Wednesday, April 30, 2025

After 100 Days Of Trump Carnage "Most" Of His 77 m Voters Unrepentant- They Are Official Morons & Jackboots

                   Some of the 77 million morons that put a felon back in office.
                                                                        
                                   "Thanks, dummies, for returning me to power!"

"I'm amazed at the degree to which MAGA is stating, out loud, that its goal is corporate feudalism and the elimination of social mobility. Education will be unaffordable and restricted to the rich, while the rubes (MAGA) will do grueling work in state approved factories generation after generation.

These morons still haven't figured out that 'owning the libs' actually ends with them being owned by the rich and powerful." - WaPo Comment

 "Thankfully, most Canadians have IQs over room temperature digits and didn't buy the BS of that fool, Pierre Poilievre!"

                                                                                      
                   Canada's PM Mark Carney (L) and Loser Pierre Poilievre

Janice squealed in delight after learning Liberal party leader Mark Carney trounced the Conservo hack Poilievre in the Canadian national elections Monday. For Poilievre, the Conservative party’s stinging defeat was compounded by the fact that he lost his seat, which he had held continuously for 20 years, to the Liberal candidate.

Carney, an economist who was running in national elections for the first time in his life, had targeted the American felon and traitor Trump and his relentless threats on Canada, America’s closest ally and trading partner. The orange pestilence imposed tariffs on Canadian goods, pushing the country toward a recession, and repeatedly threatened to annex it as the 51st state.

Incredibly, even as Canadians were heading to the polls on Monday morning, this fungal fuckwit repeated that desire, arguing on social media that it would bring economic and military benefits. So in many ways, Carney's critical win (which has Trumper trolls weeping at not being able to get a 'Trump' clone in Canada) has Trump himself to thank.  As well as Poilievre himself who in the home stretch couldn't resist vowing to crush "wokeism" and "woke ideology" in the universities. 

Poilievre, who - like Trump - railed against “radical woke ideology,” pledged to defund Canada’s national broadcasting system and said he would cut foreign aid.  That blather caused him to lose a majority of independents and centrists - unlike here in the U.S. - where egg prices, inflation drove the ninnies to voting in the felon.

Ultimately, all Poilievre's woke bilge and banter did is remind intelligent Canadians of the orange reprobate they were against - and his constant threats to their beautiful, sane country - which we have visited multiple times, e.g.

Meanwhile, in a header yesterday, we learned that most of the 77 million Trump voters are indeed "a pack of idiots" as Janice describes them, e.g. 

77 million Americans voted for Trump. After 100 days, few of them regret it. | Opinion

So even as the nation is being destroyed piece by piece these asswit orange felon cultists would do it again - vote into power an unqualified, unhinged traitor (Jan. 6th insurrectionist pardoner) and felon. These cockeyed cultist dopes, once irate over the cost of groceries, said they are willing to give Trump "a long runway to figure things out".  Newsflash, dolts, there isn't a "runway" long enough - in space or time - to allow that. The global economy and this nation will be destroyed first and one of the first signs will be the empty store shelves that manifest in a few weeks. Do these halfwits even know why? Likely not, so the higher IQs among them ought to see Jeffrey Sach's brutal takedown of their favorite fool and his tariffs:

If that's too much to handle, NYT David Brooks' recent summation ought to suffice, assuming these losers have attained at least 12th grade reading level. Brooks writes:

"I’ve covered a lot of policies over the decades, some of which I supported and some of which I opposed. But I have never seen a policy as stupid as Trump’s tariff policy. It is based on false assumptions. It rests on no coherent argument in its favor. It relies on no empirical evidence. It has almost no experts on its side — from left, right or center. It is jumble-headedness exemplified. Trump himself personifies stupidity’s essential feature — self-satisfaction, an inability to recognize the flaws in your thinking. .. Producing something this stupid is not the work of a day; it is the achievement of a lifetime — relying on decades of incuriosity, decades of not cracking a book, decades of being impervious to evidence."

As a basis for assuming low IQs among these 77 million unrepentant voters, I note that none are remotely aware of the impossibility of manufacturing on a wide scale ever coming back to the U.S. I mean, seriously?  Do these goobers truly believe Americans will be content sewing Nike sneakers, i.e. like this scene from a clever Chinese video mocking U.S. workers:

Viral Chinese AI video of US sweatshop workers mocks Trump’s tariffs | Dawn News English

Of course, like mindless, low IQ dummies they believe every word he utters - even after he played them in the '24 election. Believing he'd bring prices of groceries down "the first day" even when he telegraphed all the way through his campaign he was bent only on retribution.

Another basis for a sound assumption of low IQs among these 77 m voters. Just over 3 weeks ago Trump announced he would pause or lower his country-specific tariffs for scores of nations that want to "kiss his ass" - even as a bond market selloff forced the fucker to get real. 

Yet his followers believed it was merely  "a stunt to get countries to come to the table and ultimately will bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.".

This shows me the Trumpers have no comprehension of the bond market, how it functions and how it trumps a loudmouth, stupid senile orange know it all. It also shows me these losers have no comprehension of how difficult it would be to bring any scale of manufacturing back to this country. As a recent WSJ article ('What Tariffs Mean For The Job Market', April 12-13, p. A7) noted:

"A fairly simple, midsize factory would cost a minimum of $25 million and take around two years to build"

A much larger factory, say that would even employ 1,000 workers, could take a decade and nearly $100b to build. This according to markets specialist Stephanie Ruhle.  Thus as the WSJ piece adds, given new tariffs would also be added to the expense - given so many materials would have to come from abroad:

"There's no certainty that new factories would pay back their investment over time."

Can any of the Trump cult yahoos grasp that? Doubtful. That's because their brains are more entranced by Dotard's braggadocio and bombast. His entire talent embodies using his 'Barnum and Bailey' carny barker voice to dog whistle his morons into belief.  

The op-ed piece showing that most of the 77 m voters would do it again - even seeing the carnage that's arrived - proves my point. No awareness, no critical reasoning ability or even modest ability to link cause and effect. In other words, seriously low IQ.

Former megachurch pastor John Pavlovitz summed up these fools, twits and derelicts better than I can. He write on his Substack page a take that distinctly transfers an Old Testament attitude toward supporters of President Donald Trump.

"They shunned their responsibility as Americans, they rejected the teachings of their faith tradition, and they abandoned any kind of moral footing by enabling the ascension of a felon-rapist-scumbag mobster who lacks a single noble impulse. Through whatever combination of racism, misogyny, prejudice, intellectual ignorance, and plain old hatred, they willfully coronated him."

Bingo. Pavlovitz argues that Trump supporters have had all sorts of chances to correct course over the years despite seeing the president's cruelty and his authoritarian aspirations close. As Joe Biden once put it: "Garbage", aka lowlifes.

As a bonus here's a cross-section of thirteen of these morons:

Opinion | Tariffs, Elon Musk and Trump’s Term So Far: 13 Trump Voters Discuss - The New York Times

 Mayhap these Trumper Troglodytes  believe they are 'cool' and no adverse carnage will ever happen to them, if they're citizens. If they believe that they need to watch this segment from last night's Rachel Maddow show:

American mother, daughters terrorized by ICE in botched search for immigrants: report

See Also:

Opinion | The bond market just sent a big warning for Trump - The Washington Post

Excerpt:

Investors started dumping U.S. government bonds. They sold and sold and sold. This is not normal. Typically, U.S. government bonds are a safe haven. Whenever stocks tank or there’s turmoil around the world, investors rush to buy plain vanilla bonds from the U.S. Treasury. It’s the equivalent of chicken soup for unhealthy markets. But suddenly, those bonds turned bitter. Ultimately, Trump caved to the bond markets. He didn’t want to follow the fate of British Prime Minister Liz Truss, who resigned in humiliation in 2022 after a similar bond market fiasco in reaction to her policies.

This unsleeping, unfeeling, unsentimental voting bloc forced Trump to change course on his tariff tornado. Other forces sagged into exhaustion in the face of Trump’s obsession, but the votes of the bond markets kept piling up, second by second, hour by hour, day by day. Forget about memes, sick burns and capital letters on Truth Social. The market eschews parades and petitions and marathon speeches. It is an endless murmur of individual transactions, each one a vote, and a landslide swept Trump away.

Trump and his team tried to happy-talk their way past the stock market collapse, but the tireless voters weighed in. His attempt to brush off his defeat in the bond markets by saying that traders had gotten “yippy” fell flat. This is the world’s infrastructure of finance we’re talking about, and it’s built on the value of government promises. Yips have nothing to do with it.

And the pillar of this infrastructure is the credibility of the United States.”

And:

by Robert Becker | May 2, 2025 - 5:05am | permalink

See no evil, hear no evil, admit no evil — the close-minded cult of suckered MAGA monkeys

Inspired by Marc Antony’s lament in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

Friends, patriots, countrymen, where are your ears?
We come to bury Trumpism, not praise it.
The evil that men do lives after them,
Ballooning the horrors done when alive.
Scores of perfidy-drenched enablers
Declare this “caesar” MAGA’s messiah.
Blind faith sabotages our secular world,
Liberated from eye-rolling fables.
Of all infamous souls breathing today,
Who violates more Ten Commandments,

» article continues...

And:

by Thom Hartmann | April 30, 2025 - 5:06am | permalink

— from The Hartmann Report

Wake up, America! While we’ve been distracted by the daily chaos of the Trump administration, something far more sinister has taken root in our country. It’s called Structural Eugenics (and a hat-tip to Qasim Rashid for putting this on my radar), and if you’re not furious about it yet, you damn well should be.

This isn’t some fringe conspiracy theory: it’s a coordinated assault on our most vulnerable citizens happening in broad daylight with deadly consequences.

Let’s be brutally honest here: the MAGA movement isn’t just pushing bad policy, they’re implementing a modern form of eugenics through selective attention and neglect.

Consider what the Trump administration is obsessively tracking: They’re monitoring autistic children, trying to build databases of women’s menstrual cycles, creating blacklists of anyone who criticizes Trump or questions Israeli policies, surveilling transgender Americans, and targeting anyone who dares mention diversity or inclusion.

» article continues...


Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs Exposes The Sheer Foolishness Of Dotard's Tariffs And What They Mean For The Global Economy

 



Columbia Professor Jeffrey Sachs delivers one of the most devastating - as well as memorable  (and educational) takedowns of Donald Trump in this video of a recent appearance. 

Jeffrey Sachs's Big Remark On Donald Trump Breaks The Internet | US News | World News


Trump, aka Donnie Dotard, aka Captain Bonespurs, in 100 days has created untold national and global carnage - when he ought to have been incarcerated at Rikers Island. (But too many dummy voters let him back into power, believing his bullshit lies.)  

The deranged imp has: provoked a trade war, destroyed the U.S. brand in the bond markets - opening the nation to fiscal catastrophe, scrapped decades-old treaties, appeased Putin and even suggested the U.S. may no longer defend Europe. He's also had his butt muncher bro Muskrat dismantle the government infrastructure that has provided the know how and experience to respond to a vast array of critical events. Thereby making it less able to respond to an emergency - whether Avian flu or Category 5 hurricanes. 

 If the first mandate of any genuine president is to protect the citizens from a host of imminent threats - natural and man-made- Dotard has flunked on all counts. Jeffrey Sachs explains with brilliance and analogies how his reckless, uninformed economic moves have attained a stupidity pinnacle all of their own.

Don't miss it!

See Also:

by Les Leopold | April 29, 2025 - 5:05am | permalink

I recently wrote about a somewhat mysterious group of financial traders known as the bond vigilantes. Their actions caused Donald Trump to abort many of his Liberation Day tariffs, but that does not make them the good-guy defenders of democracy. In fact, they are quite the opposite.

Many understood that point, thankfully, but others wondered about the government bond market, how it worked, and why the value of something fully backed by the faith of the U.S. government might be mutable in value.

Readers had questions and the answers will help us understand why Trump flinched when the bond vigilantes drove up the interest rates on government bonds. As we shall see, what seems like a small change in interest rates has a very big impact on the value of outstanding bonds, causing the loss of trillions of dollars in a flash.

» article continues...

And:


by Thom Hartmann | April 26, 2025 - 5:03am | permalink

— from The Hartmann Report

The Trump administration just gutted Meals on Wheels. Seriously. Meals on Wheels!

Donald Trump didn’t just “disrupt” America; he detonated it. Like a political Chernobyl, he poisoned the very soil of our democratic republic, leaving behind a toxic cloud of cruelty, corruption, and chaos that will radiate through generations if we don’t contain it now.

He didn’t merely bring darkness; he cultivated it. He made it fashionable. He turned cruelty into currency and made ignorance a political virtue.

This man, a grotesque cocktail of malignant narcissism and petty vengeance, ripped the mask off American decency and showed the world our ugliest face. He caged children. Caged. Children. He laughed off their cries while his ghoulish acolytes used “Where are the children?” as a punchline for their next QAnon rally.

» article continues...

And:

by Robert Reich | April 14, 2025 - 5:24am | permalink

— from Robert Reich's Substack

As tens of millions of Americans hussle to pay their taxes, Trump has put the entire global economy into chaos. 401(k)s are tanking, savings are shrinking, treasury bonds are losing value, supply chains are convulsing.

Even America’s oligarchs are petrified. They contributed millions to Trump’s inauguration. Many invested heavily in his campaign. They lavished praise on the new president and have supported his every move — in order to benefit from his promised big tax cut.

But the chaos he’s unleashed on the world economy is causing many of them to go public with their worries.

“Obviously,” Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase’s chief executive, said in a conference call with reporters, “the China stuff is significant. We don’t know the full effect.”

» article continues...

And:

Opinion | The bond market just sent a big warning for Trump - The Washington Post

Excerpt:

Investors started dumping U.S. government bonds. They sold and sold and sold. This is not normal. Typically, U.S. government bonds are a safe haven. Whenever stocks tank or there’s turmoil around the world, investors rush to buy plain vanilla bonds from the U.S. Treasury. It’s the equivalent of chicken soup for unhealthy markets. But suddenly, those bonds turned bitter. Ultimately, Trump caved to the bond markets. He didn’t want to follow the fate of British Prime Minister Liz Truss, who resigned in humiliation in 2022 after a similar bond market fiasco in reaction to her policies.

This unsleeping, unfeeling, unsentimental voting bloc forced Trump to change course on his tariff tornado. Other forces sagged into exhaustion in the face of Trump’s obsession, but the votes of the bond markets kept piling up, second by second, hour by hour, day by day. Forget about memes, sick burns and capital letters on Truth Social. The market eschews parades and petitions and marathon speeches. It is an endless murmur of individual transactions, each one a vote, and a landslide swept Trump away.

Trump and his team tried to happy-talk their way past the stock market collapse, but the tireless voters weighed in. His attempt to brush off his defeat in the bond markets by saying that traders had gotten “yippy” fell flat. This is the world’s infrastructure of finance we’re talking about, and it’s built on the value of government promises. Yips have nothing to do with it.

And the pillar of this infrastructure is the credibility of the United States.”

And:

Opinion | Trump is deliberately destroying America’s scientific edge - The Washington Post

Monday, April 28, 2025

New Research Makes Sense Of Neutrino Mass - Proposes Upper Limit


Two weeks ago, a team of particle physicists unveiled the most precise measurement yet of a neutrino, scaling down the maximum possible mass of these elusive - almost massless specks of matter that permeate our universe. The result, published in the journal Science, does not define the exact mass of a neutrino, just its upper limit, given as:


resulting in an upper limit of mν < 0.45 eV at 90% confidence level.

But this finding helps bring physicists closer to figuring out just what is wrong with the so-called Standard Model, their best — albeit incomplete — theory of the laws that rule the subatomic realm. One way physicists know it is not quite accurate is that it suggests that the neutrino should not have any mass at all.

At grander scales, learning more about neutrinos may help cosmologists fill in their ever hazy picture of the universe, including how galaxies originally clustered together and what influences the expansion of the cosmos since the Big Bang.

Neutrinos occur in abundance across the cosmos, created virtually anytime atomic nuclei fuse or fission. But they carry no electric charge and are notoriously difficult to detectNeutrinos also come in three types, which physicists describe as flavors.  

Let's review again the basis for these neutrino flavor states. If there are three such states: electron, muon and tau, then there must be three different corresponding neutrino masses which we can call: m1, m2 and m3. Further, the three "flavors" are really different superpositions of the 3 basic neutrino mass states.  Moreover, and to make it more complex, we know that quantum interference between mass states means a neutrino originating in one "flavor" can transmogrify to another over its transit.


Because of the oscillations and quantum interference we need to reckon in a "misalignment" between flavor and the basic neutrino masses. This is done by reference to three independent "mixing angles": Θ 12 , Θ 23  and Θ 13. To a good approximation, oscillation in any one regime is characterized by just one Θ ij and a corresponding mass difference, defined:

 D ij2 = [m j2 - m i2]

Unlike the latest research published in Science, this earlier edition was confined only to mass differences ( D m) not to neutrino mass itself or even upper limits.

As an example, the probability that a muon neutrino of energy E acquires a different flavor after traversing distance L is:

P = sin2 Î˜ 23  sin2 (
l23)

where 
l23 is the energy -dependent oscillation length, given by:

4ħ E c / (
D m 322)

How well do we know the parameters? Atmospheric neutrino observations yield:

 Î˜ 23  
» 45 degrees, while D m 322 = 0.0024 eV2.


Meanwhile, solar neutrino data yield 
» 33 degrees for Θ12 and  D m 212 = 0.00008 eV2. (Note: ħ is the Planck constant of action divided by 2 Ï€)  If then:


D m 312  =  [D m 212    +  D m 322 ] = 0.00008 eV2 + 0.0024 eV2

We know, 
D m 312  =  0.00248 
eV2

Oddly, neutrinos can morph from one flavor to another as they move through space and time, a discovery recognized by the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2015. The underlying mechanism that makes these transformations possible, physicists realized, meant that neutrinos must have some mass. Neutrinos are mind boggingly light, and physicists don’t know why.

Uncovering the exact values of the mass of neutrinos could lead to “some kind of portal” to new physics, said Alexey Lokhov, a scientist at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany.  According to Lokhov, quoted in a NYT piece, referring to  his team’s measurement:

 Lokhov and his colleagues used the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino, or KATRIN, experiment to narrow down the mass of a neutrino. At one end of the 230-foot-long apparatus was a source of tritium, a heavier version of hydrogen with two neutrons in its nucleus. Because tritium is unstable, it decays into helium: One neutron converts into a proton, which spits out an electron in the process. It also spits out an antineutrino, the antimatter twin of a neutrino. The two should have identical mass.

The mass of the original tritium is split among the products of the decay: the helium, electron and antineutrino. Neither neutrinos nor antineutrinos can be directly detected, but a sensor at the other end of the experiment recorded 36 million electrons, over 259 days, shed by the decaying tritium. By measuring the energy of the electron’s motion, they could indirectly deduce the maximum mass possible for the antineutrino. They found that value to be no more than 0.45 electronvolts, in the units of mass used by particle physicists, a million times lighter than an electron.

Note that the upper bound on the mass:  mν < 0.45 eV

was measured for only one flavor of neutrino. But Wilkerson said that nailing down the mass of one makes it possible to calculate the rest. The latest measurement pushes the possible mass of the neutrino lower than the previous limit set in 2022 by the KATRIN collaboration, of no more than 0.8 electron volts. It is also nearly twice as precise.

Elise Novitski, a physicist at the University of Washington who was not involved in the work, commended the KATRIN team’s careful effort.  In the words of Novitski:

It’s really just a tour de force. I have full confidence in their result..

Other experiments will also contribute to a better understanding of the neutrino’s mass, including Project 8 in Seattle and the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment, spread across two physics facilities in the Midwest. The good new is the KATRIN team is currently working on an even tighter boundary on the neutrino mass from 1,000 days of data, which it expects to collect by the end of the year. That will give the physicists even more electrons to measure, leading to a more precise measurement.

Astronomers studying the structure of the cosmos at large, thought to be influenced by the vast collection of neutrinos flooding the universe, have their own measurement of the particles’ maximum mass. But according to Prof. Wilkerson, the boundaries set by astronomers staring out into the void don’t match up with what particle physicists calculate in the lab, as they scrutinize the subatomic world.  Is there a neutrino mass shrinkage? According to Wilkerson:

There’s something really interesting going on. And the likely solution to that is going to be physics beyond the Standard Model.

The neutrino’s mass is a particularly elusive quarry because it stubbornly refuses to abide by the tenets of the Standard Model of particle physics. Famously, almost all of this theory’s predictions have been experimentally confirmed, yet some of its forecasts for the neutrino have notoriously fallen flat. The model predicts that neutrinos should be completely massless. This was ultimately refuted by a Nobel-winning experiment that showed neutrinos not only have mass but also, for whatever reason, change mass by oscillating between three different neutrino varieties, or “flavors.”

Elaborating a bit: this so-called 'Standard Model' is generally defined as the symmetry:

SU(3) x SU(2) X U(1)

where each of the above denotes a specific matrix, or more exactly a group. See, e.g.

http://brane-space.blogspot.com/2010/04/looking-at-groups.html

In the case of SU(2) we describe it as the "special unitary group" which has the form:

S =

(a.........-b*)
(b..........a*)

where a*, b* are complex conjugates and we have (aa* + b*b) = 1. Thus the elements of SU(2) are the unitary 2 x 2 matrices with DET (determinant) = 1. These groups thus define the behavior of a specific class of subatomic particles. Spontaneous symmetry breaking would therefore resolve this combination into constituent parts, e.g.: SU(3) associated with the 'color force' of quarks:

 SU(2) x U(1)

associated with the electro-weak force.

One possible symmetry breaking (quark -boson format) is:

SU(3) x SU(2) X U(1) -> SU(3) + SU(2) x U(1)

which would occur at a particular ambient temperature (T_qb) for the universe at some epoch (E_qb) in the past. In the foregoing, the synthesis of SU(2) and U(1) into the locally gauge invariant electro-weak theory requires a mechanism which confers mass to three vector bosons while leaving the photon massless. This 'mass-giving' mechanism is called the Higgs Field or Higgs mechanism, and it demands the existence of one or more massive, spin-0 bosons otherwise called Higgs bosons. See e.g.

Scientists announced the discovery of the Higgs boson 10 years ago. What’s next? | University of Chicago News

The final resolution of the neutrino’s mass may well have to await the construction of a giant neutrino detector in the Antarctic.  Below, how its size compares with the Eifel Tower - set in the lower right:


See Also:

Brane Space: A Deep Dive Into Neutrino Detection & How It Also Relates To Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry In The Cosmos