Showing posts with label Mick Mulvaney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mick Mulvaney. Show all posts

Sunday, March 1, 2020

Dotard Will Soon See That The Coronavirus Is No "Hoax" As Incidents Of Community Spread Increase - And Stocks Remain Volatile

Image may contain: text

"This will be a deus ex machina test of Trump’s authoritarian behavior. Epidemics are not well suited to authoritarian regimes and propaganda...Trump’s history in business — he makes people feel good for a while and then it ends badly — could presage a stock market crash before he exits.,"  -  Maureen Dowd, NY Times,  'Trump Makes Us Ill'

"Trump’s lies, his disparagement of science and scientists, his claim that non-political civil servants are part of the deep state, his lack of credibility, his penchant for political opportunism over the needs of the nation, his pathological embrace of hyperbole, his delight in creating confusion, and his mistaking loyalty for public service puts the nation in grave danger in light of the growing pandemic. He has gutted the health services, slashed much needed revenue for public goods through tax giveaways to the ultra-rich, ousted, Tim Ziemer, one of the most trusted leaders in public health, and appointed a religious fanatic Mike Pence, to head the attack on the corona virus crisis....This is what neo fascism looks like when it ignores social needs for the demands of cravenly loyalty and the accumulation of power and profits. Trump is a menace and danger to the world not just the United States"  -  Henry Giroux, 'Cultlike Ignorance Is Death: Trump And The Coronavirus',

What do you do with a bombastic buffoon of a "leader" who - when faced with his first genuine exogenous crisis -  tries to fob it off as a "hoax"?  Exactly like he tried to do with his impeachment and the Mueller Report.  Well, you recognize first you can't believe a single damned word this deranged,  narcissistic mutt with delusions of grandeur,  says. Also,  if you're going to protect you and yours you're best served going to the CDC website as the Covid-19 virus approaches pandemic status, or seek professional advice on how to prepare.

You will get no real help from the Turd-in -Chief who, again, sees his re-election and the stock market's continued rise as more critical than protecting Americans' welfare. Hence, his constant stream of lies, exaggerations and the lack of his administration to prepare - evidenced by access to barely a few hundred testing kits -  while China and South Korea have been testing thousands.  In line with this it was incredible to me that at Trump's presser Saturday, not a single member of the illustrious press corp asked him, or the CDC's experts, about the availability of testing kits to actually confirm Covid--19 infections.  Without such testing it's pure pie in the sky to be claiming the average American is at low risk, because we've really no idea how many infected folks are walking around with no symptoms.   And yet that is all we heard from the CDC's  Pooh Bahs, "the average American is at low risk".

Meanwhile, in response to another question, Trump  again obfuscated and lied.  He was asked about his rally in North Charleston, SC, where he barked: "This is their new hoax"  - meaning the virus at large. But Trump denied that he called the coronavirus a hoax, and said he really meant that the way the Democrats were portraying it- raising "panic"-   was a hoax.  Well, excuse the hell out of me and them.  As far as I recall this hasn't devolved to an authoritarian dictatorship yet - when concerned media and the opposition party can't criticize a president for lax preparation and lying about it!  To fix ideas, in a number of instances last week I saw and heard - along with wifey- the following expulsions from Dotard:

- First denying then admitting that 14 infected Americans were brought back from China and dispatched on transport with non-infected citizens.

- Claiming with a straight face the disease will "go away in April' because the "heat will kill it"

-  Last Tuesday trying to reassure Americans the virus was "under control" when there wasn't even testing done to confirm that.  (As Business Insider noted)

-  Blathering last Wednesday "It's gonna  disappear, like a miracle"

- Claiming only 15 cases were in the U.S. when it's actually 69, at last count.  (At Saturday's press meet only 22 cases were claimed)

 The differences show  there's no real agreement, and how can there be without actual testing using proper test kits?  Which  was another thing: none of the press asked why there were no test kits available, especially after the first U.S. death,  of a male nursing home victim in Washington state.  This also marked the 2nd case of "community spread" i.e. with no known chain to any travel out of the state etc. See also:

Cult-Like Ignorance is Death: Trump and the Coronavirus

What was also really choice is Trump imposing new travel restrictions when incoming passengers from many already affected countries aren't even being tested on entry into U.S. airports.  Hell, Dr. Jen Ashton - appearing on ABC News Saturday night said: "I really don't understand why none of these arriving passengers aren't being tested."  Well, maybe, Dr. Jen, it's because there aren't enough testing kits available in the first place. So these Trump asswits are imposing travel restrictions while people from Covid-19 nations are pouring into dozens of  our main airports and no tests are done.   Not even simple temperature checks, i.e. for fever.   Anyone leading this charge with an IQ over zero?

All of this shows Trump's claims of calling out Dems and media for pushing a hoax or panic are bare balderdash.  Meanwhile, Friday at the CPAC fiasco Mick Mulvaney told a cheering crowd that impeachment was the “hoax of the day”  and now the press thinks the coronavirus “is going to be what brings down the president.”.  Don't those turkeys assembled there grasp they could well be the next victims if the Trump clowns don't get their asses in gear?  Or, are they too damned dumb to figure that out?

  This tells me the Trump cretins aren't even prepared should mass quarantines be necessary and people in those isolated zones will be left to suck salt or pound sand instead of  seeing convoys arriving with food and meds. Hence, this traitor is betraying the citizens and sabotaging any useful effort to reckon with the virus, e.g.


I mean, think about it. At a rally on Friday night this asswit actually came out with saying the coronavirus concerns expressed by the rest of the sane universe is a "hoax".   That's all this stupid maggot lives by, it's his mantra for everything he feels threatened by, hoax, hoax, hoax.  But see, this Covid-19 is a genuine existential threat that has now struck 60 nations and counting  - and no attempted misdirection by Trump or his cohort will alter that reality.

The proof in the pudding will arrive this week as the stock market may well tank again, especially on seeing the virus  community spreading in the U.S. and even desperate sound bites from central banks unable to alter the  virus' spread.  Oh, and Trump with no serious plan to deal with it.  Last Friday, Fed Chair Lewis Powell managed to fend off a looming 1100 point swoon by playing cutesy and manipulating the markets by saying he was "prepared to cut interest rates". Earlier, Dotard tried the stock manipulation gambit by promising new tax cuts, i.e. if re-elected.   See e,g.

Having burped that little effort at market manipulation (to appease Herr Trump?) Powell managed to limit the last hour's dive, so the DOW rallied by 600 points to end at 357 odd points down.   A big loss but not as big as it would have been without his intervention.  Meanwhile, the NASDAQ Composite fell as much as 3.5% before bouncing higher to narrowly close in + territory. (The first time that index "has fallen that much and notched a gain for the day"  - according to the WSJ, Feb. 29, p. A1)

But this can't last and can't keep happening.  Powell, no matter how desperate to appease Trump and keep the great Bull rolling on, has exhausted virtually all his ammo and hasn't much left in case an actual recession hits.  As it well may by the fall.  Even the WSJ editorial writers on Saturday ('The Virus and the Economy' p. A14) observed:

"We've been skeptical that rate cuts can address a classic supply side shock like the coronavirus.  Fed funds are already low at 1.5- 1.75% ....If the Fed does cut rates as an insurance policy it should be prepared to raise them again quickly if the virus turns out to be less damaging."

The editors also observed how "stocks pared their losses"after Powell's little trick, noting "the Fed's psychological clout".  Or hey, maybe it's the markets' yen and eagerness for more 'crack' in the form of rate cuts to keep their Bull going on.   But even in an earlier 'Heard on the Street' piece (Feb. 28, p. B12) it was noted 'Fed Can't Inoculate The Economy') that:

"Using monetary policy to counteract the economic effects of the coronavirus would be a bit like using a hammer to unscrew a bolt"

Adding:

"Investors only began waking up to the coronavirus threat this week, and the actual fallout could prove worse than they expect."

Given that short lead time of awareness, we will now be in the 2nd week when the clear economic shutdowns, adjustments begin to sink in - as numerous companies lay off staff, businesses retrench and airline travel is all but halted.  With more economic impacts and the awareness of the hits from them - fewer people going out shopping, eating out, many businesses shuttered, schools closed - forcing parents to take their guaranteed unpaid leave- things will get much worse.  I expect the DOW then, to sink another 8-10 % in the next few weeks, possibly ending up in Bear market territory.

I also expect any more tricks or efforts at manipulation of the markets by Powell - or Trump using happy talk- will not work. Stocks will remain volatile even if some minor recovery 'burps' manifest. But it is nothing to be permanently embraced.  The same  WSJ piece goes on to note:

"The Fed's aim when it eases policies - both cutting overnight rates and in the extraordinary measures  implemented in response to the financial crisis - is to induce businesses and households to borrow and spend more, and save less ."

But this is a fool's errand given both households and businesses will pull in their spending in an extended quarantine scenario.  You can be sure no member of any sensible household will go out dining to run the risk of possible infection, or bowling or going to the cinema, or concerts. Meanwhile, afflicted with many sick workers - or workers whose kids are home from school because schools are closed, they will have to adapt. That means less productivity, fewer profits, larger inventories piling up as factories and warehouses close.  Never mind, as the economic pain threatens even more, some central banks will try to tweak reality any which way they think they can. And yeah, some subset of investors will bite, and maybe most for a time.

In a separate Heard on the Street' piece (Feb. 26, p. B12, 'There Isn't Any Playbook For This Virus Epidemic')  we find the core of the problem on why  those investors who remain deluded are in for a shock.  That is:

"Many on Wall Street  are still adhering to the SARS analogy, even as evidence mounts that the coronavirus outbreak will last longer and spread much further.."

Once the 'Street' grasps this, Katie bar the door, because it will be every investor for himself. We also know the big institutional and corporate investors will be first to bolt as they have most to lose- or so they reckon.   As pointed out in the same piece:

"The epidemic's upshot  may be far steeper market drops and at least local recessions."

But I suspect the recession will be global, as the supply chains close almost completely by the fall, and people have no where to go to spend money - and without consumers, businesses will have no choice but to exact layoffs or close.  Again, the same piece observes:

"Already the interruption of the supply chain from China and now South Korea is more significant than many appreciate and could worsen even if the virus is contained.."

Up to now, I doubt even 1 in 10 Americans has a full appreciation of this supply chain network vulnerability and the consequences of collapse, and difficulties in reinstatement.  The only media person I see even remotely paying any attention to this aspect is Rachel Maddow.

Of course,  it is possible there may be a slight 'bump' in stocks early in the week, as investors try to pin their hopes on central banks (like the Fed)  to provide a "stimulus" to counteract the worst effects of COVID-19;  But this is myopic, magical thinking and even if the markets let collective hearts rule their heads it won't last long.  By the end of the week I predict the DOW and S&P 500 will still be in negative territory.  (Ok, let me put it this way: If that doesn't materialize I will have to re-evaluate investors' grounding in reality, or whether they are snorting too much coke,  or ingesting excess MJ candies to steady nerves.)

As for Trump, we can be sure he will keep beating his "hoax"  drum even as the cases and deaths mount and more and more citizens see he's incapable of performing the most basic presidential duty: protecting American citizens.  This orange-hued pestilence will have to learn the hard way that viruses, pandemics are not influenced or managed by autocratic idiots who think they can control the world with tweets, or subverted sycophants.

See also:





And:

And:







Maureen Dowd

Trump Makes Us Ill

And:



And:


Excerpt:
"The threat of a global pandemic is not only troubling from a health and safety standpoint, but also, from a business standpoint. Joe Pinsker, a staff writer for The Atlantic, examines coronavirus’ effect on the stock market in an article published this week, and he sheds some light on why investors react as they do.

"The global stock market is, theoretically, the distillation of how investors think everything that happens in the world will play out in the economy,” Pinsker explains. “Right now, judging by these drops, investors are much less optimistic than they were a week ago. But what they’re predicting is not only how bad the outbreak could be in terms of workers staying home sick, drops in consumer spending or supply-chain disruptions; it’s also how bad people think it could be. Those might turn out to be two very different things.”

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Another Reason Trump Needs To Be Removed ASAP - His Destruction of the Environment & American Science

 
"I wanna poison all of you with chemicals and destroy all real science. I just need enough dumb trolls to do it!"

There are over a hundred reasons I can think of for wanting to see the end of Trump's miserable, regressive, autocratic reign.  This despite the fact his Trumpkin zombies, lackeys  and trolls have vowed a "civil war" if he isn'r re-elected. (Can we now agree they all need several rounds of ECT?)

But the top reason for Dotard's removal is that his odious  administration has diminished the role of science in federal policy making to the extent it borders on the irrelevant.  The tactics have included gutting or marginalizing EPA regulations,  as I'd written about in previous posts, e.g.


 And relentlessly lying on climate change and its impacts, e.g.

The Trump Administration's Biggest Climate Lies | The Nation

Also halting or disrupting research projects nationwide,  as well as relocating two agricultural agencies and their staff to the hinterlands of a red state - instead  of D.C.   These are vital agencies  that fund crop science and study the economics of farming.   (Nearly 600 employees had less than four months to decide whether to uproot and move. Most couldn’t or wouldn’t, and two-thirds of those facing transfer left their jobs.)

The rat-faced maggot Mick Mulvaney, head of OMB, admitted his churlish crimes in videotaped remarks at a Republican Party gala in South Carolina.  - when he blabbed (just like he did when he admitted 'quid pro quo' was part of Trumpian policy):

"It’s nearly impossible to fire a federal worker.   But by simply saying to people, ‘You know what, we’re going to take you outside the bubble, outside the Beltway, outside this liberal haven of Washington, D.C., and move you out in the real part of the country,’ and they quit. What a wonderful way to sort of streamline government and do what we haven’t been able to do for a long time.”

Yes, Mick, what a wonderful way for a deplorable rat like you to remove dedicated scientists who'd been working their asses off - not for their own interest, but for farmers in flyover land.  An exodus which has led to upheaval.

To fix ideas,  the Economic Research Service, dozens of planned studies into topics like dairy industry consolidation and pesticide use have been delayed or disrupted.   According to Laura Dodson, an economist and acting vice president of the union representing agency employees:

“You can name any topic in agriculture and we’ve lost an expert,”  

The National Institute of Food and Agriculture manages $1.7 billion in grants that fund research on issues like food safety or techniques that help farmers improve their productivity. The staff loss, employees say, has held up hundreds of millions of dollars in funding, such as planned research into pests and diseases afflicting grapes, sweet potatoes and fruit trees.

Meanwhile, political appointees have shut down government studies, reduced the influence of scientists over regulatory decisions and in some cases pressured researchers not to speak publicly. The administration has particularly challenged scientific findings related to the environment and public health opposed by industries such as oil drilling and coal mining. It has also impeded research around human-caused climate change (see previous link), which  Trump has dismissed despite a global scientific consensus.

But readers  should note that the erosion of science reaches well beyond the environment and climate: In San Francisco, a study of the effects of chemicals on pregnant women has stalled after federal funding abruptly ended. In Washington, D.C., a scientific committee that provided expertise in defending against invasive insects has been disbanded. 

Industry groups have expressed support for some of the moves, including a contentious E.P.A. proposal to put new constraints on the use of scientific studies in the name of transparency. Perhaps the biggest enabler of cancers of all  - the American Chemistry Council-   praised the proposal by saying, “The goal of providing more transparency in government and using the best available science in the regulatory process should be ideals we all embrace.”

Translation:  "The goal of shutting down scientific studies that expose our multitude of carcinogens is welcome and ought to be embraced by all industry titans and fellow polluters."

This PR agenda includes diminishing the impact of chemical toxins by soft soaping them, e.g

Recall also  in one past post I linked to internal documents showing that political officials at the E.P.A. overruled the agency’s career experts on several occasions, including in a move to regulate asbestos more lightly, in a decision not to ban the pesticide chlorpyrifos and in a determination that parts of Wisconsin were in compliance with smog standards. The Interior Department sidelined its own legal and environmental analyses in advancing a proposal to raise the Shasta Dam in California.

No surprise, given this, EPA staffing has fallen to its lowest levels in at least a decade. More than two-thirds of respondents to a survey of federal scientists across 16 agencies said that hiring freezes and departures made it harder to conduct scientific work. And in June, the White House ordered agencies to cut by one-third the number of federal advisory boards that provide technical advice

Betsy Smith, a climate scientist with more than 20 years of experience at the E.P.A. who in 2017 saw her long-running study of the effects of climate change on major ports get canceled.

“Now we feel like the E.P.A. is being run by the fossil fuel industry,” she said. “It feels like a wholesale attack.”   After her project was killed, Dr. Smith resigned.

At a time when the United States is pulling back from world leadership in other areas like human rights or diplomatic accords, experts warn that the retreat from science is no less significant. Many of the achievements of the past century that helped make the U. S.  an envied global power, including gains in life expectancy, lowered air pollution and increased farm productivity are the result of the kinds of government research now under pressure.  In the words of  Wendy E. Wagner, a professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin who studies the use of science by policymakers.:

“When we decapitate the government’s ability to use science in a professional way, that increases the risk that we start making bad decisions, that we start missing new public health risks,” 

For reference, at the University of California, San Francisco, one such center has been studying how industrial chemicals such as flame retardants in furniture could affect placenta and fetal development. Key aspects of the research have now stopped.  E.g.


All of which discloses we need to get rid of this pestilence of an administration as soon as feasible, hopefully by the time of the general election.  One hopes the NY Times'  David Brooks' forecast will come true: That is, the biggest landslide against a sitting president in American history.  One can only hope!

See also:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/opinion/trump-environment.html

And:
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/09/794857523/trump-administration-proposes-major-changes-to-bedrock-environmental-law

 

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Targeted For A Scapegoat, Sondland Tosses Whole Trump Cabal Under The Bus With 'Quid Pro Quo' Assertions

Image result for brane space, Michael Cohen

"You might call it a two-fer for Putin if you can push a conspiracy theory so far that it's animating a branch of the United States government that has become the last refuge of those who want to defend the indefensible." -  Ari Melber, this morning on 'Morning Joe'

Over the first three days of testimony in the impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump, Republicans have tried out a number of defenses. After the Wednesday testimony of Gordon Sondland, Trump’s ambassador to the European Union, almost all of them have been incinerated."  - Michelle Goldberg, NY Times., ' Donald Trump's Gordon Problem'

It was perhaps the defining day of the House Impeachment hearings as Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland - within minutes elapsed of his opening statement - delivered a devastating blow to  Trump, confirming the existence of a quid pro quo with Ukraine and insisting: “We followed the president’s orders.”  Of course, Dotard tried to deny it claiming he insisted "No quid pro quo!" BUT....that was days AFTER the whistle blower had outed him, and scrutiny of the infamous July 25 phone call had begun.

So Trump's yelp was actually a bald lie. YES, Quid pro quo!  Or in more common parlance: Bare ass bribery!

Sondland, to put it mildly, stunned Washington with his bombshell evidence that blew a hole in the White House’s absurd defenses, and also implicated numerous senior officials, including Pompeo, Giuliani, Bolton, Mulvaney, Mike Pence - and the Big Boy - Baby Dotard himself. In other words the whole Trump cabal of criminals and grifters.  So of course they'd holler and deflect like the stuck pigs they are - trotting out every lame excuse or suspect explanation under the Sun.  But which anyone with an IQ over room temperature digits could see through.

I mean, as Gordo put it: "I could see 2 plus 2 is 4".

Our eyes fixed on the tube from just after 7 a.m. local time to past 1 p.m. Janice and I marveled as Sondland related his story to  a TV audience of millions.  It included how Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, sought to condition an Oval Office meeting with the new Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in exchange for politically motivated investigations of Trump’s rivals.

Sondland, a wealthy hotelier and Trump donor - now being victimized by thousands of Trumpies on Yelp (with 1 -star ratings for his hotel in Oregon),  told those assembled in the chamber:

"I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes."

By this time Janice and I were certain Trump's blood pressure was soaring even as  Gordo further  asserted that an Oval Office meeting with Trump was dependent on Ukraine announcing investigations into Burisma, a gas company linked to the son of former vice-president Joe Biden.  Both Biden and Burisma were at the center of  a widely discredited Russian-spawned conspiracy theory that Ukraine planted evidence on a server of the Democratic party to show Russia interfered in the 2016 election.  The name given to the company and its secret server hidden in the Ukraine was "Crowdstrike".   It has since become the top obsession and fetish of Trump's pet monkeys including Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan (whose antics yesterday reminded me of a half -crazed Barbary Ape on angel dust) and John Ratcliffe, aka "Rat man".

Gordo further elaborated:


"Mr Giuliani’s requests were a quid pro quo for arranging a White House visit for President Zelenskiy.  Mr Giuliani demanded that Ukraine make a public statement announcing investigations of the 2016 election/DNC server and Burisma. Mr Giuliani was expressing the desires of the president of the United States, and we knew that these investigations were important to the president.”
Sondland  did acknowledge, under scattershot Repuke questioning, that  he never heard directly from Trump that the security assistance hinged on an announcement of investigations, adding that the conclusion was his “own personal guess”. But by early September, he added, “it was abundantly clear to everyone that there was a link”.  And this was also clear to anyone with half a brain and the sense to connect the dots. NO over thinking needed, as the likes of the Reepos' Jim Jordan, or Ratcliffe would expect.




The only shaky part of  Sondland's testimony was "his insistence that he was ignorant of the connection between Burisma and the Bidens when he pressed Ukraine for investigations is hardly" -   as Michelle Goldberg noted.  I also found that this stretched credulity as did Janice.  
But one didn't even have to get into the further elaborations.  Sondland's  19-page opening statement was a potential death blow to Trump’s fight against impeachment, demolishing talking points made by House Republicans and conservative media. Of course, given Trump is a compulsive liar, he attempted to recast its significance,  spouting "NO more need for impeachment!"
Au contraire, schwein hund! Enormous need now for impeachment of your fat orange ass!
Sondland’s evidence also raises questions over the future of  Rudy Giuliani, aka Nosferatu the Vampire Reeptardo , e.g.
Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling
This is the Trump pandering slimeball who pushed hard for the investigations in Ukraine in the first place.  This despite having no official diplomatic role.  Like the other Trump reprobates, Giuliani (who had business interests of his own in Ukraine), has refused to testify or hand over documents to the impeachment investigation despite a subpoena.
Now it will be fun watching all these Trumpite ratfuckers - which is what they are, i.e. the original colloquial name for the Nixonian era dirty tricksters (like Gordon Liddy and Roger Stone) - go down in  flames.
If yesterday's hearings marked  a "bombshell" today's ought to be a double -rigged "IED" as Dr. Fiona Hill and David Holmes explode - each in their own way- the ignorant Russian conspiracy tropes and nonsense to which the Reeptards have clung.

Today, you might say, is a major day of reckoning, to see if the GOP really is an arm of the Russian security services. In which case all the guilty parties - from Nunes, to Jordan and Ratcliffe on down, ought to be hung, drawn and quartered along with Donald J. Trump.

See also:


Excerpt:

"The pundits and talking heads keep looking at the polls and noting that the dial on Donald Trump and the impeachment has barely moved. With the implication that it is stuck unto eternity. It takes time for the change to percolate and become our morning coffee. Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, has changed things on multiple levels."

And:




Excerpt:

"Closing the barn door two years too late, the editor of The Hill this week announced that the publication is going to review all the dubious Ukraine conspiracy reporting John Solomon did while he worked there as an executive vice president. We "are reviewing, updating, annotating with any denials of witnesses, and when appropriate, correcting any [of Solomon's] pieces referenced during the ongoing congressional inquiry," announced Bob Cusack.


Solomon is a well-documented fabulist who essentially works for the Republican Party, helping it launder its smear campaigns in public. At The Hill, Solomon played a leading role in advancing debunked claims about Ukraine and the supposed corruption of Joe Biden's son. For years, The Hill published the equivalent of a 9/11 Truther, but only now is the publication going to look back and see if something went wrong. "

And:

And:

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Adam Schiff & House Dems Must Ensure Impeachment Hearings Don't Descend Into A Circus


The main Reepo  ape,  Jim Jordan, left  - already under investigation for his role in ignoring Ohio State students' complaints of sexual attacks,  has been appointed to disrupt the impeachment hearings. This cannot be allowed.

"Republicans appointing Jordan to the Intel committee signals that they will not fight this on the facts.  They'll not fight other than rhetorically, using demonization of these witnesses, trying to impugn their character and their motives.  This is to be a political fire fight and they are bringing in one of their political fire fighters with a rhetorical flame thrower."  - John Heilemann last night on 'Last Word'

"What we will hear from Republicans is not an argument about the facts or about the Founders' view of impeachment. It will be geared towards a Republican reelection strategy in 2020.  This grievance politics that Republicans are victims. This will be about keeping their base and ensuring there's no erosion of Republican voters."  - David Jolly last night on 'Last Word'

Let us accept as a proposition the Trump ass lickers and enablers - also known as House Republicans - have nothing to offer in the way of the impeachment hearings. Nothing other than to try to trot out their usual half-baked conspiracy theories about the Bidens in Ukraine and trying to out the whistle blower.  At the top of this classless, nefarious bunch of reprobates is Jim Jordan, already facing new accusations he ignored warnings of sexual transgressions at Ohio State. But what would you expect of this toadie ape? Well, what you'd expect of all the Trumpie -serving cabal? Subservience and sycophancy to their master and the total absence of any moral center or compass.

That is why Jordan has been appointed as top disruptor for the impeachment public hearings,  to try to turn them into a clown show or circus.  As long as a week ago, Axios and other sources reported that Republicans formally made Rep. Jim Jordan a member of the House Intelligence Committee, a move that will allow him  to lead the party's specious PR  "defender" of Trump during public impeachment hearings tomorrow.

In case you're wondering why I employ scare quotes, it's because there is no genuine defense possible at all. Dotard the traitor committed impeachable offenses out in the open and even openly admitted to them in his released transcript.   This was by way of his extortion- shakedown of the Ukrainian president , Volodymyr Zelensky. 

As former acting solicitor general Neal Katyal wrote in a TIME essay ('The Case For Impeachment', Nov. 18, p. 39 ):

"If  Trump's efforts to coerce Ukraine into interfering with American democracy had stayed a secret until the 2020 election - if a whistle blower hadn't spoken out - we would have fundamentally, perhaps irrevocably, lost faith in the legitimacy of our republic. 

That is why there is no choice but to impeach and remove Trump: because he was willing to undermine our democracy to help his prospects of re-election; because he has stated unapologetically that he wold do it again; and most important, because he wielded the powers of his office for personal benefit instead of for the benefit of the people."


So, no, Jordan's alleged defense  will merely be a side show of distractions, non sequitur fake arguments and misdirection.  Basically,a spiel of spurious claims designed to  try to get Americans (any who watch the hearings) to take their eye off the ball of Trump the traitor's guilt.   Jordan's mission then is not to be a fair arbiter and questioner- but rather one of sabotage - to undermine our democracy and the constitutional process as badly as Trump has.

We know he will also try to resort to the usual bullshit  process arguments, i.e. that the Dems holding the witness depositions in secret makes them "illegitimate" and "unconstitutional"..  Never mind these were the actual rules drawn up by the Repukes themselves in 2015.  But since these maggots lack any sense of irony, and are stoked with hypocrisy on steroids, they believe they can get away with this codswallop.

While it's true Jordan is basically a clown primed for disruption, it is also true, as Axios notes:
  • Jordan has quickly become House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff's counterpart as the face of Republicans' defense so far. Unlike Devin Nunes, Jordan has been present at every deposition, according to transcripts he has already actively participated in questioning witnesses, and is among the first to speak in front of the cameras when the committees emerge from closed-door hearings.
  • Jordan’s general counsel Steve Castor is now shared staff with the House Intelligence Committee, and will be leading the 45 minutes of staff questions Republicans get next week during public hearings..
Let me quickly point out here that the actual ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is Devin Nunes, not Jordan.  In other words, the proper GOP role in these impeachment hearings ought to have gone to Nunes. So why isn't he involved in that role, allowing Jordan (a refugee from the House Oversight and Reform committee) to supersede him?

A key clue here is that to snatch 'brownie points'  Jordan appeared  on “Fox & Friends” last Tuesday, when he bellowed: “I want to help the country see the truth here, that President Trump didn’t do anything wrong. And what the Democrats are doing is partisan, it’s unfair and frankly, it’s ridiculous.”

Nunes, meanwhile, has been up to his eyeballs trying to tamp down a farcical clown show that erupted after he filed a   $250 million lawsuit against Twitter for allowing two fake accounts: Devin Nunes' Cow and Devin Nunes' Mom.   Rather than seeing the accounts as  raw forms of humor and free speech, Nunes lost it and pressed ahead despite being lampooned  across social media for taking them so seriously.  In effect, he  filed the lawsuit against the social media company and three individual users in Virginia state court in March, and is seeking a quarter billion in damages for defamation.

Also, in effect, Nunes showed himself to be too much damaged goods to lead any impeachment charge against  Adam Schiiff, or the star witnesses (e.g. William Taylor), or the other House Dems on the Intel committee overseeing the hearings.

When you watch the hearings tomorrow pay attention to the distracting diversions Jordan will attempt to use in trying to turn the proceedings into a sham investigation into Hunter Biden and the whistle blower.  An 18-page memo on "strategy" disclosed on CBS this morning exposes the balderdash these imps will try to use to snooker the American public - hoping its critical thinking skills don't pass muster. This includes:

1) The evidence does not prove that Trump "pressured Ukraine, covered up misconduct or obstructed justice".

2) The evidence only shows Trump was interested in combating legitimate corruption in the Ukraine, a "concern that stemmed from his deep seated, reasonable and genuine skepticism about the country."

All of which is irrelevant claptrap, of course. Indeed, no 'quid pro quo' is really required for the impeachable offense, only the solicitation - which Trump clearly did. As Lawrence O'Donnell observed last night it might be best for the Dems to drop the quid pro quo emphasis entirely as an unnecessary euphemism (apart from which those 3 Latin words are merely obscuring more than they're saying, according to many political commenters, e.g. David  Jolly last night on O'Donnell's program)  Bear in mind the simpler the case made the easier it will be to get the majority of citizens on board, to impeach and remove Trump.

In any case,  as CBS' reporter on the issue - Nancy Cortes- even noted after dispensing these two gems:

"However, according to the testimony of two diplomatic aides released on Monday, the president actually bought into some conspiracy theories about Ukraine, insisting at one White House meeting that Ukraine tried to take him down. One aide said they worried that if these theories- pushed by Giuliani - took hold, i.e. that the Ukrainian government was an enemy of Trump, it would be very hard to have high level engagement with that country."

Adding:

"Another diplomatic aide, Catherine Croft, testified it was Mick Mulvaney - the acting White House chief of staff, who placed the temporary hold on Ukraine military aid this summer at the direction of the president, just before the president's July phone call with the president of the Ukraine- where he told him he 'wanted him to do him a favor, though'. 

And in the first testimony by a military  official, Laura Cooper - the assistance Secretary of Defense, testified that even the Pentagon was in the dark about why this aid was being held up. She said her understanding was the Ukrainians did know the aid was being held up this summer. And that's important because it runs counter to the GOP argument that the president couldn't have been pressuring the Ukrainians to investigate Biden because they didn't even know that their aid had been held up."

So in other words, all we're going to get from Jordan and the House Reeps are lies, subterfuge and smokescreens, to try to protect the Traitor - in -chief.

The job of Adam Schiff is to play the role of referee and ensure: a) nothing that doesn't pass the basic facts smell test is allowed at any time, say to distract viewers from the core issue of Trump's extortion, and b) firm control is kept over the whole proceedings to make sure it doesn't devolve into a circus side show. If that means   - after the nth Reeptard irrelevant "point of order" -  sending in the Sergeant-at-arms to frog march Jordan and his imps out, so be it.

  This is particularly critical as more and more media buy into the false narrative pumped by FOX News, Dotard and his GOP quislings and enablers.  (See last link below).  The sad fact is the corporate media are in over their head in covering most of what the GOP and Trump cabal are up to. In particular, my main beef is allotting their talking points way too much air play and credibility - as opposed to dismissing them as the irrelevant malarkey they are.  The result is saddling too many  fellow citizens with skewed perceptions.

See also:


by Cody Fenwick | November 12, 2019 - 7:55am |

And: 


Bill Blum's picture
Article Tools E-mail | Print Comments (1)