Why I am Thankful......for MEDICARE

Seniors marching on behalf of Medicare in the early 1960s. At that time, adult children had to declare mortgages, assets etc. to pay any extra money for medical care for their elder parents the state wouldn’t cover. Many seniors, rather than burdening their charges, simply died alone.

The pre-Medicare era was nasty, brutish and saw most elderly either dying in an impecunious state, or simply alone.....of some disease or infection.

By 1960, the then Democratic contender for the presidency - John Fitzgerald Kennedy - had seen enough and as documented in a period issue of LIFE magazine (December 19, 1960, page 31) proposed for the first time a program of elderly medical care and insurance operating under the Social Security System.

Now, as I glance at the recently tabulated bill (from UCSF Hellen Diller Cancer Center)  for my treatment of prostate cancer, I thank JFK and my lucky stars (my 'lucky stars' in the sense of detecting the cancer this year and not when I was scrounging for a private plan prior to Medicare) that Medicare was available and still essentially intact.

That bill tabulation, for those who might be interested, came to $42, 776 and this encompassed a breakdown of different contributors, from anesthesia ($4,124) to radiology services ($16,768) to recovery room ($2, 090) to operating room services ($14,994).   The bill, after Medicare Part B kicked in, came down to $1,299 of which most will be paid by my Medicare Supplement Plan (F).

Now, flash back to when I was 62 and the best insurance on offer to me was an AARP plan with $15,000 deductible and only  limited coverage. Had I been detected with prostate cancer back then, I'd have had to come up with virtually all of the $42,000.  At most, the private AARP plan might have covered $11,000 or so. (And this is assuming the cancer was detected after enrollment and not before - else I'd have been denied based on having a "pre-existing condition".)

In that case, having been given the diagnosis, I'd have had little choice but to skip any immediate treatments and hence, the cancer would plausibly have metastasized until - by the time I finally did qualify for Medicare (last year) - the costs of treating advanced prostate cancer would've been drastically more expensive. (In that case I'd have likely required multiple treatments, including external beam radiotherapy, androgen suppression in addition to high dose brachytherapy)

I point this out because one of the alleged "solutions" to the "fiscal cliff" - grabbing so many hysterical headlines right now - is to extend the age to 67, to qualify for Medicare. To say this is monumentally STUPID, is putting it mildly! In fact, rather than limiting Medicare costs it will explode them - which doesn't require Mensa-level intellect to figure out!

If Dems yield on this to the Ryan-led "fiscal cliff" wheeling and dealing Repukes, then all hell will break loose on the Left flank. The Left understands that those 65-67 yr. old seniors caught in the proposed 'donut' coverage wait, will be like I might have been - and postpone essential medical care rather than go broke. Then, when they do finally qualify for Medicare, their problems will be much worse and require far more resources, medical costs to fix. This ain't rocket science!

As it is, Medicare is NO freebie! This needs to be repeated over and over again! The supplemental Part F insurance that paid the balance of my prostate cancer treatment bill comes to $139 a month alone. This is in addition to the regular Medicare premium (Part B)  of $99 a month. In addition, no dental coverage exists, so my wife and I had to cough up over $2,700 recently to cover the costs of new crowns, fillings and dental cleanings. This isn't any kind of luxury because most people know that once your dental health goes, the rest of your health generally follows. Healthy teeth, after all, are critical to good nutrition and avoidance of chronic inflammation! We aren't talking 'cosmetic" dentistry here!  And I won't even add the $1, 500 or so every other year or so for new glasses.

Another BIG Thankfulness acknowledgement here - that Ryan and Romney LOST the election! Imagine the path we'd now be on if the Ryanesque "vouchers" were the new Medicare? Hell, I'd have exhausted my $10,000 voucher in a heartbeat then have had to pay the balance of the $42,776 bill and that isn't even looking at any other health problems that I've had the past six months (inlcuding ear infection, strained back muscle).  

Under Ryan's plan and with no government mandate for providing care, why should the profit -oriented insurance companies put themselves on a downward treadmill or "losing wicket" as we call it in Barbados? They wouldn't if they had any grain of sense. Without a mandate or order from the government, you can also bet your sweet bippy they'd reject any elderly person with a pre-existing condition. This would be the proverbial no-brainer for them!


Thus, by the time JFK proposed a government health plan linked to Social Security, in 1960, America's seniors were more than ready. More than ready to stop being parasitized by commercial outfits, or humiliated by the likes of states under the odious Kerr-Mills plan (which required adult kids to cover costs). The only main opponents were the AMA which (One Nation Uninsured, p. 68):  "ran newspaper ads and TV spots declaring Medicare was socialized medicine and a threat to freedom" while blowhards like Ronnie Reagan made idiotic recorded talks trying to scare people by asserting (ibid.): "One of the traditional methods of imposing statism on a people has been by way of medicine".  (Reagan also suggested Medicare was a means of "communist intervention in a free nation.")

Fortunately, most seniors who'd actually experienced the dregs of capitalist medical bestiality didn't buy this hog swill. They organized under groups like the National Council of Senior Citizens (see image) and turned the tables by imposing relentless pressure on representatives (the most intransigent of whom were Southern Democrats, who LBJ had to finally confront and read the 'riot act'). Eventually, the opposing voices were muted and Medicare was passed in 1966.

For those interested in what elder health care was like before Medicare get the Oxford University Press monograph, entitled: One Nation Uninsured, by Jill Quadagno, which also gets to the bottom of why there is such massive political aversion to any kind of genuine health care coverage in this country which doesn't drag in the profit motive.

As for the "fiscal cliff" - let's not let our reps toss us over it for the sake of bankster slime (like Lloyd Blankfein) and return us to an era where seniors had to sink or swim medically!




-       

The Pre-Medicare Era: Nasty, Brutish and Inhumane

As the discussion continues unabated about whether the Wednesday New York special election result was an indictment of Paul Ryan's Nazified plan to deny healthcare to seniors (I refuse to dignify it by calling it a "Medicare plan" far less a plan to "save Medicare") it is well to go back into recent history and what life was like before Medicare came onstream in 1966. To put it succinctly: life for the aged in this country was generally nasty, short and brutish - with few options or appeals to assistance if one became seriously ill.

Much of this is detailed in several chapters of the Oxford University Press monograph, entitled: One Nation Uninsured, by Jill Quadagno, which gets to the bottom of why there is such massive political aversion to any kind of genuine health care coverage in this country which doesn't drag in the profit motive. Medicare is discussed because it putatively paved the way to at least get a 'Leg into the door' on the all but closed-shop capitalist insurance front, stiffly guarded by the likes of the AMA.

By ca. 1960 there were some 19 million citizens over age 65, and some 185,000 physicians (p. 69). The options for medical care, however, were sparse though socially insured medical insurance had been in the pipeline since the Truman administration. But by 1960 the most serious countermeasure to it was the Kerr-Mills plan- which basically confined assistance only to the "aged poor". By 1963 only 28 states had adopted any of it, and barely 148,000 seniors were covered. Again, this out of a total population of 19 million seniors.

Was Kerr-Mills a terrific deal? Hell no! In many states that established a Kerr-Mills format there still weren't the funds to finance it. This meant the older person and his immediate family had to be put on the hook for the money allocated to any care. Thus 12 states had 'family responsibility' provisions (p. 60-61) which "effectively imposed means tests on relatives of the aged, deterring many poor, elderly people from applying for support"

The author cites as an example the state of Pennsylvania (p. 61) wherein "the elderly had to provide detailed information on their children's finances to qualify for Kerr-Mills". Meanwhile, in New York many seniors actually withdrew their applications on learning their children would be involved, and would have to cough up any extra money for care the state couldn't cover (ibid.). This also meant the adult children had to appear before state boards and answer direct questions concerning their assets and liabilities, how much mortgage they owed - if any, as well as bank account balances. Most seniors, naturally, weren't able to tolerate this level of humiliation and scrutiny of their offspring, not to mention being held liable. In other states under Kerr-Mills, the elder person had to sign away the deed to his home (if he owned one) to pay for all medical bills upon his or her decease.

THIS is what life was like for the elderly in the days before Medicare. What about any seniors not among the "aged poor"? Their only option was a miserly private insurance policy with huge costs and meager benefits. Policies typically covered "only a portion of hospital costs and no medical care" (p. 61). This left the elderly with 67-75% of all the expenses to absorb, which puts the plan about on the same level as Paul Ryan's scheme (the GAO estimates seniors will have to pay at least 2/3 of all expenses), if the latter is ever introduced - say if the GOP gains all three branches of government next year, which would be a nightmare come true! As an example, "Continental Casualty and Mutual of Omaha provided only $10 a day for hospital charges and room and board, less than half the average cost".

Of course NO prescription drugs were covered, all had to be paid for out of pocket. The average commercial plan - even given this miserliness- was quite expensive, ranging from $580 - $650 a year, when the median elder income was only $2,875. Thus, nearly 25% of income was gobbled up by first tier medical costs, which could easily expand to 50-75% of income if a number of prescriptions were needed, and medical treatments, hospitalizations. Quadagno also notes that (p. 62) "insurers typically skimmed off the younger, healthier elderly" thereby forcing insurers to raise premiums. Thus "many elderly were priced out of the market entirely". In many cases, the consequences were horrific, as illustrated by the case of an 80-year old granny who allowed an umbilical hernia to go unreated, with the result it ultimately protruded to 18" out of her belly and eventually ruptured, with her bleeding to death on the kitchen floor while baking a cake (p. 63). Nor were such events exceptional.

Again, there is no reason this couldn't happen under Ryan's plan, and there'd be every incentive for insurance companies to skim the healthier (and younger) seniors as in pre-Medicare days, and zero incentive not to. After all, with no government mandate for providing care, why should the profit -oriented insurance companies put themselves on a downward treadmill or "losing wicket" as we call it in Barbados? They wouldn't if they had any grain of sense. Without a mandate or order from the government, you can also bet your sweet bippy they'd reject any elderly person with a pre-existing condition. This would be the proverbial no-brainer for them!

Thus, by the time JFK proposed a government health plan linked to Social Security, in 1960, America's seniors were more than ready. More than ready to stop being parasitized by commercial outfits, or humiliated by the likes of states under the odious Kerr-Mills plan. The only main opponents were the AMA which (p. 68) "ran newspaper ads and TV spots declaring Medicare was socialized medicine and a threat to freedom" and blowhards like Ronnie Reagan who made idiotic recorded talks trying to scare people by asserting (ibid.): "One of the traditional methods of imposing statism on a people has been by way of medicine".

Fortunately, most seniors who'd actually experienced the dregs of capitalist medical bestiality didn't buy this hog swill. They organized under groups like the National Concil of Senior Citizens (see image) and turned the tables by imposing relentless pressure on representatives (the most intransigent of whom were Southern Democrats, to whom LBJ had to finally confront and read the 'riot act'). Eventually, the opposing voices were muted and Medicare was passed.

Let's hope enough older voters-people become aware of this history before they remotely allow any plan like Paul Ryan's to take them back to the conditions of 1960!