Here the Ising model system, by virtue of undergoing spontaneous magnetization (say from a state S(1) with spin excess 0 to state S(2) with spin excess 12 , discloses an evolution to a higher degree of order at the later time t(0) + t, where t could be in billions of years or nanoseconds.

The elementary magnets may exist temporarily in the state S(1) as shown (i.e. each arrow denotes the net spin of the atom based on the sum of electron orientations within it). We then may want to find the degree of order applicable to the system, say at time t(o) and do the appropriate counting of "spin ups" and spin downs" as shown in the left side of the model. We find on doing so (which the reader can verify) that we get 8 spin ups - 8 spin downs = 0 net spin, or in other words the system is at equilibrium.

Consider then the same system but at a later time (t(0) + t) , for which we behold the right side orientations of the elementary spin magnets. Here we get: 14 spin ups - 2 spin downs = 12 spin ups, or in other words the spin excess = 12. This system, call it S(2), has much

*higher degree of order*(less entropy) than the system S(1). (We should add here that

*higher entropy*- as in S(1) - corresponds to

*the most probable state*, defined by the minimal spin excess of zero

The degree of order, as well as information, for the simple spin system shown is determined from what is called "the spin excess", or the net spin difference (up minus down or vice versa). The larger this number, the greater the degree of order, and the lower the entropy of the system. Obviously, since 0 denotes an extremely low number, we can deduce large entropy.

Accessing such simple systems allows us to infer fundamental measures applicable to the systems, for example the "magnetic moment" of a state, as well as the "

*degeneracy function*". Consider an N= 2 model system with either 2 ups (two up arrows) or 2 downs. Then, if m denotes the magnetic permeability we can have:

M = +2m or M = -2m

where the first is the magnetic moment for two spins up particles, and the second for two spins down. One can also, of course, have the mixed state inclusive of one spin up plus one spin down, then:

M = O m or O

Meantime, the degeneracy function computes the number of states having the same value of m (individual spins) or M such that:

g(N,m) = N!/ (½N + m)! (½N - m)!

_{av}]

where [M

_{av}]

_{s})

The power of the Ising model, however, doesn't end with ferromagnetic systems. We can also use it to examine ice crystal configurations as has been shown in a recent paper by Andrei Okounkov (

__Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society__, Vol. 53, No. 2, p. 187). In this paper the author presents us with the 2D ice crystal Ising model shown below:

Each white square denotes an ice crystal and the blue areas represent separating media. Certain model stipulations apply as given in the paper: 1) the total number of white squares is fixed, just as the total number of elementary magnets in the earlier system; 2) all squares along the boundary are deemed blue in order to prevent crystals sticking to the sides of the container, and 3) It must be possible to assign probabilities to the configuration in the same way we might assign "order" or entropy to the ferromagnetic system.

The most basic probability for any such system is "thermal equilibrium". Thus, at some temperature T if the system attains thermal equilibrium then the probability of any particular configuration decays exponentially with the energy of C, which is analogous to E = m

_{m}B in the ferromagnetic case. The probability of any particular configuration dependent on T is then:

Prob (C) = 1/ Z(T) [exp (-Energy (C)/ kT)

Where k is Boltzmann's constant, 1.38 x 10

^{-23}J/K.

One will also make use of the "partition function":

Z(T) = å

_{C}exp (- Energy (C)/ kT)

which as Okounkov notes, really functions as a "normalization factor" given that it "makes the probabilities sum to 1". In this Ising ice crystal model, then, the energy is "the sum of interactions of all adjacent squares." Since the total number of squares is fixed (see stipulation (1)) then the energy must be proportional to the total length of the contours separating white from blue.

To identify the contours is easy. If the energetic reader will run off a copy of the image of the 2D rectangle, then take a black magic marker and trace around each ice crystal region as it appears, he will have generated the contours. The normalization for energy is then (

*op. cit*.):

Energy = 2 x Length of contours

As in the case of the ferromagnetic system entropy competes with order (energy). In the Ising ice crystal energy is saved via clumping. If we designate an "order parameter" such that b = (kT)

**then in the ice crystal case the larger b the stronger tendency for order. Interestingly, as Okounkov notes there is a critical temperature T**

^{-1}**> 0 above which entropy wins, it is:**

_{c}b = 0.5 ln (Ö2 + 1)

Below T

**and for ice crystal concentrations above a certain threshold a crystal will form as the size of the container goes to infinity.**

_{c}From this brief foray iwe can see that the Ising model shows the great generality of physics, in being applicable to vastly dissimilar physical entities.

## No comments:

Post a Comment