Trump would rather let poorest kill each other than allow food aid
What the ongoing Trump tyranny shows is a yen for cruelty and no regard for the poorest and most destitute on our planet. This was confirmed in the recent WSJ piece: 'African Refugees Scrape, Scrap As Aid Ebbs', Aug. 12, p. A16). Noting:
"With the Trump Administration's gutting of humanitarian aid to Africa, refugees from war-torn countries have been reduced to literally fighting each other over the scraps of food that remain."
In other words, these monsters who've replaced a once functional government with a criminal extortion enterprise opposed to the rule of law - have deliberately created and stoked an ultimate version of the hunger games in the poorest region of the world. What once distinguished America as a land of compassion and generosity has now mutated - since January 20th - into a despot-ruled rogue nation. One dominated by a rogue criminal (convicted felon) and traitor intent on spreading misery and degradation to the most vulnerable.
Well, we should not be surprised if we possess any sentience. After all, as Chris Hayes recently showed on ALL In, e.g.
Hayes blasts Trump: ‘Most pro-criminal president of my lifetime’
Trump is the most unabashedly pro-criminal president in our lifetimes. I mean, frankly, he makes Richard Nixon look like a veritable choir boy. Indeed, one recent Facebook post best summed up the warp and woof of the demented orange fungal turd who calls himself a president:
It expresses exactly the nature of this deranged imp who - according to the WSJ lead story last Thursday - is now "unfettered, no controls". So believes he can do whatever he wants, to anyone. In the words of Rice University historian Douglas Brinkley (WSJ, p. A4, 8/28):
"Trump is motivated by having control over all American institutions. He seems to want to grab everyone by the neck and say 'I'm in charge'."
He also seems to believe he's worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize for having a few delusions about settling some recent dustups - like between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. But any so-called leader who cuts off critical food assistance to the neediest of our world - thereby spawning internecine refugee violence - merits no peace prize.
He more merits a lump of coal atop his Mickey D burger and gator piss in his diet coke. Especially after the recent outbreaks of refugee upon refugee mayhem as recently occurred in South Sudan and Uganda. As one Norwegian citizen aptly summed up Dotard's aspirations in a Facebook entry:
As the WSJ piece about African Refugees reported:
"At Uganda's sprawling Kiryandongo refugee settlement, residents who had fled South Sudan attacked the shelters of new arrivals from Sudan, stealing food, killing one and injuring almost 100."
Meanwhile:
"During a four day rampage in July, hundreds of South Sudanese refugees, armed with machetes and sticks, stormed a large, separate compound housing Sudanese newcomers."
Making Trump directly responsible for the refugee -on- refugee mayhem, given the food scarcity and desperation spawned by his gutting of aid. The WSJ piece again:
"Until President Trump took a chain saw to U.S. foreign assistance programs this year, American funding accounted for 60% of U.N. World Food program relief efforts in Uganda...and 40% of the global humanitarian aid budget."
In other words, Trump's taking a chain saw to vital food aid directly resulted in bestial, inhuman behavior and violence. Predictable when scarcity faces the destitute driven to desperation by starvation and disease.
Nobel Peace Prize? This Turd doesn't deserve a wad of warm doggie lickspittle.
Update: The final proof that Trump merits no peace prize, as reported in the WSJ today (9/1, Trump Moves to Bypass Congress Over Aid', p. A6: "Trump is also targeting hundreds of millions of dollars of funds for peace keeping operations, including the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Somalia."
Can we finally agree that any leader who blocks aid for a peace-keeping mission is unworthy of a Nobel Peace Prize? Yes, I believe we can!
See Also:
Defying Congress, Trump Moves to Cut $4.9 Billion in Foreign Aid - The New York Times
Excerpt:
The move largely targets accounts funding the United States’
contributions to the United Nations and soft power programs run by the State
Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development, which has already
largely been dismantled by the Trump administration.
The single biggest clawback would be a $445 million cut to U.S. funding of peacekeeping operations abroad, including through the United Nations. The request also proposes a $132-million rescission of the $140 million approved by Congress for the Democracy Fund at the State Department
And:
Trump Declares He's Now Beyond All Laws Because Of "Divine Orders" - He's Flat Wrong
And:
And:
Other Voices Weigh In On Trump's Fascist LA Power Grab
And:
'Blatantly unconstitutional': Law professor says key Trump executive orders won't survive
And:
And:
by Andrea Mazzarino | August 28, 2025 - 4:55am | permalink
US President Donald Trump, his cabinet, and those who have profited from his rise seem to revel in public displays of cruelty.
Take former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) head Elon Musk, holding a chainsaw at a televised event to celebrate the firing of civil servants. Or Trump’s White House sharing a video featuring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers marching handcuffed immigrants onto a deportation flight, with Jess Glynne’s musical hit “Hold My Hand” playing in the background. Or how about ICE allowing right-wing TV host Dr. Phil to film its sweeping immigration raids for public consumption? And don’t forget those federal agents tackling Democratic California Sen. Alex Padilla to the floor (and handcuffing him!) when he asked a question at a Department of Homeland Security press conference. Or what about during the first Trump presidential campaign, when the then-candidate boasted that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue in New York City and he wouldn’t lose a voter?
No comments:
Post a Comment