Brane Space: JFK Files Released - And Lee Oswald's Innocence Remains Despite Warrenite Disinformationists

JFK minutes before being assassinated on Nov. 22, 1963

“I believe that irrefutable evidence shows conspirators, none of them Oswald, killed JFK. A mentally ill Jack Ruby, alone and unaided, shot Oswald. The federal inquiry knowingly collapsed and theorized a political solution. Its corruption spawned theorists who tout solutions rather than define the facts that are locked in the massively muddied evidentiary base, and released only by hard work.”

Prof. David R. Wrone, in The Journal of Southern History(6), February, 1995, p. 188.

"Our collective denial of the obvious, in the setting up of Oswald and his transparent silencing by Ruby, made possible the Dallas cover-up. The success of the cover-up was the indispensable foundation for the murders of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy by the same forces at work in our government – and ourselves.

Hope for change in the world was targeted and killed four times over. The cover-up of all four murders, each leading leading into the next, was based – first of all –on denial. Not the government’s but our own- and the unspeakable was not far away." - James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters, Orbis Book, p. xvi

"The scandal in the just released files in the JFK assassination isn't any specific revelation. But that they kept all this nothingness secret for more than 60 years. Its meaningless stuff - obscure and unconnected factoids, memos that go nowhere and look like make work. Anything that was revealing in the files met a shredder long ago."- Peggy Noonan, WSJ, p. A13, Mar. 22-23.

After the release of the much trumpeted remaining JFK files last night there will likely be more disappointed truth seekers than not. The newest batch of records can be found on the agency’s webpage under the headline, “JFK Assassination Records - 2025 Documents Release.” The page features a table listing more than 1,100 entries of hyperlinked PDF files. The problem? Many if not most of the pages are difficult to read and filled with a litany of names and pseudonyms whose significance is not yet known—and may never be. For the average member of the public trying to piece together the names or even to compare the new unredacted records to their partially or fully redacted prior versions will be like trying to play 3D chess.

The basis for the confusion is simple: Most of the public has done minimal research into the assassination - if at all- and is unaware of the HSCA, the only legitimate investigation. All they know is the Warren Commission - a creature of LBJ - to cover up his involvement. Hence, they will be lost "at sea" trying to make sense of what was released.

But from what I've seen - including of the 6 million pages already released - the 'wild goose hunt' and whitewash of the Warren Commission Report has been confirmed. In the words of House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) Chief Counsel Robert Blakey:

"The purpose of the Warren Commission wasn't to find out what really happened but to assure Americans what didn't happen."

Files still missing as far as I can discern:

- The files on George Joannides:

Joannides served as chief of the CIA's anti-Castro psychological warfare operation in Miami in 1963. The operation was run out of the largest CIA station outside of Langley, called JM/WAVE. More than 300 CIA agents directed over 3,000 Cuban agents and subagents, out of a front corporation called 'Zenith Technical Enterprises, Inc. The operation was designed to spread disinformation using a group: Directorio Revolucionario Estudantil (DRE) under David Atlee Phillips.

Joannides played a major role in helping to block the HSCA access to critical JFK files at the time of that investigation (1978-79). Later, in 1992, when the Assassinations Review Board wished to release a critical Joannides' file and asked a CIA go-between, he replied: "I know there's a reason why that Joannides file shouldn't be released, I just can't think of it!" It never did see the light of day and hasn't up to now.

- All of Oswald's CIA files (OS-351-164 (office of security), the 201-289248 CI/SIG, and the 74-500) and what was done with them, e.g. by the guy who framed him: CIA Mexico City Station chief David Atlee Phillips:

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said that "only a few documents remained under a court seal because of grand jury rules, were still secret." And I am convinced these Oswald CIA files are among them, as well as the Joannides files, in addition to the identities of the two CIA hit men named by former CIA Director Richard Helms in the Church Committee hearings. Of course, the simplest explanation is that offered by the WSJ's Peggy Noonan (see 3rd quote at top) that any file that might be revealing "met a shredder a long time ago".

Among these likely in the "already shredded" category are those I name below:

-The elements of the Staff D program run by NSA contact William Harvey. As pointed out by researcher Peter Dale Scott in Deep Politics Quarterly, January, 1994:

In 1961, when William Harvey headed Staff D, he was assigned the task of developing the CIA Assassinations Project, ZR/Rifle.

When ZR/ Rifle was altered from targeting Castro to targeting JFK, it was all over except for the triangulation of gunfire that took Kennedy out in Dallas. The closest we likely got to who the actual shooters (mechanics) were occurred during the (1975) Church Committee hearings. Former CIA Director Richard Helms spoke at length about ZR Rifle in one session. When pressed, he identified two generic (i.e. for any purpose) hit team members by their code names: WI/ROGUE and QJ/WIN. Helms described the former as "a stateless soldier of fortune and a criminal" (Church Committee Report, pp. 43-44).

Helms explained his latter statement in these terse terms:

"If you need somebody to carry out murder I guess you had a man who might be prepared to carry it out.”

- The names of the 2 CIA hit men: WI/ROGUE and QJ/WIN. Richard Helms disclosed the code monickers in the Church Committee Hearings, but we need to know:

1) WHO were these guys? Cuban hires after the CIA Bay of Pigs fiasco? Mafia hit men hired by the CIA? Or...members of P2 out of Marseilles??

(2) Were they in Dallas that day as part of an assassination K Group team? We know the existence of K-groups has already been established, e.g.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB4/

Wherein we read:

"The idea of forming assassination teams ('K' groups) apparently originated with Castillo Arenas in 1952. Adopting Castillo Arenas' concept the [ ] chief routinely included two assassination specialists in his training plans. CIA training for sabotage teams in early 1954 also included creating a 'K' group trained to perform assassinations."

- The number of "assassination teams" that were active at the time of JFK's murder.

- The number of teams under control of Staff D, William Harvey's program with NSA connections. Also how many were connected to David Atlee Phillips and his operations in Mexico City?

What about ''Who dunnit"? We can't say, but we DO know who didn't.

We know it was NOT Lee Oswald - given he could not have made the kill (fatal head) shot. That shot came from the grassy knoll with the shot direction already identified from the acoustics in the HSCA investigation of 1978-79 and captured in Z-frame 314:

This was traced to the right front temple wound in JFK's skull, as revealed by Robert Groden in his superb book, The Killing of a President. (On page 178 is shown the complete path of the bullet from the right front of Kennedy’s forehead to the rear of his head.)

Let us recall here that Oswald was alleged to be shooting from the Texas School Book Depository which was behind the limo, so no shots from there could have delivered the right frontal head shot. In addition we have the Z-film frame after 314 showing Jackie clearly moving backwards over the limo trunk, she said (in secret WC testimony) to try to retrieve a piece of the skull.

Jackie's motion alone proves the shot was not from the TSBD.

One other claim that JFK files readers need to ignore is the trope that Oswald visited Mexico City shortly before the killing. Also, that he met with Cuban and Russian spies and even spoke openly about killing Kennedy with employees of the Cuban embassy there. All of this is a pack of ripe merde, likely planted and ok'd by CIA spook David Atlee Phillips to frame Lee.

As I have repeatedly pointed out, the Mexico City nonsense is total disinformation (and distraction) based on a misidentified image of Oswald. This was first revealed in Military Science Professor John Newman's book, Oswald and the CIA. Therein showing the actual Oswald (as a prisoner in Dallas) compared to the impostor Oswald in Mexico City. e.g.

Hence, all the Mexico City tropes amount to pure distraction. No serious researcher accepts them. They are all irrelevant to the facts already known, disclosed, i.e. from earlier file releases in the 1990s. And we know Oswald not only had no part in it but was himself assassinated within two days of Kennedy's assassination, e.g.

likely to prevent him from revealing his role (as a decoy) in Bill Harvey's Staff D operation.

For the most authentic depiction of how the assassination likely went down, check out the relevant sequence from the film 'Executive Action' (1973):

The Assassination Sequence from Executive Action. - YouTube

In the meantime it will be interesting to see if any serious conclusions are forthcoming from the tens of thousands of files that came over the transom last night. And also how many Warren Commission defenders (i.e. fairy tale believers) remain.

Among the latter one can count the U.S. media which remains doggedly in the Warrenite camp - such as on Laura Coates (CNN) analysis tonight when Laura barked to her guests: "Up to now we've seen no evidence other than that pointing to Lee Harvey Oswald as the sole assassin." Which is total bull pockey as this blog post clearly shows. What is it with the media that they can't break through the brain-less barrier, even to get to the only actual serious investigation, the HSCA? (Which found for 96% probability of conspiracy based on acoustic analysis). My guess is they are all caught in the trap of the "Middle Mind", e.g.

The Middle Mind: Why Americans Don't Think for Themselves: 9780060730598: White, Curtis: Books

Author Curtis White's view is that the 'Middle Mind' is a safe mental space where all the old verities are true and right -thinking citizens don't question them too closely or trespass intellectually into areas that mark "forbidden zones". Such as LBJ having helped plan the JFK assassination (to avoid prosecution in the Bobby Baker scandal) or that UFOs are actually alien craft, see e.g.

Astrophysicist Adam Frank Gets It All Wrong On UAP- UFOs

The U.S. media, by and large, promotes middle mind tropes - as Laura Coates did tonight - in pronouncing no evidence exists that contradicts the WC finding of Lee Oswald as sole JFK assassin. Clearly, these middle mind tropes, repeated often enough, can then be used to manipulate citizens' consciousness, but more often reinforce 60+ year old lies.

But in the case of the JFK assassination, one really doesn't need to bury one's nose in the newly released files. The evidence Oswald had nothing to do with it has been sitting out in the open for decades. It has been out there for the asking, for those who seek truth rather than fantasy, and who are not hostage to the "middle mind."

All one needed to do is dig it up from the array of documents, images (e.g. from Zapruder and Nix films) and use one's own intelligence and powers of deduction. Understanding that the facts of the conspiracy were not going to be handed out on a platter by the CIA or the National Archives - or the forlorn media. (See Prof. David Wrone's quote at top.)

One of the early glaring (and shocking) findings revealed in the newly released files ought to shake the middle minds out of their stupor. This was noted in the Washington Post. In an early review of previously redacted material, the WaPo researchers discovered key members of the HSCA investigation had their Social Security numbers exposed.

In addition, more than 100 members of the Senate Church Committee - the one that grilled former CIA Director Richard Helms (who identified two CIA hit men by their code names: WI/ROGUE and QJ/Win)- had their Social Security numbers, birth dates and birth places revealed. Why would this have been done and by whom? Clearly, the CIA orchestrated it to instill fear into the respective committees' members, lest they "go too far" in their respective inquires. This is not Mensa level stuff.

One hopes the larger media will put two plus two together and finally get out of its Warren Commission mind rut. But as I wrote in one of my 50th anniversary posts, that would take boldness which most of the media lacks.

At least one former CIA agent in one file fesses up to his role. Eat this Warren Commission hacks:

jfk00020.pdf

Excerpt: