Showing posts with label Electoral College. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electoral College. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2020

A Final End To White Male Grievance Support of Trump? Maybe Now After He Dismissed Fallen Troops As 'Suckers' & 'Losers'





"It doesn't matter much whether Trump is crazy, crazy like a fox, an incompetent boob who keeps getting lucky - or all three. What matters greatly is stopping him now before it is too late.  This is a tipping point, a time of trial for the soul of America.  We will protect our democracy from Trump's frontal assault or we will lose it."  - Allen Francis, 'The Twilight Of American Sanity', p. 101.


"How dare this guy make such comments when he, his kids, and the rest of the whole Trump clan never served one minute in the military, or the Peace Corps,  or sacrificed for this country in any capacity.

This guy Trump is disgusting and those who continue to support him are in the same category.  We are now in a new low in this country when we tolerate degrading the very people who sacrificed their lives to defend our country."  - Stan Hrincevich, Denver Post letters, Sunday, Aug. 6


"Donald Trump has falsely told us that only 9,000 people have died of the coronavirus in the United States, that shooting an unarmed man in the back seven times is like a bad putt at golf, that protests are being led by an airplane full of black-jacketed "thugs," and refused to condemn a vicious murderer who killed two people and blew the arm off a third. Now, he is threatening the Mayor of Portland with federal troops again.


Which raises the question, is this the America the majority of voters want to live in?  A country where the police act as an occupying force and are immune to oversight or discipline? A president who pits people against each other based on their religion or the color of their skin? An administration that lies about science as over 200,000 people die? Corrupt former lobbyists in charge of virtually every federal agency? Cutting the Social Security tax so the entire program collapses by 2023?

If the polls are any indication, almost half of America is right there with him.  WHY is This?"-  Thom Hartmann, ' Why Are So Many Americans Willing To Support Hate And Division?'

"The last four years have been deeply traumatizing to millions of Americans as we have watched our nation in the stranglehold of a maniacal, dictatorial and compulsively deceptive president. But it is worth examining the relationship that President Donald Trump has with his voters in order to understand why he won the 2016 election and why he continues to command such fervent loyalty a few months ahead of the next election. Willing to overlook his lies, improprieties, and corruption, Trump’s voters have a transactional relationship with the president that is practical, powerful, and surprisingly instructional to the rest of us.


While a majority of Americans might be stunned and horrified by Trump’s casual racism, unscientific claims, sexist attacks and more, his rambling rhetoric matters little to his base, and perhaps Trump voters don’t even bother trying to make sense of his words. To them, it matters what he does and how loyal he is to them. Trump’s reelection campaign website is literally called “Promises Kept.” Although several of his claims of promises are not true, the point is that he touts decisive action and convinces his supporters that he has fulfilled his pledges to them. He works for them and they know it. They are willing to overlook the ugliness that accompanies his rule. It is a practical and effective approach to transforming America into the country they want."  -  Sonali Kolhatkar, on smirkingchimp.com

It is beyond belief in these maddening times, that more than 2 in 5 Americans accept the surreal Trump-RNC Lie fest  and if the polls tighten in crucial "swing states" (WI, MI, PA) Trump could sneak into power again and wreak total havoc as an authoritarian, fascist dictator.   Thus, blogger Thom Hartmann's plaintive question in the caption at the top 'Why is this?' And his additional question from his full text:   

 Is this the America the majority of voters want to live in?

Well, maybe not an absolute majority but perhaps a majority of  working class, less educated Whites who remain filled with white grievance.  This lot are terrified of the massive BLM protests and also believe - following the RNC lies and propaganda- the poor blacks are coming for them in their (mostly) white suburbs.   They continue to feel, for some odd reason, that Trump has their back or sympathizes with them or wants to protect them. All of which is bunkum given Trump hasn't done one damned thing to protect them from the coronavirus. 

Most recently, WaPo reporter David Ignatius warned the white grievance and rage are still simmering, e.g.


Opinion | The rage that fuels Trumpism still burns - The ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-rage-that-fuels-trumpism-still-burns/2020/08/27/f76f554e-e898-11ea-970a-64c73a1c2392_story.html


Warning:

"When historians try to understand what happened to the United States in these years, they will study what spawned the Trump spasm of rage. Perhaps the most striking demographic change in the years preceding his election was the catastrophic decline in the health, income and cohesion of White men without college educations. That group voted 64 percent for Trump in 2016, making it one of his largest voting blocs, according to the Pew Research Center. 

The best account of this White collapse is “Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism,” published this year by economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton. Deaths from drug overdoses and other poisonings, suicide and alcohol-related diseases (which they grouped together as “deaths of despair”) among White people aged 45 to 54 “tripled from 1990 and 2017.” White men in particular were dying earlier; they were getting married less; they lost jobs and dignity."

Which makes my head spin just reading it. As for Janice, her understandable reaction was: "What is their problem, anyway? It's black men getting shot and smothered and choked, not white men! The cops give young white terrorists water bottles while they walk down the street with long guns!"

Ouch!

For me it's difficult to process all this white rage because my dad was also a young white man without any college education.  But he didn't piss and moan about any imagined plight, his Arkansas background, or blame black men or other minorities for grabbing jobs he wanted. No, he joined the WW II war effort - before Pearl Harbor- and ended up fighting in the Battle Of Buna - Gona in New Guinea. He lived to relate his war experiences in a diary which I read from time to time.

What's noteworthy is there's no self pity, no feeling sorry for himself - even after contracting malaria in the New Guinea jungles.  Nor did PTSD from his war experience make him turn to drink or drugs on his return to the states.  He had a million excuses to become an  angry a-hole and bum but he didn't.  No, he manned up, sucked it up and worked hard for his family.  Nonetheless, I am very glad he was not killed in that horrific battle (which rivaled Guadalcanal) .  Because - irrespective of my not being around to write this -  Trump would  be calling him a "sucker" or "loser" as he referred to those who put themselves out there (like coward Dotard didn't) but didn't come through.  See e.g.

Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are 'Losers ... - The Atlantic

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/trump-americans-who-died-at-war-are-losers-and-suckers/615997/

According to the piece:

"When President Donald Trump canceled a visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018, he blamed rain for the last-minute decision, saying that “the helicopter couldn’t fly” .....In a conversation with senior staff members on the morning of the scheduled visit, Trump said, “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” In a separate conversation on the same trip, Trump referred to the more than 1,800 marines who lost their lives at Belleau Wood as “suckers” for getting killed."

 Trump insisted in the wake of the ensuing firestorm:  " I'd be willing to swear on anything that I never said that about our fallen heroes!"  But of course there is nothing, nada, available to support this thug's lies.   So of course, Trump denies having ever said these things, because he knows there is nothing, no one to hold him to account. What would you expect of a  guy who's reeled off over 9,000 lies and counting?  That he'd suddenly acknowledge the truth of  those deplorable claims?   Of course not!  His defective character makes it 1,000 times more likely he'd deny that "losers" remark than admit it.    After all, look what he said about John McCain 4 years ago, i.e. "Sorry but I like heroes who don't get captured!"   So given Dotard Donnie's lying streak it's just as probable he'd spew out a negative lie (denial) as a positive one.  See e.g.


by Cody Fenwick | September 4, 2020 - 8:26am | permalink

Besides, James LaPorta - senior correspondent for Newsweek, has received confirmation from two top Defense Dept. officials who "confirm the Atlantic story in its entirety".   He made that known in an interview on Maddow Thursday night.  So if there's any "grieving", non-college white man, that should be all he needs to know about the character of the 2-legged  cockroach fouling the White House. Indeed, even FOX News' own national security correspondent (Jennifer Griffin) has verified  she was contacted by official sources confirming  what Trump said. See:
  And that begs the question: Why in hell's bells would anyone even remotely consider supporting such a roach given his disrespect and disdain for our nation's war dead?  And if he has no respect for them, or their grieving families - like those Marines that fought at Belleau Wood- why would he have a scintilla of respect for you?  As Alex Wagner put it on All In last night.

"Trump has a categorical aversion to empathy.  He was asked what words he'd have for the family of Jacob Blake. He couldn't even muster a shred of kindness and just said, 'it's bad for anybody'.   This goes back to the Atlantic article.  The cruelty is the point. The cruelty has always been central to Trump's brand and empathy is a rebuttal to cruelty.  So for personal and other reasons  he's just unable to open himself up to the crushing humanity of this moment. "

This is what I'd like all those millions of non-college educated white men -  with all their axes to grind -  to think about when they cast votes in the coming election.  Also, how Trump and his fascist brigade are trying to deliberately heap on risk for vulnerable citizens (grandparents of the aggrieved white men)  to vote by condemning the use of mail ballots. This, despite Trump encouraging his voters in NC to vote twice, and Toad Barr insisting that mail voting carries "substantial voting fraud" - which is an outright lie.  The  Brennan Center for Justice notes the actual fraud rate below 0..00006%- over years..  White men now in Trump's corner should consider all of that.  

However, one must acknowledge there are some white men (even college educated)  in Trump's camp, who are beyond redemption or help.  One such is the truculent Barton Swaim of the WSJ:


Swaim like the rest of the hacks in the WSJ op-ed stable has a problem with critical thinking as well as discerning when a leader (like Trump)  is a piece of crap and when he is for real.  Swaim, for example, attributes all Trump's abhorrent - even traitorous behavior- merely to quirks of his "celebrity personality".   He yearns to  see Trump as a "complex, multi-layered person, self-regarding and sometimes mean"..  Not as the inhuman, shit-eating pestilence he is, a living Turd who locks infants in cages and dismisses war dead as "losers" and "suckers".  SO why would any thinking person take anything Swaim writes seriously?   Just as he recently dismissed Trump's collusion, cooperation with the Russians (Aug. 15-16) as "a bloody minded conspiracy  theory rooted in machinations of bumbling FBI officials hyped by gullible journalists".  As opposed to what it really was - a deliberate, concerted effort to corrupt the American democratic experiment via the use of a foreign enemy state. 

All of which was amply born out in  recently released 966 -page Senate Intelligence Committee report, entitled :  Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities,”

The report "leaves no doubt that an extensive network of Russian operatives with intelligence ties worked with Trump's operatives to torpedo Hillary Clinton's campaign four years ago."

That opinion from Timothy O'Brien writing in Bloomberg News.  What every white man thinking of voting for Trump again needs to do is read as much of the report as possible. He will then see first hand why this  maggot traitor finds it so easy to dismiss U.S. war dead - who fought for all men's liberties - as "suckers" and "losers."

Amidst the  unending confusion, chaos, simmering anger and strife infecting the nation and the prospect of the most critical election in modern times, it is fair to ask are non-college white men really considering giving Trump 4 more years? Especially if it means turning our governance over to the truth slayers at FOX News?   What would be a genuine tragedy is to have millions of  non-college educated white men - mainly in the 5 swing states that swung the Electoral college to Trump 4 years ago - do so again. Despite how the man has already proven himself an incompetent traitor and perpetually dyspeptic 5- year old in a 74 year old's body. Not a leader who can steer this nation to more stable times over the next four year.

 Under Adolf Hitler the German state  became an agent of criminality as well as the principal perpetrator of  heinous atrocities, e.g. the slaughter of 6 million Jews and many others.  It is a state the U.S. is rapidly approaching under Adolf Jr. Trump.  Most distressing to read was the opening paragraph of a recent review of the book, 'Hitler- Downfall: 1939-1945', in The Denver Post,  showing glaring similarities between Hitler's deformed character and Trump's,  e.g.

"The impulsiveness and grandiosity, the bullying and vulgarity, were obvious from the beginning.  If anything, they accounted for Adolf Hitler's anti-establishment appeal for Germany's unpopular conservative elites.  Hitler's energy and theatrics made him an enticing partner when they appointed him Chancellor in 1933.  But anyone who thought Hitler and the Nazis would rise to the occasion were summarily purged from the system as an utter impossibility became indomitable reality: The Weimar Republic had become the Third Reich.

It would take another world war, a genocide and millions of dead before the dictatorship finally collapsed in 1945, a full 12 years after Hitler was invited into power.""

A kind of repeat of history is on the verge of happening again with Trump. if U.S. citizens (especially white males lacking college educations)  become too besotted by his bullying, fake macho and authoritarianism to think clearly. Or believe this criminal tyrant really has their interests - and safety - at heart.  Newsflash, he doesn't, he only has his interests at heart.  Which is why he signed a set of executive orders as a PR stunt but with precious little Covid benefits delivered. 


Just ask yourself: Do I really want four more years of this rage -tweeting crybaby,  and wannabe  authoritarian dictator?  A guy who calls your Vietnam war dead relatives "suckers" and "losers".  Really?  As Princeton Emeritus professor of politics Nancy Bermeo put it, in a NY Times piece by Farhad Manjoo:

"He’s doing things that are reminiscent of authoritarians in much less-developed countries with much shorter histories of competitive politics.

Which reinforces what John Dean told Chris Hayes on Wednesday night, in conjunction with his new book:

Do white guys really want this nightmare?  Do the white men who've counted themselves as Trump's bosom buddies truly relish a future - at least the next 4 years- with this orange cockroach's  pro-Putin paws on the nuclear codes? 

 If so, there really is no hope for this nation, and evidently  my dad fought all those WWII battles, and came home with malaria and PTSD for nothing.  But maybe now as word and confirmation of Trump's denigration of military vets killed in action spreads we will finally see retribution, political payback and an end to this vile fungal  excrescence.   We will see if the Atlantic story gets enough 'legs' and takes the maggot down once and for all, especially with the white male fans.  Is white nationalism and authoritarianism more powerful than vile putdowns of the fallen as "losers"?  That's the question to be answered in coming days.  Still, as Amanda Marcotte notes - as she writes (first link below):


"The Trump base, which is stable enough to keep Trump within stealing range of the 2020 election, loves to talk about how patriotic they are and to make a big show out of how much they supposedly love the troops. As this unquestioning loyalty to Trump makes clear, it's all nonsense. Given a choice between white supremacy and support for the men and women of the military, Trump voters will pick racism every single time."

The issue may already be settled for many Trump followers-  who are as shameless, gutless and unpatriotic as the roach they worship.

See Also:

And:
by Amanda Marcotte | September 2, 2020 - 7:46am | permalink


by Dave Lindorff | August 30, 2020 - 5:00am | permalink


AND:
by Dave Lindorff | September 3, 2020 - 5:25am | permalink

AND:


Trump is ‘Fox’s Frankenstein,’ insiders told CNN’s Brian Stelter — and here’s the toll it’s taken


AND:

by Bob Burnett | September 5, 2020 - 6:59am | permalink

Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Brit Ambassador Is Right That Trump "Radiates Insecurity" And His Whole Administration Is Inept. So Why Is There Even Debate?



Kudos and huzzahs to  British Ambassador Sir Kim Darroch who hit the nail on the proverbial head when he described Trump (in a leaked memo to the UK gov't) as “inept” and “dysfunctional”.  Well, that is putting it mildly, hardly "very blunt" as the U.S. media has tried to portray it.    Indeed, Trump - as I've repeatedly spelled out-   is nothing short of a criminal psychopath and parasite poseur as well as traitor - who has no more business being president of this country than being  a dog catcher in Podunk, Kansas.

He is also the laziest asshole to ever ascend - even if by pure dumb luck - to the highest office. As we learned last night ('All In') , he spends up to 4 hours each day watching "Trump TV" (FOX) and wastes the rest of his time sitting on the crapper churning out tweets to lash out at anyone and everyone who criticizes him or calls him out.

He did the same this a.m. launching tweet after tirade tweet at Sir Kim, e.g.

The wacky Ambassador that the U.K. foisted upon the United States is not someone we are thrilled with, a very stupid guy,” 

“He should speak to his country, and Prime Minister May, about their failed Brexit negotiation, and not be upset with my criticism of how badly it was... handled.

Trump’s tweets came one day after he declared he would no longer deal with Darroch and claimed the British ambassador was “not liked or well thought of within the U.S.”.   

Well, look no further than the source: a 73 year old spoiled  man baby who has to wear Depends most of the day as his toddler Twitter troll outbursts are too much even for his bladder, far less his febrile brain.  This is the turkey we have as president, so abysmally stupid he actually bragged about  the Continental Army and protecting "airports"  at the time of the Revolution. This was in his idiotic, pseudo patriot  spiel on the 4th of July.  See e.g.



  
No you can't make this stuff up.  And Trump had the nerve to try to blame his teleprompter as opposed to his lack of intelligence and common sense! Then this turd has the nerve to call Sir Kim stupid?  

Connected to the ostentatious displays of paper patriotism on the 4th, one beheld WSJ  hack William McGurn ('Yankee Doodle Donald'',  p. A13 today)  blabbing:  "The Democrats may be underestimating Trump as a cultural warrior".    Well, they most assuredly haven't underestimated Dotard as a bilious and bellicose buffoon intent on despoiling the nation's history and  rending its fabric apart by his incessant sowing  of lies, fake news and disruption of norms.

Predictably, Sir Darroch was also uninvited from a dinner Trump hosted for the Emir of Qatar on Monday.  Typical lack of class and another display of Trump's pettiness and his affinity for hanging out with slimeballs.  After all, he had invited Robert Kraft - busted not long ago for getting "extras" in a S. Florida massage parlor.  So scum accrete to scum.  .Add to that how he's praised Jeffrey Epstein (the underage teen girl predator), as a "terrific guy"-   but hasn't said word one about him now he's been busted for a safe full of child porn.  Well what does one expect of the guy who openly admitted assaulting women on that infamous Access Hollywood tape? But  notably he has no end of calumny to heap on a respectable British Ambassador - Sir Kim Darroch - whose shoes he's not fit to spit shine.

Therese May has meanwhile stood by Kim Darroch amid the controversy, even as she rejected his assessment of Trump,  though her spokesperson openly admitted the UK government expects "candid assessments".  In a written statement, Downing Street said Darroch “continues to have the prime minister’s full support”, while adding: “We have made clear to the U.S. how unfortunate this leak is.” 

Indeed.  But leave it to the man baby swine who pals around with billionaire sex perverts, like Jeffrey Epstein, to try to drag the nation further through the mud out of his petty pique.   He has no class, no sense of vision for the nation, no moral compass, only his own self-absorption and attempts to scuttle everything decent and praiseworthy about this country.  

Unlike May, who let's face it has to act diplomatic, I take no umbrage at the leak. I welcome it. In fact I  welcome any that expose the maggot we have as chief executive for what he is. As with other leaks about Trump, e.g. the early one about him being shocked at how much work was involved in being president,
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/donald-trump-stunned-to-learn-presidency-is-an-actual-j-1792215349


I applaud it if it reveals this fool as a dyspeptic and bombastic psychopath determined to wreck our constitution and blow past all democratic guard rails. Whether out of sheer incompetence and being unfit for office (as the above link reveals) or with malicious intent, as his effort to redo the census question exposes.  This is crucial as we continue to spiral into a destructive maelstrom and face perhaps the most parlous constitutional crisis since the Civil War.

All of which makes the sane person wonder what major benefits to the nation's mental state might accrue if Trump was somehow prevented from going to his Twitter account and spewing bilge like the troll he is.  For one thing you wouldn't see the spectacle of the  DOJ lawyer (after Trump tweeted he wanted the census question back in) scratching his butt and telling the judge: "I am doing my absolute best to figure out what is going on.”  Honestly, he shouldn't have had to, but this is the type of shit we've had to put up with the past 18 months.

From lacerating Fed chief Jerome Powell multiple times for not cutting interest rates, to name calling the Brit Ambassador like a school yard bully,  to even going after Chief Justice John Roberts for his census question ruling-  Trump is like a raging bull in a China shop.  No center, no self-awareness, no self-control.  A crazed bull that interjects itself into every issue, attacks anyone or anything it dislikes - and in general, looks for any excuse not to sit down and actually do the damned job.  But this is Trump and why he has no business being president  because he has no clue how to be, nor does he want to be. He only wants to pitch hissy fits and attempt to bully everyone in his sights, even as an insipid media incessantly resorts to the hackneyed phrase (in any new event) "Trump FIRES back!"  As  if this is a goddamned war we're in, and Dotard's response to any truth issued concerning him takes precedence over that truth . Not to mention the necessary criticism of his acts and tweets that should ensue. Instead of making them  (i.e.g 'firing back') the news.

This is the degenerate filth and walking maggot the Electoral College allowed to sneak into office, showing once and for all that its time for interment is long past.   What we have to ensure is that it never happens again. This nation will not withstand four more years of Trump's histrionics, chaos and shredding of norms and laws, no matter what any overpaid pundit says.

See also:


AND:


And:



And:





Wednesday, February 13, 2019

It's Past Time For The National Popular Vote (NPV) To Replace The Electoral College

Image result for alexander hamiltonImage may contain: 1 person, smiling, hat and closeup
By now every manjack and his dog knows about the electoral dumpster fire that led to the madman swine now in power and befouling our land. In the end, the great Electoral College misfired by rubber stamping a know nothing, morally bankrupt stooge for a hostile foreign power, when it should have prevented that.

Worse, the resistance and supposed  'fail safe' check on Trump's ascension to power went out more with a whimper than a bang. This as all  efforts by anti-Trump activists to stop him reaching 270 electoral votes fell pathetically short. Activists who'd urged electors to back efforts led by academics (e.g. Prof. Lawrence Lessig) to cast their ballots at variance with the rubber stamping misfits in the states, were largely ignored. E.g.  "Our state was won by the Donald so we gotta give the votes to him!"

The system the Founders set up to protect the White House from being occupied by an agent of a foreign government was straightforward, Hamilton insisted. The choice of president would not “depend on any preexisting bodies of men, who might be tampered with beforehand to prostitute their votes.”  Instead, the Electoral College would be made up of “persons [selected] for the temporary and sole purpose of making the appointment.”

The electors would be apolitical because it would be illegal for a Senator or House member to become one.  Thus Hamilton wrote:
And they have excluded from eligibility to this trust, all those who from situation might be suspected of too great devotion to the President in office. No senator, representative, or other person holding a place of trust or profit under the United States, can be of the numbers of the electors.
This, Hamilton was certain, would eliminate “any sinister bias.”  Nice assumption but it didn't work out that way, and we've been left to ponder why. But more importantly it's necessary to ensure this farce never happens again. That's why we need to support the movement for a National Popular Vote (NPV) to eradicate an anachronism that no longer functions.  With the NPV in place state electors  pledge  their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote.  

Here one may inquire: How did Hamilton's original grand idea go so far south back in 2016? Basically,  a combination of too little will to overturn the Electoral College as a mere rubber stamp, and too little actual strategy. Specifically, I place the preponderance of blame on two factors: 1) A disorganized effort to thwart the fascists with too many distracting and unrealistic alternative choices, and 2) An unwillingness to rock the boat and just play it safe, especially among Republican state electors.  As for the much ballyhooed "Hamilton electors', they turned out to be more a myth than reality.  If a person had to, he might have counted them on one hand, if that.

The result was predictable: with only external protests erupting - as in Madison, WI-  so the morally  bankrupt Trump cakewalked to his official electoral victory as millions tuned in to updated tallies, aghast.  

Hamilton and James Madison originally had high confidence the Electoral College would function to stop a deranged maggot like Trump, with the morals to match, from gaining office. So that leads us to ask what the hell happened?  Basically neither Madison or Hamilton ever envisioned a day when a man so entangled in financial affairs with foreign governments as is Donald Trump could even be seriously considered, because (in their minds), the electors would carefully investigate the candidate. That hasn’t happened in over a century, so, by those standards, the electors totally failed in their job in the 2016 election.

Taking a stroll down American history lane we also understand that The Electoral College was a compromise designed to keep the president above political considerations, and sold to the public as a way to prevent an agent (witting or unwitting) of a foreign power from becoming president. We now see it has failed on both counts.

Tracking back to the beginning we can even put the more direct source of our current  electoral morass on a bastardized element of the Constitution - a poison pill if you will -  called  Three-Fifths Compromise.  Because of the Three-Fifths Compromise (found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution,):

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."
The Electoral College thereby handed the White House to four Virginia slaveholders among our first five presidents. Since that compromise has been eliminated, it continues to wreak havoc, i.e. in having put George W. Bush and Donald Trump into officeEach state was then awarded the same number of presidential electors as it has legislators (senators plus representatives), applying the outcome of the compromises to the presidential race. After some debate, the Founding Fathers left it to each state’s legislature to decide how to award its electoral votes — a power that has been confirmed repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Currently, 48 of 50 states, including Colorado, have a winner-take-all model. This means if a majority of Colorado voters fill in a bubble on their ballot for, say, Beto O'Rourke, all the state’s electoral votes are awarded to his electors. Presumably, those electors cast a ballot for Beto. In fact, in some states, including Colorado, state law requires they do so. (In some other states, however, electors are not “pledged” and may decide to vote for another candidate, though such a move remains rare.  But this is what the activist effort in 2016 to prevent Trump's ascension was based upon.)

The winner-take-all model is so ingrained in our culture that calls to change it are often painted as unAmerican, but winner-take-all isn’t in the Constitution, nor has the Electoral College always functioned that way. In fact, only three states cast their votes winner-take-all style in the country’s first election, and a little more than a decade later, every state dropped the system. 

States adopted winner-take-all laws again starting in the 1800s in an effort to have a greater influence on elections. That led to a domino effect that has now swept up every state except Maine and Nebraska.

In 2016, despite a massive increase in support for the Electoral College by Republicans following Trump’s win, Gallup found that most Americans preferred amending the Constitution to do away with the College rather than keeping the current system, 49 to 47 percent.   This polling has paved the way for the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement today - as people realize we cannot have another clusterfuck such as transpired in 2016.  We do not need yet another Bob Woodward effort such as 
Fear: Trump in the White House  to remind us how bad things can get if the wheels of democracy fly off.

Before the NPV, it was generally assumed that ditching the Electoral College would take a constitutional amendment, which must be either approved by two-thirds of the House and Senate and three-fourths of the states or proposed by a Constitutional Convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures and approved by three-fourths of the states. (Notably, ditching equal state representation in the Senate, on the other hand, requires the consent of every state.) 

But NPV gets around the amendment process by using an interstate compact — an agreement amongst states. It’s the brainchild of Dr. John Koza, who created a board game about the Electoral College when he was a young man (it never really took off) and authored the book, Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote. Now the chair of NPV, Koza had a career with the lottery, where he dealt with interstate compacts, and taught for a time at Stanford University.

Let's also note there is a logical basis for changing to the NPV. Namely, that the respective party nominees then have to go throughout the country campaigning to win voters, as opposed to cherry picking a minority  of states. To grasp my point just look now at how presidential candidates campaign in battleground states, or how gubernatorial candidates campaign.

Doubt the  rhetoric about the importance of battleground states in the current system?  Then  consider this: The NPV campaign found general election events really only happen in battlegrounds. In 2012, for instance, 12 states saw almost all the general election campaign events.  Of 253 events, Ohio saw 73, Florida 40, Virginia 36, and Iowa 27. In 2016, the NPV claims, 94 percent of general campaign events were held in 12 battleground states.   This, my friends, is absurd. 

As one Colorado State Senator put it:  “We should elect the president of the United States, not the president of the battleground states.”

Under a National popular vote,  every vote would count in every state, and every vote in every state would thus be worth courting.  Currently, Republican presidential candidates aren’t even trying to win the popular vote right now; they’re trying to win the Electoral College.  

Instead of this perfidy it's time for a truly rational system, the National Popular Vote.  It returns the ideal of one man, one vote, and has state electors  pledging  their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote .   This mechanism would introduce finally a fail safe mechanism to preventing a minority faction  of deplorables from enacting their rage against the rest of us.  

That includes the current gaggle of buffoons - such as at Trump's rally in El Paso two nights ago - wearing red MAGA hats and chanting nutso bollocks that would embarrass a vociferous chimp. Instead of seeing this spectacle repeated over and over we could again take control of the nation's future direction and halt a travesty of destructive minority rule.    

In this case a minority of  morons and imbeciles who believe anything their mutant twit says - even that an invisible wall has already been erected at the border.  The danger triggered by this faction is that their virus of practiced and proud ignorance - including reinforcement by Trump's incessant lies- can metastasize to the normal populace and begin to convert segments into dumkopfs as well.  See e.g.


by Henry Giroux | February 14, 2019 - 7:17am | permalink
— from Truthout

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update:  As reported in The Denver Post (2/14, p. 8 A) the Colorado House Committee has now passed the resolution to implement the NPV here in Colorado.