tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post7129145106827260351..comments2023-12-17T13:05:30.543-08:00Comments on Brane Space: Larry Sabato's New Book Does NOT Disprove Conspiracy in the JFK AssassinationCopernicushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16699554476216140859noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-18409305924714566742020-10-03T21:40:02.580-07:002020-10-03T21:40:02.580-07:00Note FYI: I am registering the correction here in ...Note FYI: I am registering the correction here in comments, as the new Blogger makes it nearly impossible to get to the original post and correct-edit text within. Copernicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16699554476216140859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-1670578067004138692020-10-03T21:37:27.057-07:002020-10-03T21:37:27.057-07:00Thnx for heads up. This appears to have been an er...Thnx for heads up. This appears to have been an error made after a private communication from W. Antony Marsh in 1999 on the acoustics teams involved in HSCA tests.<br /><br />Correction: Note that James E. Barger was not part of an MIT team but part of a private research team (Bolt, Beranek & Newman, Inc.) along with Scott Robinson, Edward Schmidt and Jared Wolf.Copernicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16699554476216140859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-40666749225761841652020-09-29T16:54:51.901-07:002020-09-29T16:54:51.901-07:00You need to correct this otherwise-great article w...You need to correct this otherwise-great article when it comes to the BBN scientists. Barger was not an MIT scientist. He graduated from Harvard. I don't think any of the other BBN scientists were from MIT either. So it is not accurate to refer to them as "the MIT scientists."Mike Griffithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13979459949144167505noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-53211258280109586202014-03-06T09:51:47.689-08:002014-03-06T09:51:47.689-08:00Spearman - thanks for the update on Tague's wo...Spearman - thanks for the update on Tague's wounds from the cement chips and clarification!Copernicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16699554476216140859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-31956120833979555552014-03-05T19:05:19.468-08:002014-03-05T19:05:19.468-08:00The photo caption of J. tague says it shows where ...The photo caption of J. tague says it shows where he was standing when the shot's richocheting cement flew up & hit him. Accd to my interview with Tague 5 yrs. ago he said he was not where the photo shows when hit. He had walked 20 ft out from the abutment & was hit @ that point. JT told me he scurried back to the abutment to find cover as he was hearing more shots. That's when the picture was taken. It's also the case that the pictures of his cut chin is not the cement chip wound. He told me he cut himself shaving a few weeks earlier. The cement chips in fact left multiple small punctures on his cheek showing dots of blood for each puncture.spearmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11595953254280970686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-33273183185109764782013-11-15T09:02:20.369-08:002013-11-15T09:02:20.369-08:00Thanks for that. My analysis is mentioned in "...Thanks for that. My analysis is mentioned in "Hit List" and in the updated version of Jim Marrs' "Crossfire".<br /><br />As for the doubters, I have posted my analysis for the Warren Commission apologists many times. They resort to ridicule, but cannot refute the logic or the math. That their agenda is to spread disinformation is obvious. My analysis is no longer meant to convince them as they are wedded to their agenda. My posts are for rational thinkers with open minds. http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2013/08/06/debunking-a-jfk-mysterious-witness-death-lone-nutter/Richard Charninhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01079180863426838351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-71740510107858674542013-10-18T11:52:07.245-07:002013-10-18T11:52:07.245-07:00I just looked again at your grqaphic (1) from the ...I just looked again at your grqaphic (1) from the link, identified as: 'JFK Assassination Timeline of witness deaths'. If those 2 spikes (at the two primary investigation times) don't convince people of conspiracy, I really don't know what would.<br /><br />But people, especially the doubters, really need to go through your full analysis. <br /><br />I would also like to suggest here that interested readers get hold of the 2013 book: 'Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation Into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination' - by Richard Belzer and David wayne, which I believe nicely complements your own work.Copernicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16699554476216140859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-45654488395549364252013-10-18T11:31:25.396-07:002013-10-18T11:31:25.396-07:00Thanks for that, Richard! You have done impressive...Thanks for that, Richard! You have done impressive work on the Poisson statistical probabilities to do with the deaths of assassination witnesses and I do hope blog readers will take the time to go through your graphical proof of conspiracy. To me, it constitutes one firm leg of the evidentiary 'tetrad for truth' - the others being: the autopsy photos & radiographs of the skull, the evidence of the cover -up in the wake (i.e. dismantling the limo, destroying the suit coat) and of course, the original acoustic tests.Copernicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16699554476216140859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6301096656497422535.post-49162373962950198982013-10-18T05:36:34.158-07:002013-10-18T05:36:34.158-07:00Great analysis, clearly written. Covers all the ba...Great analysis, clearly written. Covers all the bases. Thanks for linking to my blog. Here is a graphical proof of a conspiracy: http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2013/10/14/jfk-witness-deaths-graphical-proof-of-a-conspiracy/Richard Charninhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01079180863426838351noreply@blogger.com