"The whiteness of the protests alongside the stark racial disparities in COVID-19 mortality underscores that the desire to reopen businesses is rooted in white supremacy. " - Sonali Kolhatkar, smirkinghcimp.com blog
"The coronavirus has exposed this delusion of individualism for what it is. For one thing, the virus doesn't care if you pop on a tricorner hat and declare yourself a rugged individual. It'll infect you just as easily as it infects a person who stays home, wears a mask and pays their taxes without complaint. Individualism can't stop the virus — only collective action can.
But on a deeper level, the virus has exposed the incoherence of the individualist ideology. Right now, the same people who fueled the Tea Party protests, including Trump himself, are out there insisting that the lockdowns end - Amanda Marcotte, 'Right Wing Individualism Is Just Selfish Garbage'
"It's obvious there's a huge disconnect between those willing to follow our state's guidelines and those who feel their rights are being violated...I suggest those in the latter group - who refuse to wear masks or obey social distancing, offer to volunteer at one of our hospitals. Maybe if they spent time with the health care workers risking their lives every day they might understand why the people working to save us are pleading for us to stay home." - Rebecca Cook, letter to Sunday Denver Post, p. 3E.
"In some places you see reopenings that respect Mother Nature’s power, are coordinated and grounded in science, and in other places you see crowded restaurants or a gym owner defying his governor’s guidelines as cheering demonstrators waive signs that read “My freedom doesn’t end where your fear begins. The people making those signs, and the morons on Fox cheering them on, don’t get it. We’re not up against each other. We’re all up against Mother Nature".- Thomas Friedman, NY Times
"In some places you see reopenings that respect Mother Nature’s power, are coordinated and grounded in science, and in other places you see crowded restaurants or a gym owner defying his governor’s guidelines as cheering demonstrators waive signs that read “My freedom doesn’t end where your fear begins. The people making those signs, and the morons on Fox cheering them on, don’t get it. We’re not up against each other. We’re all up against Mother Nature".- Thomas Friedman, NY Times
"The whole point of the shutdown was to buy ourselves time so we could do it right the second time after we muffed the first response. It's not only important to avoid opening up too aggressively but if you don't have a good amount of testing, tracing and isolation, you won't be able to keep infected people away from susceptible people. The basic biology then is the infection is just going to take off again- Dr. Ashish Jha, Professor of Global Health, Harvard University, on 'All In' , April 27th
As all fifty states have reopened in some form, and we learned yesterday that 3 million more Americans have joined the unemployed, the Right's propaganda mills and talking heads (as well as scribes) are working overtime. They want to paint reality to conform to their myth that it is the "tough Americans and freedom lovers" - also most "real workers" who need $$$- who demand states reopen now. That as opposed to the "elite, blue state pansies" who prefer security to being warriors for the economy ....oh yeah, and "personal liberty".
One headline in the NY Times 2 days ago blared:
Mnuchin Warns of ‘Permanent Damage’ to Economy if Lockdowns Persist
Suggesting that it's got to be workers' lives instead of dollars to be sacrificed. Or as Sen. Sherrod Brown asked: 'How Many Workers Should Give Their Lives To Increase The GDP By One Half A Percent?
In a forgettable column titled “Scenes From the Class Struggle in Lockdown,” The Wall Street Journal’s Peggy Noonan wrote: “Here’s a generalization based on a lifetime of experience and observation. The working-class people who are pushing back have had harder lives than those now determining their fate.” Incredibly, Noonan then added a bone to the "he-men" of the Right with this balderdash:
"Since the pandemic began the Overclass has been in charge - scientists, doctors, consultants - calling the shots for the average people. But personally they have no skin in the game."
And this piffle at the end:
"This is no time to make our divisions worse. The pandemic is not only about our health but our humanity".
As if the two can be conveniently separated, so Noonan feels obligated to create another false choice. The fact is there need not be such a false choice if we'd had our heads on straight from the get go. But as Rachel Maddow so often puts it, we've been saddled with the worst, god-awful government at the worst moment in our recent history - when extraordinary leadership skills were needed.
Don't believe it? The fact is that 99 percent of the chaos, ineptitude and division falls on Trump himself. He repeatedly undermined the guidance and credibility of his own health officials including by initially dismissing the pandemic as a "hoax". Then fomenting anti-quarantine protests - even as he incited his latter day Tea Baggers to flout the reopening guidelines his own administration released. Then to top it off, this criminal loser buried a detailed CDC document showing states how to reopen by minimizing risk. Oh, and he's now hawking an unproven malarial drug that he claims he's taking for prophylactic reasons.
The mistake of Noonan and others mocking the lockdowns as the product of effete snobs is that they forget or discount certain pertinent facts. That is, that more blunt options were needed to prevent the spread of the virus- and the collapse of our health system - once the Trumpies fucked it all up. Meanwhile, in South Korea massive testing and contact tracing kept deaths to a minimum in relative terms - and far less per capita than the U.S. Further, only recently when a new outbreak threatened S. Korean officials using GPS directed contract tracing were able to immediately track the new emergence to one source: a 29 -year old male with the virus who'd visited a series of Seoul nightclubs. The process uncovered 102 infected individuals and a total of 5,500 who'd been in contact with the infected subset -initially infected by the 29 year old. The new cluster was a setback but also marked a success story in that officials were able to rapidly contain the virus. THIS is what the U.S. under Trump has been unable to do, and why the reopening in too many red states is premature.
It's not because blue state "commies" and "pansies" are trying to control the red staters and gut their freedoms, but because the critical jobs of testing and contact tracing still lag behind those states' capabilities. (So much so that Georgia, for example, has stooped to publishing spurious graphs to try to show it's flattened the infection curve). In other words, by recklessly reopening before those processes are in place we risk a second wave wiping out all the progress made thus far- and even worse economic fallout. And mammoth consequences especially when idiots in crowds disregard masks and social distancing.
As reported today (WSJ. p. A1) "a study published last week by the National Academy of Sciences found that one minute of loud speech was enough to produce thousands of virus droplets that remain in the air for about 12 minutes, potentially able to infect anyone in the area."
The phenomenon also most likely to give rise to high viral loads and "superspreaders" -with the capacity to infect hundreds. Hence blue state governors and citizens are not against opening up but against opening up stupidly - with no adequate testing plan - and no means to contact trace any outbreaks. The smart reopening also includes social distancing and mask wearing, As former CDC Director Tom Friedan explained yesterday morning on CBS:
"It's not open versus closed. It's not health versus economy. It's gradual, stepwise, data driven, science driven reopening that takes account of both health and the economic impacts of the virus and our response to it. This is doing three things: we empower people to protect themselves, we hold governments accountable for getting data and sharing it openly and we accelerate toward a new normal"
So it is NOT a case of the "elites" lording it over the "salt of the earth" types to keep them locked down and unable to earn a living and feed their families - or just get outside. Rather, the issue is opening recklessly devoid of any sound plans to track or detect the virus. A goal already hobbled by a dysfunctional administration which has operated below even minimal competence levels needed to ferret out the virus., turning the whole national response into a side show. At least on the Right. Given the above, we can say a recent comment by W. Bradford Wilcox, a sociologist at the University of Virginia, (published in NY Times yesterday) is total hogwash. That comment is::
But it isn't a case of "safetyism" at all, but science-driven SANITY, as former CDC Director Tom Friedan already noted. NY Times columnist Michelle Goldberg aptly spelled it out 3 days ago:Progressives have grown more likely to embrace a culture of “safetyism” in recent years. This safetyism seeks to protect them and those who are deemed the most vulnerable members of our society from threats to their emotional and physical well-being.
"The assumptions underlying this generalization, however, are not based on even a cursory look at actual data. In a recent Washington Post/Ipsos survey, 74 percent of respondents agreed that the “U.S. should keep trying to slow the spread of the coronavirus, even if that means keeping many businesses closed.” Agreement was slightly higher — 79 percent — among respondents who’d been laid off or furloughed.
Researchers at the University of Chicago have been tracking the impact of coronavirus on a representative sample of American households. They’ve found that when it comes to judging policies on the coronavirus, “politics is the overwhelming force dividing Americans,” and that “how households have been economically impacted by the Covid crisis so far” plays only a minimal role.
Donald Trump and his allies have polarized the response to the coronavirus, turning defiance of public health directives into a mark of right-wing identity. Because a significant chunk of Trump’s base is made up of whites without a college degree, there are naturally many such people among the lockdown protesters."
Basically, she nailed it, unlike a Texan turkey by the name of Dan Crenshaw - who belched out the following op-ed codswallop ('Why Does Reopening Polarize Us?, WSJ, May 19, p.A17)
"It isn't obvious that such a debate should be partisan yet it is. Why? One popular explanation is that all roads lead to Trump. Whatever he says, the left will say the opposite."
This cornpone knucklehead, so far up Trump's ass he can't see the Sun, doesn't seem to know it wasn't the "left" that screwed the response up to a far- thee-well. It was his lord and master Dotard - ignoring warnings, babbling that the virus "will just go sway like magic". Oh, and then dismissing it as a hoax, before then forgetting Harry Truman's maxim that "the buck stops here". Essentially frittering away weeks we had to get our act together - thanks to the Chinese lockdown of their own nation- as well as isolating the infected from their families also to contain spread. All immensely effective despite Holman Jenkins Jr. further yammering (WSJ, p. A15 yesterday) the Chinese failed and oh, by the way, "the U.S. and China are in a contest now to see which world power can emerge from this chaos with the most realistic policy toward the virus".
Obviously scribbled while popping his usual opioids, speed and MJ candies. Because the efficacy of the Chinese response was exactly what gave us time to get our own act together instead of fucking it up. As proof, a new Columbia University study released yesterday showed that up to 54,000 lives might have been saved had restrictions - including lockdowns - started two weeks earlier. So, the total deaths now might have been 40,000 as opposed to 94,000. But this is what the white boy conservative death mongers like Jenkins Jr. chide liberal state governments about, and ceaselessly.
Potentially 54,000 fewer deaths but the dyspeptic Trump was unable to summon one ounce of minimal leadership and consistent national planning or leadership. Instead babbling back in January that the U.S. "has it totally under control" and in February blabbed that "within a couple of days the cases will be down to zero." And a week later, "One day it's gonna disappear ...like a miracle." As Chris Hayes put it on 'ALL IN' last night:
"Well there have been no miracles, just mass unemployment and mass death"
Facts the Reepo Trump asslickers and opinion propaganidists just can't face, so they have to deflect. Which explains why this Texas yokel Crenshaw feels compelled to write this twaddle:
"The far left is treating the lockdown and the consequent economic devastation as an opportunity to restructure America into a socialist utopia."
Uh no, asshole. We just want to ensure the 39 million people who've now lost their jobs - thanks to Trump's tomfoolery and haphazard response- get the money they need to buy groceries, pay utility bills and keep a roof over their heads. Get it? Again, Michelle Goldberg does - parsing both Noonan's canards and Crenshaw's as she observes:
"But it’s a mistake to treat the growing ideological divide over when and how to reopen the country as a matter of class rather than partisanship"
Apart from that this yahoo doesn't get the connection between controlling the virus and successfully opening the economy. As the Times Paul Krugman notes:
"One thing I keep hearing, however, is that we must reopen for the sake of workers, who need to start earning wages again to put food on their families’ tables. So it’s important to realize that this is a really bad argument. For America is fully capable of shielding workers idled by the lockdown from severe economic hardship. As Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, said in a TV interview aired Sunday, we can and should pursue policies that “keep workers in their homes, keep them paying their bills. Keep families solvent.”
A salient point I made in another post not long ago, i.e.
Noting:
"So whisking millions back to work prematurely serves two main purposes for the WSJ's hacks: 1) Disabling any need for the govt' to step in again to send relief checks or expand food stamps etc., and 2) To provide more billions for the rich, the one percent, hedge fund owners, Repuke donors and the like.. "
Also quoting Nobel winning economist Paul Romer who posited over 300 million tests were needed nationwide before we could even think of returning to business as usual. We haven't even met one hundredth that standard, so we are asking for it. This is given the virus is ready to roar back at the slightest hint of relaxing our efforts, and slacking off means letting millions resume work without proper safeguards.
But, incredibly, one must evidently - and in addition to the usual political polarization- factor in a "white male" tribal factor as well. (According to a Times article 'When The Mask You're Wearing Tastes Like Socialism') This is derived from a contingent of knuckle dragging, conservative white males who see those advocating for mitigation and safeguards as embracing a "feminine" stance. Much like these mutts (brainwashed for years by Limbaugh etc.) who believe any gov't help amounts to a 'nanny state" interfering. Peter Ditto, a psychologist at the University of California-Irvine, posits that:
"While liberals adopt their nurturant role, bemoaning the climbing infection and death rates and are willing to accept economic carnage in favor of minimizing the loss of human life, conservatives are more likely to, in effect, tell the American people to “walk it off,” increasingly staking out the position that some loss of life must be endured for the greater economic good."
Which is preposterous, and why I believe it more important than ever these "macho" white boy conservos be dragged into a Covid ward to see the intubation process, and men their age having to be on dialysis, and otherwise put into a medical coma. All of which brings Janice's favorite cartoon to mind;
But, incredibly, one must evidently - and in addition to the usual political polarization- factor in a "white male" tribal factor as well. (According to a Times article 'When The Mask You're Wearing Tastes Like Socialism') This is derived from a contingent of knuckle dragging, conservative white males who see those advocating for mitigation and safeguards as embracing a "feminine" stance. Much like these mutts (brainwashed for years by Limbaugh etc.) who believe any gov't help amounts to a 'nanny state" interfering. Peter Ditto, a psychologist at the University of California-Irvine, posits that:
"While liberals adopt their nurturant role, bemoaning the climbing infection and death rates and are willing to accept economic carnage in favor of minimizing the loss of human life, conservatives are more likely to, in effect, tell the American people to “walk it off,” increasingly staking out the position that some loss of life must be endured for the greater economic good."
Which is preposterous, and why I believe it more important than ever these "macho" white boy conservos be dragged into a Covid ward to see the intubation process, and men their age having to be on dialysis, and otherwise put into a medical coma. All of which brings Janice's favorite cartoon to mind;
The cartoon perfectly embodies the ultimate "feminization" these wannabe tough guys face as they continue their ludicrous risk taking. A pose especially choice given most of these macho apes run for cover and scream like little girls when you show them the face of even a 2 -inch diameter spider, i.e.
But especially now in the midst of a virus they know nothing about, their fake bravado is laughable, given they also feel the need to march with their guns. But then are reduced to hapless, impotent invalids after Covid lays them low. Especially justified after we read that they regard the CDC, WHO scientists as (ibid., 'When The Mask You're Wearing Tastes Like Socialism'):
" typical liberal pansies who just can’t accept the reality that people die."
Yeah, but not 93,000 in 3 months! Headed for 100,000 plus by June 1. As Janice puts it, all this posturing makes her want them to "choke on their own snot" - to see what a Covid death is like.
All of which brings up a timely warning from Krugman (ibid.):
"Suppose, after all, that the epidemiologists are right, and that premature reopening leads to a second wave of infections. What we’ll need in that case is a second lockdown. But all indications are that Republicans are totally opposed to extending benefits. What they want, instead, is legislation that would protect businesses from liability if their employees get sick. That is, they want to force Americans to go to work even if it kills them."
But, of course, the Reeptard tough guys love that stuff, that hyping of faux masculinity - part of which entails an anti- expertise mindset, which itself reflects a long -standing anti-intellectualism in American life. In the end it's all well and good for this sliver of non- college educated white male miscreants to parade their imbecility. It's a "free country" as they like to say. But that doesn't mean the rest of us ought to follow like freaking lemmings, or buy into their batshit crazy conspiracy ideations - like the medical workers are behind the pandemic and making it appear worse than it is.
Fortunately, it looks like the sensible, cautious segment of the nation is in the majority - for now. According to a new AP-NORC poll 83 percent of Americans are concerned lifting restrictions will lead to many more infections. 53 percent are prepared to continue those restrictions indefinitely. So the racist death mongers on the Right don't yet realize their precious corporate economy will still founder if so many lack the confidence to engage with it - never mind the minority of loudmouth simpletons now getting all the press coverage. What we need more of is sane voices like that of Dr. Richard Besser, former CDC head, who said last night ('All In'):
"Public health is not about keeping people unemployed... But you need to dial this up slowly and carefully, so that we don't see major outbreaks occurring and going back to the same situation of everyone under lockdown."
This was reinforced last night by Jeffrey Shaman, the lead researcher of the Columbia University study, which showed 54,000 lives could have been spared had the lockdowns begun 2 weeks earlier. In Prof. Shaman's word, from his MSNBC appearance:
"This pandemic is not over by any means, and most of the country has not been exposed, not been infected. So it's really vital that we actively seek it out in our communities and monitor what is happening as we loosen restrictions. Especially as we open the economy further and further to make sure we don't have flare ups. And if we identify any growth in cases we have to respond more quickly, That's because if you stop the virus in the early stages you will limit the number of deaths that occur over time. Important because the growth process can sneak up on you,
I like to use the illustration of a pond and there's this invasive lily flower that gets into it. Every day it doubles in size, the number that are there. By day 30 the entire pond is covered with lilies. And the question is 'On what day was it halfway covered?' Well, on day 29, just the day before, because it is a doubling process. So we can't get complacent particularly as we're moving into summer. We need to squash this virus, at least until a vaccine is available."
See also:
by Jaime O'Neill | May 20, 2020 - 6:32am | permalink
AND:
And:
