My late brother Jerry said it all along and now Retired Maj.
David Grusch delivered testimony on Wednesday to a House hearing that confirmed
it: The U.S. is
concealing a longstanding program that retrieves and reverse engineers unidentified
flying objects. The Pentagon has denied
his claims, but as Jerry would have said “So what’s new in Denmark? WTF you
expect those pinheads to say?” Jerry - who worked at Wright-Patterson AFB in the late 60s, early 70s - was always
adamant about what he’d witnessed in the base’s Blue Room – including films and
photos of EBE bodies and artifacts recovered.
Grusch’s
highly anticipated testimony before a House Oversight subcommittee was
Congress’ latest
foray into the world of UAPs — or “unidentified aerial
phenomena,” which is the official term the U.S. government uses instead of
UFOs. While the study of mysterious aircraft or objects often evokes talk of
aliens and “little green men,” Democrats and Republicans in recent years have
pushed for more research as a national security matter due to concerns that
sightings observed by pilots may be tied to U.S. adversaries.
But
let’s get clear, blaming any of these on Russian or Chinese adversaries is pure distraction and
itself seeded disinformation. As former
Navy Commander David Fravor made abundantly clear in his testimony, the 2014 incident off
Sand Diego was the most credible UFO sighting in history given its
parameters. It resembled “a giant propane
tank 40 feet long." And was tracked visually as well as on radar. It produced no
thermal exhaust and there were no visual surface structures or clues “sitting
in space at 20,000 feet altitude.” Also:
“It was aware of our presence and matched our speeds.” I submit here that no balloon or wayward drone does this.
When asked if his jet fighters could have shot it down if it had become hostile, Fravor didn’t mince words: "No we could not have. It defies current material science and is beyond anything developed on Earth,” He went on to refute the notion the Chinese or Russians had developed anything like it, given the extraordinary dynamics captured simultaneously by multiple sensors. He was joined in his assessment by the two other witnesses: Ryan Graves and David Grusch .
Ret. Maj. David Grusch said he was asked in 2019 by the
head of a government task force on UAPs to identify all highly
classified programs relating to the task force’s mission. At the time, Grusch
was detailed to the National Reconnaissance Office, the agency that operates
U.S. spy satellites.
Grusch added:
“I
was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-decade UAP crash
retrieval and reverse engineering program to which I was denied access,”
Crash retrieval? Let's recall what my brother Jerry had said transpired in the wake of the Roswell crash:
"The military powers that be scarfed up those bodies and the debris within hours and had them shipped off to Wright Patterson Army Airfield near Dayton Ohio."
Asked specifically to elaborate on any "non-human spacecraft" or artifacts recovered, Grusch responded he could not discuss such crash debris in open session. (A SCIF or special compartmentalized intelligence facility was required for congress to access sensitive materials.) Note that a recurring theme by Grusch as well as fellow witness Ryan Graves was that in order to elaborate on the nature of actual crashed craft, as well as those encountered in airspace, the details of the sensor functions (IR, electro-optical etc.) had to be known. But if these functions- and hence underlying technologies - were exposed, then real terrestrial adversaries (like China and Russia) would know, and hence work towards concealing their own weapons systems from the sensors.
Asked
whether the U.S. government had information about extraterrestrial life, Grusch
said the U.S. likely has been aware of “non-human” activity since the
1930s. Note that this predates the
Roswell incident, in July 1947.
When Grusch was confronted by the claims of Sean Kirkpatrick (current director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) i.e. asserting there "is no credible evidence of extraterrestrial activity or off-world tech" he replied "That's not accurate." (Kirkpatrick went ballistic a day later.)
Why would Kirkpatrick disseminate such disinformation? Well, because (AARO) is an office within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Hence, Kirkpatrick is bound by the same Pentagon lockstep of denial, denial, denial. Or disinformation. Hence the twaddle "there is no credible evidence" of off-world tech", when we know there is. So one can definitely say Kirkpatrick and his DoD overseers are strictly adhering to the playbook outlined by Winn Schwartau in his book, Information Warfare. I.e. "false information or misinformation is sown pertaining to a real event in order to deflect attention from it."
Perhaps
the dumbest question emanated from Rep. Earl Burlison of Missouri, who asked
Grusch:
“How can
an alien species travel billions of light years?”
Evidently unaware they don’t have to, given the nearest
sunlike star is Zeta Reticuli - only 39.1
light years distant. Unable to grasp how the “tic tac” UFOs cold move so
dramatically, in and out of visual field, Grusch did his best to explain as
Burlison’s eyes blanked out
“It’s the holographic principle: 3d objects cast shadow on 2d surface.
Objects can be then be projected interdimensionally.”
When
asked about presenting the location sites for any stashed alien, non-human
craft, “biologics” or artifacts, Grusch responded it would have to be behind
closed door, preferably in a SCIF room.
Rep.
Andy Ogles (R, TN) made no bones about the fact that there’d be consequences if
any government agency with oversight over UAP-UFO files denied congress use of
a SCIF to see Grusch’s materials. In his words, he would “invoke the Holman
rule” if need be.
The
Holman rule, basically, is a congressional device whereby a given agency – in this
case CIA, NSA etc. – would have its budget cut if it denied access, say to use
of a SCIF room to see sensitive UFO materials.
The
Pentagon has denied Grusch’s claims of a coverup. Defense Department
spokeswoman Sue Gough said investigators have not discovered “any verifiable
information to substantiate claims that any programs regarding the possession
or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past
or exist currently.”
Which as I noted is not at all surprising. To admit the presence of non-human, intelligently -controlled craft in our airspace- or god forbid their re-engineering into advanced weapons by the U.S. - would likely send half the nation ( hell, half the world) into hysterics. As noted in my July 25 post, quoting author Aja Raden, referencing the ‘War of the Worlds’ Mercury Theater broadcast in 1938:
"Looting and rioting ensued. Accidents proliferated and hospitals were jammed with people injured or killed by other people, hysterical people, people in shock, stroke and heart attack victims. People scared stiff, as well as others who harmed themselves rather than be captured or killed by the Martians.
In San Francisco, people overwhelmed army headquarters looking to fight. In Birmingham people overwhelmed churches, certain the world was ending."
Thus when the Roswell crash occurred some 9 years later, the military shut it down within hours, saying the locals had mistaken a weather balloon for a saucer. This then preceded decades of bogus investigations, from 'Project Grudge' to Project Blue Book to the Condon UFO report (which nonetheless did have some documented cases that were clearly UAP but escaped notice.)
Grusch affirmed he became a government whistleblower after his discovery of the re-engineering of alien craft, devices and has faced retaliation for coming forward. He declined to be more specific about the retaliatory tactics, citing an ongoing investigation, only saying: "It was very brutal and very unfortunate, some of the tactics they used to hurt me both professionally and personally."
As I've noted before, the military and intel agencies will never crack on releasing the information Grusch and others described. It's not just the fear of panic over the final revelation of a superior non-human interloper in terrestrial skies. But also that our national security agencies and military would have to also admit their impotence: That they no longer have sovereignty or hegemony over our own planetary domain. As former Navy Cmdr. Fravor noted, if the UFO his team encountered off San Diego had become hostile, there is nothing his Nimitz crew or jet aircraft could have done to stop the actions.
End note: Some have raised the issue or question of why UFOs-UAP are primarily reported in "English speaking countries." As if such an imbalance disqualifies the phenomenon from serious consideration. But they fail to process: a) Most of the non -English speaking world, i.e. in Africa, Asia, lacks the technological supports or capacity - including highly advanced sensor (IR, electro-optical) systems - to access UAP. Hence, they go either unrecognized or ignored - if encountered at all. (b) The U.S. as the only remaining superpower would naturally attract any non-human interlopers more than other, less developed nations i.e. without extensive capacity for conducting military exercises - using advanced weapons - in designated (and restricted) airspaces. Besides which, many sightings have also occurred in Russia since their own H-bomb testing in 1950s. Bottom line: The focus of these interlopers appears to be on those nations with the most formidable firepower, as opposed to countries in which most of the populace barely ekes out survival - and is trying desperately to flee to the U.S.
