Showing posts with label Laser-induced breakdown spectrometer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Laser-induced breakdown spectrometer. Show all posts

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Mars Curiosity Detects 'Building Blocks' of Life – But These Still Aren’t Life!

MSL RoverThe just reported finding that the Mars Curiosity Rover used its laser-induced breakdown spectrometer to detect the key elements needed for life (nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, sulfur and phosphorus) was encouraging to be sure and has been described as “a major coup for the Mars Science Laboratory Mission”. This has been operated out of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena.
But let’s be sure we don’t confuse life’s building blocks (we are assuming carbon based life) with the precursors of life.These precursors, in the form of complex carbon compounds (the basis for what we call Organic chemistry) have yet to be revealed or detected. JPL researchers do say that a key priority is to search for locations where “organics” might be preserved.

Interestingly, previous missions, e.g. Viking, have disclosed that Mars could have supported microbes billions of years ago, when water was perhaps more available – as opposed to being in frozen form now.

How would such primitive microbes have come to be?  The famous  Miller and Urey experiment provides a clue. They basically applied an electrical discharge to a chemical brew resembling the Earth’s primitive reducing atmosphere. This brew included ammonia and methane, as well as hydrogen and water vapor. The effect of the discharge transformed the mix into a diverse yield of organic compounds. These included amino acids, as well as substances such as formic acid and urea that normally occur in living organisms.

The very fact so many organic compounds could arise is remarkable in itself, given the vast number of possible compounds that might have emerged. And while it is true that the discharge didn’t produce actual living cells, there is no reason – given enough time, that a primitive pre-biotic cell in the distant past could not have emerged given the building blocks left behind.



The consensus of current research is already fairly clear about the nature or form of the first primitive organisms. They were prokaryotic autotrophs . More specifically, they were suspended colloidal micro-spheres capable of exchanging energy with their surroundings. To get energy, these self-sustaining coacervate droplets could use one or two basic reactions involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate:

L*M + R + ADP + P -> R + L + M + ATP

ATP + X + Y + X*Y -> ADP + X*Y + X*Y + P


In the above, L*M is some large, indeterminate, energy-rich compound that could serve as ‘food’. Whatever the specific form, it’s conceived here to have two major parts capable of being broken to liberate energy. Compound R is perhaps a protenoid, but in any case able to act on L*M to decompose it. Concurrent with the first reaction is the possibility of a second, entailing autocatalytic molecules X*Y. These molecules could accelerate their own formation, using ATP.


On the basis of the chemical reactions, the hypothetical coacervate would consist of the combination: X*Y + R. Now, what properties ought we expect for any such primitive life form? These include: simple organization, ability to increase in size, and ability to maintain itself over extended intervals. Does the coacervate meet these conditions?

Well, it has a simple organization, consisting of the molecules X*Y and R. It can increase its size by synthesizing more of X*Y, growing until hydrodynamically unstable. Finally, it can maintain itself over indefinite intervals, so long as it can extract the chemical components it needs. What about replication? We expect that this is feasible when it splits into ‘daughters’ after growing too large. Then, so long as each has some of the protenoid R there is the capacity for replication.


From all the evidence thus far uncovered, it does appear that ancient Martian organisms in the form of coacervates roamed that planet billions of years ago. How or why Mars changed so radically we may never know - but perhaps Curiosity can also help us to find clues. Among the reigning theories is that Mars suffered a collision with a giant asteroid billions of years ago which caused it to catastrophically lose its atmosphere. With the atmosphere gone, temperatures became too extreme to support liquid water, or life. Another theory is that in the distant past Mars lost it protective magnetic field (in a primitive magnetosphere) perhaps owing to a monster solar flare or coronal mass ejection. With the loss of magnetosphere the planet would have been blasted by high frequency radiation that no life could have surivived. This, even if it did have a residual atmosphere.

Meanwhile, in basic astronomy courses, students learn that Mars never really had a chance to keep an atmosphere because of its low surface gravity. In this case typical atmospheric molecules, say like oxygen (O2) would easily have reached escape velocity. Readers can learn more about such factors here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_escape





Sunday, August 5, 2012

Can Mars Curiosity Rover Get It Done?

MSL Rover
Image of the Mars Curiosity Rover, set to land tonight on the Red Planet

After millions of miles traveling from Earth, $2.5 billion in costs (still barely a quarter of what the Afghan Occupation costs us each month), and five years planning to find the ideal site - the Mars Science Laboratory (nicknamed 'Curiosity') is slated for touchdown on Mars sometime this evening.

Ironically, the tension will arrive not from the long flight itself, but during the final approach, starting from an altitude of roughly 10 km (6 miles) when the two metric ton (2,000 lb. ) spacecraft deploys a parachute 50m (150') long and 21.5 m in diameter to begin its descent to the Martian surface.  This is critical because designing the chute was no easy task and even the experts (if honest) will admit that "the physics of how a parachute inflates at supersonic speeds is not well understood and extremely difficult to model" (Scientific American, July, 2012, p. 41).

Having descended to an altitude of 2 km (1.2 miles) the craft will be traveling at nearly 100 meters a second (330 ft/ sec) and that's using the parachute. This "terminal velocity" is the slowest the thin Martian atmosphere can brake an incoming spacecraft but still much too fast for a safe landing. Hence, this is the most critical point: the stage at which the craft needs to "drop  out" from the parachute and when a rocket powered backpack fires thrusters in the skyward direction, to slow its descent - ultimately to ~ 20 m/ sec. If at any time during this critical phase either the rover fails to separate enough from the chute or the thrusters fail to fire, it will be all over before it even starts. You will then read tomorrow morning or see tonight the news of a crash landing at 100 m/s.

Even this isn't enough for a slow enough landing to retain the delicate equipment, so in addition to the reverse thrusters, three cables will emerge (the "sky crane" so-called, at a height of about 20 m)  on which the rover will be gradually lowered. The end result (hopefully!) will be a "soft"  landing at 0.75 m/sec with wheels and suspension fully deployed. (But note even at this 'slow' speed, the momentum just before impact will exceed 700 kg m/s)  Meanwhile, the powered thrusters package will crash land roughly 450 m away.

It doesn't take a lot to see that failure could occur at any of these critical steps on the final approach to Mars. Needless to say, if even a minor failure occurs (say the suspension and wheels failing to deploy) NASA will have 'egg' all over its collective face, particularly as it elected to eschew working with the European Space Agency (ESA) to send collaborative missions in 2016 and 2018, opting to go it alone. The risks are enormous given the agency is eyeing further exploration of the Red Planet, and any kind of disaster would have serious repercussions in the eyes of the budget cutters. This will be especially so if the  Repugs get in power in November, and grab all branches of government.

Curiosity itself is the most technologically advanced craft ever - of the 6 to successfully land on Mars - out of the 14 total attempts made by all Mars-faring nations. The Rover (see image, compliments of NASA) is nuclear -powered and equipped with more than a dozen high tech cameras, a weather station and tools to drill, and 'sniff' the environment in search of life. Perhaps the neatest instrument is a laser-induced breakdown spectrometer which can zap holes in rocks and soil up to 7 m (21 ft.) away and remote sense their chemical composition.

The "rudimentary life form" optimists at NASA are keenly awaiting such tests, along with those from the 'SAM' or sample analysis device, because they believe the pre-selected landing site (Gale Crater) merits it.  Of 50 original candidates this was the one finally chosen based on a number of factors: including the exposure of ancient river deposits compliments of wind erosion over the ages, and mineral-rich terrain analogous to those on Earth which lie near groundwater aquifers. My own view is that despite all the shiny new toys, no life will be found - even microbial single-celled life. I simply don't believe any life exists on Mars, if it ever did.

Within an hour of its successful landing the Curiosity rover will commence its work, mainly getting some terrific imagery of the surface. Within another month and certainly by the end of the 2nd, barring mishaps, the onboard lab will have analyzed the first rock and soil samples.

Let us hope, for NASA's sake, and that of future exploration (including manned, since we can't stay on this one world forever) that this latest Martian endeavor turns out to be as big a success as its purveyors and creators are now hyping!