Showing posts with label Bob Woodward. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bob Woodward. Show all posts

Monday, September 28, 2020

Why I Can't Agree With Bob Woodward - Re: "Some" Of Trump's Followers Being "Decent People"

 

                        Some of Trump's 'very fine' people

Bob Woodward, author of  'RAGE',  wants us to bear in mind that: "There are some fine and decent people who support President Trump.  These include farmers, military people,  health care workers, policemen and others".   This - related at the end of an interview with Chris Hayes (on his ALL In show) - some 2 weeks ago, after Hayes asked if Woodward judged any of Trump's supporters.

Sorry, Bob, but I'm not buying it.  "Fine" and "decent" people do not descend  on polling venues  - like in Fairfax, VA recently- and seek to disrupt early voting, e.g.


These are not "fine and decent" folks but brainwashed, angry goobers.  Worse,  even if you are not precisely among these miscreants - if you support Trump - you still end up enabling them via their mindless backing of Trump.  In the case of the preceding lot, they actually had the gall to chant "Four more years! Four more years!"  at voters went to the polls, like their impoverished brains had really taken leave.  

But then they inhabit an alternative universe and that is exactly the problem.  A universe where masking up equals bondage and slavery, and medical professionals who recommend masks, social distancing are traitors, and governors trying to save lives using lockdowns are threatened by extremist gun nuts toting AR-15s into state houses.  (Even calling for the beheading of Michigan Governor Grace Whitmer.)



This alternative universe of fantasy and crackpot conspiracy ideation has largely been created by Trump in recent years, via his endless stream of lies, misinformation, dog whistles and gaslighting.  Journalists now tally more than 20,000 lies since he assumed the presidency and also chronicle accusations of sexual misconduct against him (26 so far).  And yet he seems coated with Teflon, given nothing seems to stick.  This is because of way too many "fine, decent" people who refuse to see through the sham. As Janice put it: "Ignorance is no excuse especially after he had infants caged and separated from parents 3 years ago. Also, now admitting on tape he deliberately lied about the virus!"


 Why doesn't it "stick"?   Well,  because like all effective authoritarians he creates diversions and nonstop chaos with ever more outrageous claims and deranged statements almost every day.  Like his ongoing barrage against voting by mail,  including insisting he will not accept any peaceful transition. 

 In such a turbulent atmosphere, the normal mainstream media can't keep up.  Hell, they are still overly deferential to this walking turd.  One only had to watch his presentation of Amy Coney Barrett Saturday where all the press corps uniformly rose and clapped, like a bunch of trained seals.  They ought to have booed the bastard like those marking RBG's lying in state Thursday night when he appeared.

It is this chaotic atmosphere plus Trump's tidal wave of lies and gaslighting that have helped to create his legions of  zombies, and brainwashed faux "liberty" nincompoops. We cannot embrace this lot into any political comity until they return to reality, and there's no sign they will.  As Maureen Dowd wrote in her Sunday column:

"The cultural ecosystem, and the fever swamps of social media that amplify Trump’s craziness, will remain. Fox News and Facebook will continue to validate the biases and conspiracy theories of a nation that’s increasingly proud of its ignorance, anti-intellectualism and denial of science."

Times' columnist Frank Bruni basically seconded this outlook with his own take:

"We’re in terrible danger. Make no mistake. This country, already uncivil, is on the precipice of being ungovernable, because its institutions are being so profoundly degraded, because its partisanship is so all-consuming, and because Trump, who rode those trends to power, is now turbocharging them to drive America into the ground. The Republican Party won’t apply the brakes

Bruni pointed out that the riff raff and renegades trying to intimidate voters in Fairfax was "no rogue group" adding: "This was an omen and a harrowing one at that."  

 Indeed it is, because with every day that passes with Trump yapping about "fraud" and "mail ballots" his zombies and crazies get more and more worked up.  Add in  incendiary stunts like the one about "discarded Trump ballots" in Pennsylvania - and you are looking at tossing gasoline on an already lit fire. (In this case, it was later determined the allegedly "discarded ballots" were a result of Pennsylvania Republicans passing a law banning "naked' ballots, i.e. those not inserted into an outer security sleeve.  So when 9 such ballots were accidentally found they were discarded by bureaucrats.  There was no sinister element as claimed by Toady Barr, or Trump or their lackeys.).  


Then there is the pandemic and the University of Washington model now forecasting quadruple the daily deaths from Covid by year's end.  The source of  90 percent of the problem? Trump and his endless lying and minimizing the impacts while corrupting the science including at the CDC - all the time giving false hope of a vaccine- for political gain.  As medical specialist and journalist Laurie Garrett said in an interview on Saturday, it is "ridiculous" any viable vaccine could be ready even by year's end given intermediary trials haven't even begun for most candidates.    Meanwhile, Trump's zombies continue to attack health specialists, and defy mask orders - the most effective way to control the virus pre-vaccine.

Also derivative of pro-Trumpian insanity  (some might say the core of it) is the QAnon movement, which Bloomberg columnist Andreas Kutsch has recently described as the "vilest" conspiracy ideation since the medieval slanders spread against the Jews, e.g. poisoning drinking wells and drinking the blood of Christian children.  In the QAnon case, deep state "elites" (including prominent Dem politicos) are accused of child sacrifices to Satan and organizing pedophile rings. Hence, a major example of current mass insanity on the tribal conservative Right.

One Colorado Springs contact tracer - John Potterat- when interviewed by the local Indy paper three weeks ago, said:

"As I look at American society today we're simply not the people we used to be. I'm disappointed. The American population was much more society conscious 30, 40 or 50 years ago.  We're not the people we should be."


We're not the people we used to be primarily because we've been fractured into two hostile tribes on account of one tribe becoming detached from objective reality.  This is the tribe that's been brainwashed by Limbaugh, FOX news and that follows Trump's every word.   They intimidate blue state governors with loaded rifles at state houses, attack medical personnel on social media and at their homes, mock masks - and deride virus deaths and cases with  screams of "Hoax!".  Never mind Covid has now felled 204,000 fellow citizens.  They are also prepared, again, to try to commit "national suicide" (in the words of Keith Olbermann in his recent book 'Donald Trump Is F*cking Crazy!') and take the rest of us down with them by voting Trump back in.   Make nice or judge kindly those prepared to do this, because they're too damned lazy or dense to see the scam artist con man authoritarian trying to pull us down his sinkhole?  No way in hell.

My only real worry is how even at this stage Trump's Svengali-like mind control is working on likely voters as per the economy. Polling from NBC/WSJ as of Sunday showed Trump with a 53 %- 42 % edge over Biden as regards handling of the economy, which is absolutely preposterous. In fact it's insane because there's zero basis in reality for it- and that was before the NY Times bombshell expose yesterday showing this fruitcake may owe up to $421 million to unknown lenders (as MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle noted this a.m. and which personal liability he'd carry into any new term.)  This is apart from his using twitchy con-man strategies to get away with paying only $750 in taxes (in 2016, 2017), when for other years he didn't pay a dime.

 Leaving out his tax cons, e.g. taking tax deductions on his personal expenses - like over a million for "housing" and $70,000 for "hair styling and hair spray", we now know how his policies have hobbled the U.S. in terms of borrowing and debt - as Robert Freeman (2nd link below) notes:

"This borrowing masks profound weakness in Trump’s “best economy in the history of the world.” It amounts to $4.8 billion of borrowing every DAY since Trump took office. Yes, injecting almost $5 billion of borrowed money into the economy every day for almost 4 years can create the illusion of prosperity, at least for a while. But borrowing is not a sign of economic strength, but of weakness."

 Beyond that, we know over 28 million jobs have been lost and we are in the midst of a historic recession all tied to the pandemic - which management Trump has blown, fucked up to a far thee well. Further, annualized growth under Trump ranked seventh among his 11 predecessors. And growth actually slowed during each of Trump’s three years.   Handle the economy better than Biden?  Only a brain-eaten imbecile would believe so.

So why is so much credit being given to Trump for his handling of the economy, which is tied to the pandemic which now has seen over 204,000 dead?  Have the respondents' brains been taken over by brain-eating amoebas? It appears so. 

Apart from the apparent mental regression spreading into the larger (voter) population there is the danger of overt voter suppression. We now know - thanks to reporting by Michelle Goldberg- that Republicans are planning to have tens of thousands of volunteers fan out to voting places in key states, ostensibly to guard against fraud but effectively to create a climate of menace. Trump has not merely blessed such renegade tactics but encouraged them. On Fox News last month, he bragged to Sean Hannity about all the “sheriffs” and “law enforcement” who would monitor the polls on his behalf. At a rally in North Carolina, he told supporters: “Be poll watchers when you go there. Watch all the thieving and stealing and robbing they do.”

Michelle Goldberg does, however, believe there's a way out of Trump's 'through the looking glass' world of unreality, writing in a column from 3 weeks ago:  

"Trump's recordings (e.g. on the Woodward tapes) offer the prospect of breaking through his alternative reality, of nailing down this most slippery and mendacious of presidents by showing everyone who he really is."

But wisely adding:  "Our politics suffers no shortage of incontrovertible proof of Trump's venality. What it lacks is accountability"

A first start in reversing this could be made at the first presidential debate tomorrow night, if moderator Chris Wallace would play at least one of the Woodward tapes and demand that Trump respond.  Especially the one where he admits to deliberately playing down the virus despite knowing of its real fatality rate being worse than flu.

If Wallace and other debate moderators lack the nerve to 'take the bull by the horns' it is possible (according to Goldberg) that: "Woodward's utterly damning tapes of Trump discussing the coronavirus will fall into this same 'nothing matters' cycle."   And if that happens Trump scores another 'W' thanks to the lackadaisical media.

Shortly after Trump was elected, the Russian-born journalist Masha Gessen published an important essay called “Autocracy: Rules for Survival.” Gessen laid out six such rules, each incredibly prescient. This was notably after taking Obama, Hillary, and members of the "liberal" commentariat (like Nicholas Kristof and Thomas Friedman) to task for too quickly being willing  to say we ought to close ranks behind the orange maggot and give him a chance.  (At least Keith Olbermann never bought into this horse manure.)

Leaving out that brain fart and misfire at the start of Trump's reign (and note I never accepted him as a president, at least mine)  I most often hear one Gessen rule repeated, i.e. on 'ALL In': “Believe the autocrat,” which says:

 Whenever you find yourself thinking, or hear others claiming, that he is exaggerating, that is our innate tendency to reach for a rationalization.

That tendency is clearly one we must avoid as we near the home stretch of this most critical, most existential of elections. I mean, it isn't often that a suicide attempt - say by hanging -  survives. (In this case, as per Keith Olbermann, a national attempt).  But good god, to deliberately make a 2nd attempt and succeed?  Well it's beyond the pale, in fact beyond any dystopic ideation I can imagine short of a Torino 10 asteroid strike.  If it does happen to succeed this time and  democracy dies under a 2nd Trump term, we can thank his "fine and decent" followers who joined ranks with the Nazis, white nationalists,  KKK,  extremist militias, QAnon  conspiracy degenerates and others to allow Trump to complete the destruction of our nation he started with his first term.

Make common cause with them? No way in hell!

See Also:
And:
 
And:
And:

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

Peggy Noonan Uses "Godfather Pt. II" Script To Claim Trump's Insult Of the Fallen Was Merely A Case Of "Family Loyalty"



As I noted in previous posts,  WSJ columnist Peggy Noonan can no longer be trusted to provide a rational or halfway objective take on Trump.  Noonan, in a misfire last month ('The Democrats Miss The Meaning' Aug. 22-23, p. A13):
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-democrats-miss-the-meaning-11597980333

claimed that the Dems at their convention "beat the crap out of the country" -   which was a gross misinterpretation.   As I had to point out in my Aug. 27 post, they in fact,  beat the crap out of what TRUMP has let the country become. As Tim O'Brien  aptly pointed out (Bloomberg News):

"Trumpism has fostered a cult of personality around Trump, allowing him to posture as the final arbiter of truth and guardian of the downtrodden. But division, chaos an disrepair - and the corruption of the American experiment - are the long term consequences."

Hence, no good thing can really be said of our nation until and unless the Trump pestilence  is totally eliminated. Only then can we rebuild the nation to what it was,  what it could be.  Even now as I write this Trump is soiling more of the office of the presidency with his lies and flouting of norms, including saying (yesterday at an ABC Town Hall) "I didn't downplay the virus, I upgraded it!"  in answer to an undecided voter's question.  WTF?  Does this walking turd think voters are stupid?  They already heard him admit to downplaying it on tape!  (Thanks to Bob Woodward, author of 'RAGE' - which I am now reading.)

A day earlier, at a California forum in the midst of the state's wild fires, the little orange fucktard actually said: it "will get cooler, wait and see"  and also that the fires were from poor forest management.   Then having his deranged mutt and henchman Michael Caputo troll about "left wing hit squads"  threatening Trump's zombies near the election.  Oh yeah, and CDC scientists committing "sedition" against Trump.

 Then you also have the spectacle of a notorious criminal like Roger Stone (whose sentence was commuted by Trump, i.e.  for Stone's nefarious involvement in the Russia conspiracy). No surprise Stone is now  demanding Trump declare martial law for the election and lock up Dems.  And let's not forget a toady like Bill Barr fouling the DOJ and about to let another lackey - John Durham- release a twisted and bogus "report" on the Russia probe.  By 'twisted' I mean going after the investigators (FBI, Mueller, etc.) when in fact the Trump campaign's cooperation with the Russians was masterfully exposed in the  recently released  966 page final instalment of the Senate Intelligence Committee report, entitled :  Volume 5: Counterintelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities,”

But all that isn't enough for the hare-brained Noonan (who temporarily mustered enough brain power  6 weeks ago to say Trump ought to resign) reverting to blind Trump love in her latest twaddle


 Therein seeking to defend Trump's mocking of the fallen by appeal to the "family" script for The Godfather Pt. II.  Before that, Peggy trots out friends of hers who confide in her they still plan to vote for Trump despite acknowledging - as one did that:

"Donald Trump is a boorish, narcissistic, self aggrandizing, petulant child who has sown significant discord among my fellow citizens.  He has little knowledge of his current job description or limitations.”

No, you can't make this shit up.  But one supposes Peggy is happy to expose friends even dumber and less insightful than she is.   It's all relative in Trump World, after all. This turkey she quotes then has the absolute temerity to assert one reason for his misgivings about Biden is that he "does exhibit a degree of obvious cognitive impairment".   Which is choice given Trump - aka the Dotard- can barely pass a basic test for  early Alzheimer's patients.  And who, in the real realm we live in, actually believes the California wildfires  aren't from climate change,  adding, "Yes it will get cooler you'll see."    For which any thinking citizen would instantly award an IQ of ....10.  Biden, the supposed mental slacker, at least had the insight, awareness and gumption to refer to Trump as a "climate arsonist" which is what he is.  Give him four more years and watch the remainder of the country either burn up or be flooded out - as he trashes even more environmental regulations and puts more toadies into agencies - like he just  did at the NOAA.   See  e.g.



But Noonan outdoes herself for pure stupidity, nonsense and gullibility when she devotes an entire fourth of her  WSJ column to the Godfather  II script to provide fictional support for Dotard denigrating troops.  I reproduce the relevant section below for readers directly from the paper.   I do this because it has more impact than reading the words from the link above.   Again she is using this as counterpoint to the Atlantic piece by Michael Goldberg, e.g.


She is resorting to this pathetic ploy to try to make the specious case that - like Sonny's family loyalty emphasis in the Godfather II movie-   Trump is also about family loyalty which trumps any military service, or higher respect for the military. 



Read her words carefully, and you will see she takes this fictional script seriously and as a worthwhile template to defend (or at least justify)  Trump's deplorable words in referring to active military (and fallen military) as "suckers" and "losers".   Indeed, Noonan ends her idiocy writing this:

"Mr. Trump would know that scene well. Perhaps it gave him a higher rationale for claiming bone spurs in his deferment during Vietnam. It wasn’t selfishness, disagreement with the war, cowardice. It was loyalty to family."

Again, this is verbatim from this WSJ harpy's loopy piece.  Oh no, it wasn't cowardice, despite the fact that Trump got his "bonespurs"  I-Y exemption from a note written by a quack. Not from actually having to undergo a full  4 ½   hour draft physical as I did in March, 1965 (sent the notice to report -to the shock of Biever Hall dorm mates -  while in the middle of my 2nd semester as a Loyola University freshman.)

And lordy be, it wasn't selfishness that led to his calling the fallen at Belleau Wood "losers" and "suckers" - it was merely "loyalty" to his family.  If Noonan really believes this she ought to resign her columnist position instantly.  Oh wait, she is in the op-ed pages of the WSJ -  which editorial board Joe Scarborough unleashed a classic rant against barely a week ago.

The country is going to hell in a proverbial hand basket thanks to Trump and his gangsters, and Peggy Noonan prefers we worry more about Joe Biden and the Dems being "socialists".   While giving cover to Trump's abominable dismissing of military war dead,  using  a fictional Mafia movie script.

Pardon me while I barf.

Wednesday, July 8, 2020

Make Trump Sit A Mensa Entrance Test -Then We'll See What A "Stable Genius" He Is

Related image
"Doh! I'm a very stable genius!  So I don't believe that stupid book! And I'll even take the Mensa test to prove it!"


The soon to be released book by Trump niece, Mary Trump ('Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man') ,  includes some real blockbuster revelations, many of which haven't appeared in earlier  Trump expose books  such as: 'Fire and Fury', by Michael Wolff,  'FEAR: Trump In The White House', by Bob Woodward,  'A Warning' by Anonymous, and 'The Room Where It Happened' by John Bolton.

Of particular interest to me was Trump having to hire a substitute kid (a Joe Shapiro) to sit the SAT for him.   This was necessary because as a HS kid Trump had visions of "the best school in the world" and that was UPenn's Wharton School of Business. Trouble was, his less than stellar academic grades (according to Mary Trump) would not have enabled him entry on their own merits.  

The high score  (over 1400) the chosen proxy earned, assured Trump of an acceptance he'd otherwise never have had.   In the wake of the release of the book to journalists, some have debated whether the account is true.  But I have no doubt it is, first because I trust Mary Trump's word - and certainly over anything Trump or his retinue of liars says. And secondly because it fits in with his abysmal character traits as a narcissistic, compulsory cheat (who even cheats at games like golf) and a general moral reprobate.  A reprobate with no moral compass, period.  So why wouldn't he cheat?  It makes perfect, logical sense, especially for a crook and traitor who's already racked up over 5,000 lies. Oh, and sought sundry ways to enlist the help of other nations (like Ukraine, Russia) to help him win re-election.

Cheating by hiring a proxy to sit the SAT for him? A no brainer.  Here  are also some other explosive reveals about the maggot fouling the highest office:

1) Trump’s niece revealed how she leaked hordes of confidential Trump family financial documents to the New York Times in an effort to expose her uncle, whom she portrays as a dangerous sociopath,” This, according to Rachel Maddow's reporting on the book last night.  Maddow also reported that when  NY Times reporter Susanne Craig showed up at her door, Mary Trump “initially turned Craig away, telling her that she didn’t talk to reporters.” But she reconsidered,  especially after seeing how her uncle was "shredding every norm" and being enabled at every step.  So she decided to work with the Times, which directed her to the likely venue for Trump's tax records, and she hauled out 19 boxes worth.  from the law firm, Farrell Fritz,” Swan notes.

2) Trump’s world view was shaped by a desire to avoid his father’s disapproval. Here, Mary Trump paints a damning picture of Fred Trump, Sr., saying that he came to envy his son’s “confidence and brazenness.”   In the Washington Post, reporters Shane Harris and Michael Kranish explain that Donald Trump’s “view of the world was shaped by his desire during childhood to avoid his father’s disapproval, according to the niece, Mary L. Trump.”

Trump still claims,  despite his obvious mental -cognitive infirmities,  that he's a stable genius.  Well, let's see how he does on the Mensa entrance test, for which he will not be able to hire a substitute to try to gain admittance.  Of course, Mensa entry, i.e.  at the upper 2%  of IQ level, or roughly 132 on the Stanford -Binet scale, is "gifted" - but not genius.  That  level is at least 15 points higher.   

In any case, given Trump's severe mental deficiencies,  it is as likely he'd make either cut  (gifted or genius) as it is he sat that SAT himself ca. 1964. 

See Also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqBIQhh927M

https://mymodernmet.com/mensa-iq-test/


This is what a Mensa IQ test looks like - YouTube


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h36cpwlslHk

Thursday, May 2, 2019

The Public's "Exhaustion" Is Irrelevant: House Dems Must Proceed With Hearings And Impeach Barr

Related image
"Gee, I'm just doin' my job sittin' on the real Mueller report for the Donald!"

"You had Harvard and Yale educated Republican lawyers on the U,S, Senate Judiciary committee. And they sat there and listened to the attorney general of the United States say that any president, if he feels an investigation is unfair, can shut it down.  That is banana republic stuff! That is North Korea. That is Russia! That is China!  What separates us from those countries - and those guys know it - is respect for the rule of law."  - Claire McKaskill, on 'Morning Joe' today.

"Yours is a Republic, if you can keep it!"  - Benjamin Franklin

"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance." - Patrick Henry

" The attorney general is corrupt. The congress is dysfunctional.  What good is leaving a road map for impeachment if you know a tribal, party-before-country Republican Senate will never remove the president?  Bob, your trail of bread crumbs just isn't good enough. We're just not that smart anymore! America is now an aging shortstop.  You have to hit it right at us."  Bill Maher on Real Time Friday, April 26,telling Mueller his report revelations and conclusions were too indirect.too

It is inconceivable that while we are currently in one of the most critical pivot points in American history, a seeming majority of the American public is screaming 'Enough of Mueller already!"  This according to a recently released NBC-WSJ poll that showed 56 percent are "exhausted" and want no more to do with Mueller, his report or the Democrats' efforts to hold hearings,  or subpoena Trump tax files and other documents.  This sorry state - if true - elicits the question: Are Americans still prepared to exercise eternal vigilance to preserve their liberty, constitution and Republic, or are they too lazy and distracted? So much so they just want to punt it away?

The attitude now, in the wake of unprecedented contempt of congress and Trump stonewalling, appears to be "It's just Trump, that's how he is. Enough already!"  Not that his actions, orders and toadies - like Barr - are setting a slew of dangerous templates that don't bode well for the future of this country or the existence of democratic principles - far less respect for the constitution. (Which, btw, both Barr and Trump swore to uphold.)

Take the case of the office of attorney general now defiled almost beyond recognition thanks to Barr's lies, cover-ups and other mischief. Let's understand here this office is a unique one in American government. To briefly review: The Department of Justice (DOJ) though it is part of the executive branch is supposed to be wholly independent of the president and hence the arbiter of fairness.

By contrast, the Toad Barr has worked feverishly as an apologist for Trump, starting with a 19 page memo he released, had published some months ago. In that screed, this toad averred a president cannot be held guilty of obstruction of justice, especially if he was "falsely accused" and it "negatively affects his ability to govern" .  Worse, as legal specialist and attorney Rikki Klieman pointed out on CBS this morning, Barr under separate testimony has insisted if any president believes he is being falsely accused he "has the right to get rid of that accuser."  In Klieman's take: "That is a very dangerous precedent indeed."

In fact, it turns on its head the whole constitutional notion of checks and balances and the legislative branch having oversight over an executive. Or as former Watergate reporter Bob Woodward so aptly put it this a.m. ('Morning Joe'):  "I feel innocent, so the investigation has to go away."

Thus, if the executive doesn't cotton to the "accusations" of the legislators he has the "right" to ditch them, or in Trump's case negate their powers by refusing to allow aides to testify or documents to be released. Even to the point of ignoring subpoenas!  This is serious shit, folks, not some parlor game. Our nation's integrity and future as a constitutional Republic is at stake - and yet 56 % in a poll want us all to just "move on"  like brain dead zombies or imbeciles.

Back to Barr:  As the second most corrupt attorney general in American history (after John Mitchell) continues his display of contempt and obstruction of justice - by refusing to appear today before the House Judiciary Committee- it is time to bring the hammer down. That means not only citing this execrable toad for contempt of congress but moving to impeach him as well.   This is especially now in the wake of Bob Mueller's letter after William Barr released his brief summary or as he likes to call it "conclusions in a nutshell."  Mueller, not too happy about Barr's degenerate presentation, wrote in the wake of its release: "There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel to assure public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."

The letter in its totality was described as laying out Mueller's concerns "in stark terms that shocked Justice Department officials".

Worse, in the wake of letter's release the Toad Barr lied shamelessly, insisting that when he pressed Mueller on whether the memo to congress was inaccurate, Mueller replied "he did not".  Instead "he felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation."

Which was total "bull pockey" in the parlance of Rachel Maddow last night, and more colorful choice of terms for Janice and myself. But this is now why the House Democrats need to have Mueller appear and testify in open hearings, in public.  As Ms. Klieman said:

"There is no doubt that if we didn't think we needed to hear from Robert Mueller before yesterday's testimony, by the end of yesterday we certainly know we do. 

And it is for good reason. William Barr is abundantly clear that he and Rod Rosenstein came to a conclusion about approximately ten episodes of obstruction of justice using a standard for criminal cases of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. He claims not to now why Mueller instead came to a conclusion of equal poise, 'there is evidence of obstruction, yet there isn't evidence of obstruction'  enough to convict in a criminal case.

So who has the primary evidence? Well Robert Mueller!"

When CBS co -anchor John Dickerson tried to play Devil's advocate and defend Barr ('Well Mueller left it in Barr's lap, so Barr made the call') Klieman shot back:  "But it certainly could be said Robert Mueller intended to leave it in congress' hands. Don't you think that congress has the right to ask that question? "  Dickerson then asked:  "Well the special counsel's handed it all off, why does he have to do any more?"  To which Klieman replied:

"Because we don't know and congress doesn't know.  When he looked at approximately ten episodes with sub episodes beneath them, Don McGahn - legal counsel for the president - gave the most egregious example we can lay our hands on."

So there's no issue that Mueller has to appear, speak for himself  with no more filters- to congress and the American people -  to better educate them on the facts as opposed to Barr's omissions woven into a false narrative.

As a pundit also observed on 'Morning Joe', "this has now fired up again the Russia investigation, and Bob Mueller will be in the chair for hearings, so this will go on and on and on."

And so let it be. And any people without the minds or degree of attention to learn more and demand justice can go off and play Kandy Crush, Fortnite or whatever other mindrot now passes for entertainment.   We don't need unthinking parasites or pseudo- citizens, who likely won't have the interest (self or national) to vote anyway,

As for the Democrats, more aggressive options to deal with the Trump admin's refusal to cooperate are now being sought.  These include the impeachment of Barr, as well as fines imposed on all aides who don't acknowledge or adhere to subpoenas - and even jail time for assorted scofflaws - high and low.  The rule of law must be adhered to and not based on whim, preference or fancy.   Oh, and it has to start at the top.

Time to bring the hammer! And start with the Toad called Barr!  As for the wimps who claim to have had their fill and "can't take any more", they deserve neither liberty, security or to live in a democracy. Let them take their sorry ass hides to a real autocracy - say like Russia or Turkey. I'm sure they'd be a lot happier just living under a strong man like Putin or Erdogan, and not having to lift a finger or work their brains toward exercising any vigilance.

See also:



Excerpt:

What could the Committee do? Hold Barr in contempt of Congress—under Congress’s inherent power to get the information it needs to carry out its constitutional duties. Congress cannot function without this power.


Under this inherent power, the House can order its own sergeant-at-arms to arrest the offender, subject him to a trial before the full House, and, if judged to be in contempt, jail that person until he appears before the House and brings whatever documentation the House has subpoenaed.


When President Richard Nixon tried to stop key aides from testifying in the Senate Watergate hearings, in 1973, Senator Sam Ervin, chairman of the Watergate select committee, threatened to jail anyone who refused to appear.


Congress hasn’t actually carried through on the threat since 1935—but it could.

Would America really be subject to the wild spectacle of the sergeant-at-arms of the House arresting an Attorney General and possibly placing him in jail?

Probably not. Before that ever occurred, the Trump administration would take the matter to the Supreme Court on an expedited basis.


Sadly, there seems no other way to get Trump to move.


And:

by Cody Fenwick | May 2, 2019 - 6:51am | permalink 






Wednesday, February 13, 2019

It's Past Time For The National Popular Vote (NPV) To Replace The Electoral College

Image result for alexander hamiltonImage may contain: 1 person, smiling, hat and closeup
By now every manjack and his dog knows about the electoral dumpster fire that led to the madman swine now in power and befouling our land. In the end, the great Electoral College misfired by rubber stamping a know nothing, morally bankrupt stooge for a hostile foreign power, when it should have prevented that.

Worse, the resistance and supposed  'fail safe' check on Trump's ascension to power went out more with a whimper than a bang. This as all  efforts by anti-Trump activists to stop him reaching 270 electoral votes fell pathetically short. Activists who'd urged electors to back efforts led by academics (e.g. Prof. Lawrence Lessig) to cast their ballots at variance with the rubber stamping misfits in the states, were largely ignored. E.g.  "Our state was won by the Donald so we gotta give the votes to him!"

The system the Founders set up to protect the White House from being occupied by an agent of a foreign government was straightforward, Hamilton insisted. The choice of president would not “depend on any preexisting bodies of men, who might be tampered with beforehand to prostitute their votes.”  Instead, the Electoral College would be made up of “persons [selected] for the temporary and sole purpose of making the appointment.”

The electors would be apolitical because it would be illegal for a Senator or House member to become one.  Thus Hamilton wrote:
And they have excluded from eligibility to this trust, all those who from situation might be suspected of too great devotion to the President in office. No senator, representative, or other person holding a place of trust or profit under the United States, can be of the numbers of the electors.
This, Hamilton was certain, would eliminate “any sinister bias.”  Nice assumption but it didn't work out that way, and we've been left to ponder why. But more importantly it's necessary to ensure this farce never happens again. That's why we need to support the movement for a National Popular Vote (NPV) to eradicate an anachronism that no longer functions.  With the NPV in place state electors  pledge  their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote.  

Here one may inquire: How did Hamilton's original grand idea go so far south back in 2016? Basically,  a combination of too little will to overturn the Electoral College as a mere rubber stamp, and too little actual strategy. Specifically, I place the preponderance of blame on two factors: 1) A disorganized effort to thwart the fascists with too many distracting and unrealistic alternative choices, and 2) An unwillingness to rock the boat and just play it safe, especially among Republican state electors.  As for the much ballyhooed "Hamilton electors', they turned out to be more a myth than reality.  If a person had to, he might have counted them on one hand, if that.

The result was predictable: with only external protests erupting - as in Madison, WI-  so the morally  bankrupt Trump cakewalked to his official electoral victory as millions tuned in to updated tallies, aghast.  

Hamilton and James Madison originally had high confidence the Electoral College would function to stop a deranged maggot like Trump, with the morals to match, from gaining office. So that leads us to ask what the hell happened?  Basically neither Madison or Hamilton ever envisioned a day when a man so entangled in financial affairs with foreign governments as is Donald Trump could even be seriously considered, because (in their minds), the electors would carefully investigate the candidate. That hasn’t happened in over a century, so, by those standards, the electors totally failed in their job in the 2016 election.

Taking a stroll down American history lane we also understand that The Electoral College was a compromise designed to keep the president above political considerations, and sold to the public as a way to prevent an agent (witting or unwitting) of a foreign power from becoming president. We now see it has failed on both counts.

Tracking back to the beginning we can even put the more direct source of our current  electoral morass on a bastardized element of the Constitution - a poison pill if you will -  called  Three-Fifths Compromise.  Because of the Three-Fifths Compromise (found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution,):

"Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons."
The Electoral College thereby handed the White House to four Virginia slaveholders among our first five presidents. Since that compromise has been eliminated, it continues to wreak havoc, i.e. in having put George W. Bush and Donald Trump into officeEach state was then awarded the same number of presidential electors as it has legislators (senators plus representatives), applying the outcome of the compromises to the presidential race. After some debate, the Founding Fathers left it to each state’s legislature to decide how to award its electoral votes — a power that has been confirmed repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Currently, 48 of 50 states, including Colorado, have a winner-take-all model. This means if a majority of Colorado voters fill in a bubble on their ballot for, say, Beto O'Rourke, all the state’s electoral votes are awarded to his electors. Presumably, those electors cast a ballot for Beto. In fact, in some states, including Colorado, state law requires they do so. (In some other states, however, electors are not “pledged” and may decide to vote for another candidate, though such a move remains rare.  But this is what the activist effort in 2016 to prevent Trump's ascension was based upon.)

The winner-take-all model is so ingrained in our culture that calls to change it are often painted as unAmerican, but winner-take-all isn’t in the Constitution, nor has the Electoral College always functioned that way. In fact, only three states cast their votes winner-take-all style in the country’s first election, and a little more than a decade later, every state dropped the system. 

States adopted winner-take-all laws again starting in the 1800s in an effort to have a greater influence on elections. That led to a domino effect that has now swept up every state except Maine and Nebraska.

In 2016, despite a massive increase in support for the Electoral College by Republicans following Trump’s win, Gallup found that most Americans preferred amending the Constitution to do away with the College rather than keeping the current system, 49 to 47 percent.   This polling has paved the way for the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement today - as people realize we cannot have another clusterfuck such as transpired in 2016.  We do not need yet another Bob Woodward effort such as 
Fear: Trump in the White House  to remind us how bad things can get if the wheels of democracy fly off.

Before the NPV, it was generally assumed that ditching the Electoral College would take a constitutional amendment, which must be either approved by two-thirds of the House and Senate and three-fourths of the states or proposed by a Constitutional Convention called by two-thirds of state legislatures and approved by three-fourths of the states. (Notably, ditching equal state representation in the Senate, on the other hand, requires the consent of every state.) 

But NPV gets around the amendment process by using an interstate compact — an agreement amongst states. It’s the brainchild of Dr. John Koza, who created a board game about the Electoral College when he was a young man (it never really took off) and authored the book, Every Vote Equal: A State-Based Plan for Electing the President by National Popular Vote. Now the chair of NPV, Koza had a career with the lottery, where he dealt with interstate compacts, and taught for a time at Stanford University.

Let's also note there is a logical basis for changing to the NPV. Namely, that the respective party nominees then have to go throughout the country campaigning to win voters, as opposed to cherry picking a minority  of states. To grasp my point just look now at how presidential candidates campaign in battleground states, or how gubernatorial candidates campaign.

Doubt the  rhetoric about the importance of battleground states in the current system?  Then  consider this: The NPV campaign found general election events really only happen in battlegrounds. In 2012, for instance, 12 states saw almost all the general election campaign events.  Of 253 events, Ohio saw 73, Florida 40, Virginia 36, and Iowa 27. In 2016, the NPV claims, 94 percent of general campaign events were held in 12 battleground states.   This, my friends, is absurd. 

As one Colorado State Senator put it:  “We should elect the president of the United States, not the president of the battleground states.”

Under a National popular vote,  every vote would count in every state, and every vote in every state would thus be worth courting.  Currently, Republican presidential candidates aren’t even trying to win the popular vote right now; they’re trying to win the Electoral College.  

Instead of this perfidy it's time for a truly rational system, the National Popular Vote.  It returns the ideal of one man, one vote, and has state electors  pledging  their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the national popular vote .   This mechanism would introduce finally a fail safe mechanism to preventing a minority faction  of deplorables from enacting their rage against the rest of us.  

That includes the current gaggle of buffoons - such as at Trump's rally in El Paso two nights ago - wearing red MAGA hats and chanting nutso bollocks that would embarrass a vociferous chimp. Instead of seeing this spectacle repeated over and over we could again take control of the nation's future direction and halt a travesty of destructive minority rule.    

In this case a minority of  morons and imbeciles who believe anything their mutant twit says - even that an invisible wall has already been erected at the border.  The danger triggered by this faction is that their virus of practiced and proud ignorance - including reinforcement by Trump's incessant lies- can metastasize to the normal populace and begin to convert segments into dumkopfs as well.  See e.g.


by Henry Giroux | February 14, 2019 - 7:17am | permalink
— from Truthout

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update:  As reported in The Denver Post (2/14, p. 8 A) the Colorado House Committee has now passed the resolution to implement the NPV here in Colorado.