Well, you know you've struck a nerve of truth when the piggy squeals 'Onkel Adolf!' And seems like Mikey didn't like my blog on Terrorist Right Extremists at all. Why should he if he's one of them? His most fired up reaction goes:
"I also got a kick out him writing "But WHY do that when the REAL Terrorists and Murderers are all on the RIGHT?" Of course, he becomes 'deaf, dumb, and blind' to the "REAL Terrorists and Murderers" of the LEFT that I cited in my past post ( http://www.mstahlstraighttalk.blogspot.com/2013/02/chris-dorner-another-anti-gun-libo-gone.html ) that he is too chicken-SHIT to address! "
Actually, bonehead, I've addressed them multiple times in previous blogs, it's just that you never ever pay attention! Basically, without an iota of proof, he names the following "Libos" as murdering maggots. I list them as he has them in his stupid link:
1. The Ft Hood Killer: a registered Democrat and radical Muslim who supported Al Qaeda and Hamas
2. The Columbine Killer: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals
3. Virginia Tech Killer: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff and a registered Democrat
4. Colorado Theater Killer: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal
5. Newtown School Killer: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.
And, NOW we can add #6: CHRIS DORNER! (Which, I'll prove beyond a shadow of a doubt in a minute)!"
---------------------
I love it when Mikey insists he will "prove beyond a shadow of a doubt in a minute". Well, more like a century - if then. But see, Mikey is soo stupid or too far gone on sniffing his plastic wrap laced with paint and RAID to grasp that trotting out singleton anecdotal examples of killers as "registered democrats" - even if it were so, (he provides not a single vetted document though I grant he may have read some whacko Right web site) does not constitute proof that "Liberals are mass killers". Indeed, he commits the classical logical error of the fallacy of distribution, or arguing from the specific to the general.. Another case of such shoddy reasoning would be:
"Barbie was raped by Jack"
"Jack happens to be a man"
"Therefore all men are rapists"
In a similar vein, look at Mikey's example (one of them- each of the others also applies).
"James Eagan Holmes committed the Aurora Theater massacre"
"James Eagan Holmes is a registered Democrat"
"Therefore, all registered Democrats are mass murderers"
Note the converse of the last statement, i.e. "all mass murderers are registered democrats" is equally fallacious, because he's using a selective sample (6 'registered democrats' - for which he provides no real evidence other than his words) to argue to a general conclusion applicable to a whole class.
Of course, if Mike never took a logic course, which I am certain he didn't at Smokehouse Online College, it's doubtful he'd ever have discovered the fallacy of distribution. We have to chalk it up to another of his deficiencies, along with not being able to read properly.
Since he goes on to write, referring to me:
"He then says that America is an "armed camp," and that there are "89 guns for every 100 civilians... That amounts to roughly 270 million guns owned nationwide, far and away the highest gun ownership rate in the world." But the guns are unevenly distributed. About 35 percent of Americans personally own a gun. "Around 80 percent of gun owners are men. On average they own 7.9 guns each."
But I never said those exact words, they were cited from blogger Bob Burnett. The words "according to Burnett" were clearly at the end of the paragraph, and the beginning, but Mike must have been so het up he didn't see them or didn't read them properly.
He also mocks the citation (from Freedom of Information Act released documents obtained from Homeland Security and the FBI) about "suppressed sniper rifles in Houston" to be used against OWS. His blog remark is on the order of: "HAHAHAHAHAHAHA....what a conspiracy theory". But is too stupid to see these are not coming from me but statements in the FOIA DOCUMENTS themselves, obtained by the Partnership for Civil Justice. Again, it shows he doesn't read properly if he conflates statements I make or made with statements in documents released under the Freedom of Information Act.
He then barks with a belligerent tone:
"So, what's your point, dumbass? Are ya agin' us law-abidin' folks having guns? (well, dumb question, I must admit - of course y'all are ). "
Actually not, dumbass, or dumb fuck as the case may be - though you still may be brain- damaged giving rise to your dumbness. I have always supported the right to bear arms, since I used to own a rifle of my own. Where I come down, with all sensible people, is that 2nd amendment does NOT give a citizen the right to carry the ordnance or weapon of a fucking soldier, get it? Nor does it confer the right to have multiple clip magazines. You don't need a Bushmaster .223 to shoot "Bambi" and you don't need an AR-15 to kill a burglar. So enough of the dumb shit questions, ok? Oh wait, they're emanating from a dumb shit, I forgot!
Miffed, he continues:
"Why don't ya have the balls to 'enlighten' us to the fact that Obummer's homie town of Chicago, which now has the strictest gun laws in the nation, also has the highest gun murder rate in the nation - surpassing even NYC! I'll tell ya - it's because CRIMNALS DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT GUN LAWS!! They'll get 'em whether their banned or not! "
Cool down, Mikey, stop peeing in your diapers or wetting your bed. The fact is that Chicago has seen a fall in the rate of murders in the first two months of this year compared to last. This, after hiring the former NYC Chief of Police.
You are also incorrect about Chicago having the 'highest murder rate in the nation'- but why am I not surprised? I mean you didn't know what the fallacy of distribution was when you used it so why not blow it on this one too? Anyway, FBI Uniform Crime statistics (for cities with populations over 300,000) Detroit is the most murderous city with 54.6 murders per 100,000, with New Orleans next at 53.5 and Chicago doesn't even make the top ten (for 2012) at 18.7. It's true that the Windy City's has spiked, but the per capita rate is still less than New Orleans by nearly a factor three (and let's be reminded N.O held the 'murder capital' title for many years, while Chicago never did - which to hear Mike's take, ought to be a feather in the Windy City's cap!)
But this just goes to show how political enmity against a group or person (in this case Obama) can cloud one's judgment.
Mikey ends up bloviating with his most asinine question:
“Now, what part of that is to complicated for your jungle-jook, educated, third World pea brain to comprehend...DUMBASS!! "
----
Alas, none of it you proto-Reptilian turd. The real question is what part of my response can that pea brain of yours comprehend without losing a quarter or more of its neurons?
No comments:
Post a Comment