Well, a recent complete blood panel ordered by my primary care doc turned up generally terrific results - including 178 for cholesterol, 143 for trigylcerides, 43 for HDL cholesterol and 29 mg/DL for VLDL cholesterol. The one bummer in the mix was for the PSA (prostate specific antigen) which had gone up to 2.5 ng/ mL from 2.0 last December. Thus, in a period of just over the year from the brachytherapy HDR treatment, my PSA had gone up as opposed to continuing a steady decline down. I emailed my radiation oncologist immediately, and his take was that it appeared to be a "benign PSA flare" - but I needed to send him my PSA test results now every three months.
Evidently, this PSA "bounce" - called such in most of the literature, occurs in 25-33% of men following any kind of treatment, whether radiation or radical surgery (prostactectomy). Generally then, it will go down by 18 months (for radiation therapy) to 1.0 ng/mL and stay there or decrease. A "treatment failure" on the other hand, is defined as three or more successive increases in the PSA after radiation, especially if these exceed the limit of 2.0 ng/mL total increment.
Treatment failure is serious, since it means the cancer may well still be there as well as resurgent, and ready to create havoc once more. The options - after you've received the primary treatment, say high dose rate radiation as I have, aren't too wonderful or promising. Basically, in most cases, some type of cryogenic treatment (freezing the prostate), or anti-androgen hormone therapy (i.e. female hormones administered) and now, after some improvements in "morbidity" - a kind of 'salvaging prostatectomy" - where a last ditch surgery is attempted.
As I told wifey yesterday, none of these will be chosen as any option should I be deemed to have "treatment failure". I sure as hell am not getting any surgery now, having elected the radiation therapy, and especially with the considerable risks still in play and the fact that surgery on the radiated gland requires much, much higher level of competence as well as technical skill - including operating any da Vinci robot. Anti-androgens are out, after reading about their effects on one hapless guy (Victoria Hallerman's hubby in her book, How We Survived Prostate Cancer. She religiously documented how he constantly broke down in tears, was dogged by muddled, emotional thinking and basically poor judgment. This is all on top of the other effects, including enlarged breasts, etc. So thanks, but no thanks!
Fortunately, the odds remain in my favor, and I don't plan to toss the towel in so soon. As one site at McIver Clinic notes, with their own study - "The 10 year PSA relapse-free survival was 94% for the patients with low risk prostate cancer who were treated with Iodine monotherapy. " I like those chances, and they are surely as good for the UCSF Helen Diller Cancer Center- where I received my (Ir-192) brachy hdr treatment a year ago.
Now, the question becomes: How low does the PSA fall after radiation treatment? According to the same site:
There is no absolute threshold for the PSA nadir (lowest value), but our center uses 1.0 ng/ml as a goal for successful treatment. There is tremendous variation in the time it takes to reach a nadir after radiation. Some patients reach a nadir after a few months while others can take a few years. There is no absolute PSA nadir value that is accepted for success or failure or treatment. Many patients reach a PSA of <0.1 ng/ml and most are below 0.5 ng/ml.
This suggests I need not hit any panic button yet, and likely not for at least a few years, maybe up to 5 - if Dr. John C. Mulhall's take is accepted. Now, what is a PSA "flare"? The same site defines it:
A “bump” or “Bounce” that occurs 18 to 24 months after radiation. The levels can go up to 20 ng/ml. The evaluation reveals no recurrence. These “bumps” in the PSA occur in nearly 30% of patients. The cause of the flare or bump is not known. In most bumps, the PSA rise is temporary and then falls in a quick fashion – up and down over a 6 – 9 month period. A PSA bounce can be confused with a PSA failure.
Again, nothing to be overtly alarmed about, so far as I can tell, though yes, one would want to monitor changes over time. This is why the oncologist asked me to get tested now at 3 month intervals. Given this, how does PSA level as indicated in testing, relate to recurrence of the cancer? The site again:
Prostate cancer patients who have a lower prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir (the lowest PSA value) after radiation therapy are less likely to have the cancer return than patients with a higher PSA nadir. The longer the PSA continues to fall and the lower its ultimate lowest value (nadir) the better the patient's chances of disease-free survival. In our patients, those that had ultimately had PSA at or below 0.5 ng/ml did not have a recurrence. Those that achieved a 1.0 ng/ml at 1 year did not have a recurrence.
The same FAQ notes that the nadir itself may not be reached for three years. Hence, there is time on my side before action becomes critical- or delay, inaction has grave consequences. How much - who can say? But I'd allott at least another 3-4 years before getting panicky. By then, perhaps - if recurrence has been concluded by my oncologist- I might seek further treatment. But at this stage, I have no plans to do so. After all, the bible says "three score years and ten" is allotted to a man, not that I am a bible believer, but with rising Alzheimers and what's going on in the world, also the approach of savage climate change, hey - who knows? Clocking out "early" may be the best thing!