Tuesday, October 27, 2020

Colorado Climate Scientists Warn Of A Fiery And Smoke-Choking Future

 

                                                                             

When the images came over Janice's cell phone early Thursday we knew our niece (Vanessa - who sent them) and her hubby, were in the midst of a stark and sudden emergency. They had received the order to evacuate their home in northern Colorado - between Estes Park and Fort Collins - and had barely an hour to gather all their belongings and escape.   Why?  Well the Cameron Peak fire (largest in Colorado history) was bearing down on them from the north, and the East Troublesome fire threatened from the east.  

Their story is one of thousands told in the wake of the four largest wildfires in the state's history.  Scenes accompanying all the stories showing not only the towering flames but the lines of vehicles trying to escape the mobile infernos. (Only now somewhat calmed after a major snow storm last night.)   Fortunately Vanessa and hubby, Mitch,  already had an emergency plan in case they had to evacuate.  Here in a fire state like Colorado, we all have one - which entails putting all valuables (including passports, Social Security and Medicare cards. ID etc.) in easily portable compact safes or briefcases.  Also, having necessary clothes - for at least a week- packed up in suitcases.

It is now becoming absolutely clear these fires - and likely the ones before them (in 2012)  are tied to global warming - climate change. Look, it no longer requires a Mensa level I.Q. to see that the direct effects have arrived and are hurting tens of thousands of Coloradans - not just from the flames themselves -  but the choking air- exposing hundreds of thousands to heavy particulates discharged into the atmosphere.

Look no further than Commerce City teacher Renee Chacon, quoted in the Sunday Denver Post (p. 12A):  "We're choking ourselves to death!"   She concluded this after desperately closing her home's windows against an ominous, billowing, gray-brown barrage.  Engendering scenes such as that below in Fraser, when Carole Roberts had to escape to her friend's home.  

Smoke is a serious threat because first, it affects 30 to 40 times more people than the fires themselves. Second, it can leave long-lasting, devastating health problems in its wake.  As people inhale the particulates which lodge in their lungs and clog airways, heart, and lung function are stretched to their limits.  In a time of Covid, this is especially dire.  Dr. Emily Fischer, quoted in the Denver Post piece, warns:

"Multiple weeks and even months of exposure to fire smoke will lead to increased respiratory infections and mortality."  

 She went on to note that the increased hospitalizations occur especially for those with asthma and COPD.

Getting back to the fires themselves, we now have records that show  that 8 of Colorado's 20 largest  "megafires" - including this year's Cameron Peak fire- hit after 2018. Also, all occurred in the last two decades, while the three largest occurred in the last three months

Basically, three aggravating factors have incepted Colorado's biggest, most fearsome fires: 1) higher temperatures, 2) prolonged drought and 3) the rendering of thousands of acres of hollowed out trees into fire tinder.

Both (1) and (2) are directly traced to global warming, and (3) can be as well.  I actually highlighted the role of (3) and the pest known as the mountain pine beetle in a June 27, 2012 blog post.   Therein I referenced a book entitled  The Dying of the Trees.   and provided a link  showing the beetle is a major catalyst in Colorado's wild fires, e.g.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/science/18trees.html?pagewanted=all

In respect of (1)  we now know Colorado's average temperature has increased 2 F since 1990 - faster than the global rate of increase, with temperatures in western Colorado increasing even more.   Nor will things get better, especially if we continue to sit on our asses and do nothing in terms of controlling fossil fuels.   In the words of state climatologist Russ Schumacher (ibid.):

"And we will see years hotter than we've ever had.  There's very high confidence in the climate science community that this warming is going to continue...and because the atmosphere is 'thirstier' in hot years, what moisture you have goes away more quickly."

This brings us to (2) where we learn that  "97 percent of the state of Colorado has now been classified in "extreme drought".  And  "across the Southwest, rising temperatures are drawing down water supplies, especially in the Colorado River basin where the crucial Lake Mead reservoir (which supplies Vegas) has dropped to 39 percent of capacity."

Further, "Streams and rivers will lose 4 to 5 % of water for every 1 degree temperature rise." according to Jeff Lukas author of the 2020 Colorado River Basin State of the Science report.  

 Given how record-breaking wildfires are hitting the West so hard,  it is no wonder resident climate scientists are upping their rhetoric to try to get the public's attention.   Thus, as one Colorado State University climate scientist  (Scott Denning) related to the Sunday Denver Post (p. 1A):

"We've got to get motivated and cease turning the thermostat up with our actions, or inaction. This is urgent, not a scifi thing .It is us turning up the thermostat. And it does not readily turn down.  The farther we turn it up, the worse it will get."

 But will there be any motivation to change, or for citizens to push to avert the worst consequences of climate change?  It is doubtful until we remove the pestilence of Trump and his administration and clean out the rats he's inserted in all the key agencies - from the EPA to the NOAA and beyond. In the case of the NOAA we learned recently (Denver Post) Trump "removed the agency's chief scientist (Craig McLean) and installed new political staff who have questioned accepted facts about climate change and imposed stricter controls on communication at the agency."

In other words, Trump and his  Trumpite vermin  have followed a similar gutting process to what they've done  already at the CDC.  In each case  destroying the reputations and credibility of the respective agencies as they control communications and public pressers.  Ever more reason to have these Trump cockroaches eliminated on November 3rd.

See Also:

CLIMATE CHANGE

Dealing with climate change requires more fight and less flight


Monday, October 26, 2020

Looking At Retrograde Motion

 Recall from Kepler’s 3rd or harmonic law: 


(P1/ P2)2 = k(a1/ a2)3

where P1, P2 are the periods, related to a1, a2 - the semi-major axes, as shown.

    Now, it should be clear that once the sidereal period P of a planet is known, and also the semi-major axis a(or mean heliocentric distance) then the velocity of the planet in its orbit (assumed circular) can be computed, or:

V= 2π a/ P

Hence, for two planets, the ratio of their orbital velocities is:

V2/V1 = (a2/a1) (P1/P2)

where we intentionally allow the numbers 1 and 2 to refer to the inner and outer planets, respectively. As may deduced form Kepler's 3rd law:

P1 = [(a1)3/k] ½ and T2 = [(a2)3/k]½

Substituting for T1 and T2 in the earlier form:

V2/ V1 = (a1/a2)½

    In Fig. 1, the orbits for the Earth and a superior planet are shown, and the semi-major axes are denoted by a and b, respectively. For any superior planet, b > a.
  
At opposition (the alignment SEP) the positions of Earth and planet are given as E and P, with velocity vectors V and Vp, tangential to their orbits. 

From the expression for (V2/V1),  if   Vp < V,   then the angular velocity of the planet as observed from Earth is:

 (Vp - V)/ PE 

and is in a direction opposite to the orbital motion , and hence is retrograde at opposition. 

    At the following quadrature, shown by configuration SE' P', the Earth's orbital velocity V is now along the line P'E' but the planet's velocity Vp has a component Vp sin (φ) perpendicular to E'P'. The other component, Vp cos (φ) lies along the line P'E' and - like the Earth's velocity -doesn't contribute to the observed angular velocity of the planet.

The geocentric angular velocity at quadrature is then:

Vp sin (φ)/ E'P'


Suggested Problem:

1 a) Compare the orbital velocities of Venus and Earth, if the sidereal period for Venus, T1,  is 224.69 d, and for Earth (T2) is 365.25 d.

b) Verify this by using a Table of orbital velocities for the planets - given in km/s 

 2) (a) Why doesn't the component  Vp cos (φ)   contribute  to the observed angular velocity of the planet, (i.e. in Fig. 1) ?

(b) What if the  angular velocity of the planet as observed from Earth is: 
 - (Vp - V)/ PE and parallel  to the orbital motion?

Peggy Noonan Does A 180 Flip- Becomes A Cheerleader For Trump COVID Super Spreading Rallies

 

"I know we've all grown numb to Trump's casual cruelty and his obvious inability to imagine that other people are fully real, but hot damn, it is incumbent on us who carry the dubious title of "journalist" not to let that numbness cloud our vision."- Amanda Marcotte,  'What Civil Debate?  The One I Watched Revealed Donald Trump As A Cold-Blooded Psychopath'. 

WSJ columnist Peggy Noonan, recall, wrote in her June 6-7 'Declarations' column (p. A13):

"This will not end well. With his timing he'd know it. He should give an Oval Office address announcing he's leaving: 'America, you don't deserve me'.  Truer words have never been spoken in that old place."

But wow, how 5 months can cause a major brain regression- even damage- in the Covid era!  Because Peggy now is apparently drooling over the possibility of Dotard Donnie- the top virus "donor" (Rachel Maddow's words) -  rising from the electoral ashes (WSJ, Oct. 24-25, 'A Good Night For Trump If It's Not Over', p. A13), e.g.

"Trump supporters believe he will win because of his special magic. Trump foes fear he will win because of his dark magic."   

  Uh, no, Peggy. If he should win it would be because of his mammoth cheating "magic" - including vast voter suppression as well as sabotaging the Post Office (using a toady named Louis DeJoy)  and otherwise trying to single out mail ballots as fraudulent.  Eventually taking a fraudulent challenge to mail voting to his now packed (with right wing toadies) Supreme Court - betting on a 'W'.

 But Noonan's most disgusting turn is slobbering over Trump's super spreader rallies:

  "The second data point has to do with Trump's rallies - big, boisterous and frequent. He's been in Michigan and North Carolina and has rallies planned this weekend in Ohio, Wisconsin and New Hampshire... Mr. Biden doesn't seem to draw much of anybody and doesn't try. He doesn't have rallies and barely even appearances at this point."  

Well, because Biden knows the virus is raging with new cases now up to 79,000 plus cases a day, 225,000 Americans dead and hospitals in dozens of states near capacity.  Something your beloved, looneytune ape-  who you once advised to resign - dismisses ("We're turning the corner!") .  And who with his batshit nuts rallies is indeed spreading the virus all over, sending infections "into the stratosphere". e.g.

Nuns and  MAGA idiots drool over Dotard at a super spread rally.

Noonan's being all in with Trump spreading the virus at his rally locations is evident when one then reads (ibid.,)

"You can, seeing the polls, hypothesize what you're seeing at Trump rallies is a political movement in its death throes.  But I don't know, they look pretty lively to me."

Adding:

"You might say the Democrats aren't having rallies because they are more careful about the virus. Fair enough. But in a lifetime watching politics I have never seen crowds keep away from something they love....It's funny you don't see any of this from the Democrat this year. You can't gainsay a strategy that seems to be working."

Yeah, it's working all right - infecting and killing people! (See Rachel Maddow's takedown below).  Noonan, clearly, doesn't: a) grasp the lethality of the virus, b) doesn't care about its lethality (since she demeans the Dems for not holding rallies), or Trump spreading it, and c) doesn't care about the virus overrunning hospitals.   Hence, one must conclude she loves the fact of Trump holding his rallies and seeding the virus in all the battleground states.  Exaggeration?   I don't believe so, as we learned  over the weekend 43 states now have cases exploding with many of these Trump recent rally states.   

Which is why Rachel Maddow referred to him as an "epidemiological menace" on Friday.   As she pointed out, using clips from both Bloomberg News and USA Today:

"When U.S. cases started climbing in mid-September,  Trump did not alter his campaign schedule, but continued holding an average of four rallies a week.  Trump's campaign made stops nationwide, and coronavirus cases surged in his wake in at least five places."

Maddow then noted how he appeared in Blue Earth County, MN after which the Covid cases shot up from 15% to 24%.  Then on to Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania whose cases went from 3%  to more than 7 percent afterward (with 5% the normative threshold for opening schools, businesses).  Most galling and mind blowing:  

"Even in states where cases were already rising, the spikes in at least four counties that hosted Trump rallies far surpassed their states' overall growth rates.  In two counties it was more than double.  In Beltrami County, Minnesota,  cases swelled by 35 percent compared to the state's 14 percent    In Marathon County, Wisconsin the cases surged by 67 percent after Trump's visit compared to Wisconsin's overall growth rate of 29 percent during the same time."

As Maddow added:  "It is one thing to be mad at this president for the botched response to this pandemic with over 220, 000 of our fellow Americans dead.   Including that we just learned how he disbanded the vaccine safety office last year.   It's one thing to be mad at this president for the worst botched Covid response for any nation on Earth- one that keeps getting worse over time.   It's getting larger and larger while the president is doing more than anything else to spread it.   

But it's another thing to come to the realization that he really is Johnny Appleseed seeding this thing all over the country.  I mean, he's like a universal donor for this thing. His campaign, his ego-feeding desire to do mass, in-person events - even in places with older people.  This isn't just callous or tone deaf, that is one of the things driving this into the stratosphere just before an election.  He's an epidemiological menace. I mean that not only in how he is governing, but in how he's actively spreading this thing."  

 Leave it to Maddow to  totally splatter Noonan's brainless extolling of Trump's rallies as some kind of energetic, liberating events.  Having shown the link of the rallies to major virus spread it follows that Peggy's love of the rallies means she must also love Trump spreading the virus.  There is no other logical conclusion, and pleading ignorance of the stats is no excuse - especially as a journalist. Thereby  Noonan's been exposed as a know-nothing Trumper bimbo -  as opposed to the circumspect and skeptical observer she had originally portrayed herself. (When she recommended he resign back in June).   

So the jig is up on Noonan and what she is really about.   More than 41,000 people are currently hospitalized with the coronavirus in the United States, a 40 percent rise in the past month.  Meanwhile, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services on Friday  reported a seven-day average of 3,470 new COVID-19 cases — the highest ever — as well as 42 deaths due to the virus.   All this as Dotard brought his Covid infection rally to Waukesha

It is beyond belief Noonan doesn't know any of  this.  But it is clear from reading her latest column she doesn't give a god-damn.  She's more enthralled by the thrill of Trump's rallies and the excitement she craves as a latter day Reeptard political hack.  

Of course, one might suggest she check out Leslie Stahl's interview with Trump on '60 Minutes' which will show the deranged asswipe for the con man, liar and psychopath  he really is.  But that may be asking too much, because clearly her mind is already made up.   As if it ever changed in the first place.

See Also:

Friday, October 23, 2020

Solutions To Astronomy Stationary Point Problems

 



1) Mars reaches a stationary point 36 ½ days after opposition. Its elongation is then measured to be 136.2 deg. Given that the sidereal period is 687 days, find the distance of Mars from Earth in AU. Also, find the time to its next stationary point.

Solution: First obtain Mars synodic periodS:

Using : 1/ S = 1/P1 - 1/P2

With P1 = Earth's sidereal period (1 yr), and P2 = Mars sidereal  (687/365.25) = 1.88 yr

Then:

1/S = 1 – 1/1.88 = 1 – 0.5319 = 0.468 yr

Whence: S = 1/0.468 = 2.13 yrs. (or 779.9 days)

Mars’ distance from Earth is PE from the diagram in the  original blog post, so b may be obtained from:

b - a cos Θ = PE cos φ

and: PE = (b - a cos Θ)/ cos φ

Now (given a = 1 and b = 1.52):

cos Θ = [Ö a  Ö b (Ö aÖb)]  / (a 3/2 + b3/2 )

= [
Ö (1.52) ( Ö (1) + Ö (1.52))]/ ((1) 3/2 + (1.52) 3/2)


cos Θ = 0.958

so: Θ = 16.7 o

And the angle of elongation (136.2) is (in terms of the geometry):

136.2 = 180 – (Θ + φ)

So we can solve for φ:

φ = 180 – 136.2 – 16.7 = 27.1 o

Now:

PE = (b - a cos Θ)/ cos φ

= (1.520 – 0.958)/ cos (27.1) = (0.562)/0.890 = 0.631

So the distance of Mars from Earth denoted by PE (at stationary point) = 0.631 AU

The time to next stationary point:

r/2   = Θ/ 360 x S

where: (given a =1, b = 1.52):

So:

r/2   = Θ/ 360 x S = (16.7)/360 x (779.9 d) = 36.1 days

2) Find the length of time Jupiter has retrograde motion in each synodic period given its heliocentric distance is 5.2 AU and its sidereal period is 11.86 years.

Solution:

First, use: 1/ S = 1/P1 - 1/P2

And thereby obtain Jupiter’s synodic period, S:

Where P1 = Earth's sidereal period (1 yr), and P2 = Jupiter’s  sidereal period (11.86 yrs)

1/S = 1 – 1/(11.86) = 1 – 0.0843 = 0.9156

Then: S = 1/ 0.9156 = 1.09 yrs. = 398.1 d

The time for retrograde (r) motion in each synodic period is:

r    =2 Θ/ 360 x S

Where:

cos Θ = [Ö a  Ö b  (Ö a + Ö b)]  / (a 3/2 + b 3/2 )

and a =1, b = 5.2, so:

cos Θ= [
Ö (5.2) (Ö  (1) + Ö  (5.2))]/ ((1) 3/2  +  (5.2)  3/2)


And: cos Θ = 0.582

So: Θ = arc cos(0.582) = 54.4 o

and the time to move retrograde over each synodic period;

 =2 Θ/ 360 x S = (2 x 54.4)/360 x (1.09 yr) = 0.329 yr. = 120.3 days


3)
In the Epsilon Eridani star system a planet designated Epsilon Eridani III is determined to have the exact same orbital parameters as Earth (e.g. a, e, i etc.). In the same system, another exoplanet designated Epsilon Eridani IV is found to have  = 4.5 km/s. a) Using your knowledge of the known parameters, plus the diagram shown, construct an appropriate parallelogram of velocities and hence obtain the angles: Θ and φ.


Solution:

We use  
= 4.5 km/s and V E   = 47 km/s for the velocities.


Since Eridani III has the same orbital parameters as Earth we can employ Earth semi-major axis, etc. in the computations. Also, a check of tables (or previous problems from earlier sets) shows Eridani IV has the same orbital velocity as Neptune so will have approximately the same sidereal period of 163.73 yrs. Now to form the parallelogram we need to obtain the angles Θ and φ.

We must first obtain the synodic period  (S)  of Eridani IV:

1/ S = 1/P1 - 1/P2

Where P1 = 1 yr (for Eridani III), and P2 = 163.7 yrs. for IV

1/S = 1 – 1/163.7 = 1 – 0.0061 = 0.9939

Then: S = 1/0.9939 = 1.006 yr. = 367.7 d

To get Θ:

cos Θ = [Ö a  Ö b (Ö a + Ö b)]  / (a 3/2 + b3/2 )

where b is Eridani IV’s semi-major axis or:

b = {[P2] 21/3  = { [163.7] 2} 1/3 = 29.9 AU

And we know a (semi-major axis for Earth) = 1 (AU) , so:

cos Θ= [
Ö (29.9) (Ö (1) + Ö (29.9))]/ ((1) 3/2 + (29.9)3/2)


cos Θ = 0.215 and Θ = arc cos(0.215) = 77.6 o

Meanwhile, by using a scaled diagram (e.g. see the example shown ) we find: 

90 + φ = 105 deg so:

φ = 105 – 90 =  15 o


b) Hence, or otherwise, estimate the time planet Epsilon Eridani IV will be moving retrograde relative to Epsilon Eridani III, and also the time between its opposition and the next stationary point.

Solution:

The time for retrograde is:

r    =  2 Θ/ 360 x S = (2 x 77.6)/ 360 x (367.7 d) = 158. 5 d

Between opposition and next stationary pt.:

r/2  = (158.5 d)/2 = 79¼ d

c) Obtain the time during Epsilon Eridani IV's synodic period that it is moving direct.

Solution:

t(D) = (1 – Θ/ 180) x S = (1 - 77.6/ 180) (367.7 d) = 209 days

(N.B. Remember these are times referred to the synodic not sidereal periods!)

Don't Be Fooled - Last Night Was Another Shit Show (Though More Subdued) - And Biden May Pay With A Much Tightened Race

 



"An avalanche of lying even by Donald Trump's standards."

- Nicole Wallace,  last night, MSNBC Debate analysis

"Perhaps, in the end, the greatest usefulness of the debates was as a vivid illustration of just how far we have fallen."  - Roger Cohen, NY Times

"I am the least racist person  in this room!"

"There's been nobody tougher than me on Russia."

- Two of the 490-odd lies spewed by Trump last night

"I don't know what debate these analysts were watching. Because the one I saw was between a normal politician, Joe Biden, and a man whose utter lack of empathy for any other human being is only matched by his baseless self-regard. The mute button only allowed Trump to speak at greater length, showcasing for all of America to see a textbook illustration of what sociopathy looks like. Afterwards, I wondered if Christian Bale had been watching, and if so, if he was worried that his star turn in "American Psycho" was too understated.

I know we've all grown numb to Trump's casual cruelty and his obvious inability to imagine that other people are fully real, but hot damn, it is incumbent on us who carry the dubious title of "journalist" not to let that numbness cloud our vision. There is something deeply wrong with that man. Anyone who listened — really listened — to him on Thursday night could see it. "  - Amanda Marcotte, see Blog post in link at bottom.

First, let's get out of the way the nature of a "shit show".   Contrary to a widespread pundit belief it does not have to be a chaotic scream fest and tantrum epic such as the Sept. 29 debate. In fact, it need not be too contentious at all, but still a shit show if one candidate lets loose an incessant stream of lies that can't be checked in real time.  With the truth literally violated second by second, total audience disrespect allowed, then shit has certainly been evacuated - and the "debate" can't even be defined down.

Such was the case last night, so let's not bandy idiotic words about how it was "much more substantive" as a debate. No, it was not! Time to get out of Fantasy land. If you want to see what a substantive debate looks like then please watch the first Kennedy-Nixon debate from September, 1960 - with link provided at the end.  This was the event that marked my entry into following U.S. politics, when  - as a 14 year old high school freshman -  I watched JFK debate Richard Nixon.   Suffice to say I was mesmerized by the presentation and deep discussion of issues which made current debates look like jokes.  Last night? It was a Joker's mock event by comparison, given how Trump's incessant lying defiled it.  If you didn't see or hear them you were not paying attention.

On Monday I warned that the best move now for Joe Biden would be to just turn down this totally unnecessary  debate. There was nothing of advantage and only much to lose.  I believe last night's Lie-athon proved it, even as some Biden supporters believe he blew Trump out of the water.  But not so

The torrent of lies from Trump - I lost count at 455 - just before I left the room and Janice screamed "Stop lying!" for the umpteenth time, was too much to handle.  Like successive hammer blows to the brain and consciousness.  These were also clearly too much for Biden to counter and the moderator to check.  Too many lies to even list here but the astute reader who has the stomach to play back the debacle from a DVR list - just the first hour-  can see and hear them first hand. 

The worst part of this entire fiasco? It was totally unnecessary and may now cost Biden 4-5 points in national polls, and probably at least two or three of the battle ground states.   I may be wrong, I hope I am, but we will see. 

Why?  Because after the first psychotic, screaming, interrupting display,  all Trump had to do is behave in a half way civilized manner to appear 100 percent more "presidential" than he did earlier.   So he took his advisers' recommendations to heart and spoke in a (mostly) calm voice but still delivered lie after lie after lie - as well as numerous distortions. 

All the lies spewed as well as outrageous claims (e.g. "Biden took $3.5   million from Russia") followed the liar's template exposed  in Bob Woodward's book RAGE (p.258). That was where we learned  from a particular Trump playbook: 'Win Bigly - Persuasion In A World Where Facts Don't Matter') that there is a method to Trump's lying madness.   

Thus "Trump's misstatements of fact are not regrettable errors or ethical lapses but part of a technique called intentional wrongness persuasion."  As proclaimed by Jared Kushner in those pages Trump "can invent any reality for most voters on most issues"  and "all you will remember is that he provided his reasons, he didn't apologize and opponents called him a liar."    That was perfectly on display last night, and because of it, the American viewing public lost, and lost big as they became victims (most of them - at least the allegedly "undecided")  of the intentional wrongness persuasion delivered by the orange scumball.  

That strategy was helped when "useful idiot" pundits appeared, like on CNN this a.m. and agreed with Trump that "Yes, Trump is correct, Biden didn't do anything much to move the needle in his eight years"  (On North Korean denuclearization)  Hello, fuckwit!  Biden wasn't President, Obama was!

It is sad that Biden participated in this travesty and it will be sadder still if the race now becomes much closer. Because what we need on November 3rd when the votes are tallied  is a blowout, landslide win. And we may now be lucky to prevail in a squeaker- thanks to Joe's false confidence to take on Trump - without fact checking - and prevail.

See also:

by Amanda Marcotte | October 24, 2020 - 7:41am | permalink

Now, for those who want to see a REAL debate, please check out this link below for the full 58 minute, first Kennedy -Nixon debate  - or go to the next link after for a clip  (8 minutes) of the same debate:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbrcRKqLSRw


Kennedy vs. Nixon - 1st 1960 Debate - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QazmVHAO0os

Aug 15, 2008 · Clip from the 1st 1960 presidential debate between Senator John F. Kennedy (D-MA) and Vice President Richard Nixon (R-CA). Held on September 26, 1960, it was...

  • Author: Major Kong
  • Views: 1M

Thursday, October 22, 2020

Lack Of Solid Political Education Means Most Americans Are Prey To Childish Assumptions, Trump Agnosticism and QAnon Conspiracy Bollocks


The visage of the classic, non-college educated, white male Trump voter - reflecting minimal political discrimination or mental acuity, awareness

Watching a so-called "undecided voter" on CBS   yesterday morning - part of the network's 'Crossroads" segment- was illuminating.  The thirtyish black woman was asked if she had made up her mind on whom  to vote for.  She hemmed and hawed - said she was initially for Biden-   but then wasn't too impressed by his behavior ("unpresidential")  in the first debate on Sept. 29th.  My explosive reaction?  WTF were you watching, lady?  Did you not see Trump's antics? See e.g.

What was most mind boggling is that this black woman from Philly had to have seen Trump's calling on the racist Proud Boys to "stand by" yet her reaction was that she still "hadn't made up her mind".  So, if she's telling the truth, she also has been infected by a rampant imbecility (which I refer to as "Trump agnosticism") affecting a large swatch of the nation.  Did she know Biden's actual policy positions?  No, she said she was going by her "feelings" and "impressions".  As Janice put it, "A total idiot!"   

Then two days ago I spotted a NY Times piece that might account for her agnosticism and that of many others.  The article began:

"The common view of American politics today is of a clamorous divide between Democrats and Republicans, an unyielding, inevitable clash of harsh partisan polarization.  But that focus obscures another, enormous gulf — the gap between those who follow politics closely and those who don’t. Call it the “attention divide.”

What we found is that most Americans — upward of 80 percent to 85 percent — follow politics casually or not at all. Just 15 percent to 20 percent follow it closely (the people we call “deeply involved”): the group of people who monitor everything from covfefe to the politics of “Cuties.”

Clearly, this black woman from Philly, on CBS for a 'battleground state' voter dialogue,  is one of those "80 percent" with minimal investment in following U.S.  politics. She goes by her gut, and evidently is oblivious to the ways a gut can mislead a voter.  Where I had issues with the Times' authors is their labeling of those with deep familiarity with the politics and issues as  "hard partisans" or "political junkies".  For example,

"Among Democrats, the political junkies think the influence of wealthy donors and interest groups is an urgent problems. But less-attentive Democrats are 25 percentage points more likely to name moral decline as an important problem facing the country — a problem partisan Democrats never even mention."

The correct term ought to have been citizens not political junkies-  which is derogatory at a basic level.  After all, it was Thomas Jefferson who first pointed out the supreme importance of the citizen in his Notes on Virginia, i.e.

"Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves therefore are its only safe depositories. AND TO RENDER THEM SAFE, THEIR MINDS MUST BE IMPROVED"

Why the difficulty?  Jefferson knew, as any intelligent American would, that being a "safe depository" in one's nation meant being attentive to its politics and political dynamics.  That includes an easy recognition of the most important, critical issues at a given time.  Is this hard to do?  Yes, of course!  Particularly when so many have competing demands on their time  - from work, to online schooling of their kids, to caretaking duties of elder parents,  to you name it.   However, none of this absolves the real citizen of the duty to improve one's mind, in this case being informed regarding a nation's political dynamic, the forces at work to either consolidate unity or destroy it.   

This isn't the case right now, which explains the sophomoric - perhaps even infantile - level of the average U.S. voter. Also, why so many have fallen into the rabbit hole of insane conspiracy ideations and movements (like QAnon) as well as becoming prey to fake news-misinformation claptrap. Thus, instead of acknowledging and understanding the fundamental differences between the two major parties, 

"Most Americans just see two angry groups of people bickering over issues that may not always seem pressing or important."

Meanwhile, treating QAnon garbage, and Trump's bombastic assertions ("we're turning the corner on this virus") and claims ("best economy ever") as important.  No surprise a backward political universe where black is white and up is down is created. 

This is pathetic to say the least.  It also dovetails with multiple survey findings of how few Americans are able to:

- Name their two state Senators

- Name the congressional representative for their district

- Name the three main branches of the federal government

-  Name  five of the Bill of Rights   

Which confirms not only a dismal lack of attention but serious ignorance derived from lack of  political education as well as deficient critical thinking. Truth be told, if this 80 percent who isn't locked in to political information (reliable!) was instead in tune and paying attention, we wouldn't see the fake news virus all over the place.

As recently as mid-June, PizzaGate was reported to have  reached  a level nearly exceeding its 2016 fever pitch, according to an analysis by The New York Times. TikTok posts with the #PizzaGate hashtag were viewed more than 82 million times from April to June. Google searches for PizzaGate reportedly skyrocketed.  All this again points to the infectious value as well as propagation value of the original meme. (Recall Pizzagate's  pushers - like Michael Flynn - claimed Hillary Clinton ran a child sex trafficking ring in the basement of a D.C. pizza parlor.)

 But this sordid episode  also underscores the inadequate political knowledge and total absence of critical thinking in those millions of indiscriminate Pizzagate consumers.

According to the Times analysis:

"In the first week of June, comments, likes and shares of PizzaGate also spiked to more than 800,000 on Facebook and nearly 600,000 on Instagram, according to data from CrowdTangle, a Facebook-owned tool for analyzing social interactions. That compares with 512,000 interactions on Facebook and 93,000 on Instagram during the first week of December 2016. From the start of 2017 through January this year, the average number of weekly PizzaGate mentions, likes and shares on Facebook and Instagram was under 20,000."

If Jefferson were alive today he'd be appalled at the mental degeneration evident in too many Americans.  Improving their minds?  Safe depositories of our collective national heritage? Hell, more like receptacles of misinformation, disinformation, political garbage and toxic memes.  Certainly, the black woman interviewed on CBS as an "undecided voter" yesterday had been influenced by some of these.  That she couldn't even distinguish a decent candidate like Joe Biden from a corrupt, criminal reprobate like Donald Trump - says little about her political I.Q., character assessment or her ability to cast a judicious vote.  I.e. one in the interests of the nation, not one man's furtherance of narcissistic ambitions.

The question also isn't: "How can we get politics to match the opinions of the majority of Americans?" - which defines citizenship down, but rather:

What do more Americans need to do to become real citizens?

Of course, I am certain that most of our population -  like the black undecided voter- regard themselves as true citizens to the core. But ARE they really? I myself believe being a citizen means much more than voting at each opportunity or being able to recall several facts about the governing system, or naming one's reps or Senators.  It is, to me, a deep and almost tactile awareness of one's role in exposing the real workings of our system and how it often isn't living up to our justified expectations. 

So, what can we say defines or delineates the real citizen, as opposed to the wannabe?   I offer the following attributes for readers' consideration:

1) The real citizen perceives the interest of the commonweal over his or her own passing fancies, or hedonist pursuits, or whether a promised material gain (e.g. tax cuts, stock gains) is more important than the national welfare.

2) The real citizen sees the need for the prioritizing of public or civic space above encroaching commercial interests in many venues (most especially media - perhaps imposing a tax on E-M spectrum usage for the corporate megaliths).

3) The real citizen will additionally see the need for fairness in tax liability. So, he will pressure government to alter the existing tax burden so that investors in the stock market do not always come out ahead of ordinary wage earners.

4)  The real citizen dedicates himself to improving his mind (in accord with Jefferson's injunction) by reading widely and with discrimination. He understands he owes it to  himself to educate himself not only about national politics, but the history of his country.  Above all, he trains himself to recognize false information when he sees it, and helps to educate his fellows about it  - so they don't spread it. 

5) The Real Citizen doesn’t need a ‘pledge’ or song to remind him of his duties and obligations – he knows his Bill of Rights and more importantly exercises them. (Use them or lose them!)  He also helps to educate his fellows about these  rights, as well as other critical sections of the Constitution. 

6) The Real Citizen understands that the flag is the symbol for the principles enshrined in the Bill of Rights – and to that extent cannot be placed above those principles. Hence, he requires no ‘flag desecration’ amendments to bolster his patriotism or make him feel better if someone else chooses to use the flag as the focal point of protest.


7) The Real Citizen - above all - doesn’t confuse the nation he loves with the corporatocratic, toxic SYSTEM which confers disproportionate power on corporations in relation to the PEOPLE. Only flesh and blood PEOPLE can have rights – not legal artifacts.

The REAL citizen - by the above criteria -  is  absolutely essential to the exercise of a genuine democracy. For as Thomas Jefferson noted in his 'Notes on Virginia', to the extent the people's (citizens') minds are improved they will hold check the worst excesses of government. (Which, he added, will always tend toward tyranny otherwise). If the people's minds are degraded (as they are by consumption of fake news and bogus conspiracies),  they will become mere pawns or tools for a despotic, authoritarian leader to wield any way he wants.  

A politically savvy people would prevent such a miscreant and demagogue from snatching power in the first place.  Or, if he already got in, preventing him from effecting a repeat.  This is what we are faced with now: preventing a Trump election redux.

See Also:

And:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/21/opinion/q-anon-conspiracy.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage


Excerpt:

I have become consumed with an alarming possibility: that neither the polls nor the actual outcome of the election really matter, because to a great many Americans, digital communication has already rendered empirical, observable reality beside the point.

If I sound jumpy, it’s because I spent a couple of hours recently chatting with Joan Donovan, the research director of the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School. Donovan is a pioneering scholar of misinformation and media manipulation — the way that activists, extremists and propagandists surf currents in our fragmented, poorly moderated media ecosystem to gain attention and influence society...

This week, Donovan’s team published “The Media Manipulation Casebook,” a searchable online database of their research. It makes for grim reading — an accounting of the many failures of journalists, media companies, tech companies, policymakers, law enforcement officials and the national security establishment to anticipate and counteract the liars who seek to dupe us.

Media manipulation is a fairly novel area of research. It was only when Donald Trump won the White House by hitting it big with right-wing online subcultures — and after internet-mobilized authoritarians around the world pulled similar tricks — that serious scholars began to take notice.

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

"Everyone Has Gone Crazy In Washington"? - Nope, Only Trump And Apparently Peggy Noonan

 

Sheldon Whitehouse lays out  a dark money scheme to capture the Judiciary during the  Coney -Barret Senate confirmation hearing. Idiot WSJ  columnist Peggy Noonan compared it to a psychotic breakdown by Princeton mathematician John Nash as depicted in the film, 'A Beautiful Mind'

 In this post I return once more to the WSJ's Peggy Noonan, whose grip on political reality now appears to be fading with each passing week - and each drop in Trump's poll numbers.  In her latest essay,  'Everyone Has Gone Crazy In Washington' (Oct. 17-18, p. A13)  Noonan appears to have given up any semblance of common sense and resorted to total conflation mixed with ignorance, idiocy and propaganda.

This is given she is even now unable to recognize Trump as the real crazy one, or refuses to admit it.  Trapped in a weasel's world,  she resorts to calling "everyone" she can think of as 'crazy' based on recent behavior, forgetting or ignoring Trump's daily insanity.  Or maybe deliberately giving him a pass, with 13 days until the votes are tallied.

Miss Peggy starts out by targeting Nancy Pelosi - two full columns worth of bilge-  referring to a recent interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer as "bonkers".   Adding:

"To watch was to witness, uncomfortably, the defensive aggression of an official who goes through life each day not being challenged enough."

 And what, pray tell, got Peggy's dander up to the point of being captive to such a rancid display of high dudgeon?  Well, it was  the House Speaker's refusal to accept Trump's $1.8 trillion for COVID relief, with Noonan asking:  "Why not accept the president's $1.8 trillion offer?"  

Well, uh, dummy, because  it wasn't a serious offer, it was a con. What you'd expect  from a liar, con man and grifter.  As I already pointed out in my October 17 post:

"This is a new gimmick package ... for $1.8 trillion (on paper) - but only  $1.2 trillion when the poison pills and corporate giveaways are stripped out.  Also, no help for cities- for fire departments, sanitation services, policing, etc., and no extension of unemployment benefits or resumption of the moratoria. "

Clearly, Peggy doesn't recognize a con when it appears, or else she's so under Trump's spell she'd let this useless offal pass - be given rubber stamp approval by Pelosi- merely to satisfy GOP optics. Well, fortunately Nancy Pelosi isn't low IQ like Noonan.  A charge confirmed when Noonan barks:

"It's wrong to hold hostage  people in immediate financial crisis!"

Indeed it is, Miss Peg, especially when the 'aid' being offered is glorified snake oil. 


Insufficiently embarrassed, Noonan then launches her next jab at Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, determined to prove her IQ is even lower than assessed up to now.  She scribbles:

"Senator Sheldon Whitehouse delivered a Rachel Maddow -style monologue on 'dark money'.  His data board linking 'phony front groups'   was wonderfully John Nash -like.

Noonan here is trying to analogize the thorough and rational layout of Sen. Whitehouse's arguments at the Coney Barret hearing, with John Nash's newspaper smothered wall in the film 'A Beautiful Mind', e.g.


In which - during one of his paranoid schizophrenic episodes - Nash has papered over his office wall with disparate articles on differing events,  trying to trace a global conspiracy.  (In the image, the wall is shown to Nash's wife by his co-workers) Alas, if Noonan wasn't so dense, and/or better read, she'd have seen her comparison was totally specious.

Far from being a psychotic 30 minute ramble, Whitehouse cogently showed how the Repukes are using dark money in a process called "the Scheme" to get the biased courts they want. Citing the Washington Post, Whitehouse described a $250 million dark money operation designed to capture the courts and push cases to friendly judges in the hopes of favorable rulings.Two hundred and fifty million dollars is a lot of money to spend if you’re not getting anything for it,” he said. “So that raises the question: What are they getting for it?” 

To answer that question, Whitehouse provided charts and bullet points that would make Mark Lane proud. One of his posters laid out the Republican Party’s own words explaining precisely what they wanted from judicial nominees: “A Republican president will appoint judges … who will reverse the long line of activist decisions—including Roe, Obergefell, & the Obamacare cases."

Whitehouse drew arrows with sharpies and explained in remarkably clear terms how anonymous money has fueled conservative legal advocacy groups like the Federalist Society and the Judicial Crisis Network that have spent millions cultivating and promoting conservative, ideological candidates like Barrett for the federal bench.

But this was clearly too much for Noonan's feeble brain, so she decided to disparage the Senator's robust effort by linking it to her "craziness" theme.   

Realizing by now she'd singled the Dems out for the craziness accusations, she knew that for optical balance she had  to include a Reepo example as well.  So this elicits the question: What constituted the GOP side of crazy? According to Peggy:

"They went on an on about her large family and motherhood in a way that seemed, subtly, to obscure the depth of her intellect. and the breadth of her command of the law."

Cheeze Louise, Peggy, no craziness on the part of Coney Barrett herself?  Like babbling in tongues to unknown spirit beings?  Or not being able to answer a question about the intimidation of voters?  A question any high school kid could have answered who'd taken a course in Government.   Oh no.  Peggy confined her "crazy" GOP accusation to the Reeps' obsession over Coney Barrett's large family e.g.

"They lauded her large family in a way that lacked finesse, by which I mean at times they sounded like Mussolini advancing pro-natalism as a matter of state." 

Wow!  "Mussolini pro-natalism" -  how hard did her pitiful neurons have to work to come up with that?  Never mind. Noonan's effort confirmed an essay written in bad faith, as just another lame excuse to pound the Dems with bogus crazy-  while pretending the GOP were not so crazy-   and ignoring  the 800 pound, totally crazy orange gorilla,  Trump.    Like how Trump is now calling on his toady Barr to arrest his political opponent, Joe Biden - for a "crime" he's not even stated -  the stuff of Banana Republics.  How did Noonan miss this latest insanity?  Well, maybe she's not "all there" herself, so Covid plus election stress is getting to her.

Worse, Noonan has already admitted multiple times how batshit nuts Dotard is, even advising him to resign barely two months ago.  She first called attention to the deranged fool in a March 8, 2018 WSJ column wherein she wrote:

"What you feel is disquiet and you know what it's about: the worrying nature of Mr. Trump himself...epic instability, mismanagement and confusion. We are not talking about being colorfully, craftily unpredictable...but something more unfortunate, an unhinged quality that feels like a screwball tragedy."

A "screwball tragedy"  - as in batshit CRAZY dumpster fire of a presidency. Thus, to now redirect her  "craziness" meme onto those like Nancy Pelosi and Sheldon Whithouse is the epitome of dishonest (yellow) journalism, giving a crackpot like Trump a pass while distracting reader attention- in stupid, uninformed ways - to two Democrats.

Shame on you, Miss Peggy. You need to have your journalist creds revoked.

See Also:

And:

Trump will end his presidency as he began it: Whining