Wednesday, November 27, 2024

Better Get Your Affordable Electronics (& Avocados) Now Before Trump Imposes His Tariffs In January

 

                "I want tariffs! I don't care about inflation! Screw the voters!"
      
"Americans will pay through the nose for their avocados, thanks to you!"

Donald Trump has long telegraphed his love of trade wars. So Americans probably should have expected the president-elect’s latest tariff news: 25 percent taxes on all Canadian and Mexican products, starting Jan. 20. On the other hand, voters could be forgiven for not anticipating that he’d renege on his main campaign pitch — a promise to reduce prices — even before he takes office. So, if you voted for Trump because you thought he’d lower your grocery bills, I have some very bad news for you..

Each year, Mexico sends us $19 billion worth of fruits and vegetables alone. For some common grocery items — such as ones that Americans eat year-round but can’t grow domestically year-round — we’re especially reliant on our southern neighbor. About two-thirds of fresh tomatoes that Americans eat are from Mexico; same goes for 90 percent of avocados.”.-”.- Catherine Rampell, The Washington Post, ‘Trump’s tariffs on Mexico and Canada won’t reduce grocery prices’


On Monday, Donnie Dotard - aka your new president-  announced his plan to impose a 25 percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico. In a series of Truth Social posts, Trump argued ed that the tariffs were needed to stop swarming "criminals" coming  in - not only from Mexico but from Canada.  

The impetuous rat - who thinks he has a mandate-  wrote: 

"As everyone is aware, thousands of people are pouring through Mexico and Canada, bringing Crime and Drugs at levels never seen before. Right now a Caravan coming from Mexico, composed of thousands of people, seems to be unstoppable in its quest to come through our currently Open Border. On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25 percent Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders."

Who does this stupid fucker think he is?  I mean he doesn't even have a mandate or electoral majority - getting barely 49.8 % of the votes.  Besides, Canada and Mexico are major trading partners with the U.S., accounting for almost 30 percent of U.S. trade volume. Canada is also one of the most trade-dependent countries in the world, with 75 percent of its exports going to the U.S., so higher tariffs would have a significant effect on Canada's economy. 

As for Mexico, as President Claudia Sheinbaum (see her image at top) warned, this move is: "unacceptable and will cause inflation and joblessness for the U.S. and Mexico." She also warned of retaliation and that the blowback on the U.S. would be even worse should Mexico exert less control over migration (currently down 3/4 from last December).  Also, the impact on U.S. car buyers will be worse given "big U.S. carmakers were among Mexico's principal exporters to the U.S."

Is Dotard remotely aware of any of this, of the economic hornet's nest he's poking?  Doubtful, which is why we brand him a dotard.  His brain cells, including the microglial, are basically no longer functional. While he may appear relatively sane and coherent, when you parse his words it turns out to be  delusion. He's the next thing to stark raving mad. In this case he fails to grasp his tariffs are in fact a tax on the U.S. citizens he claims to want to protect. 

But don't take my word. A number of companies have already said they are planning price hikes to cover any loss of their profits owing to Trump's tariffs, e.g.

Companies ready price hikes to offset Trump’s global tariff plans - The Washington Post

Wherein we read:

"Across the United States, companies that rely on foreign suppliers are preparing to raise prices in response to the massive import tariffs that former president Donald Trump promises if he wins the election Tuesday".

In response to the proposed batshit nuts tariffs, the Canadian government, in a joint statement from Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and Public Safety Minister Dominic Leblanc, tried to be civil.  They emphasized the close relationship between the two countries and said they would discuss the border and vast economic ties with the incoming administration.  But they seem not to realize that Rump isn't a rational person, he is demented and right now, in the wake of the absurd election result - putting an unfit loon back into power - they will see it's like trying to argue with a rabid dog. Anyway, their rational statement read:

"Canada places the highest priority on border security and the integrity of our shared border. Our relationship today is balanced and mutually beneficial, particularly for American workers," 

Meanwhile, Mexico's Foreign Relations Department and Economy Department had no immediate reaction to Trump's statements.  Why would they, they're likely still in shot at a fool willing to 'toss the baby out with the bath water' on mutual trade because a minor fraction of bad actors is trying to send fentanyl in.  But it's typical Trump, especially after a post-marginal election win and 'sugar' high.

To be sure, it remains uncertain whether Dump will follow through on his tariff proposals or whether they are part of a broader negotiating strategy - or just plain empty bombast and bluster. If he did try to impose these tariffs - it would violate a 2020 treaty already in place with both nations.

 Also, they could cost Americans an estimated $78 billion annually, NBC News reported, with everyday goods costing more. Already, Corie Barry - the chief executive of Best Buy - has warned that "60 percent of the cost of its goods come from China and Mexico" so that "consumers will pay more given very little is not imported."

Below are the seven major product categories that would be most affected if Trumptard gets his way. (And recall as I posted before, tariffs are impositions of higher prices on a nation's own citizens- not on the foreign countries for which they are purportedly targeted  This is what simpleton Trump doesn't get).

Automobiles and Automotive Parts

Canada and Mexico are major suppliers of vehicles and parts, and many cars sold in the U.S. are assembled in those countries or use components sourced from them. Analysts have estimated that a tariff could add $1,000 to $5,000 to the price of a new car, with parts such as engines, transmissions and tires becoming more expensive. Replacement parts would also become more expensive because of the tariffs.

Agricultural Products

Canada and Mexico are also significant exporters of agricultural goods to the U.S., including fruits, vegetables, meat and dairy. A 25 percent tariff would make everyday staples such as avocados, tomatoes, beef and cheese more expensive for U.S. consumers. Canadian beef exports across all markets are projected to total 595,000 tons this year, with about 80 percent destined for U.S. customers. Last year, the U.S. imported $2.7 billion worth of avocados from Mexico, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported.

Electronics

Many electronics—including smartphones—are assembled in Mexico or rely on components manufactured there. Tariffs on electronics could lead to higher prices for consumer goods, especially devices such as TVs, laptops and home appliances that rely on Mexican manufacturing.

Mineral Fuels and Oils

Canada is the largest exporter of crude oil and refined petroleum to the U.S. A 25 percent tariff would increase fuel costs, affecting gas prices and heating oil. This means consumers would likely see higher prices at the pump, with several cents per gallon being added to gasoline and diesel prices.

Plastics and Plastic Products

Canada and Mexico supply a significant amount of plastic materials and products used in packaging, construction and consumer goods. Tariffs would raise costs for businesses and consumers across industries that rely on plastic.

Machinery and Industrial Equipment

Canada and Mexico also export heavy machinery, engines and industrial tools used in manufacturing and construction. If Trump's tariffs are imposed, U.S. industries will face higher costs for equipment, such as industrial machinery, boilers and electrical equipment. The higher costs could slow down construction and manufacturing projects, which in turn could hit companies in those industries.

In the words of economics commentator Catherine Rampell on Monday (CNN):

"Maybe you voted for Trump because you thought he was going to bring down the cost of housing.  But a lot of our lumber, cement and other materials comes from Canada, which means that construction costs are going to go up,

Aluminum and Steel Products

Canada is a top supplier of aluminum and steel, which are essential for construction, automotive manufacturing and packaging. Tariffs would raise the cost of raw materials, affecting industries that use these metals and even products such as soda cans.


If the inflation does spike even higher than it was in the last months of the Biden-Harris administration, don't say I didn't sound the warning.  This is exactly what happens when too many 'low information' voters -  dazzled by bluster and fake machismo - cast ballots for an imp who shouldn't even run a dog kennel.

See Also:

Opinion | Trump’s proposed tariffs on Mexico and Canada won’t make his voters happy - The Washington Post

And:

Trump’s tariffs could mean higher inflation on groceries, gas and cars - The Washington Post

And:

by Alex Henderson | November 29, 2024 - 7:00am | permalink

— from Alternet

Critics of President-elect Donald Trump's proposal for aggressive new tariffs were hoping that he would back down or reconsider his idea. Instead, Trump is promising to enact new tariffs on his first day back in office, including across-the-board 25% tariffs on goods imported into the United States from Mexico and Canada. Tariffs on items imported from Mainland China would be pegged at 10%.

Vice President Kamala Harris, during her 2024 presidential campaign, repeatedly warned that the tariffs Trump was proposing would, in effect, be a major "sales tax on the American people" if enacted. And many economists, including Robert Reich and the New York Times' Paul Krugman, have been warning that Trump's tariffs would lead to brutal inflation.

And:

by Maya Boddie | November 26, 2024 - 7:21am | permalink

— from Alternet

President-Elect Donald Trump announced via social media on Monday that he will enforce tariffs on goods imported from Canada, Mexico, and China.

"On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders," the MAGA leader wrote via Truth Social. "This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country! Both Mexico and Canada have the absolute right and power to easily solve this long simmering problem. We hereby demand that they use this power, and until such time that they do, it is time for them to pay a very big price!"

Several political and economic experts slammed the president-elect's announcement.

Adam Isacson replied: "Using the same logic, Mexico and Canada could impose tariffs on US goods until we get serious about: - Reducing US demand for illicit drugs - Stopping cross-border trafficking of guns easily purchased in US shops - Curtailing money-laundering in US banks, real estate, etc."

Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) said: "Donald Trump’s first act as president will be to intentionally *raise* prices for the American people."

Economist and University of Los Angeles law professor Kimberly Clausing commented: "Policy by tweet is something we once again brace for. But the uncertainty and chaos are just part of the economic damage that these policies bring. Canada and Mexico are our largest trading partners, and these huge tariffs will raise prices for consumers."

Boston College political science assistant professor Masha Krupenkin replied: "Enjoy your cheap avocados and electronics while you can."ring problem. We hereby demand that they use this power, and until such time that they do, it is time for them to pay a very big price!"

And:

Eric Trump demonstrates in 30 seconds he doesn’t have a clue how tariffs work

And:

Donald Trump & GOP "Better For Economy" ? This Delusion Is Belied By The Facts

And:

by Rev Dr Liz Theoharis | November 26, 2024 - 6:32am | permalink

— from TomDispatch

by Rev. Dr. Liz Theoharis and Shailly Gupta Barnes

“If they do these things when the wood is green, what will happen when it is dry?”
— Luke 23:31

Before November 5, millions of us were already struggling with poverty, extreme storms, immigration nightmares, anti-trans bills, criminalized reproductive health, the demolition of homeless encampments, the silencing of freedom of speech on campuses… and, of course, the list only goes on and on. Since Donald Trump and JD Vance were elected, more of us find ourselves in a state of fear and trembling, given the reports of transgender people attacked in broad daylight, misogynist social media posts threatening “your body, my choice,” Black college students receiving notes about returning to enslavement, and the unhoused beaten and battered.

In the wake of the election results, there has also been a flurry of activity in anticipation of the extremist policies Donald Trump and crew are likely to put in place to more deeply harm the nation’s most vulnerable: mass Zoom meetings with MoveOn, the Working Families Party, Indivisible, and more; interfaith prayer services for healing and justice organized by various denominations and ecumenical groups; local actions pulled together by the Women’s March; community meetings with the hashtag #weareworthfightingfor; and calls to mobilize for inauguration day and beyond.

And:

by Thom Hartmann | November 26, 2024 - 6:04am | permalink

— from The Hartmann Report

“The political folks believed that because [Covid] was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy.”
Vanity Fair’s Katherine Eban quoting Jared Kushner’s team in March, 2020

Arguably the most important aspect of political leadership is the ability to deal with a crisis.

The massive incompetence and malice of the Trump administration in 2020 led, for example, to the unnecessary deaths of an estimated half-million Americans. And now we may well be facing a repeat that could be even worse.

The flu pandemic of 1918-1920 was the result of a bird flu (H1N1) that mixed, presumably in a pig, with a human-adapted flu virus and then killed over 50 million people worldwide and almost 700,000 in America (when our population was only 100 million people; it’s 334 million today).

» article continues...

Solutions to Differential Geometry Problems (From Nov. 19 Post)

 Problems:

1Consider two vectors AB spanning a subspace of   R 4   where: = (1, 2, 1, 0) and = (1, 2, 3, 1)  

Find:  AA ‖    and:  BA


Solution: For A we have the orthonormal basis:

AA  = (1, 2, 1, 0)/ Ã–{1  +  2  + 1  +  0 } =

(1, 2, 1, 0)/ Ã– 6

For B we have:

B
A = (1, 2, 3, 1)/ Ã– {1 2 + 2 2 +  3 2 + 1 2} =

 

(1, 2, 3, 1)/ Ã– 15


2)  Given  x'i =    x i  +   b i

And:    =

(2….1…..0)

(3….-5.….6)

(-7….0… .4)

Find the new coordinates x'  if :

  b i  =

(1….2…..1)

(2….1.….3)

(3….2… .1)


Write out the matrix elements for  ik . 

Solutions:

The key to the solution is noting - from the original post text: 
A(ik ) equals the Kronecker delta (unit matrix) so then the new Cartesian coordinate system is given by:

x'i =    x i  +   b i             i=  1, 2, 3.....

Then we know immediately the matrix for ik is:

(1….0…..0)

(0….1…..0)

(0….0… .1)


And the solution follows from simple Mathcad matrix operations summarized below:

For which the final - new - coordinates after transformation become:

(3….3…..1)

(3….-4.…9)

(-4….2… 5)





Monday, November 25, 2024

Mensa Basic Geometry Brain Twisters

 


1) The Rectangle Problem:

The height of a rectangle is 81 units. Two circles are inscribed in the rectangle as shown above. The circles are tangent to each other. A line segment has an endpoint on both circles and passes through the point of tangency. It measures 56 units, and is parallel to the height of the rectangle. What is the length L of the rectangle?



1) The Square Problem:   

ABCD is a square. W is the midpoint of AB.  Z is the center of the square where AD and BC intersect. X is the point where AD and WC intersect. Y is the point where BC and WD intersect.

If the area of square ABCD is 4 square units, then find the area of the orange region WYXZ.


Dallas Journalists Need To Grow Up And Face The Reality of Conspiracy In Kennedy Assassination

 

                 It's essential people discriminate between actual conspiracies & conspiracy ideations


It is passing incredible that now more than sixty years after the JFK assassination-  with all the millions of key files released-  too many still gobble the codswallop that "Oswald did it".  Case in point, a Dallas Morning News columnist named Tom Croward who fairly screamed in his piece yesterday:


Adding:


Son, if you claim to want to "unapologetically" address this issue, why do you succumb to fairy tales spun by the now discredited Warren Commission, as opposed to digging out the facts on your own as a genuine journalist should? The fact here is that all the files since released from the JFK Records Act show that Lee Harvey Oswald had nothing to do with the assassination of John F. Kennedy. And you can take that to the bank.

Let's begin by dismantling the claptrap of one of the biggest purveyors of JFK anti-conspiracy nonsense: Gerald Posner in his ridiculous book, Case Closed. Which is the go to source for many of today's lazy or incompetent columnists who insist Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin.  To cut to the chase,  Posner's slipshod work has already been exposed on one JFK website detailing a host of "Posnerisms", e.g.  

http://www.assassinationweb.com/twpos.htm

Those who take the time to read carefully through the examples in the link will become aware of an unnerving lack of attention to detail and a penchant for what appears to be deliberate misrepresentation. Indeed, Posner’s entire case appears to be erected on a tissue of lies, misrepresentations, gross distortions and shoddy methodology, the mass of which can’t even redeem it as coincidental. 

This dissembling cretin couldn’t even get his facts straight in a July 23rd NY Times piece:

Opinion | Post-Trump Shooting, the Government Is Allowing Conspiracy Theories to Flourish - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Writing: 

In the early days following the Kennedy assassination, it was often said that the greatest marksmen in the world tried and failed to repeat what the government said Lee Harvey Oswald had done — fire three shots at a moving target in a very short amount of time. But it turned out that Mr. Oswald had plenty of time to get the shots off, and what he did has been replicated numerous times

Failing to note that the vaunted Warren Commission itself enlisted three master marksmen from the National Rifle Association to attempt to replicate the shots attributed to Oswald. [1]  The WC -chosen  team failed, even after rebuilding the alleged weapon to enable any shots to be fired. (An aspect Posner glosses over including that NO one has been able to replicate the alleged feat, likely because that Mannlicher-Carcano was never the weapon actually used. Nor the only one.)

Oswald was presumed to have fired from the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository, so effectively six stories up or 60’ in altitude. However, the experts were allowed to fire from a tower only half this altitude (30’)[2]. In addition, while Oswald had to have fired at a limousine moving at 11 miles per hour, the experts fired at stationary targets[3].  The target area was also magnified for the experts, to the whole upper torso of the target prop’s body – while Oswald was limited to the head and neck.

 More to the point, the rifle was altered away from the one Oswald supposedly used, according to the WC.  The rifle sight itself was rebuilt and “metal shims were fitted to provide a degree of accuracy previously absent’. When Ronald Simmons, the Chief of the Infantry Weapons Evaluation Branch of the Army’s Ballistics Research Division was asked about this he replied: “Well, they could not sight the weapon in using the telescope”[4]. He added that the aiming apparatus had to be rebuilt by a machinist[5], with two shims added, one to adjust for the elevation, the other for the azimuth.

In other words, had they actually used the rifle in the same condition Oswald was alleged to have had it, then they’d likely not have hit the side of a barn.  Even so, just one of the three expert riflemen was able to get off three shots in under 5.6 seconds – the designated time interval for total shots declared by the Warren Commission. And most to the point: none of the total 18 shots fired struck the targets (ibid.). in the head or the neck. In other words, from a technical standpoint of duplicating Oswald’s alleged shots- this trio of experts failed. 

Another key aspect: for the duration of the 18 rounds, two of   the “master” riflemen were unable to reload and fire at the stationary target as rapidly as Oswald purportedly did for the moving limo! (The Mannlicher-Carcano had a bolt action recycling time of 2. 33 secs)

It wouldn't be until years later when Patricia Dumais - who suspected the rifle was a stage prop and wanted to see the internal control number - was informed by the National Archives (H.E. Livingstone, 1993,  'Killing the Truth', p. 204.):

'We cannot disassemble Lee Harvey Oswald's rifle because this action might be destructive to the object.’'

So all the Warren Commission followers have been 'had' for over 60 years by a colossal hoax.  Prof. David R. Wrone, whose review of Case Closed appeared in The Journal of Southern History, notes:

"Posner often presents the opposite of what the evidence says. In the presentation of a corrupt picture of Oswald’s background- for example – he states that, under the name of Osborne, Oswald picked up leaflets he distributed from the Jones Printing Company and that a ‘receptionist’ identified him. She in fact said that Oswald did not pick up the leaflets as the source that Posner cites indicates. “

But the dimensions of the colossal hoax perpetrated on the American people by the Warren Commission - which ought to be the real subject of Mr. Croward's ire- go even deeper. I am referring to how actual physical evidence was fraudulently manipulated, i.e. in the "autopsy" carried out at Bethesda Naval Hospital. Specifically, the rear of JFK's head (with the gaping EXIT wound from a frontal shot) had to be "redone" using mortician's plaster, i.e.  


The reason is so it would now conform to the WC fairy tale, i.e. that the kill shot came from the rear - fired by one Lee Harvey Oswald in the 6th floor of the Texas Book Depository - and not from the actual assassin on the grassy knoll.  This reconstruction (on the left side) would also then dovetail with the portrayal in the Warren Report, using the now famous WC sketch by artist H.A.  Rydberg:

Note the upper inclined arrow (from the upper shoulder) through Kennedy’s throat marks the original placement.     This was done in order to simultaneously account for the (actual) upper back wound (5.5. inches below the tip of the right mastoid process)  and the throat wound without adding an extra shot (entry from front) , which would have pointed to conspiracy (i.e. at least two shooters).  Thus the "single bullet" or "magic bullet" theory.  The change in angle and placement (on back) had to be done else it would require someone firing from street level (blue arrow), as opposed to firing from the Texas School Book Depository.

The actual alteration occurred compliments of Warren Commission member Gerald Ford, who understood that to make Specter’s “magic bullet”  work the original upper back wound had to become a base of neck wound.  Hence the bullet path had to be raised 5.5 inches to get a downward sloping angle.  The problem was he had to violate the original autopsy report -  from Adm. George Burkley - to accomplish this manipulation. Note the initial draft of the autopsy report stated:

“A bullet had entered his back at a point slightly above the shoulder to the right of the spine."

Ford altered it to read:

“A bullet had entered the back of his neck slightly to the right of the spine."

The act of deliberate manipulation was also reported in the NY Times decades after the fact, e.g.


So we only now begin to see and appreciate the level of cynical manipulation of evidence to get ordinary 'Joes' and 'Janes' as well as casual JFK historians (evidently like Larry Sabato at U. of VA)  to buy into the Oswald did it bunkum. Once Gerald Ford changed the angle of wound entry – from the upper back to the base of the neck- he effectively sacrificed one of the seven wounds needed for the magic bullet. While gaining a more realistic wound angle, in order to be able to account for an exit throat wound, he had to forego the one accurate  (back) wound the Warren Commission had originally identified. In its place a spurious neck wound.

There was still left the job of converting Parkland's Dr. Malcolm Perry to rejecting his original take of a throat entry wound for an exit wound. Nurse Audrey Bell related to JFK researcher H.L. Livingstone (on his visit to Dallas in 1991), how Perry was hounded relentlessly - including by SBT creator Arlen Specter. In the words of RN Bell:  

 “They called him in the middle of the night from Bethesda to change the entry wound in the throat wound to an exit wound.”    

But Dr. Perry damn well knew what he saw and had faithfully sketched an entrance wound, placed just slightly above the knot of JFK's tie, e.g.

The placement and identification as an entrance wound also conformed to the key Zapruder film frame, showing JFK clutching his throat, e.g.


This, of course, also shows a frontal shot, not one from the rear at the TSBD.  This, obviously, was why Dr. Perry was subjected to so much pressure to change his observation to an exit wound, i.e. to allow for a shooter behind the limo.

The 'capper' is the head shot itself, the real kill shot - not any from behind that Oswald was claimed to have made. We see it clearly in Z-frame 314:

We also - thanks to release of critical JFK files from JFK Records Act- have the actual image showing the entry wound of the bullet at the right temple:


We can thereby infer the direct trajectory of the bullet from the right front of Kennedy’s forehead to the rear of the head (leaving the gaping hole seen in previous b&W photo) , and contrast it with the Warrenite fictitious version of an assassin to the rear at the Texas School Book Depository.  Finally, the motion of Jackie backwards over the limo trunk also confirms the kill shot from the front, not the rear, e.g.


Jackie was adamant, when asked in WC secret session, what she was doing and she replied she was trying to recover a dislodged piece of her husband's skull. There is no way known to Newtonian physics a shot arriving from the rear would create a skull fragment hurtling backward - since the momentum must be in the same direction. Hence, Jackie would not be reacting this particular way if the shot arrived from the rear as the Warrenite fairy tale claims.

 The only possible explanation is JFK was killed from a frontal shot, in accord with the Newtonian law of linear momentum transfer.  One does not need elaborate mathematical formulae to show this. Or elaborate logic to deduce Lee Oswald could not have been the assassin.

So if Lee Oswald was not responsible for the dastardly deed, who was?  The (1975) Church Committee hearings and testimony were critical in establishing the existence of the program called  ZR/ Rifle.  Former CIA Director Richard Helms -in one session - spoke to the Committee at length about ZR/Rifle.  When pressed he even identified two hit team members by their code names: WI/ROGUE and QJ/WIN.  He described the former as "a stateless soldier of fortune and a criminal" (Church Committee Report, pp. 43-44).  He summarized the second in these terse terms (ibid.):

"If you needed somebody to carry out murder I guess you had a man who might be prepared to carry it out.”

More compelling still, a direct link of Richards Helms to William Harvey and the assassin (designated  QJ/WIN) appears in a February 19, 1962 memorandum from Helms to Harvey obtained from the Assassination Archives in Washington, D.C.

All of which comes together (take note, Mr. Croward!) knowing these assigned mechanics would have used the CIA Assassinations Handbook, available since Operation PBSuccess in Guatemala, in 1954.


http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/

As noted in 
Document 1:


"The idea of forming assassination teams ('K' groups) apparently originated with Castillo Arenas in 1952.  Adopting Castillo Arenas' concept the [  ] chief routinely included two assassination specialists in his training plans.  CIA training for sabotage teams in early 1954 also included creating a 'K' group trained to perform assassinations."

There is no doubt such a 'K' group was set to target Castro under ZR/Rifle (not 'Mongoose' in 1962), but could easily be redirected to target Kennedy in late 1963.  The proof in the pudding was the letter ‘D’ – on the cover sheet of Oswald’s 201 file – indicating a  CIA Staff D  SIGINT or signals intelligence operation run in concert with the National Security Agency or NSA. As pointed out by Peter Dale Scott (Deep Politics Quarterly, Jan. 1994): 

In 1961, when William Harvey headed Staff D, he was assigned the task of developing the CIA Assassinations Project, ZR/Rifle.

When ZR/Rifle was redirected from targeting Castro to JFK- probably in late 1962 or mid 1963 -  it was all over except for the triangulation of gunfire that took out the 35th president.  Who would have done it? A professional team dispatched to Dallas and basically admitted to by former CIA Director Helms in later 
Church Committee hearings.  Lee Oswald, set up as the designated patsy - meanwhile - was likely given a cock and bull story (by Wm Harvey's NSA affiliates) that his job was to stop the assassination at the TSBD.

Is digging out the truth behind actual conspiracies, difficult, time-consuming? You bet. But the truth, the facts, are vastly preferable to childish appeals to fantasies to help one sleep better at night. Besides, as St. Paul once admonished, when one becomes a man one puts away the things of a child. That includes peddling patently false bunkum and fairy stories about the Kennedy assassination we've been fed for over 60 years.

 In this case, no fictitious Oswald rifle "launched a post truth era from Dallas"  as Croward insists. Rather, a contrived compendium of fraudulent exhibits, manipulated  (as well as withheld) evidence, and deliberately omitted witnesses in the Warren Commission Report, created the post truth and fake news era in which we now are enmeshed. 

 Lastly, let's not forget the  only official government investigation (The  HSCA or House Select Committee On Assassinations), i.e. not under LBJ's purview :

Frequently Asked Questions on the JFK Assassination: (Pt. 7): The HSCA Investigation

Found a 96% probability for conspiracy. 

See Also:

In One Blockbuster JFK Assassination Documentary 7 Parkland Doctors Expose The Chicanery Of The Warren Commission 


And:


And:


And:


References

[1] Hearings Before the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, 1964: Vol. II, p. 243 (Government Printing Office)

[2] Op. cit p. 137.

[3] Op. cit. p. 133.

[4] Op. cit. (Vol. II), p. 250.

[5] Ibid.