using The Green Card Ploy

 From my Aug. 24, 2015 Blog Post:

Who would have believed the Editors of the WSJ would for once write an editorial with which I could agree? But they did. No bloviating about the evils of Obamacare, the scourge of entitlements, the wrong-headedness of the Iran nuclear deal or the folly of Obama's student loan solution. For once the WSJ editors and I were in agreement ('Born in the USA', Aug. 21, p. A14).

This was regarding the matter of "anchor babies" and birthright citizenship that several GOP candidates, especially Donald Trump, have been sowing nonsense about. Trump, in a recent bombastic tirade deplored that fact that "300 Mexican babies were being born each day" in the U.S. and he wanted to stop it.  These :anchor babies" were growing up to take American college spots, as well as jobs.

As the WSJ put it, regarding Trump's gibberish on the 14th amendment:

"Donald Trump fomented the mayhem when he told Bill O'Reilly on Fox News that the Fourteenth Amendment is unconstitutional . 'It's not going to hold up in court, it's going to have to be tested' e said. The distinguished legal scholar added that 'I don't think they have American citizenship, and if you speak to some very, very good lawyers some would disagree - but many of them would agree with me- you're going to find they do not have American citizenship"

And, of course, this is exactly what those 20,000 Trump turkeys at the stadium in Mobile, as the WSJ noted "nearly half the GOP field apparently believes Mr. Trump has found a winning political message."

The WSJ Editors then proceed to educate these turkeys:

"The Fourteenth Amendment begins, 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside'. This is the common law doctrine of juris soli, and the meaning of the language is straightforward..


Further:

"'Jurisdiction' defines the territory where the force of law applies and to whom - and this principle is well settled to include almost everyone within U.S.  borders, regardless of their home country or the circumstances of their birth....By the circular restrictionist logic, illegal immigrants could not be prosecuted for committing crimes because they are not U.S. citizens."


This is a crucial point and shows  the nuttiness of the Trump et al "restrictionist" position. Because clearly, if they are not under jurisdiction according to the 14th amendment, then they would not be technically under the force of law  where born or residing, so could not be prosecuted for crimes - since they would not be citizens. Only U.S. citizens can be so prosecuted.

The WSJ editorial notes that "in 1898 the Supreme Court confirmed the Amendment's original meaning ...and it reaffirmed it as recently in 1982 in Plyler vs Doe."

The WSJ then hoisted all these bozos on their own petards:


"If the candidates are as  committed to the Constitution and the rule of law as they say they are, then they should propose a constitutional amendment on birthright citizenship. Refresher: This requires a two -thirds majority vote of both houses of congress and ratification by 38 states. Getting Mexico to pay for a wall along its border is more plausible."

One can almost sense in the sarcasm the ridicule the Journal holds for all the wacko GOP candidates who hold this sappy position. Confirmed with this send off:

"The futility of ending birthright citizenship is part of the cheap political appeal. Republicans can pose as MacGruff the Border Crime Dog, signal that they are also mad as hell and slipstream on Mr. Trump's poll numbers....The immigration hawks are correct that birthright citizenship is unusual among nations - but since when did Republicans dump their belief in American exceptionalism?"

Damn! I just knew there had to be a situation where the American exceptionalist rot would come back to haunt the 'pukes - and the WSJ exposed it!  Now it appears ('Green Card Applicants Told To File Overseas', WSJ, P. A3, May 23-24) the Trump bunch understands the coming Supreme Court ruling will not go their way on this issue. Their plan B? Making most green card applicants go abroad to apply for permanent residency to the U.S. rather than filing from within the U.S. as they do now. In which case:

"The approach would affect the millions of immigrants who are living in the U.S. illegally but who would gain legal status either by marrying a U.S. citizen or having U.S. citizen children sponsor them once they turn 21."

The bugbear?

 "By going abroad they risk losing whatever legal status they held in the U.S. and be unable to return."

Thus: 

"This main policy impetus for the administration appears to be a remedy in case the birthright citizenship case doesn't go their way."

That according to Leon Fresco, a former Justice Dept. official under Obama, quoted in the weekend WSJ piece. For my money, the Trumper anti-immigrant forces (led by Stephen Miller) probably were shown that early WSJ editorial defending birthright citizenship and decided the SC would buy it given the strength of argument. Hence, they came up with the green card ploy as an 'end around' solution.

See Also:

by Pierre Tristam | April 18, 2026 - 5:18am | permalink

— from Flagler Live

`

“The destruction of a man’s rights, the killing of the judicial person in him, is a prerequisite for dominating him entirely.”
—Hannah Arendt in The Origins of Totalitarianism.

Clarity in language is never immune to the treachery of sinister intentions. “Truth will set you free” and “Work will set you free” are clear, noble statements. The first is from the gospels. The second is from an 1873 German novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. Both are forever defiled by the Nazis hanging the work slogan above the entrance to the Auschwitz death camp. A similarly bigoted motive is behind Trump’s defilement of the clear language of the 14th Amendment in the birthright citizenship case.

It is not just about birthright. It is about anyone’s citizenship.

» article continues...

And:
by Jordan Liz | May 27, 2026 - 5:40am | permalink

On May 22, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services issued a policy memo announcing a major shift in immigration policy. As USCIS Spokesperson Zach Kahler explains: “From now on, an alien who is in the US temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances. This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes.”

This new policy is unlawful, immoral, and xenophobic. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as well as the LIFE Act, Congress created various pathways for immigrants to apply for “adjustment of status.” This allows a temporary legal resident to apply for legal permanent resident (LPR) status without having to leave the US.

Such adjustments are not limited to “extraordinary circumstances.” As the USCIS Policy Manual makes clear:

» article continues...

And:

by Jeffrey C. Isaac | May 7, 2026 - 4:25am | permalink

`

On May 6, 1866, exactly one hundred and sixty years ago today, Thaddeus Stevens, US Congressman from Pennsylvania and the leading Radical Republican in the House of Representatives, rose to introduce the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution on the floor of the. Stevens, chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, was also co-chair of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction set up by Congress, in late 1865, to promote a radical Reconstruction, a program advanced over the consistent objections of President Andrew Johnson.

Here is how Stevens introduced the Amendment:

» article continues...