Suppose, for the sake of argument, that polluting refineries and related facilities were allowed to operate without air pollution permits and little if any oversight? That now seems to be the case with the notorious Suncor refinery (in Adams County, CO) . As I posted about just over two years ago- Suncor had reported an "opacity event"- for which details were posted on the company’s Facebook page . It then claimed that "company tests showed air quality in surrounding neighborhoods were within acceptable levels." But what does that mean exactly when the company has been operating with an expired air pollution permit since before then? (As reported in The Denver Post, March 13, p. 1B)
Questions were especially needed, in the wake of that December 11, 2019 event, after the South Adams County Fire Dept got a call to investigate a strange odor. And oh yeah, kids at Adams City Middle School were advised to "shelter in place" even as vehicles in Commerce City were being covered in ash. (Late in the afternoon, Suncor Energy admitted the ash had emanated from its facility.)
Incredibly, the Colorado Dept. of Public Heatlh (CDPH) further found it necessary to elaborate on the company's esoteric terms ("operational upset") and relations to the event itself, e.g.
In the most recent update (D. Post, ibid.) we have learned that early last month the Air Quality Control Division sent a "proposed permit renewal to the Environmental Protection Agency for approval." Fair enough, but what can we expect? The residents of Commerce City, and Adams County and the whole of the state of Colorado? Well, according to the Post account, "the EPA will finish its review on March 26 and send the draft version back to the state with any recommended revisions," So far so good, but will it be enough to halt the Suncor 'operational upsets' and 'opacity events'?
Evidently, according to the Post account the permit renewal is "already being criticized by community activists because it won't be more restrictive on Suncor's operations and also allow the company to continue to violate the Federal Clean Air Act". Inquiring minds want to know how this can be given the company's checkered history with polluting events.
The state itself has given a mixed response and not entirely satisfactory. We read for example: "The state has said the proposed permit will crack down on some emissions while increasing the limits for others."
Say again? Increasing the limits for others? How so? For what chemicals? Well, if the EPA approves the permit renewal Suncor would be allowed to get away with releasing more "volatile organic compounds" which form ground level ozone. The current limit would be increased by 138 tons a year, while particulate soot (of the sort that is no good for my bronchiecstasis) can be increased by 11 tons a year. On the positive side, the new permit will limit the amounts of sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide that can be emitted by its refinery. So I guess we ought to be grateful for small mercies. Especially, given it provides so many jobs as part of the fracking industry.
Another positive outcome relates to Colorado working on a new water quality permit for Suncor. This would (hypothetically) put tighter restrictions on the company when it comes to water contamination - especially given the facility sits along Sand Creek in Adams County. Can the company be trusted to toe the line for any such waste dumping into the Creek? Most residents don't buy it insisting the company has already shown itself too willing to cut corners in any self regulation schemes.
Thus, "even with new monitoring and more restrictive permits neighbors remain leery of Suncor's willingness to change." According to one resident:
"Self-regulation does not work. Self-monitoring does not work. They've been doing that for a century."
Well, hope springs eternal in Colorado citizens' hearts and we hope to see a long time energy scofflaw finally turn changeling this year. But we aren't going to hock the farm to make any bets!
See Also:
What's polluting Colorado's air? 125 million tons a year of heat ...
And:
And:
by Richard Heinberg | March 17, 2022 - 5:23am | permalink
No comments:
Post a Comment