Have you heard or seen anything of The House Oversight Committee's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets? I hadn't until Wednesday while watching a segment about it on CBS Mornings.
There’s been precious little mainstream media coverage of it
(I’ve seen nothing in the Denver Post). Incredible, given a never-before-seen video released
Tuesday by a member of Congress appears to show a U.S. military Hellfire
missile bouncing off a bright object being tracked off the coast of Yemen on
Oct. 30, 2024.
Luis Elizondo, who wrote the book Imminent, made no pretense that the video ought to shock anyone with a working brain cell – given Hellfire missiles typically annihilate their targets. In this case it was as if the object was surrounded by a 'force field' - preventing any damage - far less knocking it out.
This shows me that my now deceased AF brother Jerry -who worked at Wright-Patterson AFB
was totally correct when he said back in 1990:
"There isn't a Pentagon weapon in existence capable of taking one of those fuckers out, and you can take that to the bank!"
The video was released at a House Government Oversight subcommittee hearing into Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), which is the military's term for UFOs. During the hearing Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) played a video that he said he'd "been given" and claimed was taken by an MQ-9 Reaper drone.
The overhead video showed a fast-moving object moving in a
straight line above the waves off the coast of Yemen and captured
what Burlison said was a Hellfire missile fired by another Reaper drone that
appeared to strike the object:
Video of US missile fired at mystery orb shown at UFO hearing
Approaching the critical sequence Burlison says: "I'm not going to explain it to you, you'll see exactly
what it does."
And we do see, indeed, no explanation is needed, with the missile blowing up and the UFO untouched. George Knapp, an investigative journalist, who was a witness at Tuesday's hearing alongside others identified as whistleblowers of military UFO incidents, proclaimed:
"The public should be seeing this stuff, and why you're not allowed to, I don't know. That's the Hellfire missile smacking into that UFO and just (bouncing) right off."
He added: "And it (the UFO) kept going."
"It kept going," Burlison agreed, "and it looks
like the debris was taken with it."
"Yeah. What the hell is that?" Knapp asked in disbelief.
Burlison said he was not going to speculate on what the object
was in the video, but asked "Why are we being blocked from this
information consistently?"
Elizondo, former director of The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) made clear in his book the reason for withholding: The military doesn’t want the public to know how impotent it is in stopping invasions of its airspace by what are clearly advanced extraterrestrial craft.
My brother Jerry also had that explanation when we discussed films of other UAP- UFO sightings in Port Charlotte, FL back in 1990. By July, 1978, Jerry noted, "some 10,000 pages of alien craft were located, but only 900 pages were eventually released" to the two citizen groups, GSW, CAUS. At the same time, the CIA refused to release "fifty -seven related UFO documents."
Jerry asked rhetorically: "Why the fuck not?" He wasn't hesitant in his reply:
"I'll tell you why. The Air Force intended to re-engineer downed saucer parts - such as recovered at Roswell- and develop new, more powerful weapons."
A take Elizondo basically concurs with in his book Imminent. Jerry elaborated that in such a case keeping the recovered craft findings secret would have been paramount. There could not be any advantage given to the "other side" by knowing about it. If alive today, I am 100 percent certain he'd agree that this is also the primary driver behind dodging, debunking or outright rejecting all the most significant UFO-UAP incidents
Indeed, in the wake of the Tuesday House UAP hearing, a military mouthpiece - when asked to confirm the incident, sputtered: "we do not have anything to provide on this" . This coming from an anonymous U.S. defense
official, when asked directly to authenticate the video as to the time and location.
Then, asked to comment on the video, another DOD spokesperson said:
"I have nothing for you."
Again, showing that when positive, unimpeachable evidence shows up the military is at a loss for amplification or explanation, unless of course it can exploit the video or images to portray them as fakes, e.g. as the WSJ reported in June;
No surprise then that while the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly
Resolution Office (AARO) continues to receive many high profile reports that are
unexplained - but it: “has not found that any of the incidents are of an
extraterrestrial origin.” See e.g.
Of course not, because that would violate the unmentioned “sovereignty”
clause, i.e. that humans are the masters of this planet so there can’t be any
more advanced alien craft in our skies. I.e.
At the end of the hearing, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.)
replayed the video and asked the panelists if they were scared by what they saw
in the video. All said yes with the exception of George Knapp, who replied that he was
happy that the video had been released. (But you can bet your sweet bippy he was also terrified at what he saw- namely the total impotence of the planet's numero uno "superpower" to stop it.)
No comments:
Post a Comment