The EPR Paradox and Quantum Nonlocality (Part 2)

Continued from Part One:

3. Bohm’s Version of Quantum Mechanics

  Regarding the various violations of the Bell Inequality, David Bohm  with colleague Brian Hiley developed an alternative form of quantum mechanics to integrate it within existing observations. This began by treating the de Broglie wave as a physically real entity not merely a statistical one.  Also, Bohm and Hiley refined the concept of the pilot wave, originally proposed by Louis de Broglie

     If matter waves, or de Broglie waves, can be “piloted” then clearly they will have far more theoretical impact than if mere products of random encounters or observations. Hence, Bohm and Hiley ‘s development of a “pilot wave” theory to accompany the acceptance of B-waves physical reality.

     To understand the “clocking” guidance system for these waves, we begin with the basic energy definition for the quantum given some rest frequency, f _o.   

     Then the energy quantum associated with this frequency is, by Planck’s equation:

E_o  = h f_o

     Where h is the Planck constant. Then we can also write:

f_o  =  E_o /  h

In the relativistic limit, for photons:  f_o  =   m_o  c² / h

Now, change to angular frequency w_o to make the synchronous mechanism consistent with that proposed by de Broglie and Bohm, Hiley[1]. Then:

2p  f_o  =   m_o  c² / h

Replacing the Planck constant by ħ = h/ 2p , the Planck constant of action:

2p  f_o  =   m_o  c² /  ħ  

Then:

w_o =  m_o  c² /  ħ 

Which is the “clock frequency”  in the photon rest frame.

     There is also an additional condition, known as the Bohr-Sommerfield condition, for the clock to remain in phase with the pilot wave:

∮ p dx =  n ħ

     Now, the momentum p =  m_o  c , so that the integral becomes:

2p x (m_o  c) = n ħ

And the de Broglie wavelength emergence (l_D = h/ p) is evident in the equation. In this sense, we have:

2p x  =  n (h/ m_o  c)  =  n l_D  

     Or the same expression (2p r =  n l_D)  for the standing waves in an atom.  In Bohm’s own development, the procession of B-waves is actually enfolded within a “packet” of P-waves[2].  A basic diagram of the arrangement is shown below.

  
The axis labeled E is actually the real part of the electric field component, E_z. The width of the p-wave packet is denoted by the spread:

Dk = p / (x – x_o)

     Where x_o  denotes the center point of the wave packet. In other words, if the center point is at  x_o = 0, the packet width is just Dk = p / x.

     The wavelength, l = 2p / Dk then  is much less than the width of the packet. E.g. if Dk = p / x then:

 l = 2p / (p / x) = 2x. so if x = 1 nm, then l = 2 nm and:

 Dk = p / x = p / (1 nm) = p  nm, but p (nm) > 2 nm.

    The maximum of the wave packet is approximated closely by the square of the amplitude:

[ E_z ] ² =    4 sin² Dk (x – x_o) / (x – x_o) ²

   We can check the limits of the preceding. Let x_o = 0 then:

[ E_z ] ² =    4 sin² Dk x / x ²

And: 

[ E_z ] ² =      4 sin² Dk /  x

Conversely, let x_o = x, then:

 [ E_z ] ² = 0 =  4 sin² Dk (x – x) / (x – x) ²

   

     Thus, the p-wave packet ceases to exist as a discrete or localized entity and thereby loses its particle properties. But what about  the photon mass?

     Mass can be derived as a basis for the wave packet spread Dx =  (x – x_o). Thus, a “particle” is represented as a finite wave packet with wavelength-based spread Dl, such that, according to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:

Dx =   D k =  D  (1/l) ~ 1

Now:  l  =   h/ m vg

Where: g   =  (1 – v ²/c²)  ^-½

Recall we saw the basic clock frequency (in the zero reference frame):

w_o =  m_o  c² /  ħ 

Which may now be generalized for relativistic speeds:

w =  m g  c² /  ħ 

In terms of the Compton wavelength:

= ħ/ mc 

w =  g (c/ x )

Given a spread in the velocity D v =  D k =   D (vg) then the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states:

D x D p  » ħ   where D p  =  D (m vg)

Therefore: D x D (m vg)    » ħ  

Or, since the “ultimate” lower limit on D x is of the order of the Compton wavelength, i.e.  D x  » x  or  ħ/ m c,  we have:

m »  ħ/ D x c

Where D x  denotes a lower limit to D x. And it can be shown that the quantity 1/ x possesses the additive and inertial properties of mass.

4. Bohm’s Version of the Uncertainty Principle:

     In Bohm’s case, the Heisenberg relations are embodied in his theory as a limiting case over a certain level of intervals of space and time. However, the potential exists for the fields to be averaged over smaller intervals and hence, subject to a greater degree of self-determination than is consistent with the Heisenberg principle. As Bohm concludes[3]:

From this, it follows that our new theory is able to reproduce, in essence at least, one of the essential features of the quantum theory, i.e. Heisenberg’s principle, and yet have a different content in new levels

     Bohm is primarily concerned with the canonically conjugate field momentum, for which the associated coordinates, i.e. Dt,  Df_k  fluctuate at random. Thus, we have, according to Bohm:

p _k = a (Df_k  /Dt)

Where a is a constant of proportionality, and Df_k  is the fluctuation of the field coordinate. If then the field fluctuates in a random way the region over which it fluctuates is;

(d  Df_k) ²  = b (Dt)

Taking the square root of both sides yields:

(d  Df_k)   = b ^1/2   (Dt)^1/2 

Bohm notes that p _k   also fluctuates at random over the given range so:

d p _k =  a b ^1/2 /   (Dt)^1/2 

Combining all the preceding results one finally gets a relation reflective of the Heisenberg principle, but time independent:

d p _k   (d  Df_k  ) = ab

This is analogous to Heisenberg’s principle, cf.

dp dq  <  ħ

Where the product ab  plays the same role as ħ

Problems:

1) Consider the details of the Einstein ‘box’ thought experiment in which he attempted to out wit Bohr. Based on the hypothetic measured quantities given, how much uncertainty would be expected in the mass? In the weight? (Find the mass uncertainty in kg, and the weight in N.)

2)An Aspect-style experiment is carried out and th e result is found to be:

S = (A1,A2)I + (A1,A2)II + (A1,A2,)III + (A1,A2)IV =

2.65 + 0.10

Explain whether Bell’s inequality was confirmed or not. If not, explain why not.

3) Consider a theoretical  wavelength, l = 2p / Dk, where Dk is the expected width of the wave packet.  If Dk = 0.5 nm, and x = 1 nm with x_o = 0.5 nm, then compute the E-field amplitude:  E_z 

4) In a particular experiment to test Bohmian quantum mechanics on a computer, the uncertainty in one input turns out to be: Dt  =   10 ^-39 s  and in the other,  Df_k  = 10 ^-51 m. From this data, find the quantity b. Then compose a form of the Uncertainty principle and obtain the product ab. (Where ab plays the same role as  ħ in the conventional form of the Uncertainty principle.)

Comment on how your product ab compares to ħ.

---

.[1] Bohm and Hiley:  Foundations of Physics, (12), No. 10, p. 1001.

[2] See, e.g. Bohm, D: Quantum Theory, Dover, p. 169, 1951.

[3] Bohm, op. cit.,. 91.

An Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (1)

1. The Wave Model of the Atom.

Though useful, especially in terms of identifying spectral lines, Bohr’s model had its limitations. For example, it couldn’t account for how angular momentum is conserved in atoms, nor how electronic transitions originate. More seriously, it wasn’t able to deal with the problem of lost energy and why atoms don’t simply collapse.

    Consider the following dynamical picture:  as the electrons whir about the nucleus they ought to be losing energy, in the context of Bohr’s orbital model. If they lose kinetic energy over time they must spiral into the nucleus, and the atom then ceases to exist. This ought to happen in a very short time, so that most atoms in the universe cease to exist and hence the whole universe. But this isn’t observed. Why?

     The only explanation is that Bohr’s orbital model can’t be correct.  Thus was born the theoretical basis for the wave model which we mostly accept today in modern quantum mechanics.  Unlike the Bohr model, electrons don’t follow defined orbital paths but instead are referenced to regions or volumes in which they will be more or less probable.  The basic allocation of electrons, say for the hydrogen atom, is then confined to “orbitals” or regions of higher probability.

     We now look at the experimental basis provided for this model.

     Around 1926, a young French physicist named Louis de Broglie actually postulated the basis for material particles, such as electrons, acting as waves.  This was experimentally verified in the (1927) Davisson and Germer electron diffraction experiment sketched below:

 

Fig. 1: The Basic Davisson and Germer experiment

    From the experiment, with electrons moving through a potential difference V = 4,000 volts, the kinetic energy gained should be equal to the work done, or:

½ m v²   =   eV

Where m the mass of the electron is: 9.1 x 10 ^-31 kg

And the electron charge e = 1.6 x 10^-19 C

The velocity then is:

v = Ö (2eV/m)

The momentum p = mv = m Ö (2eV/m) = Ö (2eVm)

And the de Broglie wavelength is:

l_D= h/p = h/Ö (2eVm)

For a voltage V = 3,000 V one would find:

l_D =

(6.626 x 10^-34 J-s) / [(3.2 x 10^-19 C) (3000V) ( 9.1 x 10^-31 kg)]^1/2

l_D =  2 x 10^-11 m

Which is the de Broglie wavelength of the electron in this experiment.

    A first step to uncovering the wave model from Bohr’s is to examine his quantized relationship:

m vr  = nh/ 2p  = L

where L is the angular momentum.  Re-arranging:

h/ mv =  2p r/ n = l_D    or  2p r =  n l_D

Showing the circumference is scaled into n (standing) waves of wavelength l_D   as shown below:

Fig. 2. Standing wave model for the Bohr atom.

     This wave-orbiting electron atom still has a radius r,  but with waves each separated by one de Broglie wavelength , l_D.

     Thereby  an integral number of such wavelengths form the circumference of the atomic orbit, as required by  the condition:  2p r =  n l_D.

  For example, in the case of hydrogen the first three of these cloud-wave regions are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3: Electron (“orbital”) clouds-regions in Hydrogen

Let us ‘zoom in’ on the more spherical n= 1 configuration, and the probability for the electron in this space as depicted in Fig. 4 below:

Fig. 4: The n = 1 electron orbital for hydrogen

    This diagram more than any other dispenses with the notion that hydrogen electron occupies a definite position. Instead, it’s confined someplace within a “cloud” or probability space (b) but that probability can be computed as a function of the Bohr radius (a_o = 0.0529 nm).  The probability P_1s for the 1s orbital is itself a result of squaring the “wave function” for the orbital.  If the wave function is defined y (1s) = 1/Öp (Z/ a_o) exp (-Zr/ a_o), and the probability function is expressed:

P = ½y (1s) y (1s) *½

     Where y (1s) * is the complex conjugate, then the graph shown in Fig. 4 is obtained. Inspection shows the probability of finding the electron at the Bohr radius is the greatest, but it can also be found at distances less than or greater than  0.0529 nm.

     We thereby see from Figs. 3-4 that Bohr’s original quantizing number, n (the "principal quantum number"), has far more meaning than simply to parse the number of standing waves for a given atom. We already see that it determines the energy of the atom, viz.

E _n =  - 13.6/ n²   

     But it also indicates the average distance of the electron from the nucleus.  Thus, de Broglie’s wavelength provides the basis for the wave-particle duality that lies at the basis of the “smeared” probabilistic atoms peculiar to modern atomic theory.

       At the bottom of Fig. 3 are the quantum numbers: n and ℓ, which are identified as: the principal quantum number, and the angular momentum quantum number, respectively.

    There are two physical meanings attendant on n: i) it determines the energy of an orbital (specifically in the H-atom), and (ii) it indicates the average distance of an electron in a particular orbital, to the nucleus, To fix ideas, I show in the accompanying diagram (Fig. 5)  a sketch of one lobe for an electron orbital associated with the (3, 2, +2) state in the Hydrogen atom. The key point is the orbital denotes an electron density associated with a probability of finding the electron in some defined space.

Fig. 5: one lobe for an electron orbital associated with the (3, 2, +2) state in hydrogen

     In the case shown one must also visualize a symmetrical lobe on the other side (making the whole orbital resemble a dumbbell) to make it complete. As one alters the set of quantum numbers the electron densities change and so do the probabilities associated with the orbit.(See Fig.6)

    Fig. 6: Further hydrogen orbitals with higher quantum numbers

     Describing orbitals using the set of given quantum numbers means knowing the numbering rules applied to each. In the case of the principal quantum number, n, we allow it to have integral (non-zero) values: 1, 2, 3, 4 etc.

     The physical significance of the angular momentum quantum number (ℓ) is to convey the shape of the probability density cloud or orbital. The numbering rule for l is directly contingent on the value for n. Thus, for any given n, then ℓ must be such that it has integral values from 0 to (n -1). This means if n = 2, then ℓ can have (n- 1) = (2 -1) = 1. But if n =1, then ℓ = (n - 1) = 1 - 1 = 0.

       Note that the ℓ -quantum numbers appear more than once for any  orbital with n >1. Thus, for the n = 2 case, we have two values of ℓ occurring: one for l = 0, the other for ℓ = 1. If we go on to n= 3 there are three values of ℓ, for n = 4, four values and so on. One also finds the ℓ -value specified for lettered orbitals: s, p, d, f, g, h. The s-orbital is for ℓ =0, the p for ℓ =1, the d for ℓ = 2 and so on.

     There is no special significance to the letters (apart from the physical meaning we already gave for the angular momentum quantum number, ℓ, and they are mainly of historical import- though still retained, for example, in chemistry. (By extension, one also often hears the term "atomic shell" used in chemistry). A collection of orbitals under the same value of n is called a "shell". Thus, for n = 4, we have ℓ =0, ℓ = 1, ℓ =2, ℓ = 3 so comprising the collection of orbitals: s, p, d and f.

Lastly, there is the magnetic quantum number, usually designated m _ℓ (subscript the same as the angular momentum quantum number) because it is contingent upon it. This quantum number describes the orientation of the orbital in 3-D space. For a given angular momentum quantum number, ℓ, we have integral values specified as follows:

m _ℓ = - ℓ, (-ℓ +1)....0......( ℓ - 1), + ℓ

Note the above set of m _ℓ numbers is given as a SERIES, e.g. starting with (-ℓ) and terminating at + ℓ. Look at the simplest example for ℓ = 0, then:

m _ℓ  = 0.    (Since all terms are zero)

What about ℓ = 1?

Then: m _ℓ = -1, 0, 1

What about ℓ = 2?

We have:

m _ℓ = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2


As a general rule then, we can use the formula:

N(m _ℓ) = {(2 x l) + 1}

to give the total number of m _ℓ   numbers.

In any problems to do with identifying electron shell structure- configuration, it is well to bear in mind the Pauli Exclusion Principle to make sure the electrons are distributed so that no two electrons have the same set of quantum numbers. It is instructive to study the table below to see how the principal quantum number, n, changes with ℓ, and the subshell as well as the symbol for the primary electron shell.  The  Table shown below shows the respective Shell and Subshell Symbols and associated Quantum Numbers.

n  =	SHELL	ℓ   =	Subshell
1	K	0	s
2	L	1	p
3	M	2	d
4	N	3	f
5	O	4	g
6	P	5	h

In working out assorted problems, preparation of a schematic energy level diagram associated with the state of the system can also be of immense value.

Problems:

(1) Find the de Broglie wavelength  l_D  of a proton subject to 4000 V in a Davisson-Germer type experiment.

 (Take m _p = 1.7  x 10 ^-27  kg)

(2) Write out the electron configuration for oxygen (O16), then write out the values for the set of quantum numbers : n, ℓ, m _ℓ, m _s  for each of the electrons in O16.

(Hint: The  m _s or spin quantum number, which we will encounter in the next section, has either +1/2 or -1/2 value. )