Dotard calling upon the deity at the recent National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C. where hundreds of evangelicals came to kiss the ass of the nation's top pussy grabber.
Forget the stupid "wall" for now, even as the Dotard spewed 150 more lies about its value last night at his dope and pony show in El Paso (e.g. that it brought crime down there when in fact crime went up 17 %). While too many have had their brains and attention seized by Trump's fake border wall tropes, he's been making deals with religious extremists to undermine American values, lives, freedoms. And doing it by posing as a holy roller himself, when we all know he's a pervert and adulterer - not to mention the most colossal liar office holder ever.
Cutting to the chase, let us accept as a primary proposition that an admitted, proud pussy grabber, as well as serial assaulter of women, cannot be "religious", "spiritual" or even morally decent. In fact, one can argue that the preponderance of evidence shows Trump lacks any moral compass at all, zero. This elicits the question of how this swine could even preside over a national prayer breakfast, far less have all those in attendance kissing his fat, orange butt. Hypocrisy anyone? What is wrong with these evangelical idiots anyway?
Hell, as the inimitable Richard Painter said - appearing as a guest on Chris Hayes' All In after the Stormy Daniels episode erupted: "These folks are even prepared to let pass his perversions", e.g.
As I noted in that blog post:
In an In Touch interview with Stormy Daniels she described having a sexual affair with Trump which included her beating his ass with a FORBES magazine. .. Subsequently, Mother Jones basically confirmed all the sordid details that Daniels described from her 2006 encounters For reference, see:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/01/stormy-daniels-trump-spanking-forbes-and-shark-week.html
This was reported in 2013, while Trump's spanking antics with Stormy Daniels occurred in 2006, little more than a year after his marriage to Melania and barely 3 months after the birth of son, Barron.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/01/stormy-daniels-trump-spanking-forbes-and-shark-week.html
According to a trove of 2009 emails exchanged between political operatives (advising Daniels at the time on a possible political campaign), the adult film actress claimed that her affair with Trump included spanking him with a copy of Forbes. By one account, a political consultant to Andrea Dubé related in an email that:
"He made her sit with him for three hours watching Shark Week. Another time he had her spank him with a Forbes magazine,"
The magazine used evidently had Dotard's face on the cover which no doubt provides endless material for any Freudian school psychiatrists and psychologists. See this humorous take from late night host Stephen Colbert:
-----------
Now, it is quite true the Christian ascetics believed strongly that a good flogging was needed from time to time to keep the desires of the flesh in check. As one website dealing with the lives and times of Christian ascetics put it:
"For St. Francis this attitude entailed fasting and self-flagellation for the disciplining of the body, which he called "brother donkey." This metaphor, beloved by the ascetics, expresses the idea of the body as a beast of burden that, according to Legenda maior, the life of St. Francis by St. Bonaventure (c. 1217–1274), "should be weighed down by hard work, often scourged with the whip, and nourished with poor fodder."
(cf. Asceticism - Western Asceticism - The Middle Ages - Self, Body, Practiced, and Church )
(cf. Asceticism - Western Asceticism - The Middle Ages - Self, Body, Practiced, and Church )
But I sincerely believe most rational Americans will agree with me that Trump, aka Dotard, was not enlisting Stormy to impart a spanking in order to subjugate "brother donkey", follow St. Francis or emulate any other ascetics. Further, it is abundantly clear that Trump's peeing antics (in the infamous "pee tape") which we know Putin is keeping for future extortion, would not be the behavior of a sainted persona. As former MI 6 spy Christopher Steele pointed out in his dossier:
"Trump's perverted conduct in Moscow (2013) included hiring the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel. where he knew President and Mrs. Obama (whom he hated) had stayed on one of their official trips to Russia, and defiling the bed where they had slept by employing a number of prostitutes to perform a 'golden showers' (urination) show in front of him. The hotel was known to be under FSB control with microphones and concealed cameras in all the main rooms to record anything they wanted to."
So why aren't evangelicals tarring and feathering his fat ass as opposed to kowtowing to him at prayer breakfasts? WaPo columnist Jennifer Rubin provided one of the best explanations which I also cited in my blog post link, e.g.:
"These white Christians are now, for the first time, not in the majority of the American people. So they're no longer just leaders, they are grievance leaders. They feel this put upon, discriminated against, angry sentiment that their fellowship voices. They don't like being displaced from authority in society. They think women, they think immigrants, they think gays are somehow displacing them taking what is rightfully theirs. And these people are out to claim it. They believe - and in some really interesting polling - they think they are the victims and not African -Americans, and not gays in terms of discrimination in America. That is how twisted it is."
For which insights I give her a '10' out of 10.
Hmmmm....grievance leaders? Poor little victims of those nasty "libtards", "commies", Blacks and gays. Oh, the pity! No wonder so many Americans now are losing any impetus to join a religion. Seeing the spectacle of the 'hear no evil, see no evil' Evangelicals, how could they?
The real issue is what these sanctimonious maggots are planning to do to the rest of us using Trump as their Trojan horse. How much these vermin own Trump was exposed in the October 2018 issue of 'Church and State', in an article by Rob Boston - wherein we learn, that Right Christian extremist Rev. Johnnie Moore boasted on CSPAN that the Evangelical Advisory Board:
For which insights I give her a '10' out of 10.
Hmmmm....grievance leaders? Poor little victims of those nasty "libtards", "commies", Blacks and gays. Oh, the pity! No wonder so many Americans now are losing any impetus to join a religion. Seeing the spectacle of the 'hear no evil, see no evil' Evangelicals, how could they?
The real issue is what these sanctimonious maggots are planning to do to the rest of us using Trump as their Trojan horse. How much these vermin own Trump was exposed in the October 2018 issue of 'Church and State', in an article by Rob Boston - wherein we learn, that Right Christian extremist Rev. Johnnie Moore boasted on CSPAN that the Evangelical Advisory Board:
"Pays regular visits to the White House which can start with policy briefings from West Wing staff and agency official and end with impromptu visits to the Oval Office."
Moore added "the advisory board has a pretty significant hand in directing or affecting administration policy". This can be on everything from immigration, to LGBT soldiers in the military (i.e. keeping them out), to bans on abortion - even if the mother's life is in danger if carried out, or in the case of incest of a young teem. And all of the policy outcomes disclose that "the Evangelical Advisory Board is not merely ceremonial, it has had substantial input on administration policies and decisions.
Further, these moral degenerates are in violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) a 1972 law that Congress enacted to: "ensure that advice by the various advisory committees formed over the years is objective and accessible to the public."
As noted by Mr. Boston (ibid.):
"Under FACA, all meetings of a presidential committee must be open to the public and a timely notice of each meeting must be published in The Federal Register. In addition, interested parties must be permitted to attend meetings, appear before the committee and file statement with it. Detailed minutes of each meeting must also be kept and various records related to committee meetings must be made available to the public".
Needless to say, the Evangelical Advisory Board has met none of these conditions. And yet "its members openly brag about the important work they're doing to formulate policies." Yes, policies that would turn most Americans into religiously dominated serfs under the thumb of one or ,more Trump associates or Nazis.
Incredibly, the top Xtian Nazi, Rev. Johnnie Moore, to avoid scrutiny by The Washington Post in followup inquiries, claimed the advisory board doesn't really exist. According to Rev. Johnnie, who must now be regarded as a rival liar to Trump (ibid.):
Incredibly, the top Xtian Nazi, Rev. Johnnie Moore, to avoid scrutiny by The Washington Post in followup inquiries, claimed the advisory board doesn't really exist. According to Rev. Johnnie, who must now be regarded as a rival liar to Trump (ibid.):
"The truth is there actually isn't a board. That's just slang language that's carried on from the campaign into the administration. There is no formal faith advisory board of any sort at the White House."
Okay, well if that's the case we ought not expect any draconian laws or policies to pop up, eh? Say like limiting access to abortion providers, or disallowing LGBT folks from entering the military? Otherwise, if such policies actually exist, and have been tweeted on and promoted by Trump - we know an advisory board had to be behind them. The reason? Trump lacks the brains and religious fervor to forge such policies on his own, he is being used as a puppet - just like Putin is using him.
Now some may retort at this point, "Hold on! Obama also had faith advisory councils!" But let us make clear these differences:
- All Obama's advisory sessions were open to the public
- All notices for such were first published in The Federal Register.
- All interested parties were allowed to attend the meetings.
- Obama's councils were uniformly non-partisan in contrast to Trump's
This is a rather different kettle of fish from operating in the shadows, then trying to deny such a board even exists when caught out. Americans ought to be roused to fury by this B.S. but I understand there are more than ample issues inducing outrage right now - so we will give people an "outrage pass". But at least keep this shadowy collusion between the Trump Nazis and Evangelical extremists on your radar!
See also:
Now some may retort at this point, "Hold on! Obama also had faith advisory councils!" But let us make clear these differences:
- All Obama's advisory sessions were open to the public
- All notices for such were first published in The Federal Register.
- All interested parties were allowed to attend the meetings.
- Obama's councils were uniformly non-partisan in contrast to Trump's
This is a rather different kettle of fish from operating in the shadows, then trying to deny such a board even exists when caught out. Americans ought to be roused to fury by this B.S. but I understand there are more than ample issues inducing outrage right now - so we will give people an "outrage pass". But at least keep this shadowy collusion between the Trump Nazis and Evangelical extremists on your radar!
See also:
No comments:
Post a Comment