Showing posts with label Laurie Garrett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laurie Garrett. Show all posts

Friday, July 24, 2020

The Virus Controls The Economy - Not The Reverse: From Restaurants to Retailers To Vegas, Americans Are Slowly Getting It




"The crisis we now find ourselves in is a human tragedy, an economic calamity  but it is also a singular national humiliation.  We're living in a moment when the U.S. is a laughingstock or a subject of pity around the world."-  Chris Hayes on All In, July 2nd


As the SARS-Cov-2 virus continues its depredations, with 30,000 new deaths forecast in the next 3 weeks, it may finally be sinking in this is serious.  The Covid 19  plague has already shattered all illusions that the summer heat would make it vanish and the economy would be going 'gangbusters'.  Americans are gradually learning that the virus controls their economy, not vice  versa. and until we get the damned thing under control - meaning decreasing cases in all 50 states-   reopening is a fool's errand.

Earlier the mindless followers of Trump, including at FOX News and the WSJ's op ed pages,  had puzzled over why even aggressive tactics for reopening in red states have come a cropper.   These  nabobs  were convinced  that sheer will and courage in reopening would put the virus in its place, with American pluck the supreme victor.  That lasted only until we've beheld ice trucks laden with corpses fill up, like in Texas' Rio Grande valley  (Hidalgo County), where they are now seeing the folly of reopening too soon, i.e. before the cases had gone down.  

As Dr. David Ho put it on Maddow Wednesday night: "The situation can still be saved but we have to act NOW!"  By "act" he meant instituting a 2nd nationwide lockdown  as well as universal masking and social distancing until the cases are on a downward trend again.  Oh,  and doing this along with contact tracing and ten times more testing.     This is why over 150 medical -epidemiological  experts have dispatched a letter to the powers - that-be to get it right this time around, e.g.

https://uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/USP_Public-health_final-letter-shutdowns_V2.pdf

Enough then, with the BS and balderdash that the "economy can't sustain any more lockdowns"  and "Masks take away my personal  freedoms!"  

 People, in other words, have to grasp the tail doesn't wag the dog.  The dog being the pandemic.  The 'dog' (pandemic) determines how confident customers are in venturing out - whether to dine, buy school items, board a plane,  or just shop in supermarkets.  Right now nearly  72% of Americans aren't confident at all and as they see the new surge and its deadly toll, their lack of trust is fully justified.

That includes wifey and  me.  We will soon  (next month) be celebrating our 45 th anniversary.  But as much as we'd like to we will not be dining out.  Too dangerous still - especially given our ages and each of us has conditions that would make us more vulnerable if infected.  So we will order food for takeout then just pick it up, and watch a pay per view movie dining at home.

According to The Denver Post yesterday (p. 9A) restaurants that pulled the economy through the great recession ten years ago are no longer able to do so. Keeping to 50 percent (or lower) capacity does not a profit make. As the piece notes:

"Restaurants now are less likely to deliver an economic boost, having suffered lockdowns and occupancy restrictions.  It's also unclear how readily Americans will return to dining out."

Well, from the polls available, not too readily.  Especially the senior population that frequents restaurants the most.  The article goes on:

"Before the pandemic restaurants had employed 11 million people nationwide-  more than the number that worked in construction or in factories. They generated more revenue than grocery stores.  From 1990 through February this year they generated more than twice as many restaurant jobs (91%) as overall jobs (40%)."

Going on to point out that as restaurants reluctantly closed their sales sank more than 50%-   from $66b in February to $30 b in April. In March 5.4 million restaurant workers had to be let go. And while 1.4 million were rehired in May, that is set to crater once more as Covid 19 has surged in many Sunbelt states and new lockdowns loom.    

Add to that 10 -11 million close to eviction because the eviction moratorium ends July 31, and 30 million plus who will lose their unemployment bonus of $600/week by the end of next week if congress  (i.e. Reepo Senate) doesn't vote to extend them. If not,  it's self-evident that spending - any kind - is set to crash as people rightly pull in the purse strings for simple financial self-preservation.  So you can blame any further crash of the economy or an extended recession on the Repubs who've been dithering for over two months on whether to extend the unemployment bonus.  Their worry?  They feel too many would just loaf at home, not return to work - and watch TV soaps - like they would do in their place.  Wastrel Reeptardo goofballs like Ted Yoho (FL).  Oh, and morons like Sen. Ron Johnson (WSJ, today, p. A15, 'No More Blank Checks From Congress For Coronavirus') spouting the usual Repuke idiocy:

"There is no need to  continue broad economic shutdowns with fatalities in these (low annual flu) ranges."

Again, unable to process with his feeble intellect that it isn't fatalities driving the crisis but overwhelmed ICUs and health workers from the higher infection rates which translate into  much higher intensive care rates.   Because the  ER- ICU teams are desperately trying to stop the infections from becoming fatalities.  In addition, Johnson takes no account of the lasting damage:  vascular, cognitive, to liver,  to kidneys etc. - that outlasts being hospitalized and which 1 in 3 recovering patients will deal with for 3 weeks or more.

But despite these very real risks to  workers with infection on returning to work amidst the current surge, this fool  won't budge.  He doesn't want another cent going to the 30 million Americans still unable to get work. They can go pound sand for all he cares. 

Frustrated by pushing premature reopenings that have now resulted in many thousands more deaths and ICUs flooded, Trump has vowed to make it ten times worse by pushing schools to reopen for the fall.   But does anyone with an IQ over 10  really believe that's  going to make Covid deaths go down or help retailers and restaurants stay open?   Prize-winning medical journalist  Laurie Garrett isn't biting and lashed out at how Trump has rendered America's schools "medical and moral catastrophes" and they are nowhere near ready to reopen, e.g.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/24/americas-schools-are-a-moral-and-medical-catastrophe/

This is because in nearly all the areas considering school reopening, none have achieved the goal of 14 straight days of declining cases. Hence, the nation's retailers for sure aren't holding their breath to see a huge school purchase boom (WSJ, 'Retailers Face Hard Lesson', July 23, p. B12)  The piece points out retailers - especially geared to school sales- can't even properly gauge inventory because of the existing uncertainty - including parents' fears.  They don't know whether ordering tons of hoodies, calculators, and backpacks now will leave them still sitting on shelves in September.

 Hell, the Trump morons have even railed against the CDC guidelines for schools to reopen as "too restrictive", and those don't even include a high grade HEPA filter in each classroom, as one Harvard prof has insisted be installed.

And until the money is spent to ensure these kind of adaptations - including enough space for limited capacity classes- Americans aren't buying.  According to a Denver Post piece yesterday ('Very Few Americans Back Full Reopening of Schools', p. 14 A):

"Only about one in ten Americans think daycare centers, preschools or K12 schools should open this fall without restrictions, according to a new poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs."  

And further 46 percent think "major adjustments" are needed, i.e. HEPA filters working in each classroom,  while 31 percent don't believe any in person instruction should happen this fall.    Of course, the wealthy have their own solutions which will work for them as the WSJ let us know 3 days ago, e.g


Amid Coronavirus, Parents 'Pod Up' to Form At-Home Schools ...


https://www.wsj.com/articles/amid-coronavirus-parents-pod-up-to-form-at-home-schools-11595323805

But this is a no-go for most American parents who will barely be able to make it if new stimulus checks and unemployment bonuses aren't forthcoming from the cheapskate Reepos.

The importance of infusing more lifeline checks to people is also underscored when we see  (WSJ, July 23, 'Virus Effect On Retailers Worse Than Expected', p. B1):

"With a resurgence of coronavirus cases across much of the country, companies that were relatively healthy before the pandemic are showing signs of buckling. Bankruptcies in the sector are piling up, with more retailers seeking Chapter 11 protection so far in 2020 than  all last year. "

The result? "The financial pain for U.S. retailers is worsening beyond what executives and analysts anticipated when the coronavirus began to spread."

Well, they fell off the mark in expectations because they miscalculated the degree of arrogance and over confidence in state governors who believed (like Texas' Guv Greg Abbott) they could just plow ahead with reopenings and devil take the virus. Except the virus is having the final say as bodies cram into  ICUs and health workers are on their last legs from the stress and work of caring for so many. Indeed, in Texas' Hidalgo County, triage will now have to be implemented at hospitals to determine who can enter an ICU and who is beyond hope of saving.

We let ourselves get into this mess by not taking the virus seriously as other nations (like the United Arab Emirates - with the highest testing rate in the world)  We also had too many stupid people who believed wearing masks was a political statement  - and proceeded to start fights with workers in stores over defending their "rights". Ignoring the fact there are no rights without responsibilities.  Finally, we were led to this tragic pass by not having a coordinated national strategy - because our leaders lacked both the vision and courage. 

So no wonder now we see the likes of Michael Appel (of Appel Associates LLC) saying (ibid.):

"You're going to see as time goes on how the dominoes fall. The big question for any retailer is if they close tomorrow would anyone care."

The same could be asked of the casinos in Vegas- one of our favorite places and which we enjoyed in October of last year, e.g. the Bellagio Fountains at night seen from our 11th floor room:



Flash forward 8 months, now we learn (WSJ, July 23, p. B3) the Sands revenue alone has dropped 97%  and pessimism has engulfed the town.  During a conference call with Wall Street analysts Sands Chief operating officer Robert Goldstein "offered a pessimistic outlook for Las Vegas"   To wit, "even if casino revenue rebounds conventions and other group events have supplanted gambling as the primary economic engine."

He goes on to tell the WSJ (ibid.)

"In all of the years I've been here in Las Vegas I've never felt more gloomy than I do today about what's happening in Las Vegas short term."

In essence, he said, all the Strip's  resorts are now "running like a regional casino operator relying on nearby gamblers driving in."

In other words, the thousands of Vegas visitors who'd normally arrive daily by air to fill the resorts and casinos (like when we were there) are no longer doing so.  (Again largely driven by fear of infection associated with getting on a plane.) So in Las Vegas now it's all local folk or none at all. No casino can survive for long in a restrictive (and artificial) bubble like that. Again, public -customer confidence dictates the economic register and that is determined by the fear (or not) of the virus.   As long as we refuse to  contain it - which means pursuing rigorous methods -  we will  not make headway.

The lessons, some of which are restated here  (also in terms of the economic blowback), are summed in one takeaway:  

There will be no going back to any kind of normality or vibrant economy until we get this virus under control.

And that does not mean each manjack doing his or her own thing, or  blowing off the experts. It means pulling together as my folks and their generation did during World War II.  No whining, no bitching or fighting with store workers - just putting on the big boy pants and acting like  responsible  adults for once!   As opposed to toddlers in need of their personal sippy cups.

See Also:

As parents realize how badly the U.S. botched the next school year, we’re furious


And:

by Jaime O'Neill | July 24, 2020 - 7:14am | permalink


Excerpt:

"It is sickening that we mostly still can't find out if we're sick, can't get tested until it's often very late in this deadly game that is no game at all. It is sickening to inventory ourselves daily for symptoms, to attempt to self-diagnose without the tools to do so. It is sickening that we are told things that are later rescinded, or that the leader of our nation insists on spreading so much misinformation. It is sickening we can't get those tests we need, and it is sickening that so much time has passed and still less-than-nothing is forthcoming from the federal government, unless you count those unwanted storm troopers being sent to selected American cities."

And:



And:
by Jill Richardson | July 24, 2020 - 5:47am | permalink

Excerpt:

"When he can’t pretend everything is fine, he blames the Chinese. But China is not responsible for Trump’s botched response to the pandemic. Now the Trump administration is actively interfering with the pandemic response.

Hospitals have been instructed to send COVID data to a central database in Washington, bypassing the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The information will no longer be accessible to the public, raising concern that the data is being hidden for political reasons and the lack of transparency will make it easier for the administration to mislead the public.

The administration is also blocking CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield from testifying before Congress about the safety of reopening schools. They are attempting to block GOP senators from allocating billions of dollars to the CDC, Pentagon, and State Department for pandemic response. And the administration even opposes sending billions to states for testing and contact tracing.

Trump’s message to states has largely been “you’re on your own,” declining a national leadership role and placing responsibility for handling the pandemic on the states. He’s also suggested that governors should “treat him well” to receive federal aid, using the pandemic as a bargaining chip to silence dissent from governors who disagree with him."



Friday, July 3, 2020

Profile Of Another Covid Quack: Joseph A. Ladipo (Still Peddling Baloney Amidst The Worst National Response To Pandemic)

Joseph-Ladapo Photo
Dr. Joseph R. Ladipo  - his Covid quackery continues to reach the WSJ op-ed pages.
And (right) Covid mutant he chooses to ignore.


"The crisis we now find ourselves in is a human tragedy, an economic calamity  but it is also a singular national humiliation.  We're living in a moment when the U.S. is a laughingstock or a subject of pity around the world.  Look at the chart of nations and all who've gotten their cases down, some at or near zero. Then look at the graph going straight up. That is us, our cases are skyrocketing.  We are living in this tragedy, this national humiliation for all to see. We keep setting new records each day, five times in the last eight days and yesterday another record." - Chris Hayes, last night on 'All In


"While we have been continually screwing up, we have learned something. We have learned that masks work!  Pretty well, to slow the spread of this thing.  If you wear a covering that covers your mouth and your nose that is going to make you less likely to infect other people, especially if you have coronavirus but you don't know you have it."  -  Rachel Maddow last night.

"Right now we are heading at a million miles per hour in the wrong direction.   It's absolutely the saddest thing, the most unnecessary situation we're finding ourselves in. And it's  behaviorally driven."- Dr. Aileen Marty, infectious disease expert who helped Miami-Dade County write its reopening rules (This morning on CBS)

"It's actually possible that we could become the next New York City. I can't believe we're now staring down the barrel of that gun." - Roberta Schwartz, President of Houston Methodist Hospital, quoted in The Houston Chronicle yesterday.

The trouble with medical quacks is that their words can be taken very seriously if published in venues regarded as having some degree of gravitas.   Never mind this may only be on the notoriously ideological Op-ed pages of The Wall Street Journal ("the print version of FOX" according to Janice), and despite those pages not having the veneer of respected journalism of the the rest of the paper.  Just the source name "Wall Street Journal" can lend credibility where none is really warranted.    This is the case with the continued bunkum about the pandemic and the U.S. response to it  (now  seeing a record 54, 915 reported cases yesterday)  churned out by the likes of Joseph R. Ladipo, a  Covid quack based at UCLA, for Pete's sake.  In his latest WSJ op-ed he started off by writing: (July 2, p. A17, 'The Coronavirus Credibility Gap'):


"The American public is fractured over policy responses to Covid-19. That rift is most visible in debates about masks and new rounds of shutdowns. Such disputes are common in a country as diverse and opinionated as America. "


Let's first register that the American public is "fractured" because of a lack of nationally coordinated response.  As journalist Laurie Garrett put it last night, it as if the U.S. is acting as 50 different nations in its response, as opposed to one unified country.   That, and the lack of national mandates has caused this virus to now spread like an uncontrolled wildfire, and yet Ladipo writes in his op-ed as if we still need to give different people "choices" in their behavior. ("The preferences and circumstances of individuals vary".)    Ladipo even has the nerve to insist "alternative to masks" exist and "include physical distancing"  - unaware or ignorant of the fact the two mitigations are not mutually exclusive.  They are intended to be used in tandem.  

Giving people "choices" and "mask alternatives"?  No, we do not, if we wish to get this virus under control and not have the economy suffer irreparable damage, even as medical workers burn out and hospitals crater.   Ladipo, who often resorts to false analogy, invokes the need for "empathy" - as with HIV patients, drug users or cig smokers-  which examples do permit a kind of luxury of time for response.  But having played the fool for three months we no longer have that luxury of paced, measured and "empathetic,   even "tolerant"  response - say to maskless scofflaws- 0r idiot college kids who think Covid is a parlor game.  No, it's time to bring the hammer down, like Barbados did, fining lockdown and curfew violators $10,000 each and 90 days in the can.  When your whole home is on fire you do not use a fire extinguisher, you call the Fire Dept.

Ladipo writes that "such disputes are common in a country as diverse and opinionated as America" - and yet the case stats now disclose the only nation showing as shameful a response is Brazil - also led by a narcissist autocrat.  All other nations are seeing their numbers dive lower, even as the EU now prohibits Americans from traveling there for fear of spreading the virus. And why not given we've done nothing to show a serious behavioral response?  

Contrast that with last night's scenes (on 'All In') showing people in places like Prague in the Czech Republic celebrating in outdoor cafes, New Zealanders playing rugby, high school students in Denmark out celebrating the end of school (and not virtual school), bars in Ireland back open, along with movie theaters, museums and other venues.  In Japan, the malls of  Tokyo are open and the streets as crowded as they've ever been. Just like New York City once was, the only difference being everyone wearing masks in the rest of the sane world.  So they can afford to celebrate a genuine reopen, while we pursued a premature fraudulent one that the likes of Ladipo had also supported.

Ladipo appears to have a particular "bee in his bonnet" about mandating that people wear masks.  Why?  Given that is precisely the item that's permitted the normal world to reopen while we grovel like fools in false rebellion, based on a fictitious concept of liberty. I have no idea also why Ladipo invokes this nonsense given even he must know there can be no genuine liberty without responsibility. Besides,  citizens of other nations display no similar reservations, nor are they any less aware of personal freedom. They just happen to possess a lot more insight into the nature of the virus and hence have more common sense.    Here's a news item out of FORBES that Ladapo and his fellow anti-mandate quacks ought to digest:

"Goldman’s analysts found that wearing face coverings has a significant impact on coronavirus outcomes, and they suggest that a federal mask mandate would “meaningfully” increase mask usage across the country, especially in states like Florida and Texas, where masks are not currently required. 

The researchers estimate that a national mandate would increase the portion of people wearing masks by 15 percentage points, and cut the daily growth of new cases by 1.0 percentage point to 0.6%. 

Reducing the spread of the virus through mask-wearing, the analysts found, could be a substitute for strict lockdown measures that would otherwise shave 5%—or $1 trillion—off the U.S. GDP. "

Here's a number check of how we are now faced with a five alarm fire and why a national mandate is essential - no exceptions (if you have "trouble breathing" you stay home!) if we are to dig ourselves out of the debacle we're in:  With a combined population of 2.6 billion, China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Vietnam, Australia and the EU are averaging 6,760 new cases. By comparison, Florida with 21 million people, counted 10,100 cases yesterday - or more than 3,300 the tally of the combined nations cited. 

 Does Ladipo know enough math to reckon this stat into his consciousness?  That is without making specious attacks using strawmen on medical experts' credibility?  (Such as belaboring that experts  such as Dr. Fauci held an  original position that no masks were needed. But that was back in February when much less was known about the virus and which behaviors carry the most viral loads.)

Here's another non-trick question: How does Ladipo now account for Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordering a statewide mandate for masks?  Here was a guy who originally didn't believe they were necessary but has since (as Houston ICUs are overwhelmed) had a 'come to Jesus' moment.  As Chris Hayes' put it last night "The country is in flames, and we cannot just douse each ember as it appears like other nations. That is not us. We are way past the ember stage. The country is on fire. It is in flames. And the rest of the world is looking on in horror."

And yet Ladipo proposes we get a metaphorical squirt gun to combat this raging fire, rather than go all  out.   Most aggravating is when this quack writes that:

"if political leaders and health experts want to restore their credibility and the public's confidence they need to admit that politics rather than science influenced important public health decisions."  

But he's mixing apples and oranges here, in this case the scientists who use science with the politicos (like Trump et al) who don't.   Thereby, via such conflation,  it escapes him the latter are responsible for using politics to drive their decisions - the classic case being Trump for whom his re-election is the only barometer, and which is why now he tries to ignore the virus' ravages -  hoping it will "disappear" by November..

The other key point, less noted in much of our media, is the importance of a centralized, national health system.  As Laurie Garrett explained last night on 'All In':

"Every single European country has a national health system. That means they have centralized data, centralized purchasing, and centralized policy. So that a given response happens for the whole country, not piecemeal. Here, we have a completely fragmented response.  I mean just today Rep. Andy Biggs in Arizona called on to shut down the coronavirus task force and get rid of Tony Fauci and Deborah Birks.  Meanwhile, Andrew Cuomo says we're not allowing these people from this list of states to enter without quarantine. So we're acting more like 50 different nations than like a single national response."

And of course, mandating masks be worn would be a key part of any nationally coordinated response.   As Hayes replied to her: "The only Moonshot I can think of to save us is a 100 percent mask adoption If everyone masks up and gets on the same page."  But as Garrett noted, the decision to wear or not wear a mask is being tainted by politicized memes, so if you wear one you are an "elitist"  and stand for lockdowns.  If you don't, you're for "freedom" and the economy opening.  She then referred to the Goldman Sachs report cited earlier to show this is a misdirection by those who ought to know better.  As Dr John Lapook put it on CBS this morning:

 "For this weekend I'm telling everybody to stay home. You know our country has done things a lot harder than this.  Compared to what our parents had to go through in World War Two wearing a mask and social distancing are nothing.  It's a walk in the park compared to the rationing  and curfews then."  

 Maybe.  But we no longer have the stoic and made of sterner stuff citizens we had then.  We now have wimps, whiners and twaddle -brained imps who have lost their common sense, courage and intellect to PR and propaganda.   As a prime exhibit there is Repuke strategist Alex Castellanos who told The Washington Post:

"Members of the Church of Secular Science bow to the Gods of Data by wearing a mask as their symbol, demonstrating that they are the elite; smarter, more rational, and morally superior to everyone else.”

Maybe not necessarily "morally superior", since this isn't a gauge of morality, though it is of ethics, i.e. in saving lives and  grasping one's responsibility to the larger community, namely the vulnerable ones such as elders and disabled citizens.   But yes, if we accept the data and the science concerning the virus we ARE more rational and I'd wager smarter.    In general, anyone guided by facts and reason is more intelligent than one who is not, like Dotard Trump.

But Castellanos' take suggests we will have to  continue to deal with irrational clowns and the idiots with misbegotten notions of liberty,  as well as medical Sophists like Ladipo.   Thus, we will likely have to shut down again to force these imps to learn a painful lesson they ought to have learned in March.  As Janice put it: "This country has too many idiots!"  Alas, I concur.  The "Greatest  Generation"  we are not.  The election of Trump has ensured that, and the real test to see if we are worthy citizens will come in November, in whether we can expel the maggot traitor one time.   "Make America Great Again?"  Maybe, but only if Trump is dumped first!

See Also:





Friday, June 19, 2020

Yes, Bats Carry The Virus - BUT They Are Not The "Bad Guys"



Amidst continuing furor in the country, including  mounting protests against police nationwide, and now learning of a widespread "Antifa hysteria" disabling the less capable and discriminating brains, e.g.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/17/opinion/antifa-protests.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage&section=OpEd%20Columnists

 As well as Trump endorsing Chinese concentration camps for the minority Uyghur Muslims, gleaned from John Bolton's just released book. (Of course, 99% of Bolton's content , i.e. regarding Trump being chaotic, despotic  and "transactional" we already knew from earlier works - such as from authors like Michael Wolff, Bob Woodward,  James Comey and Cliff Simms.)   We are still not covering all bases in this time of historical upheaval.

Slowly retreating from the national 'radar'  - in the yen to return to normality -  is the persistent threat of the Covid 19 virus (SARS-COV-2)which is still filling up hospital ICUs and ravaging lives and lungs.    In addition, millions of people are disrespecting the virus - its very nature of transmission - by turning the wearing of masks into a tribal identity issue.   Beyond that, many of those non-mask tribes hail from red states and blame the virus and the bats carrying it for causing the lockdown and economic devastation - as opposed to Trump.

Let's recall again Trump wasted two weeks of critical time calling the pandemic a "hoax", after which he refused to organize a nationally coordinated response- forcing medical centers and health workers to compete for scarce ppe. He then stage managed chaotic  PR "briefings" which  overshadowed the medical professionals and substituted his own ignorant notions and beliefs.  One casualty? A young patient who came into the emergency room with damage to his intestinal tract after having ingested bleach. The incident occurred just days after Trump suggested that "injection" of disinfectants should be researched as a potential coronavirus treatment .   There followed  - on top of all Trump's other misfires- an intentional gutting and muzzling of the CDC which caused Laurie Garrett to deliver a scathing assessment on 'Democracy Now' 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_z297eni8c

As well as a withering piece on Trump's total incompetence:


 Trump Has Sabotaged America's Coronavirus Response


 
The Trumpistas tried to fight back by confecting a cockeyed conspiracy ideation that China was ultimately to blame. Indeed, a WSJ May 2 (p. A3) that "the Education Department has asked the University of Texas system to provide documentation of its dealings with the Chinese laboratory U.S. officials are investigating", i.e.  the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its researcher Shi Zhenghi.   The eminent scientist dubbed "Bat Woman" because of her work on bats.  All this despite the fact (ibid.):  "There is no concrete public evidence to confirm the theory the outbreak resulted from an accident at the lab."  And so "the current dominant theory remains that the bats passed the virus to humans either directly or indirectly."

WSJ columnist Matt Ridley showed the connection between bats and the virus in his article:  The Bats Behind The Pandemic'WSJ, April 11-12, p. C5.

Therein he noted that:

"Bats have supplied most of the dangerous new diseases of the past two decades including: rabies, Ebola, Marburg and other highly dangerous viruses...even the "tasty" fruit bats carry the Hendra and Nipah viruses - and have been responsible for "small but lethal outbreaks in South Asia and Australia"

""One quarter of all mammal species are bats - and they have lots of different viruses. They also fly so can carry diseases long distances."

But this may be giving bats too much of a bad name in terms of being the source of the new coronavirus as well as spreading it, while letting humans off the hook. Why are humans on the hook in the first place?  A recent (Feb. 18) article in The Nation by Sonia Smith sheds much needed light on how and why we are the real 'bad guys' and not the bats. Ms. Smith does concede that 60 percent of the most virulent microbial pathogens  that have emerged since 1940 can be traced to bats and other wild creatures.  But as she writes:

"That's not the fault of the wild animals.  Though stories illustrated with pictures of the wild animals (like the fruit bat, see photo) abound and identify them as "the source" of the current Covid 19 outbreak this is premature.  The reason is that most of the microbes "live harmlessly" in the bodies of the animals - including the horseshoe bat  (Rhinolophus affinis) the carrier of the Covid 19 virus.

But wait! Doesn't that make this bat the bad guy?  

Not really, because (ibid.):

"The problem is the way that cutting down forests and expanding towns and industrial activities creates pathways for the animal microbes to adapt to the human body...Cutting down bats' forests forces them to roost in trees in backyards and farms instead, increasing the likelihood that a human might take a bite of a piece of fruit covered in bat saliva. Or hunt and slaughter a local bat, exposing oneself to the virus sheltering in the bat's tissues."


So here's the point: viruses were on Earth billions of years before humans and there is no way all can be eliminated. In the case of their presence in bats and other wild creatures we behold a kind of peaceful co-existence.  The viruses just inhabit those animal tissues for the most part but don't kill the beasts. But when humans enter the picture - say by destruction of bat wild habitat- that's when things get ugly.

Again, the fictional (2011) movie 'Contagion' probably has one of the most illuminating scenes - but near the end- on how "Patient Zero" (Gwenneth Paltrow's character ) became infected. To recount: we see a flock of bats originally perched on trees which then fly over a pig farm in Guangdong province and drop bat guano over the pig feeding area. The guano is already infected with the unknown virus. The pigs then consume the guano, and become infected themselves. 

 In the film the Chinese hog butcher slaughters one of these pigs, gets pig blood all over his hands - wipes it off.  He then greets Gweneth Paltrow's character (on a visit on behalf of her corporation) and she shakes the butcher's hand.  She then becomes "Patient zero" - which we learn only at the end- though we suspect it earlier.   When she then visits a bar full of people and glasses with which she makes contact, we know how this pandemic began.  Who is to blame? Well, not the bats whose habitat was violently upended by the industrial activity of Patient zero's corporation. In the words of biologist Christine Kreuder Johnson, Director for the Epicenter for Disease Dynamics at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine:
  
Spillover of viruses from animals are a direct result of our actions involving wildlife and their habitat.  The consequence is they’re sharing their viruses with us. These actions simultaneously threaten species survival and increase the risk of spillover. In an unfortunate convergence of many factors, this brings about the kind of mess we’re in now.”
Something to consider next time we plan to barge into a bat's habitat- or that of any other creature. Want to keep viral outbreaks down? Then we need to stop invading the living spaces of other animals with which we share this planet.  In the case of bats, before we contemplate slaughtering them to protect human health, we may want to consider their role in global biodiversity and ecosystem health as well as beneficial neighbors. Included in the last are:their role in pollination, dispersal of fruits and consumption of insects - especially those responsible for many dread human diseases.  As one scientist has pointed out: "The good they do outweighs any potential negatives."

In the meantime we can assert the real 'bad guys'  are the  HUMAN cretins who continue to threaten public health officials, both via  social media and live - including showing up at their homes with weapons.  Idiots like the "Freedom Angels" that stalk and harass health officials online (e.g. on Facebook) as well as other misfits, worms and vermin.  And what are all these crazies exercised about? Well, being mandated to wear masks, and practicing social distancing - the only ways to avoid another lockdown, or nationwide quarantine.   The only practical means to avoid hundreds of thousands more infections and hospital ICUs being flooded with desperately ill Covid patients.

See Also:

The Bat Behind The Coronavirus Pandemic ID'd - A...